An Article on free will

You wrote "This would give me pause and lead me to reconsider my belief system", and your statement demonstrates that your faith is rooted in your faulty flesh instead of rooted in the unshakable God. God tells me that my faith is the belief deposited in me by God with “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent” (John 6:29).

I am not going to discuss about your "reformed theology" because I am talking about Christ's teaching of “you did not choose Me, but I chose you” (John 15:16) and “I chose you out of the world” (John 15:19).

Until you come to the understanding that these verses you have made red are not for John Q Public but that Jesus is primarily addressing his disciples. This chapter is part of the larger context of the Gospel of John, where Jesus is having a conversation with his disciples. You are not a disciple nor an apostle. You make a large mistake... and not you only but many others... including some on here of believing that statements like
these they are meant for you.

Too many do not take the entire passage, or chapter as a whole to understand.

If there was going to be one definitive explanation that you have to have a new birth before you could believe it would have come about when Jesus was talking to Nicodemus. He would have said, when Nick said "“Rabbi, we know that You have come from God as a teacher; for no one can do these signs that You do unless God is with him.”... Jesus would have likely said something about... You cannot seek God unless he sought you out first.

BUT HE DIDNT... INSTEAD HE SAID...... so that whoever believes will in Him have eternal life..... Not one word about believing coming after.


I just posted this a bit ago to someone else.... GO SEE REPLY #84 HERE

You exalted yourself with an attribute of God when you wrote "Every other denomination", so your self-ascribed attribute is that you convey to know every denomination that has ever existed in all places in all time - you claimed to be all knowing which is God’s exclusive domain! Your words are reminiscent of "I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High" (Isaiah 14:14).

Self-will or image of Christ will​

These 16 parts integrally contribute to one full composition. A response to post #6,699.
Part 1 of 16: Illegitimate Isolation
Part 2 of 16: Self-exaltation
Part 3 of 16: Unity Prayer (Acts 4:24)
Part 4 of 16: CHOOSE, ABLE, list
Part 5 of 16: God creates all
Part 6 of 16: Matthew 11 examined
Part 7 of 16: Free-willian NT Conflict
Part 8 of 16: John 3 16/Matthew 11:25
Part 9 of 16: Free-willian Self-savior
Part 10 of 16: Faith, the gift of God
Part 11 of 16: Free-willian are self-willed
Part 12 of 16: The Potter and the clay
Part 13 of 16: the problem here
Part 14 of 16: you confuse Calvin for Christ
Part 15 of 16: Christ controls Christians
Part 16 of 16: Christians hear Christ
 
You, and your cohort, have made a concerted effort to belittle and degrade me who proclaims the awesome and majestic Sovereignty of God, but I'll focus on just your efforts, here.
My cohort is God's Word Kermos.
Other than that, I have no cohort, except I'm sure that others on this forum know very well how absolutely incoherent calvinism is.
First, you lied by writing "You like to concentrate on one word" about a post which contained a short paragraph about the word "for" in John 3:16 but 3 longer paragraphs about the Love of God as recorded in post #6,508.
I really can't converse well with someone that calls me a LIAR because I DON'T AGREE with him.
And you CONFIRMED that you spent a whole post (almost) on one word FOR.
I forget what you said about God's love, but Calvinists don't even understand God's love.
They think God loves ONLY them....the fortunate chosen few.
BUT
Actually, God loves all of His creation.

Perhaps we could stop right here and you could write a paragraph or two on the word ALL.

WHY would the word FOR be so all-important for you?
Because you have to TWIST the word of God to make it make sense in a belief system that makes no sense.

Second, you tried to isolate me as a non-christian heretic by conveying no one believed in the Sovereignty of God for about 1,500 years starting from the time of Christ, and you quoted Ignatius as your proof, but your quote is a much longer modern forgery of the shorter ancient manuscript as recorded in this proof post #6,695.
You'll have to post my exact words stating that I said you were non-Christian.
Because Kermos....that's not something I would say.
You ARE however, a HERETIC.
If you don't know what that means, it's not my responsibility.
You could look it up.

You'll also have to post exactly my words stating something about the Sovereignty of God not being believed in for 1,500 years.
NOW THESE ARE LIES.

