An Article on free will

If faith is a gift after regeneration
@MTMattie

It is not a matter of if, it is a biblical truth that once one is regenerated by the Spirit of God, then they have a new man, that has been created after the image of Jesus Christ ~ this new man where the Spirit of God dwells can believe, see and understand, etc.
why would the one who gives this faith not also be able to gift the knowledge to be taught... or better said to be taught to understanding...
The Spirit of God is more than able, but, as with new born children of flesh, they must grow, and this takes time...time for one to mature into young men, and then fathers, etc. Just as it did with Christ. With each step one increases with true wisdom and understanding, but, it takes time, with some, more time, with others less, nevertheless still it takes time to mature into warriors for God.

Luke 2:52​

“And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.”

1st Peter 2:2​

“As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby:”

1st John 2:12-14​

“I write unto you, little children, because your sins are forgiven you for his name's sake. I write unto you, fathers, because ye have known him that is from the beginning. I write unto you, young men, because ye have overcome the wicked one. I write unto you, little children, because ye have known the Father. I have written unto you, fathers, because ye have known him that is from the beginning. I have written unto you, young men, because ye are strong, and the word of God abideth in you, and ye have overcome the wicked one.”
And since we know that there are 2 cases of seeming regeneration in the bible with infants still in their mothers wombs.
Actually, there is only one clearly stated, but no doubt others as well...John the Baptist. But, there's another one that may very well been even from her mother's womb and it is found here:

2 Kings 5:1-3​

“Now Naaman, captain of the host of the king of Syria, was a great man with his master, and honourable, because by him the LORD had given deliverance unto Syria: he was also a mighty man in valour, but he was a leper. And the Syrians had gone out by companies, and had brought away captive out of the land of Israel a little maid; and she waited on Naaman's wife. And she said unto her mistress, Would God my lord were with the prophet that is in Samaria! for he would recover him of his leprosy.”

A little maid somewhere between the age of seven to twelve at most, I would think, since the Holy Ghost emphasizes "little", yet able to work. Yet being so young, she had a very strong faith in God and God's prophets and gave honour to Naaman, calling him lord. All evidence of a true child of God.
were they given faith to believe before being taught spiritual knowledge or were they basically regenerated and the knowledge came as soon as they could understand anything?
Again, at regeneration a new man is created within the elect child of God, and from that point forward they have the power, to believe, understand, etc. As individuals transition from childhood to adulthood, they experience significant mental development, including but not limited to: enhanced abstract thinking and reasoning, they improved decision-making, they increased greatly in natural wisdom and in the case of God's children, spiritual wisdom and knowledge concerning many subjects essential to their success and that will keep them from failures, and displeasing God, etc., etc. But, again, each person will difference from each other, no two will advance equally. Many factors will come into play as one goes from a child to a adult.

1st Corinthians 13:11​

“When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.”

Nora, did I confuse you more, or did I help? I trust I helped you.
 
You may not be a Calvinist but you certainly act like one with your unmitigated spewing out of ad hominems.
@synergy

Well, it seems to me that you have about as much Calvinism as I do ~ since many Calvinist believed in infant baptism, which we know is against the word of God. Yet, we still have high regards for many of them because of the stance of the doctrine of election by grace alone and because most all of them were Sola Scriptura, and rejected oral traditions, as being on equal par with the word of God.

" your unmitigated spewing out of ad hominems."~no, I do not attack the person but their false teachings, I try to stay free from going after the person ~ maybe you need to reread your own post and see if you are the guilty party, you just might be surprise.
You failed miserably again.
Wishful thinking on your part. It is not what you think, but what others think that counts! Or, better yet, what God knows that counts, but we will ahve to wait until that day.
You might not care what the original Churches taught but the Bible does care and even teaches that they are the Pillar of Truth. Some fine example you are, spitting on God's Pillar of Truth.
Boy, do you love putting spins on what others say! Listen carefully once more:
synergy, who should care what the original churches taught once the scriptures where finished and the apostles died off? God's word lives on and as children of God we live by the words of the Living God recorded in our bibles ~ not by what the churches taught after John the beloved apostle died around 90-95 A.D. Not interested in so-called church traditions as though those traditions are equal to God's word and in many cases above the scriptures, with men like you and the whores from EOC/RCC think are though they are,~ reason being because the corruption that soon enter into the churches support their false teachings, whereas they get no support from the scriptures.
Again, we are talking about what the churches taught after John died, from 95 A.D. onward, not before then. Again ~ We are not speaking about 33 - 95 A.D. even though false doctrine try to enter in, but the apostle's dealt with it head on, but they knew that as soon as they left, the flood gate would be open and was it ever!
I love the scriptures, but once they were finished and the apostles died off, the churches they left here soon became a den of every unclean fowls (evil spirits) to where we are now. Have you never read:

Matthew 13:31,32​

“Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field: Which indeed is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof."

Need help with the interpretation? It is very easy to understand, if one knew his bible. The kingdom of heaven in the beginning was very small, but over time has grow into the greatest kingdom (religion as a whole) in the world, so large that the bird of the air (evil spirits~Ephesians 2) now live in her and rules her.

Revelation 18:2​

“And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.”

Is this the church you desire for me to honour? I have came out of her, never to return, no, never.
Furthermore, the Bible promotes both oral teachings (by word) and written teachings (by our letter). Where do you think oral teachings are best heard? In a Church of course.
I have my bible, you can have the modern day churches of this world, I left them for good.

2nd Timothy 3:5​

“Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.”

And turn away I did.
The only person here going against the Bible is you. No only are you going against the verses I quoted but you are also going against the archeological evidence of infant baptism, the Roman Catacomb Churches for example.
I have dealt with every verse you put forth, so do not say that lie ~ and I will never accept anything that I cannot find in the word of God. Paul and he other apostles always reason with the Jews from the scriptures, and only from the scriptures.

Acts 17:2​

“And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures,”

You would be wise to practice the same.
I see that your prayers have pitted you against many Bible verses such as 1 Tim 3:15 and 2 Th 2:13-15 in the short time we've interacted. I'm sure there will be more verses that conflict with your heresies the more we talk. God gave us a mind for critical thinking and it's time to make use of it.
synergy, you desire to push critical thinking, whereas, I as a child of God I want only to live by "biblically thinking".
Let us look at the difference bewtween the two of them briefly.

Critical thinking is driven by man's wisdom, which inevitable will always lead to many different ways of doing really what man thinks is right than what God's word actually teaches us. Critical thinking opens the door to bring in many false teaching the word of God will not support. Teaching that is for man's benefits more than what is pleasing to God. The Pharisees lived by critical thinking:

Matthew 23:16-22​

“Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold? And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty. Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift? Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon. And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein. And he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon.”

"Biblically thinking" Lives only by every word of God.

Proverbs 3:5​

“Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.”

Here is the true basis of wisdom. We must reject our own ideas, and instead trust God’s inspired revelation and sovereign providence to save us from the ignorance of the human race. If we cherish or protect our opinions against His will, we will suffer.

Grasp the issue. We have no understanding. What we think we know is dangerous. Because it seduces us away from truth and wisdom and resists any change toward them. Our greatest enemy is our own heart and mind. Ignorant from conception, fed misinformation since birth, encouraged to idiocy by peers, deceived by false interpretation of experiences, and inherently arrogant and selfish, we are in deep trouble.

