praise_yeshua
Well-known member
I speak 3 languages PY. So I don't think I'll be studying languages anymore.
And, like I said, I don't care where the word comes from...it's here...we use it.
Even Wikepedia knows what it means....
Concupiscence is an ardent longing, typically one that is sensual.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concupiscence#cite_note-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a> In Christianity, concupiscence is the tendency of humans to sin.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concupiscence#cite_note-Malloy2005-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concupiscence#cite_note-Coleman2007-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a>
There are nine occurrences of concupiscence in the Douay-Rheims Bible<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concupiscence#cite_note-4"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a> and three occurrences in the King James Bible.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concupiscence#cite_note-5"><span>[</span>5<span>]</span></a>
Sensuality
[edit]
Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century described two divisions of "sensuality". The concupiscible describes pursuit, avoidance, and instincts. The irascible describes competition, aggression, defense, and instincts.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concupiscence
Who said it was? Lust is within the doctrine.
The doctrine has to do with Original Sin.
But I've already stated that I don't care for Augustine and will not discuss him here.
I read everything. I don't agree on all.
But this is way off the topic I'm here to address.
It is all relative. Details build conclusions.....Precept upon precept. Line upon line....
If you don't know where something came from, then you can't understand what it means now...... God spoke to Job about this......
There are terms that have "false doctrines" "baked in"..... These are man made distinctions. They don't come from God.
Did you know the term "Synoptic Gospels" were coined by a theologian? NOW.... everyone uses that term like it has always existed. They believe what that theologian believed. The same is true of "Romanization" vs "Latinization". They don't mean the same things. Yet, someone decided they did...... and now people just blindly repeat the references as if they mean what others have defined for a purpose. To drive a narrative.
Yes. We are all tainted in this regard. You're ignorant of this. The proof is in how you're responding. I'm not tainted in that regard.