I'll wait for you to post my exact words.

Third, you try to marginalize me by way of you brazenly lie with your "ONLY CALVINISTS agree that God is the God that YOU THINK He is" which contrasts with the testimony of @Red Baker wrote "You and others can slander this truth by calling it Calvinism, but I call it the truth of the gospel of Christ, supported by God's very own testimony. Calvin and others from the Reformation period did not hold to this in the exact way that we just wrote it".
Let me repeat:
ONLY CALVINISTS BELIEVE IN THE GOD YOU BELIEVE IN AND THE GOD YOU THINK HE IS.

You see Kermos....
The God of the bible that I read is NOT THE SAME GOD as the one YOU espouse.
The God YOU espouse DOES NOT EXIST.

He's the figment of the imagination of some men and the most popular and important one gave this imaginary God a system of belief called
CALVINISM.

Here's another quote which contradicts your lie, this time from @The Rogue Tomato who excludes himself from your "CALVINISTS" camp when he wrote "I stopped using the term 'Calvinism'. It's intellectually honest to do that because I never read Calvin, nor did I get my ideas about election from Calvin. I didn't get any of my views from TULIP, either. If my views overlap with Calvinism or TULIP at all, I'm unaware of it. I couldn't care less, since I'm not a follower of Calvin, nor a student of TULIP" in post #747.
I don't really care if anyone knows who JOHN CALVIN is.
Makes no difference.

IF someone preaches Calvinism....
He's a calvinist.

Plain and simple.

You could call yourself what you think sounds sweet....
but you're still a Calvinist because you follow the teachings of John Calvin.

Your post demonstrates your public deception of you not knowing God's Grace. Grace is "unearned love", but you believe that you earn God's Grace by your free-willian conveyance "in my sovereignty, I choose to permit your resistibly non-sovereign heart's love to enter my sovereign heart" - the fidelity your conveyance about this is assured by your "God's grace can be resisted" further down in your post, yet Holy Spirit inspired Paul wrote “For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Romans 8:38-39).
Would you like to get into a discussion on OSAS?
I'm willing.
OSAS or Pers of the Saints, as YOU call it
DOES NOT EXIST
IS NOT FOUND IN THE NEW TESTAMENT.

And this business of regular, mainline Christians that believe in the REAL Sovereignty of God, and not some god that is afraid to give his creatures FREE WILL....thinking that they save themselves and all that other nonsense those such as yourself state...
IS TIRING Kermos. It's dumb...it's a strawman arguement because NO CHRISTIAN believes he saves himself...
so why not stop with this nonsense?

Oh. I know why....it's all you've got.

As to nothing separating us from God....WE can separate OURSELVES from God.
The God that gave us free will because it is one of HIS attributes which He passed on to us.
The God that will not force us to accept His salvation if we do not want it...
and will not force us to stay with Him if we do not want to.

Free will is so liberating !

Here's what Paul and Peter and James and Jesus thought of separating ourselves from God:


1 Timothy 4:1
Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons,



Hebrews6:4-6

For it is impossible,in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt.


2Corinthians 11:3

But I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, your thoughts will be led astray from a sincere and pure devotion to Christ.


Revelation2:4-5

But I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first. Remember therefore from where you have fallen; repent, and do the works you did at first. If not, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place, unless you repent.


Hebrews3:12-19

Take care, brothers, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God.


2Peter 2:20-22

For if, after they have escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the last state has become worse for them than the first. For it would have been better for them never to have known theway of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment delivered to them. What the true proverb says has happened to them: “The dog returns to its own vomit, and the sow, after washing herself, returns to wallow in the mire.”


Romans11:19-22

Then you will say,“Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.” That istrue. They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you standfast through faith. So do not become proud, but fear. For if God didnot spare the natural branches, neither will he spare you. Note thenthe kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who havefallen, but God's kindness to you, provided you continue in hiskindness. Otherwise you too will be cut off.


Matthew24:10-13

And then many will fall away and betray one another and hate one another. And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray. And because lawlessness will be increased, the love of many will grow cold. But the one who endures to the end will be saved.