In order to succeed, we must reject our understanding. To progress beyond the rest of our species, we cannot even lean toward our own understanding. We must flush it all. Any infatuation or protection of our thoughts will take us down with the rest of this foolish race. The rule is simple and strict – do not even lean toward our own thoughts. Which is what critical thinking will quickly cause one to do.
Conscience is our alarm system signaling sin in our lives. What are Infants guilty of? Being born?
Where is your scriptures for what you saying? You do not have one.

Proverbs 20:27​

“The spirit of man is the candle of the LORD, searching all the inward parts of the belly.”

Man is not an animal, and he is not like any animal. God Jehovah, Creator of heaven and earth, put something in man that makes him very different. God gave man a conscience, and this conscience is a law, teacher, and judge for each man, woman, and child.

Your conscience is the candle of the LORD. This light from God inside you examines and judges your thoughts, words, and deeds. Man makes choices by more than instincts, for God gave every conscious person a conscience to help him know and do what is right.

The word conscience has two parts: con (with) + science (knowledge) = knowing within yourself about yourself. This invisible spirit inside you has a sense of right and wrong, and it will approve right things and condemn wrong things you do. It will also reflect on what others do and make judgments as to whether they are right or wrong.

Consider how you can have a thought within yourself and yet analyze and judge that thought as well. A man can only know himself by his conscience; he cannot know another person by it (I Cor 2:11). Sometimes your spirit is full of joy, and sometimes it is full of sadness, and no other person can fully feel or know your emotions (Pr 14:10).

Your belly in this proverb is metonymy for your heart and mind. It is a figure of speech that uses a part of the body to refer to what goes on there. When you are moved by love or fear, you can feel it in your belly. When it is love, you may say, “My stomach flipped.” When it is fear, you may say, “I am sick with fear.” According to the proverb, your conscience examines your entire inner person to help direct your choices in things.

Your conscience can convict you that what you or others have thought, said, or done is wrong (Rom 2:15). This internal sense of guilt can be very strong, and it can control or influence what you do or not do. The accusers of the woman taken in adultery left her alone, when their consciences were confronted about the justice of their actions (Jn 8:9).

How did you get a conscience? The LORD gave it to you, so it is called the candle of the LORD. It is a light from God to help you make decisions. It also proves your sinfulness, for you have sinned against your conscience many times. Even if God has not condemned an action, it is sin for you, if your conscience condemns it (Rom 14:22-23; Jas 4:17).

All men have a conscience. Gentiles, reprobates, and the Pharisees had consciences, though hard to believe (Rom 2:15; 1:32; John 8:9). Amnon and Judas Iscariot had consciences (II Sam 13:1-2; Matt 27:3-5). The universal restraint and godly laws of men reflect this conscience, though their sorrow for sin is not godly sorrow (II Cor 7:9-11). A conscience in an unregenerate man is simply one more source of condemnation for him.

God has revealed Himself to all men in the natural creation. David wrote, “The heavens declare the glory of God” (Ps 19:1). Paul wrote that though God Himself is invisible, the things He created can be seen, and they prove to men that God exists with eternal power and Godhead, so mankind is without excuse. God also declares His existence in the consciences of men, which is His candle giving them some knowledge about Him.

Great men and women have strong consciences, and they obey them. A strong conscience is one that is well taught and active in assessing all parts of life, and great men listen to it and obey it. Such persons are very sensitive to doing what is right and avoiding what is wrong. They are very opinionated against evil. God gave you a conscience to be a daily companion to keep you doing right things and hating wrong things. Strengthen it. Use it.

You must teach your conscience the truth and wisdom of God, and you must obey it when it tells you to do certain things and when it says other things are wrong. God gave you this candle to help make you great, but the sinful world around you tries to silence your conscience so you will approve all they want to do. You must not allow worldly lifestyles, presented to you by various media, to corrupt or numb your conscience.

Your conscience can and must be taught. The more you learn, the better your conscience will serve you. If you learn God’s wisdom by these proverbs and the rest of scripture, your conscience will help you more (I Cor 8:1-7). You can even keep your conscience ignorant to stop it from condemning you in things that God allows (I Cor 10:25-27).

In some societies women lived bare-breasted. Their consciences about it were formed by habit and tradition to see no wrong in it. They were amused or offended by any objection to it. Only careful teaching could put shame in their consciences about the practice. Now, think carefully about what your children see at home, on the television, or at school.

Your conscience must be taught. In order for you to please God, you need a conscience that knows the will of God and will seek to enforce it in your life. This conscience that loves truth and wisdom only exists in born again children of God, and yet it needs the instruction of God’s word to form its opinions properly on most every subject (Heb 5:14).

Your conscience must be obeyed. If you ignore it, then it becomes calloused, cauterized, and less sensitive to things, leaving you vulnerable to most any temptation (I Tim 4:2; Eph 4:19). If you reject God and His word, He can and will blind your conscience, leaving you without the candle of the LORD to direct you (Rom 1:21-28; II Cor 4:2-4).

Do you appreciate your conscience from God? Self-examination, a duty of true Christians, is done partly by the conscience (Ps 26:2; 139:23-24). It could have saved the Corinthians from judgment (I Cor 11:28-31). Do you meditate with your own heart at night (Ps 4:4; 16:7)? Do you let the preaching of God’s word convict you (Ps 73:17,21)? The confidence of a pure conscience is a wonderful and powerful thing (Pr 28:1).

Your conscience should always consider others (I Cor 10:28-33). Paul lived virtuously to avoid offending his conscience toward God or men (Acts 24:16). Such conscientiousness toward God will help you fulfill the first commandment to love God, and toward others it will help you keep the second commandment of loving your neighbor as yourself.

Your great goal is to grow in favor with God and men (Pr 3:1-4; Luke 2:52). Your goal is to be perfect. Your conscience can help you achieve these goals by accusing you for wrongdoing and excusing your right choices. Paul kept a good conscience at all times (II Cor 1:12; Heb 13:18), and he required it of Timothy and deacons (I Tim 1:5,19; 3:9).

One of the first acts of obedience to God is baptism, which the Bible calls the answer of a good conscience toward God (I Pet 3:21). (Infants, which do not have active consciences, were never baptized in the New Testament.) Before hearing the gospel, a regenerated man has a defiled conscience, knowing he is a sinner and deserves God’s wrath. But the gospel tells him that Jesus Christ paid for his sins, which gives him a guilt-free conscience, which pushes him to thank God for his merciful grace (Heb 9:14; 10:19-22).

Your conscience should approve or accuse you right now. If you have been living a godly and righteous life, your conscience should approve you for following this proverb. If you have been living a foolish or worldly life, often violating your conscience, then it should accuse you of wrongdoing. What will you do with this candle of the LORD? Ask God to revive it inside you (Ps 51:10), and carefully use it to guide your choices to please Him. (J. R. Crosby a friend of mine, used by permission)
 
Last edited:
The Conflicting, Perplexing Calvinistic Doctrine of Free Will (Part Two)
Part One Calvinists say that other systems limit God's sovereignty or control. Apparently when those systems assign to man free will, they...
kentbrandenburg.blogspot.com

Election and “The Elect”
Without a doubt, “election” is a Christian doctrine. The question is, what is election, and how is one elected? Are Calvinists correct to say that God pre-ordains some particular men t…
israeliteindeed.wordpress.com

J.

