Ephesians: A Fellowship of Hebrew Saints.

[jeremiah1five]

I said to your....
The New Covenant includes God and the House of Israel and the House of Judah. Jeremiah says NOTHING about Gentiles being included along with Israel. Take the text as written and stop adding to the Bible.
Fine... Stop with the OT and the new never happened.



Meaning since you deny that Jesus came for the Gentiles your bible should stop before the NT and
That means Jesus never came... not even for the lost sheep.

That you do not know when Jesus came. That you do not know the purpose the Father sent Him. It is not I adding to the Holy words, but You who deny them

Why would it stop at the New Testament? The New Covenant is only the Mosaic Covenant fulfilled by Christ. Nothing has been abolished or made obsolete, but the everlasting covenant exists to this day and will continue even after everything is said and done.

 

[jeremiah1five]

@jeremiah1five

1. You yourself have never calimed to be Hebraic Jew. I have challenged you many times that you are not and yet you have
not corrected me if I am wrong.

2. I just wonder , when the large percentage of membership in this forum is non-Hebraic Jewish why you are here and why
you want to grind your opinion into the fibers of these threads if you are correct and we can do noting about it.... or perhaps
if we got a donor and did a complete blood transfusion that would count?

3. Are you trying to make the non Hebraic Jew upset or nervous.

4. Now as to your charge that there is zero Gentile covenant....

I hit the Ai to look things up because I am tired of looking up things and posting things you do not understand. First response is

1. God​

a. The Noahic covenant (Genesis 9)​

This covenant is explicitly with all humanity, not just Israel:




Noah was not “Jewish,” and the covenant applies universally. That alone disproves the claim.

b. The Abrahamic covenant was​

While the covenant was made through Abraham’s line, it was never restricted to ethnic Israel:




Paul explicitly interprets this as the gospel preached beforehand to the Gentiles:




The covenant is mediated through Israel, not limited to Israel.

2. Gentiles could join the covenant​

Gentiles were never excluded in principle.

• Rahab (Josh 2; Heb 11:31)
• Ruth the Moabitess (Ruth 1–4)
• The “mixed multitude” of the Exodus (Exod 12:38)
• Foreigners who joined Israel and were circumcised (Exod 12:48)

God explicitly says:




Gentiles entered by faith and allegiance, not ethnicity.

---

3. The New Covenant is explicitly for Gentiles​

Jesus states the blood of the New Covenant is:




And after the resurrection:




Paul is unambiguous:

---

4. Paul directly refutes the claim in Ephesians 2​

Yes, Gentiles were once:




But that is past tense. The very next verses say:




Gentiles are not outside grace—they are brought into the covenant, not by replacing Israel, but by union with Christ.

---

5. Grace has never been ethnicity-based​

If salvation required being part of a specific ethnic covenant, then:

• Adam,
• Abel,
• Noah,
• Job,
• Melchizedek

would all be excluded—which Scripture never suggests.


Salvation has always been:

---

Bottom line ​

The claim is false. God made universal covenants (Noah), promised global blessing through Abraham, welcomed Gentiles even under the Mosaic covenant, and explicitly included all nations in the New Covenant through Christ. Gentiles are not outside God’s grace—they are grafted into the covenant promises by faith, not ethnicity (Rom 11; Gal 3; Eph 2).

I have other sources to post if you want them....

Ai will only give you responses from all the sources it has been programmed to access. There is no original thinking involved and so its answers will be gathered from Gentile sources that are already itself infected by Gentile theologies. I prefer to do it the way Saul did it, through study of Scripture under the anointing to receive the revelation that comes from Christ Himself.