James1:12

Blessed is the man who remains steadfast under trial, for when he has stood the test he will receive the crown of life, which God has promised to those who love him.


1Timothy 4:16

Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers.


James5:19-20

My brothers, if any one among you wanders from the truth and someone brings him back, let himknow that whoever brings back a sinner from his wandering will savehis soul from death and will cover a multitude of sins.


1Corinthians 9:27

But I discipline mybody and keep it under control, lest after preaching to others Imyself should be disqualified.


There's plenty more,,,but the above should suffice.
These verses clearly state that one can FALL AWAY from faith.

Self-will or image of Christ will​

These 16 parts integrally contribute to one full composition. A response to post #6,699.
Part 1 of 16: Illegitimate Isolation
Part 2 of 16: Self-exaltation
Part 3 of 16: Unity Prayer (Acts 4:24)
Part 4 of 16: CHOOSE, ABLE, list
Part 5 of 16: God creates all
Part 6 of 16: Matthew 11 examined
Part 7 of 16: Free-willian NT Conflict
Part 8 of 16: John 3 16/Matthew 11:25
Part 9 of 16: Free-willian Self-savior
Part 10 of 16: Faith, the gift of God
Part 11 of 16: Free-willian are self-willed
Part 12 of 16: The Potter and the clay
Part 13 of 16: the problem here
Part 14 of 16: you confuse Calvin for Christ
Part 15 of 16: Christ controls Christians
Part 16 of 16: Christians hear Christ
I don't really know what the above is.
I DO agree that you confuse CALVIN for CHRIST.
 
You wrote "This would give me pause and lead me to reconsider my belief system", and your statement demonstrates that your faith is rooted in your faulty flesh instead of rooted in the unshakable God. God tells me that my faith is the belief deposited in me by God with “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent” (John 6:29).

I am not going to discuss about your "reformed theology" because I am talking about Christ's teaching of “you did not choose Me, but I chose you” (John 15:16) and “I chose you out of the world” (John 15:19).

You exalted yourself with an attribute of God when you wrote "Every other denomination", so your self-ascribed attribute is that you convey to know every denomination that has ever existed in all places in all time - you claimed to be all knowing which is God’s exclusive domain! Your words are reminiscent of "I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High" (Isaiah 14:14).
This I know FOR SURE Kermos.
PREDESTINATION DID NOT EXIST PRIOR TO THE REFORMATION.
FREE WILL WAS ALWAYS ATTRIBUTED TO MANKIND AND THE ABSENCE THEREOF DID NOT EXIST PRIOR TO THE REFORMATION.
NONE of the TULIP concepts existed priior to the reformation
EXCEPT
some gnostic sects believed in the above....
for instance:

AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO.
THE MANACHAEN GNOSTIC OF 10 YEARS WHO TOOK HIS IDEAS WITH HIM WHEN HE BECAME A CATHOLIC IN THE 5TH CENTURY AD.

But,,,,and pay attention:
NOT EVEN THE CC BELIEVES IN THE CALVINIST PREDESTINATION.
THE CC BELIEVES MAN HAS FREE WILL.

Not even his own church has accepted his belief system.

BECAUSE IT IS NOT BIBLICAL.

Self-will or image of Christ will​

These 16 parts integrally contribute to one full composition. A response to post #6,699.
Part 1 of 16: Illegitimate Isolation
Part 2 of 16: Self-exaltation
Part 3 of 16: Unity Prayer (Acts 4:24)
Part 4 of 16: CHOOSE, ABLE, list
Part 5 of 16: God creates all
Part 6 of 16: Matthew 11 examined
Part 7 of 16: Free-willian NT Conflict
Part 8 of 16: John 3 16/Matthew 11:25
Part 9 of 16: Free-willian Self-savior
Part 10 of 16: Faith, the gift of God
Part 11 of 16: Free-willian are self-willed
Part 12 of 16: The Potter and the clay
Part 13 of 16: the problem here
Part 14 of 16: you confuse Calvin for Christ
Part 15 of 16: Christ controls Christians
Part 16 of 16: Christians hear Christ
I'm sure the above is very interesting,,,
but I like to stick to scripture.
 
snip...
Are you trying to say that Christians do not understand that God PREDESTINATED THE DEATH OF JESUS to atone for the sins of man?