Hello Johann,

Have you ever noticed any post where I used the phrase "The Elect" as support? Your article is unrelated in this respect. The Word of God is my Life, not the man or people that you posted.

I am a Christian for I believe in Christ. I am not a Calvinist. Your article is not relevant nor of interest to me because my Pastor Jesus says all I need.

No Word of God exists imparting man a free-will; therefore, free-willians adulterate the Word of God by injecting free-will where free-will does not exist.

Free-willians believe they buy their way into heaven with your natural fleshly free-will faith payment in their "apart from Christ, I chose to believe in Christ so Christ must profit me with salvation", yet the Christ of us Christians declares "I am the vine, you are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, he bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing" (The Word of God, John 15:5) and "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the Kingdom of God" (John 3:3) and “you did not choose Me, but I chose you” (John 15:16) and “I chose you out of the world” (John 15:19, includes salvation) and “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent” (John 6:29) and “It is the Spirit who gives Life; the flesh profits nothing; the words that I have spoken to you are Spirit and are Life” (John 6:63), so they believe falsehood (2 Peter 2:1, 2 Peter 2:9-10).

Free-will is a conjured concept of the traditions of men leading to worship in vain (Matthew 15:9).

In Truth (John 14:6), the Almighty God is Sovereign (Genesis 1:1) in man's salvation and affairs of man (Daniel 4:34-35)! PRAISE PASTOR JESUS WHO ALONE IS WORTHY OF PRAISE!!
 
@MTMattie

It is not a matter of if, it is a biblical truth that once one is regenerated by the Spirit of God, then they have a new man, that has been created after the image of Jesus Christ ~ this new man where the Spirit of God dwells can believe, see and understand, etc.
@Red Baker , First... No where in the entire 66 books of scripture... no idea about the EOC/RCC or Syrians for they have bundles more then we follow... some of which may be man made ???? ...does it say about becoming a man before becoming a new man, before being regenerated.
The Spirit of God is more than able, but, as with new born children of flesh, they must grow, and this takes time...time for one to mature into young men, and then fathers, etc. Just as it did with Christ.
Are you now claiming that they must be of the age to be a father in order to be regenerated? That the spark from God will wait until such a time? Of course biblical research has often pointed to the ages of 12 and 13 for these children to marry... So !
With each step one increases with true wisdom and understanding, but, it takes time, with some, more time, with others less, nevertheless still it takes time to mature into warriors for God.

Luke 2:52

“And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.”
Jesus was 12, at this time. At what age do you suppose he began learning to increase in wisdom to this point and then another 18 years of growth until He started his ministry.

Luke 2 : 46-52


46 And it came to pass, that after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions.

47 And all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers.

48 And when they saw him, they were amazed: and his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing.

49 And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father's business?

50 And they understood not the saying which he spake unto them.

51 And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them: but his mother kept all these sayings in her heart.

52 And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.

Clearly Jesus was learning the ways of man and temple teachings before he began his own ministry.

1st Peter 2:2

“As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby:”

How is that possible????????? new born babies desiring the sincere milk of the word???????????????
According to you and all who are adamantly opposed to the suggestion that an infant can or should be baptised as they are too young to know or understand or even accept the faith that you claim is given after the regeneration... yet here we have Peter saying "newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word,"



1st John 2:12-14

“I write unto you, little children, because your sins are forgiven you for his name's sake.

Little Children's sins are forgiven. Would they even know what a sin was, much less if the committed one? No regeneration just forgiveness???????

I write unto you, fathers, because ye have known him that is from the beginning. I write unto you, young men, because ye have overcome the wicked one.
Young men over coming the wicked one. Wonder how young these young men are and if they know of a wicked one? Another case of overcoming the wicked one and not being regenerated, yet unless they have the faith to understand how would they know of a wicked one? Very confusing this age thing in 1st John...................................................
I write unto you, little children, because ye have known the Father.

Little children. Little children knew the Father??????????? HOW? No regeneration unless the little children understood... oh, wait... That is backwards right? They were regenerated and then the understanding came right? And the little children then could know the Father.
I have written unto you, fathers, because ye have known him that is from the beginning. I have written unto you, young men, because ye are strong, and the word of God abideth in you, and ye have overcome the wicked one.”

Young men because the word of God abideth in them...... and overcame the wicked one.... Again, wonder how young these young men are. DID YOU NOT SAY "A little maid somewhere between the age of seven to twelve at most, I would think, since the Holy Ghost emphasizes "little", yet able to work. Yet being so young, she had a very strong faith in God and God's prophets and gave honour to Naaman, calling him lord. All evidence of a true child of God."
I see more clarity now....
So these young men, at possible age of 7 could have had a very strong faith in God.. Do you think their strong faith started when they were tots since you also said
With each step one increases with true wisdom and understanding, but, it takes time.
Question? So their new birth would have come at what age so they could be given the necessary faith that by the time they were possibly at the age of 7 they developed a very strong faith in God.

And all these years I thought you were of the group that disavowed such ages as being eligible.

Actually, there is only one clearly stated, but no doubt others as well...John the Baptist. But, there's another one that may very well been even from her mother's womb and it is found here:

Wrong. You forget that Jeremiah was. Stated clearly here... and when even he doubted his abilities look what God told him. Jeremiah 1: 5-7 KJV


5Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.

6 Then said I, Ah, Lord God! behold, I cannot speak: for I am a child.

7 But the Lord said unto me, Say not, I am a child: for thou shalt go to all that I shall send thee, and whatsoever I command thee thou shalt speak.

Do you disagree with that in Christian theology, sanctification is a state of separation unto God... that all believers enter into this state when they are born of God: But of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption:(1 Cor !:30, KJV). The sanctification mentioned in this verse is a once-for-ever separation of believers unto God. It is a work God performs, an integral part of our salvation and our connection with Christ ....By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. (Heb 10:10, KJV). ?

2 Kings 5:1-3

“Now Naaman, captain of the host of the king of Syria, was a great man with his master, and honourable, because by him the LORD had given deliverance unto Syria: he was also a mighty man in valour, but he was a leper. And the Syrians had gone out by companies, and had brought away captive out of the land of Israel a little maid; and she waited on Naaman's wife. And she said unto her mistress, Would God my lord were with the prophet that is in Samaria! for he would recover him of his leprosy.”

A little maid somewhere between the age of seven to twelve at most, I would think, since the Holy Ghost emphasizes "little", yet able to work. Yet being so young, she had a very strong faith in God and God's prophets and gave honour to Naaman, calling him lord. All evidence of a true child of God.

Again, at regeneration a new man is created within the elect child of God, and from that point forward they have the power, to believe, understand, etc. As individuals transition from childhood to adulthood, they experience significant mental development, including but not limited to: enhanced abstract thinking and reasoning, they improved decision-making, they increased greatly in natural wisdom and in the case of God's children, spiritual wisdom and knowledge concerning many subjects essential to their success and that will keep them from failures, and displeasing God, etc., etc. But, again, each person will difference from each other, no two will advance equally. Many factors will come into play as one goes from a child to a adult.

