Christendom's Trinity: Where Did It Come From?

[Capbook]

DOG BEGAT DOG . . . . yes, dog begat after its kind through bodily fluids being exchanged and a conception taking place.
The conception and birth of Jesus was NOT IN THAT MANNER!!!! God created IN MARY HER KIND, HER OFFSPRING -- no bodily fluids passed as in normal procreation ---- a miracle occurred.

You did not answer this question amazing grace. Why?
"Which do you prefer to base your belief amazing grace from the original Bible words or not?

The Bible word "begotten" with Strong#G3439, in Greek "μονογενής monogenēs" defined by Louw and Nida Greek-English Lexicon Based on Semantic Domain means as - unique in the sense of being the only one of the same kind or class
Thus, Jesus as being the only one of the same kind with the Father as God, having the same divine nature.
I don't know what Bible lexicon denying Jesus as God based on bodily fluids, my first time ever from an Arian.

Joh 1:18 No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.

Joh 1:18 R1NoG3762 oneG3762 has seenG3708 GodG2316 at anyG4455 timeG4455; R2the onlyG3439 begottenG3439 GodG2316 who is R3in the bosomG2859 of the FatherG3962, R4He has explainedG1834 Him.

G3439
μονογενής monogenēs
pertaining to what is unique in the sense of being the only one of the same kind or class
(from Greek-English Lexicon Based on Semantic Domain. Copyright © 1988 United Bible Societies, New York. Used by permission.)

REPEAT.

Post #37

My question was based through the context of 1John 5:11-20.
I don't know why Arians have difficulty facing 1John 5:11-20?
Is it comprehension problem or scared to face the truth?

Once again sorry, I did not see your answer as yes or no on your Post#37.
Again and again, do you have the Son, the eternal life in 1John 5:12,20 amazing grace? Yes or no?

 

[amazing grace]

You did not answer this question amazing grace. Why?
"Which do you prefer to base your belief amazing grace from the original Bible words or not?

Being that I am not a scholar-----I have not been trained in either Hebrew or Greek-----I rely on scripture that has been preserved as is written in the Holy Bible. I have the ability to look up words and do word searches in immediate contexts and remote context which carry similar meanings. So I believe that I have enough in my hands to come to a reliable sense of understanding.

The Bible word "begotten" with Strong#G3439, in Greek "μονογενής monogenēs" defined by Louw and Nida Greek-English Lexicon Based on Semantic Domain means as - unique in the sense of being the only one of the same kind or class
Thus, Jesus as being the only one of the same kind with the Father as God, having the same divine nature.
I don't know what Bible lexicon denying Jesus as God based on bodily fluids, my first time ever from an Arian.

Yes, monogenes single of its kind, only; used of only sons or daughters (viewed in relation to their parents); used of Christ, denotes the only begotten son of God
. . . . single of its kind ---- a human being born of a human being, a virgin Mary. A human being conceived in the womb of Mary IS VERY UNIQUE and SINGLE OF ITS KIND!

I'm not an Arian and 'the bodily fluids' was said in the context of procreation, breeding, etc. what makes one a part of a species or kind.

Joh 1:18 No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.

Joh 1:18 R1NoG3762 oneG3762 has seenG3708 GodG2316 at anyG4455 timeG4455; R2the onlyG3439 begottenG3439 GodG2316 who is R3in the bosomG2859 of the FatherG3962, R4He has explainedG1834 Him.

G3439
μονογενής monogenēs
pertaining to what is unique in the sense of being the only one of the same kind or class
(from Greek-English Lexicon Based on Semantic Domain. Copyright © 1988 United Bible Societies, New York. Used by permission.)

You are using a verse which is a considerable textual variant.
God has always been - God is not begotten - God is not a human being in any sense of the word.

My question was based through the context of 1John 5:11-20.
I don't know why Arians have difficulty facing 1John 5:11-20?
Is it comprehension problem or scared to face the truth?

Once again sorry, I did not see your answer as yes or no on your Post#37.
Again and again, do you have the Son, the eternal life in 1John 5:12,20 amazing grace? Yes or no?

Do I believe the testimony of God that he has told us concerning his Son --- yes, I do.
AND THIS IS THE TESTIMONY - THAT GOD GAVE US ETERNAL LIFE AND THIS LIFE IS IN HIS SON -----
For as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom he will......For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. (John 5:21,26)
Yep, no one comes to the Father except through Jesus Christ, the Son.
Yep, I believe in the Son of God . . . Jesus Christ.

And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him (God) who is true; and we are in him (God) who is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life. [1 John 5:20] - And this is eternal life that they may know you, the only true God and Jesus Christ whom you have sent. [John 17:3]
God's word fits together so great . . . when it harmonizes, it just flows!

 

[mikesw]

Being that I am not a scholar-----I have not been trained in either Hebrew or Greek-----I rely on scripture that has been preserved as is written in the Holy Bible. I have the ability to look up words and do word searches in immediate contexts and remote context which carry similar meanings. So I believe that I have enough in my hands to come to a reliable sense of understanding.

You ought to recognize your limitations and be more humble in your effort to provide a new, novel, gnostic, private interpretation about the essence of Jesus.

 

[mikesw]

I was expecting amazing grace to mock wise advice. It is reckless to create new doctrine and not want sufficient discussion by well-equipped scholars before trying to push the novel doctrine on other people.