Try to come up with something better.

God, from the beginning of time, planned for man to be saved THROUGH JESUS.
No problem here Kermos.

Your spiritual "problem here" is that you wrote "You believe in a God that causes man to sin and causes evil THIS GOD DOES NOT EXIST" (proof post #6,661), so you are diverging from the topic that you started.

My, oh, my, how quickly you forget.

While your words from post #6,661 are an inaccurate representation of my God given belief, God caused me to post the following.

Specifically, you (and your free-willian cohort) do not understand that the Apostolic unison prayer to God includes Pontius Pilate to do whatever Your Hand predestined to occur.

God's Hand intimately influenced Pontius Pilate to murder the innocent Son of Man.

Now compare your denial of God's control "You believe in a God that causes man to sin and causes evil THIS GOD DOES NOT EXIST".

Now contrast your denial to the Assembly of God unison prayer to God including "truly in this city there were gathered together against Your holy servant Jesus, whom You anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever Your Hand and Your purpose predestined to occur" ((see Acts 4:24-30 for the complete prayer), the Apostle Peter and the Apostle John and the Assembly of God were together when they lifted their voices to God with one accord).

Now review your denial of God's control "You believe in a God that causes man to sin and causes evil THIS GOD DOES NOT EXIST".

Now revisit Pontius Pilate to do whatever Your Hand predestined to occur was prayed to God by the Apostle Peter and the Apostle John.

You believe the God proclaimed in Apostolic Testimony "DOES NOT EXIST".

Self-will or image of Christ will​

These 16 parts integrally contribute to one full composition. A response to post #6,699.
Part 1 of 16: Illegitimate Isolation
Part 2 of 16: Self-exaltation
Part 3 of 16: Unity Prayer (Acts 4:24)
Part 4 of 16: CHOOSE, ABLE, list
Part 5 of 16: God creates all
Part 6 of 16: Matthew 11 examined
Part 7 of 16: Free-willian NT Conflict
Part 8 of 16: John 3 16/Matthew 11:25
Part 9 of 16: Free-willian Self-savior
Part 10 of 16: Faith, the gift of God
Part 11 of 16: Free-willian are self-willed
Part 12 of 16: The Potter and the clay
Part 13 of 16: the problem here
Part 14 of 16: you confuse Calvin for Christ
Part 15 of 16: Christ controls Christians
Part 16 of 16: Christians hear Christ
 
Your spiritual "problem here" is that you wrote "You believe in a God that causes man to sin and causes evil THIS GOD DOES NOT EXIST" (proof post #6,661), so you are diverging from the topic that you started.

My, oh, my, how quickly you forget.

While your words from post #6,661 are an inaccurate representation of my God given belief, God caused me to post the following.

Specifically, you (and your free-willian cohort) do not understand that the Apostolic unison prayer to God includes Pontius Pilate to do whatever Your Hand predestined to occur.

God's Hand intimately influenced Pontius Pilate to murder the innocent Son of Man.

Now compare your denial of God's control "You believe in a God that causes man to sin and causes evil THIS GOD DOES NOT EXIST".

Now contrast your denial to the Assembly of God unison prayer to God including "truly in this city there were gathered together against Your holy servant Jesus, whom You anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever Your Hand and Your purpose predestined to occur" ((see Acts 4:24-30 for the complete prayer), the Apostle Peter and the Apostle John and the Assembly of God were together when they lifted their voices to God with one accord).

Now review your denial of God's control "You believe in a God that causes man to sin and causes evil THIS GOD DOES NOT EXIST".

Now revisit Pontius Pilate to do whatever Your Hand predestined to occur was prayed to God by the Apostle Peter and the Apostle John.

You believe the God proclaimed in Apostolic Testimony "DOES NOT EXIST".