1st Corinthians 13:11

“When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.”

Nora, did I confuse you more, or did I help? I trust I helped you.
Mr. Baker

You did not confuse me more, nor did you help or clarify your position and my replies in blue above are why.

I am not going to rehash my basic question because I am sure it confused you putting your basic words together to form a question.

You say I am wrong and I say the bible shows you to be wrong on this score.

Blessings
 
@Red Baker , First... No where in the entire 66 books of scripture... no idea about the EOC/RCC or Syrians for they have bundles more then we follow... some of which may be man made ???? ...does it say about becoming a man before becoming a new man, before being regenerated.
@MTMattie

And neither did I say that ~ you did not follow what I said to you very well. The problem is yours, not mine.
Are you now claiming that they must be of the age to be a father in order to be regenerated?
I did not say that ~ the sum of what I said is: that once a person is born again, regardless of their age, it take time for them to grow.....all of God's children go through the four stages mention in the scriptures ~ from new born babes, young children, young men, and then fathers in the faith.
Of course biblical research has often pointed to the ages of 12 and 13 for these children to marry... So !
I'm speaking of the spiritual, not natural ~ but even that is too young to marry.
Jesus was 12, at this time. At what age do you suppose he began learning to increase in wisdom to this point and then another 18 years of growth until He started his ministry.
Again, there was much for even Jesus to learn, even though he was God, yet that never interfere with his humanity, he still was learning a lot concerning living in the flesh ~ and the wisdom of God chose thirty years of age for him.
Clearly Jesus was learning the ways of man and temple teachings before he began his own ministry.
Agreed, but at twelve he was too young, way too young as far as the growth of his fleshly body was going to go through.
How is that possible????????? new born babies desiring the sincere milk of the word???????????????
According to you and all who are adamantly opposed to the suggestion that an infant can or should be baptised as they are too young to know or understand or even accept the faith that you claim is given after the regeneration... yet here we have Peter saying "newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word,"
New born babes as soon as they are born desire milk ~ when a person is born of God, regardless of their age, they should do likewise, it is only natural for them to desire the word of God, which is their only source of spiritual growth. But, this does not means that all natural babies born of flesh, should be baptized, if this is what you are trying to say, for this goes against scriptures and the doctrine of water baptism (1st Peter 3:21) and the examples left for us by the apostles, who would only baptize believers, who gave clear evidence of the new birth (Acts 8:37) which no infant can possible give.
Little Children's sins are forgiven. Would they even know what a sin was, much less if the committed one? No regeneration just forgiveness???????
You are not following what even John is saying ~ he is not speaking of little children in the sense in which we think of little children, he could be speaking to old men, who just came to the faith, they would be consider little children as far as their understanding goes.
Young men over coming the wicked one. Wonder how young these young men are and if they know of a wicked one? Another case of overcoming the wicked one and not being regenerated, yet unless they have the faith to understand how would they know of a wicked one? Very confusing this age thing in 1st John.
We do not know, yet they obviously had been in the faith for a longer period than the little children, but not as long as the fathers. Nora, not confusing one little bit, if we are hearing what John is saying, which you are not.
Young men because the word of God abideth in them...... and overcame the wicked one.... Again, wonder how young these young men are. DID YOU NOT SAY "A little maid somewhere between the age of seven to twelve at most, I would think, since the Holy Ghost emphasizes "little", yet able to work. Yet being so young, she had a very strong faith in God and God's prophets and gave honour to Naaman, calling him lord. All evidence of a true child of God."
I see more clarity now....
So these young men, at possible age of 7 could have had a very strong faith in God.. Do you think their strong faith started when they were tots since you also said With each step one increases with true wisdom and understanding, but, it takes time.
Question? So their new birth would have come at what age so they could be given the necessary faith that by the time they were possibly at the age of 7 they developed a very strong faith in God.


And all these years I thought you were of the group that disavowed such ages as being eligible.
Nora, go back and read these scriptures again, next time around they should be much clearer to you. John is speaking about their length of time being IN CHRIST not of a certain age they were.
Mr. Baker

You did not confuse me more, nor did you help or clarify your position and my replies in blue above are why.

I am not going to rehash my basic question because I am sure it confused you putting your basic words together to form a question.

You say I am wrong and I say the bible shows you to be wrong on this score.

Nora, read those scriptures again with a different mind set, it should be clearer to you. 🙏 🙏 🙏
 
Hello Johann,

Have you ever noticed any post where I used the phrase "The Elect" as support? Your article is unrelated in this respect. The Word of God is my Life, not the man or people that you posted.

I am a Christian for I believe in Christ. I am not a Calvinist. Your article is not relevant nor of interest to me because my Pastor Jesus says all I need.

No Word of God exists imparting man a free-will; therefore, free-willians adulterate the Word of God by injecting free-will where free-will does not exist.

Free-willians believe they buy their way into heaven with your natural fleshly free-will faith payment in their "apart from Christ, I chose to believe in Christ so Christ must profit me with salvation", yet the Christ of us Christians declares "I am the vine, you are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, he bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing" (The Word of God, John 15:5) and "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the Kingdom of God" (John 3:3) and “you did not choose Me, but I chose you” (John 15:16) and “I chose you out of the world” (John 15:19, includes salvation) and “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent” (John 6:29) and “It is the Spirit who gives Life; the flesh profits nothing; the words that I have spoken to you are Spirit and are Life” (John 6:63), so they believe falsehood (2 Peter 2:1, 2 Peter 2:9-10).

Free-will is a conjured concept of the traditions of men leading to worship in vain (Matthew 15:9).

In Truth (John 14:6), the Almighty God is Sovereign (Genesis 1:1) in man's salvation and affairs of man (Daniel 4:34-35)! PRAISE PASTOR JESUS WHO ALONE IS WORTHY OF PRAISE!!
Israel was Gds elect/chosen yet they died in unbelief/lost sinners with eternal separation from God.

So much for your elect/chosen and dead and buried frozen eh ?

So much for God giving His elect/chosen faith.

So much for their perseverance eh ?

So much for their irresistible grace eh ?

So much for their unconditional election eh ?

So much for their limited atonement dying only for the elect eh ?

Down goes tulip, down goes tulip.

Away with Fatalism.

conclusion: you must change the meaning of elect/chosen to get out of this GIANT PICKLE 🥒

hope this helps !!!
 
Last edited:
Israel was Gds elect/chosen yet they died in unbelief/lost sinners with eternal separation from God.
I would remind you of what Paul said:

Romans 9:7​

“Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.”

civic, not one of the children of God's promises died in unbelief, not one. For they were secured by two immutable acts of God ~ his holy oath and his promises of pure grace.
So much for God giving His elect/chosen faith.

So much for their perseverance eh ?

So much for their irresistible grace eh ?

So much for their unconditional election eh ?

So much for their limited atonement dying only for the elect eh ?
You think so, then maybe we can discuss this more in detail. civic, if salvation from sin and condemnation is not unconditional, then no one will enter eternal life if it depended on the flesh in any sense whatsoever. .
Down goes tulip, down goes tulip.