Self-will or image of Christ will​

These 16 parts integrally contribute to one full composition. A response to post #6,699.
Part 1 of 16: Illegitimate Isolation
Part 2 of 16: Self-exaltation
Part 3 of 16: Unity Prayer (Acts 4:24)
Part 4 of 16: CHOOSE, ABLE, list
Part 5 of 16: God creates all
Part 6 of 16: Matthew 11 examined
Part 7 of 16: Free-willian NT Conflict
Part 8 of 16: John 3 16/Matthew 11:25
Part 9 of 16: Free-willian Self-savior
Part 10 of 16: Faith, the gift of God
Part 11 of 16: Free-willian are self-willed
Part 12 of 16: The Potter and the clay
Part 13 of 16: the problem here
Part 14 of 16: you confuse Calvin for Christ
Part 15 of 16: Christ controls Christians
Part 16 of 16: Christians hear Christ
I replied to the above in the post to which you're referring.
Using Jesus death and sacrifice to prove God predestinated EVERYTHING is dishonest since
ALL CHRISTIANS believe God prepared for Christ's salvific work from the beginning of time.
I DO believe this is what I stated.

Your post above is moot.
Good night.
 
see below especially the last paragraph. they have a similar view to the brethren movement about their denomination being the true church and being a member of one of their communities. Also their view of baptism by immersion only for the forgiveness of sins is a requirement to be saved. Another one is no musical instruments in the church. They are very legalistic. I had a family member years ago in the church of christ.

I think you misunderstand Cottrell. The church of Christ which he speaks of is not a denomination or any local church; but rather the true church which Jesus spoke of building in Matthew 16:18. Cottrell certainly was not against musical instruments in the church. There are within what is loosely called the Restoration Movement, which began in the early 1800s, three different divisions. One is most often called the Church of Christ and does employ only an A Cappella music service; one is referred to as an open membership congregation which means that "members" are not required to even be baptized believers so long as they attend and "join" the congregation They more often identify themselves as Disciples of Christ. The third one for which Cottrell (and I) is associated with was neither A Cappella nor open membership and is more often referred to as a "This or that Christian Church", such as the Lincoln Street Christian Church. There are some other distinctions, but that is the short version of the distinctions.

Cottrell received his undergraduate degree from Cincinnati Bible Seminary (CBS). I spent two years at CBS; my wife received a BA in theology from CBS and was one year behind Jack. He also received a BS from the University of Cincinnati. He earned an M.Div. from Westminster Theological Seminary and a Ph.D. from Princeton Theological Seminary. He returned to CBS to be the Head of the Theology Department until he retired. He died in 2022 (just a couple of months after my wife). My wife and I knew Jack personally, my wife more so than I. Even as a student, he was proficient enough in Greek to fill in occasionally when the regular instructors couldn't make it. As I so often has said, "he was really smart". And he was a really nice person. He was a prolific writer and I truly enjoy reading and studying him. I disagree with him on a few things but most such disagreements are not all that significant. I am with him completely on his soteriology.
 
A little more about this. Many Christians believe that the Holy Spirit not only has given us the Bible as such, but also gives us definitive, subjective help in understanding it. This is called the doctrine of illumination, which is the idea that the Spirit speaks directly to our minds, directly stimulating our intellects to perceive the true meaning of Scripture. The following texts are said to promise this gift of knowledge to every believer: Matt 10:19-20; John 14:26; 16:13; 1 Cor 2:10-13; Heb 8:10-11 (Jer 31:31-34); 1 John 2:20,27. Some take this to be the main purpose of the Spirit’s indwelling, and they pray, “Open my eyes, illumine me, Spirit divine.” The doctrine of illumination as commonly taught is not a biblical doctrine. This is true for four reasons.

One, Christian people who claim to be illumined by the Spirit often have different and even opposing understandings of the same passages of Scripture, e.g., texts about gender roles or the millennium.

Two, In the final analysis it is a useless idea, for even those who believe in illumination recognize that individual Christians grow in their understanding and sometimes change their interpretations of Scripture. When this happens, one always assumes that he is changing from a mistaken view to the correct view, or from a non-illumined view to an illumined view. But does this not mean that what he once thought was an illumined view was actually a mistaken view? So how can he be sure that his present views are illumined rather than mistaken, and that no further changes will occur?