Away with Fatalism.
Since I do not hold 100% to the tulip, then I may agree with you, but my understanding is more than what most Calvinist are willing to embrace. I would be consider by those men who truly understand Calvinism as a Hyper Calvinist, or high Calvinist. But, I prefer just to be called what I'm...a Christian, and believer, etc. But, truly names means very little to me, as long as I hear the call to "come up hither" in that day.

Revelation 11:12​

“And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them.”
 
So RB at least made a least a feeble and failing attempt to address 2 Th 2:13 and John 8:24. You, on the other hand, continue to run away from them as fast as you possibly can. 🏃

Let’s revisit the Bible verses so that we can reveal what exactly you're running away from:

(2 Th 2:13) But we ought always to thank God for you, brothers and sisters loved by the Lord, because God chose you as firstfruits to be saved through the sanctifying work of the Spirit and through belief in the truth.

If you actually believed 2 Th 2:13, then you would know that our election by God is through belief (and sanctification of the Spirit). IOW, belief is before election. You ran away from 2 Th 2:13 as fast as you possibly could; nevertheless, just for argument’s sake let’s imagine your election before belief heresy is true. Let’s bring up John 8:24 and see what happens:

(John 8:24) Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for if you do not believe that I AM, you will die in your sins.”

That means you are dead in your sins as long as you do not believe. So if one is chosen in Christ (made alive in Christ) but still dead in his sins, well, that makes him a Living Dead person, a zombie monstrocity that is an impossibility and proves your heresy is an abomination. Your continuous rants against the Bible will not change those facts. We refuse to believe in your Zombie Man-Made Traditions.

This is just a lame excuse for you to once again run away from having to face up to Bible verses that expose your Man-Made Anti-Biblical Zombie Traditions.

John 3:3 is indeed a wonderful verse which we totally believe. So, when is one born again? When one is chosen by God. And when is one chosen by God? When one is called by God and repents and believes. See Th 2:13 for proof Edit by Admin

More wonderful verses that warn you of Man-Made Zombie Traditions like yours and that declare the Sovereignty of God.
Keep those Biblical anti-calvinism anti-Zombie verses coming!

In conclusion, you think that by running away from Bible verses that's how you prove that you follow Christ. What type of mind-rattling logic is that? 🤪 So stop with the lame excuses and man up to the verses I mentioned.

Your practice of relentless pride in shunning of apology over you bearing false witness against Red Baker is the issue, not whether "]color=blue]RB at least[/color]" showed you the Truth (John 14:6) contained in 2 Thessalonians 2:13 and John 8:24 (see post #6,597 and elsewhere in this thread), yet God having him show you the Truth (John 14:6) is critically important.

A Christian humbly apologizes in repentance, but a non-christian positions himself in stubborn pride.

As previously conveyed to you, if you want me to consider addressing your points, then you need to apologize to Red Baker for your long standing and repeated position of bearing false witness against him as shown per the below. You need to apologize publicly in this thread for your publicly visible behavior.

Self-willed (2 Peter 2:9-10) you continues to refuse to apologize, that is clear, and you persist in bearing false witness against @Red Baker who stated:
Nicodemus' child like confession proved that he was already born of the Spirit of God, or, else he would had been just like the other leaders of the Pharisees who said that jesus did what he did under the power of the prince of the devils​
in post #2,814 regarding the Lord’s saying "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the Kingdom of God." (Lord Jesus Christ, John 3:3).

As a blessed Christian in Christ, the work of God is that I believe in Him whom He has sent (John 6:29) according to Christ who is the Truth (John 14:6)Edit by Admin

Your heart makes false statements about God and man. Free-will is a conjured concept of the traditions of men leading to worship in vain (Matthew 15:9).

In Truth (John 14:6), the Almighty God is Sovereign (Genesis 1:1) in man's salvation and affairs of man (Daniel 4:34-35)! PRAISE THE SOVEREIGN GOD WHO REDEEMS A PECULIAR PEOPLE!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would remind you of what Paul said:

Romans 9:7​

“Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.”

civic, not one of the children of God's promises died in unbelief, not one. For they were secured by two immutable acts of God ~ his holy oath and his promises of pure grace.

You think so, then maybe we can discuss this more in detail. civic, if salvation from sin and condemnation is not unconditional, then no one will enter eternal life if it depended on the flesh in any sense whatsoever. .

Since I do not hold 100% to the tulip, then I may agree with you, but my understanding is more than what most Calvinist are willing to embrace. I would be consider by those men who truly understand Calvinism as a Hyper Calvinist, or high Calvinist. But, I prefer just to be called what I'm...a Christian, and believer, etc. But, truly names means very little to me, as long as I hear the call to "come up hither" in that day.

Revelation 11:12​

“And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them.”
we don't depend on the flesh- we deny the flesh, crucified it with Christ. We are dead to sin and alive in Christ. The old man was done away with and we are new creations in Christ.

we are saved in the same way the OT saints were by the same faith, the same hope, the same promised. the only advantage we have is we have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. They did not.

hope this helps !!!
 
As a blessed Christian in Christ, the work of God is that I believe in Him whom He has sent (John 6:29) according to Christ who is the Truth (John 14:6), so you calling me a follower of "Zombie Traditions" means that you insult my loving Leader Jesus Christ by calling Christ your wicked "walking dead", and no Christian applies walking dead to Lord Jesus Christ. Lord Jesus Christ is alive! Your arrogant pride in labeling Lord Jesus Christ your "walking dead" is deadly sin!
It's your man made teachings that espouses a Living Dead philosophy, not Christ. I nailed you with that fact and instead of proving me wrong you are vomiting out lies. I never called Christ a "wicked walking dead". Never have, never will. Stop with the lies.
 
Yes the zombie apocalypse theology - night of the living dead- the old creature feature :)
When confronted with the evilness of his man-made religion, @Kermos had only blatant lies to fall back on. When heretics resort to vomiting out lies 🤮 , everyone knows that their heresies have been annihilated. May Kermos come to his senses and leave behind that Living Dead religion of his.
 
we don't depend on the flesh
@civic @MTMattie @synergy

Everyone that believes in free will, as preach by most, that teach that their flesh, the old man, apart from God first regenerating them, is the cause as to why they are born again ~"If" that is what one truly believes in their hearts, and teach others the same, and fight against those who teach that man's will is in bondage to sin and the devil himself, then by their own words and teaching, and mocking those that teach unconditional salvation from sin and condemnation then that person is guilty of making the flesh, his free will, co-partners with Christ in salvation from sin and condemnation........... that man is depending on his own works perform by his sinful flesh. This is another gospel, one that the great apostle to the Gentiles expose with all of his might.
we deny the flesh, crucified it with Christ. We are dead to sin and alive in Christ. The old man was done away with and we are new creations in Christ.
civic, I do not deny that many good men like yourself and others here, truly deny the flesh and live godly lives and fear God. You and others I think would fall under those elect Jews, that Paul labored to convert to the truth, who truly fear God, had a zeal for God, yet they had a hard times of letting go of the works of the law, and totally looking to Christ as the end of law for righteousness. Romans 10:1-4
we are saved in the same way the OT saints were by the same faith, the same hope, the same promised. the only advantage we have is we have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. They did not.
I will only say this for now ~ yes all of God's children are saved from sin and condemnation in the same manner, by Jesus Christ being made a surety for them ~ all are justified freely by God's grace given to us~ ETERNAL LIFE secured for us, based upon Jesus' life of faith and obedience, not our.

 

Revelation 18:2​

“And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.”

Is this the church you desire for me to honour? I have came out of her, never to return, no, never.

I have my bible, you can have the modern day churches of this world, I left them for good.
No wonder you have such a bad opinion of all Churches. You came out of a Church called Babylon. You think that all Churches are like her. It all makes sense now! That explains the following:

That's why don't believe 1Tim 3:15 that declares the eternal truth that the "Church of the living God, is the Pillar and Foundation of the Truth.

That's why you launch other verses against verses like 2 Th 2:13 hoping that your interpretation of those other verses overwhelm what 2 Th 2:13 clearly says, namely that belief precedes election. Throwing verses against verses will never allow you to arrive at the Truth. Verses must be harmonized, not overwhelmed into submission according to your misguided presuppositions.

That's why you don't believe that the righteousness manifested by Jesus at his Baptism envelopes infants even though 1 Cor 7:14 tells us that children can be "holy". To contradict that verse is to fall into the doctrine of demons that you were part of in your former worshiping place called Babylon..
 
@GodsGrace

Greetings Fran, I have a few things to say to your post. Leaving @Kermos out of my post to you, since I'm not here to defend any person, even if I agree with some things they may post, while maybe disagreeing with their method.......even in the scriptures, certain prophets had totally different method of preaching from each other~ Elijah was very forceful and out spoken, did not care much for others feelings, while others were more fatherly in their approach ~ besides, that's not up to me or you, to approve or disapprove, they are not our servant to judge, I'll leave that to God, whose judgement is according to the truth and what he knows to be in man's heart, which I do not know.

Fran, whose cares if others agree with you or not? I surely do not and neither should you,
This is wrong RB.
If EVERYONE (every other denomination in this case) tells me they see a yellow wall and I see a white wall...
I would seriously question my eyesight.

Do you understand that the Apostles and those they taught believed in free will?
They believed that ANYONE could be saved.
They did NOT believe in predestination.

Yes,,,I would seriously consider my belief system.
if we in our hearts believe what we see to be the truth from God's word, then we have an responsibility before the God of heaven to proclaim it without fear, and without seeking man's approval. And we will add, if it is the truth, than we know from the scriptures most will not accept it, never have, never will. If most accept what we have to say, then that's not a good sign we have a truth.

Luke 6:26​

Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets"
My goodness RB.
Jesus is speaking about the Pharisees.
Jesus was mad at them for keeping GOD FAR AWAY FROM the Jews.
Pretty much what Calvinists do.
They present a God that is loveless, merciless and unjust....many have left calvinism behind because they've come to realize that the God of the bible is NOT the God of Calvinism.
We seek our approval from the scriptures alone, not from men of flesh, they can not support you in that day when all shall stand before God to give an account of their deeds. Btw, I want the RCC/EOC, and the many daughters that have came out of them to be against me, because the word of God is against them and so are we. We hate all of God's enemies, while seeking to love our own enemies, but only by using the truth, not by compromising God's word in any way whatsoever.
Why not concentrate instead on the following verse?

Galatians 1:6-10
6 I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting * Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel;
7 which is really not another; only * there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ.
8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed!
9 As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed!
10 For am I now seeking the favor of men, or of God? Or am I striving to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a bond-servant of Christ.


Calvinism is a NEW GOSPEL.
It DID NOT EXIST until the reformation.
Some ideas were taken from Augustine of Hippo.
He was a gnostic Manachaen who converted to the Catholic religion in the 5th century AD.
NO APOSTLE OR THOSE THEY TAUGHT BELIEVED AS HE DID.
Even the CC does NOT believe what Augustine taught...,
this says a lot.
Fran, I would word this more according to the scriptures by saying: God purpose to saved his elect, through Jesus being the surety of His elect, by using the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ as the only means thereof.
Right. Except, according to YOU, Jesus is NOT the only means.
He would be the only means if it was required to believe in Him for salvation...
which, INDEED, THIS IS THE PROPER GOSPEL.

But Jesus is NOT the means for salvation.
According to YOUR belief,,,,,it is GOD WHO CHOOSES WHO WILL BE SAVED.
Jesus really doesn't have too much to do with our salvation.
In Calvinism it's not really even necessary that Jesus should have died.
God willl choose whom He will....
Jesus death is useless in the reformed faith.

The life of Christ, meaning by his obedience and faith that he yielded as a man unto the law of God, acting as God's elect surety, representative ~ Jesus being the elect of God for this work of redemption, (Isaiah 42) thereby Christ the head of the elect body, and God's elect children being members of Christ, and what he did, was as though they themselves did it perfectly, and this obedience yielded by Christ is the only means of our free justification by God's grace. This is the truth of the gospel in a few words. You and others can slander this truth by calling it Calvinism, but I call it the truth of the gospel of Christ, supported by God's very own testimony. Calvin and others from the Reformation period did not hold to this in the exact way that we just wrote it, only a few Baptist did mostly unknown to most ~ men like Samuel Richardson, John Gill, John Brine, and a few others mostly from the Particular Baptist group, who were not Calvinist in the strict sense of Calvinism.
I'm not going to spend my time here discussing MEN and what they believed.
I trust scriipture..and I'll stick to scripture.
The ONLY men I would pay any attention to are the Apostles and those they taught.

The particular baptist group is CALVINIST.....
No matter what they want to call themselves (and I've known a few) they believe exactly what John Calvin taught.
Unless YOU could prove to me that they believe something different, perhaps using the 1689 Confession...
this conversation should end right here.
No problem to prove this to be wrong and truly another gospel which will fall under God's curse.
God will not be too happy RB....when you show up in front of Him and you've been blaspheming Him all you life.
YOU have been following a different gospel...
NOT the rest of Christianity, that is following the CORRECT gospel.
Then you are going against plain scriptures.

John 15:16​

“Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.”
RB...
How dumb are calvinists?
HOW DUMB are calvinists?
Jesus was speaking to His Apostles that HE CHOSE.

Look it up.
I'm tired of stating this.
Please use sources OTHER THAN your calvinist sources which do not portray the truth.
This scripture is clear, regardless of the abuse men have given to it in a attempt to disprove what Jesus said. This election is not speaking concerning a choice to the office of apostleship, of course they knew that without Christ even have to mention this to them. But, by nature, they would have had the thoughts that it was them that chose to believe and follow Christ, just as you are now saying, so Jesus made it clear to them that by the very fact they believe in Christ, that faith was a gift to them because God had from the beginning chose them to salvation. Jesus had earlier reminded them that their faith was given to them by God, while they confess that Jesus was the Christ while others rejected him~and were not sure who he was.

Matthew 16:17​

“And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.”
So? WHERE is the problem?
God does all the revealing....is there a different god that reveals things to us?
NO:

God always revealed Himself to mankind.
Read Romans 1:19-21 it might be of help.

The reason why God reveal Jesus to some and not all is because....