Three, the doctrine of illumination is actually the product of the doctrine of universal total depravity. Illumination is necessary because the totally depraved person is completely blind in his intellect and cannot understand the Bible unless illumined by the Spirit. But as I have said so many times, the doctrine of total depravity is itself not biblical. The sinner’s blindness is partial and willful, not total and inborn (Rom 1:18; Eph 4:18).

The fourth reason for rejecting the doctrine of illumination is that it has no exegetical basis in Scripture. Ironically, the passages cited as proof-texts for this doctrine are themselves misinterpreted and misapplied. For example, Matt 10:19-20; John 14:26; 16:13; and 1 Cor 2:10-13 apply only to the apostles, and refer to revelation and inspiration. They are not general promises to all Christians; to apply them thus is a serious error.

Even though the doctrine of illumination is false, this does not mean that we receive no help from God in our effort to understand Scripture. What it means is that such help is not a distinctive work of the Spirit. It is rather something God promises to us as a part of his special providential answer to prayer. See Ps 119:18; Eph 1:17-18; Phil 1:9-10; Col 1:9. All these Scriptures are prayers; and answers to prayer may be the work of the Father, the Son, or the Spirit. God will not answer such prayers by directly feeding knowledge into our minds, but by providing us with the means to achieve this knowledge through personal study. He will sharpen our mental processes, clear our preoccupied minds, prevent distractions, help us to concentrate, and help us to recall ideas or put ideas together. Also, James 1:5 instructs us to pray for wisdom. This is not a prayer for new knowledge, but for insight and understanding in how to use and apply what is already known.

Most of this comes, as you, @MTMattie, might expect from my favorite theologian, Jack Cottrell and his book, The Faith Once For All: Bible Doctrine For Today, Published by College Press Publishing Company, Inc..
You've got me curious about Jack Cottrell. What distinguishes him from hundreds of other theologians of recent times?

I tend to agree with what you mentioned about "illumination". Every single one of us possesses a God-given mind. So those who make use of it are blessed with intelligence. There's no rocket science in that fact.
 
I think you misunderstand Cottrell. The church of Christ which he speaks of is not a denomination or any local church; but rather the true church which Jesus spoke of building in Matthew 16:18. Cottrell certainly was not against musical instruments in the church. There are within what is loosely called the Restoration Movement, which began in the early 1800s, three different divisions. One is most often called the Church of Christ and does employ only an A Cappella music service; one is referred to as an open membership congregation which means that "members" are not required to even be baptized believers so long as they attend and "join" the congregation They more often identify themselves as Disciples of Christ. The third one for which Cottrell (and I) is associated with was neither A Cappella nor open membership and is more often referred to as a "This or that Christian Church", such as the Lincoln Street Christian Church. There are some other distinctions, but that is the short version of the distinctions.

Cottrell received his undergraduate degree from Cincinnati Bible Seminary (CBS). I spent two years at CBS; my wife received a BA in theology from CBS and was one year behind Jack. He also received a BS from the University of Cincinnati. He earned an M.Div. from Westminster Theological Seminary and a Ph.D. from Princeton Theological Seminary. He returned to CBS to be the Head of the Theology Department until he retired. He died in 2022 (just a couple of months after my wife). My wife and I knew Jack personally, my wife more so than I. Even as a student, he was proficient enough in Greek to fill in occasionally when the regular instructors couldn't make it. As I so often has said, "he was really smart". And he was a really nice person. He was a prolific writer and I truly enjoy reading and studying him. I disagree with him on a few things but most such disagreements are not all that significant. I am with him completely on his soteriology.
Thanks for clarifying the above Jim 👍
 
Now compare your denial of God's control "You believe in a God that causes man to sin and causes evil THIS GOD DOES NOT EXIST".

Now contrast your denial to the Assembly of God unison prayer to God including "truly in this city there were gathered together against Your holy servant Jesus, whom You anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever Your Hand and Your purpose predestined to occur" ((see Acts 4:24-30 for the complete prayer), the Apostle Peter and the Apostle John and the Assembly of God were together when they lifted their voices to God with one accord).

Now review your denial of God's control "You believe in a God that causes man to sin and causes evil THIS GOD DOES NOT EXIST".

Now revisit Pontius Pilate to do whatever Your Hand predestined to occur was prayed to God by the Apostle Peter and the Apostle John.