2nd Thessalonians 2:13​

“But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:”
So? WHERE is the problem?
Read 2 Thes 2:13 a few times over and then come here and tell me what was chosen from the beginning of time.
WAS IT PARTICULAR PERSONS?
NO.

Was it, maybe, the METHOD by which God chooses persons?
YES.

God's plan was to save us to salvation through the sanctification of the spiirit.
THROUGH SANCTIFICATION.

It's the METHOD...
NOT THE WHO.

It's never the who.
Fran, in what way is man able? If able, then why does he need to be saved? What part of man is able? His heart is deceitful above all things, (it has even got you deceived in believing that it is not that bad) desperately wicked, even to a point that no man can know it.

Jeremiah 17:9​

“The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?”
This is dumb and I'm not replying to it.
Get out your bible and look up the TENS of verses that COMMAND man to SEEK GOD.
According to YOU it's impossible for man to seek God because of his wickedness.
So who's right?
THE BIBLE
or
JOHN CALVIN?

Paul said this:

Romans 7:18​

“For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.”
OK.
So according to YOU God made us this way....
so WHY would Paul complain about it?

It's all very absurd.

Fran, the flesh is all the natural man has until he is born again, then he has the power to do good, things pleasing unto God, but not until then.... impossible.
Oh. We agree on something!
The things of God is foolishness unto the natural man, boring, he could think of a thousand things he rather do than to hear, read about spiritual things, his flesh hates the things of God. No man will, can seek God until God first seek man and gives him a heart that would desire the things of God.

Romans 3:11​

“There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.” Read Romans 3:10-18 and very sad commentary of man by nature.
See my reply above.
The BIBLE is full of commands to seek God.
So surely Romans 3:11 must have a different meaning.
Perhaps something going back to Psalms in the OT?
Maybe Psalm 110?

Again...look it up but using sources that are NOT calvinist IF you WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH.

One of the more challenging books I have read in my life, a book, in the reading of which I found myself actually learning how to think, is John Owen’s (1616-83), The Death of Death in the Death of Christ. It has long been recognized as the most persuasive biblical and theological defense of definite atonement. The latter is the doctrine that it was only for the elect of God that Jesus suffered and died and exhausted the wrath that we deserved.

I seriously doubt if many of you will take the time and make the necessary effort to read Owen’s book, so here is a brief summation of its principal argument. Consider it it well.
I read the BIBLE RB.
It's enough for me.

It contains ALL I need to know to become a friend of God and to save my soul.

Mr. Owen probably has some nice ideas, but AGAIN...
YOU'RE listening to a MAN
instead of listening to JESUS.

The Father imposed His wrath due unto, and the Son underwent punishment for, either:

1. All the sins of all men, or

2. All the sins of some men, or

3. Some of the sins of all men.

In which case it may be said:

1. That if the last be true, all men have some sins to answer for, and so, none are saved.

2. That if the second be true, then Christ, in their stead suffered for all the sins of all the elect in the whole world, and this is the truth.

3. But if the first be the case, why are not all men free from the punishment due unto their sins?

You answer,“Because of unbelief.”
What wrath did God impose on Jesus?
Now you want to talk about the brand new concept of Penal Substitution?
Penal Substitution DID NOT EXIST until the reformation.
Only Calvinists could come up with such a concept....
God having wrath ON HIMSELF....
blaming JESUS for the sins of all men and punishing JESUS when the bible
clearly states that ONE MAN CANNOT SUFFER FOR THE SINS OF ANOTHER MAN-

There are many atonement theories...
The PSA theory is the WORST ONE.
Just like every other concept Calvinists have.

Why?
Because they don't know about the
GOD OF LOVE
GOD OF MERCY
GOD OF JUSTICE

Which is NOT the God of calvinism.
I ask, Is this unbelief a sin, or is it not? If it be, then Christ suffered the punishment due unto it, or He did not. If He did, why must that hinder them more than their other sins for which He died? If He did not, He did not die for all their sins!


The salvation of any sinner is a matter of Divine power. By nature the sinner is at enmity with God, and nothing but Divine power operating within him, can overcome this enmity; hence it is written, “No man can come unto Me, except the Father which hath sent Me draw him” (John 6:44).

It is the Divine power overcoming the sinner’s innate enmity which makes him willing to come to Christ that he might have life. But this “enmity” is not overcome in all—why? Is it because the enmity is too strong to be overcome? Are there some hearts so steeled against Him that Christ is unable to gain entrance? To answer in the affirmative is to DENY HIS OMNIPOTENCE. In the final analysis it is not a question of the sinner’s willingness or unwillingness, for by nature all are unwilling. Willingness to come to Christ is the finished product of Divine power operating in the human heart and will in overcoming man’s inherent and chronic “enmity,” as it is written, “Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power” (Ps. 110:3).

To say that Christ is unable to win to Himself those who are unwilling is to deny that all power in heaven and earth is His. To say that Christ cannot put forth His power without destroying man’s responsibility is a begging of the question here raised, for he has put forth His power and made willing those who have come to Him, and if He did this without destroying their responsibility, why “cannot” He do so with others? If He is able to win the heart of one sinner to Himself, why not that of another? To say, as is usually said, the others will not let him is to impeach His sufficiency. It is a question of his will. If the Lord Jesus has decreed, desired, purposed the salvation of all mankind, then the entire human race will be saved, or, otherwise, He lacks the power to make good His intentions; and in such a case it could never be said, “He shall see of the travail of His soul and be satisfied.”

The issue raised involves the deity of the Saviour, for a defeated Saviour cannot be God!

By nature, God’s elect are children of wrath even as others (Eph. 2:3), and as such their hearts are at enmity with God. But this “enmity” of theirs is overcome by the Spirit and He “compels” them to come in. Is it not clear then that the reason why others are left outside, is not only because they are unmilling to go in, but also because the Holy Spirit does not “compel” them to come in? Is it not manifest that the Holy Spirit is sovereign in the exercise of His power, and that as the wind “bloweth where it pleaseth“, so the Holy Spirit operates where he pleases?

I'll come back to finish.
No need to finish RB.
Keep believing the NEW GOSPEL that Calvinists believe.
I think I've made my position very clear.

And all this talk of saving ourselves and how we don't believe in a sovereign God is rubbish.

And you say man is unwilling because the Holy Spirit did not compel him.
Any logical person understands what foolishness you're espousing.

And every other reformed/calvinist believer.

Join the rest of Christianity and stop blaspheming God.
 
I have never been part of the Reformed community of believers, as a matter of fact, they reject much of my understanding as I do their. Unconditionally election is not a Reformed doctrine, even though some of them believe in election of grace, yet when we pressed them to explain their understanding of unconditional, it is evident that they bring works into the back door, whereas the Armenians boldly come through the front door shouting... synergism, synergism, let the god of synergy reign! They have one of their prophets on this forum, that proudly bears their name.

Fran, you said: "Now, let's look at Matthew 11 in full:" That's okay, no problem, but going back and looking at other scriptures will not change what is clearly written in Matthew 11:25, but, we can wait.