You believe the God proclaimed in Apostolic Testimony "DOES NOT EXIST".
Although Pontius Pilate’s actions were predestined (meaning God had already determined that he would play a role in Jesus' crucifixion), his free will was not violated—he acted according to his own fears, ambitions, and weaknesses. Like Pharaoh, whom God hardened to fulfill His purposes, Pilate was already predisposed toward self-interest, and God allowed him to act on his own overwhelming fears to bring about a greater good: the redemption of mankind.

1. Pilate’s Role Was Foreordained – Acts 4:27-28

"Indeed Herod and Pontius Pilate met together with the Gentiles and the people of Israel in this city to conspire against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed. They did what your power and will had decided beforehand should happen."
  • God had already determined that Pilate would be involved in Jesus' death.
  • However, Pilate acted of his own will, making choices that aligned with his personal interests and fears.

2. Pilate Had the Power to Choose – John 19:10-11

"Do you refuse to speak to me?" Pilate said. "Don’t you realize I have power either to free you or to crucify you?"
Jesus answered, "You would have no power over me if it were not given to you from above. Therefore the one who handed me over to you is guilty of a greater sin."

  • Pilate claimed to have the power to free or crucify Jesus, which shows he believed he had a choice.
  • Jesus acknowledged that Pilate's authority was given by God, but He did not say Pilate was forced to act a certain way.

3. Pilate Was Already Weak and Fearful – God Allowed His Heart to Be Hardened Further

"From then on, Pilate tried to set Jesus free, but the Jewish leaders kept shouting, ‘If you let this man go, you are no friend of Caesar. Anyone who claims to be a king opposes Caesar!’" (John 19:12)
  • Pilate was already politically motivated and fearful of losing his position.
  • Just as God hardened Pharaoh’s already rebellious heart (Exodus 9:12), He allowed Pilate to give in to his fear, ensuring that Jesus' crucifixion would take place.
  • Pilate wasn’t forced to act against his will—he simply followed his own selfish desires.

4. Pilate Made a Self-Interested Choice – Matthew 27:24

"When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd. ‘I am innocent of this man’s blood,’ he said. ‘It is your responsibility!’"
  • Pilate tried to absolve himself, but washing his hands did not change the fact that he made a choice.
  • God did not force Pilate to act—He simply allowed him to succumb to the fear and self-preservation already in his heart.

5. Like Pharaoh, Pilate’s Hard Heart Served a Greater Purpose – Romans 9:17

"For Scripture says to Pharaoh: ‘I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.’"
  • Pharaoh was already rebellious, and God hardened his heart further to accomplish His plan.
  • Pilate, already weak and fearful, was allowed to give in to pressure so that Christ's sacrifice could take place.

Conclusion: Predestined, But Free Will Intact

  • Pilate’s role in Jesus’ crucifixion was predestined, just as Pharaoh's defiance was.
  • However, Pilate’s free will was not violated—he acted out of his own fear and self-interest.
  • God did not create evil in Pilate but allowed his already weak and selfish heart to be hardened for a greater purpose: the salvation of humanity through Christ’s crucifixion.
 
@synergy

Although Pontius Pilate’s actions were predestined (meaning God had already determined that he would play a role in Jesus' crucifixion), his free will was not violated—he acted according to his own fears, ambitions, and weaknesses.

Thats correct, and yet God predetermined all of his actions, and will hold him accountable for them in the day of Judgment.
 
Mans will is never free from Gods Sovereign will,
So man can never tie his will to satan? What about verses like 2 Tim 2:25-26 (being captured by the devil) or Eph 2:1-2 (following the prince of the power of the air) or Acts 5:3 (satan has filled their hearts to lie)?
even when men freely choose, they chose what Gods will predetermined for them to freely choose.
Only if God predetermined it for a better cause like the Cross. Otherwise, they could be choosing Satan's will if they choose evil.
 
Last edited:
No, you are wrong. Such knowledge comes only from the study of God's written word as given to the apostles and prophets.

All of those events concern the special revelation given to apostles and prophets. They have nothing to do with knowledge being bestowed upon any others. More specifically, neither you nor I nor anyone else today fall into the category of ones to whom the Holy Spirit speaks to and teaches directly.
Again, let it be clearly understood, that they is no new revelation to be given, nor does God speak to men in any way, other than through the voices of the prophets and apostles that is recorded for us in the scriptures ~ but just as true, no man can understand the scriptures using theri natural wisdom and ability, apart from God opening one's understanding to receive his hidden truths therein ~ if this is not so, then the majority of the world could understand the word of God when most of God's children could not, yet it is the other way around.

1 John 2:20​

“But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things.”

Jim, John writing to Christians saying to them that they had an unction from God, an unction that the world did not know, nor had.

The Spirit among many other things reveals to the soul the suitability and sufficiency of Christ to meet its desperate needs. It is an important branchof the Spirit’s teaching to open the Gospel to those whom He has quickened, enlightened, and convicted—and to open their understanding and affections to take in the precious contents of the Gospel. “He shall glorify Me” said the Savior, “for He shall receive of Mine, and shall show it unto you” (John 16:14). This is His prime function: to magnify Christ in the esteem of “His own.” The Spirit teaches the believer many things, but His supreme subject "is Christ": to emphasize His claims, to exalt His Person, to reveal His perfections, to make Him superlatively attractive. Many things in Nature are very beautiful, but when the sun shines upon them, we appreciate their splendor all the more. Thus it is when we are enabled by the Spirit teaching us through his word to view Christ in the light of the Spirit’s teaching, and those he does, have a gospel of pure grace as far as free justification through the obedience and righteousness of Christ, those whom he does not teach preaches a system of works in order to be accepted by God. If a man rejects the teaching of God's Spirit, then it is inevitable that that man will embrace another gospel, if he's trusting only in his own wisdom and the wisdom of other men.

John 16:13-16​

“Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you. All things that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.”

Jim, if you and others reject such scriptures as only applying to the apostles, then you are just as guilty as the preterist are in their eschatology teachings, and them rubber stamping so much of the word of God FULFILLED 70 A.D. ! Leaving us very little bible for us to believe in and teach as pertaining to these times, etc.
 
What do you mean civic?

J.
I have some of his books, only to see what he believed in so I would know first hand ~ he's a hard core church of Christ/Campbellites, therefore an Armenian. They live and died by Acts 2:38; Mark 16:16; Acts 22:16 scriptures they corrupt. I have debated these very folks for fifty years plus, and counting.
 
How can a dead person eat and drink?
Jim, I did devotion with four of my 18 grandchildren last night and this very subject came up since we are reading through John's gospel with four of them, laboring to teach them the scriptures ~ and this verse came up:

John 5:21​

“For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will.”

So, my little Daniel, who is si. soon to be seven in July and reads along with us, and does quite well, has a very inquisitive mind, always thinking, much above his age level ~ wanted to know what it meant that the Father, which he knew was speaking of God, raiseth the dead. So, I told him (and the other three) who were the dead in this verse that Jesus was speaking about. I very briefly took them to Genesis and told them again about Adam and his sin that bought spiritual death upon Adam and Eve as soon as they sinned, and this is whom Jesus was speaking about in this particular verse. I explained to his little mind that spiritual death meant that all men are dead to spiritual deeds/acts pleasing to God, until God raised them to life by his mighty power. How mush they understood is yet to be seen, but I can assure you of this, tomorrow when I go back over what we have taught, he will remember, even though he might not be able to grasp its full meaning, but the seed has been planted.

How can a dead person eat and drink?
No problem with doing natural things, for that's the very realm in which they live.
 
I'm leaving to go out of town and away from my computer, which is a good thing. Be back tomorrow if all goes well. Going to Atlanta for a guick visit with one of my daughters and her family since one of her boys has a birthday, today I think, it's hard trying to keep up with all of them. This thread is quickly becoming an attack on Calvinism.

I would never look to men like James White to defend a position that I hold to, but would look only to the scriptures, if that's my source of trust and it is. Neither would I post video's of others as my main source of defense, but, again would use God's word to defend what I believe to be the truth. That's my 2cent worth.

I'm not much to listening to video's, but will a little until it get nauseating to do so, and generally that happens very quickly.
 
Back
Top Bottom