Fran, you are not reading this correctly, nor considering what the Lord meant by saying what he did ~ this has nothing to do the free will of a unregenerate sinner. The meaning of this scriptures is this: Jesus was going to make an spiritual application concerning John the Baptist, that it would be hard for any to consider, unless taught by the Spirit of God~he said that John the Baptist was the fulfillment of the scripture which prophesied that Elijah would come.

Malachi 4:5​

“Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:”

Was John literally Elijah? No, but he had the same spirit and power and manner of preaching that Elijah had, so in this sense John was indeed the fulfilment of Malachi 4:5. Actually you add to what Jesus said:

Matthew 11:14​

“And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come.”

It is a matter of be willing to be taught understanding the scriptures in a spiritual sense and not taking them literally.

Fran, notice what the Lord said...

Matthew 11:15​

“He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.” past tense verb ~ those that already have spiritual ear, then let THEM hear! It is a call to born again believers to use their spiritual ear to listen carefully what Jesus is saying.

No they did not repent, yet some did when they heard and saw Jesus' miracles, and Fran the next verses will tell us why this is so.

Matthew 11:25​

At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes. Even so, Father: for so it seemed good in thy sight. All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.

So, there Fran we have our answer, as to why some believe and repented, and others harden their hearts even more. "Even so, Father: for so it seemed good in thy sight." God left some to their own deceived and wicked hearts, since he was not under obligation to show mercy to anyone.

Jesus said "except" one is born again ( meaning born again first), he cannot see~a huge difference. That's the truth that the Lord was teaching in John 3:1-8

Enough for now.
Sorry RB
Not replying to the above.
You like to pick verses you like and don't even accept exegesis of said verse because I go back up a few verse or down a few verses.
THIS IS CALLED CONTEXT.

Since you don't know what context is...or maybe you but it's too uncomfortable for you...
then it makes replying to the above a total waste of my time.

And YOU ARE REFORMED....
YOU ARE CALVINIST.

Whatever name YOU would like to call yourself is meaningless....
Remember this:

CHRISTIANS FOLLOW JESUS.
CALVINISTS FOLLOW CALVIN.
 
This is wrong RB.
If EVERYONE (every other denomination in this case) tells me they see a yellow wall and I see a white wall...
I would seriously question my eyesight.

Do you understand that the Apostles and those they taught believed in free will?
They believed that ANYONE could be saved.
They did NOT believe in predestination.

Yes,,,I would seriously consider my belief system.

My goodness RB.
Jesus is speaking about the Pharisees.
Jesus was mad at them for keeping GOD FAR AWAY FROM the Jews.
Pretty much what Calvinists do.
They present a God that is loveless, merciless and unjust....many have left calvinism behind because they've come to realize that the God of the bible is NOT the God of Calvinism.

Why not concentrate instead on the following verse?

Galatians 1:6-10
6 I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting * Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel;
7 which is really not another; only * there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ.
8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed!
9 As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed!
10 For am I now seeking the favor of men, or of God? Or am I striving to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a bond-servant of Christ.


Calvinism is a NEW GOSPEL.
It DID NOT EXIST until the reformation.
Some ideas were taken from Augustine of Hippo.
He was a gnostic Manachaen who converted to the Catholic religion in the 5th century AD.
NO APOSTLE OR THOSE THEY TAUGHT BELIEVED AS HE DID.
Even the CC does NOT believe what Augustine taught...,
this says a lot.

Right. Except, according to YOU, Jesus is NOT the only means.
He would be the only means if it was required to believe in Him for salvation...
which, INDEED, THIS IS THE PROPER GOSPEL.

But Jesus is NOT the means for salvation.
According to YOUR belief,,,,,it is GOD WHO CHOOSES WHO WILL BE SAVED.
Jesus really doesn't have too much to do with our salvation.
In Calvinism it's not really even necessary that Jesus should have died.
God willl choose whom He will....
Jesus death is useless in the reformed faith.


I'm not going to spend my time here discussing MEN and what they believed.
I trust scriipture..and I'll stick to scripture.
The ONLY men I would pay any attention to are the Apostles and those they taught.

The particular baptist group is CALVINIST.....
No matter what they want to call themselves (and I've known a few) they believe exactly what John Calvin taught.
Unless YOU could prove to me that they believe something different, perhaps using the 1689 Confession...
this conversation should end right here.

God will not be too happy RB....when you show up in front of Him and you've been blaspheming Him all you life.
YOU have been following a different gospel...
NOT the rest of Christianity, that is following the CORRECT gospel.

RB...
How dumb are calvinists?
HOW DUMB are calvinists?
Jesus was speaking to His Apostles that HE CHOSE.

Look it up.
I'm tired of stating this.
Please use sources OTHER THAN your calvinist sources which do not portray the truth.

So? WHERE is the problem?
God does all the revealing....is there a different god that reveals things to us?
NO:

God always revealed Himself to mankind.
Read Romans 1:19-21 it might be of help.


So? WHERE is the problem?
Read 2 Thes 2:13 a few times over and then come here and tell me what was chosen from the beginning of time.
WAS IT PARTICULAR PERSONS?
NO.

Was it, maybe, the METHOD by which God chooses persons?
YES.

God's plan was to save us to salvation through the sanctification of the spiirit.
THROUGH SANCTIFICATION.

It's the METHOD...
NOT THE WHO.

It's never the who.

This is dumb and I'm not replying to it.
Get out your bible and look up the TENS of verses that COMMAND man to SEEK GOD.
According to YOU it's impossible for man to seek God because of his wickedness.
So who's right?
THE BIBLE
or
JOHN CALVIN?


OK.
So according to YOU God made us this way....
so WHY would Paul complain about it?

It's all very absurd.


Oh. We agree on something!

See my reply above.
The BIBLE is full of commands to seek God.
So surely Romans 3:11 must have a different meaning.
Perhaps something going back to Psalms in the OT?
Maybe Psalm 110?

Again...look it up but using sources that are NOT calvinist IF you WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH.


I read the BIBLE RB.
It's enough for me.

It contains ALL I need to know to become a friend of God and to save my soul.

Mr. Owen probably has some nice ideas, but AGAIN...
YOU'RE listening to a MAN
instead of listening to JESUS.


What wrath did God impose on Jesus?
Now you want to talk about the brand new concept of Penal Substitution?
Penal Substitution DID NOT EXIST until the reformation.
Only Calvinists could come up with such a concept....
God having wrath ON HIMSELF....
blaming JESUS for the sins of all men and punishing JESUS when the bible
clearly states that ONE MAN CANNOT SUFFER FOR THE SINS OF ANOTHER MAN-

There are many atonement theories...
The PSA theory is the WORST ONE.
Just like every other concept Calvinists have.

Why?
Because they don't know about the
GOD OF LOVE
GOD OF MERCY
GOD OF JUSTICE

Which is NOT the God of calvinism.

No need to finish RB.
Keep believing the NEW GOSPEL that Calvinists believe.
I think I've made my position very clear.

And all this talk of saving ourselves and how we don't believe in a sovereign God is rubbish.

And you say man is unwilling because the Holy Spirit did not compel him.
Any logical person understands what foolishness you're espousing.

And every other reformed/calvinist believer.

Join the rest of Christianity and stop blaspheming God.
Way to go GodsGrace! You've got all Calvinists and even those who lean towards Calvinism on the run! 👏
 
Back
Top Bottom