The Divine Son is able to give the gift of the Holy Spirit. I'm not sure why that is a problem.
Sure it is a new birth where God's Spirit abides in man. I'm not sure what you are contesting.
Bullinger's ideas can be useful. I am just noting that he is not denying the Holy Spirit in the way you would wish to.
#1 The
pnuema is used of God Himself or the "Father". "God" is
pneuma." (John 4:24) It is His Divine Nature that is spoken of. . . . #2 The word
pneuma is used of Christ,
the second Person of the Trinity. He, in resurrection, became a quickening or life-giving
pneuma (1 Cor. 15:45) . . . (Word Studies of the Holy Spirit, p. 14,15)
As you see above he does mention "the second Person of the Trinity" --- I don't believe in the Trinity so I don't believe that Christ is the second person of the Trinity but I do believe Jesus was resurrection and became a life-giving spirit. As you can imagine there is a whole list of occurrences and usages of spirit with their corresponding verses and not all meanings have to do with being a 'person.'
Oops. I forgot. For the unitarian this is just this impersonal power commonly pushed by New Age religions. It is possible that the divine Son also had the third person of the Trinity in him. So you could be half-right but still erring on who the Holy Spirit is
If you are not New Age, then stop speaking like a New Ager.
Since I am not New Age then I don't know how they speak therefore I cannot stop doing something I don't recognize.
Did Jesus walk on water or did he walk on h2o? There is no problem of Jesus sending the Holy Spirit as the third person of the Trinity into their lives. Indeeed the Spirit had not been given to the disciples until the Day of Pentecost.
<snip>
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, ‘Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.’” Now this he said about the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were to receive, for as yet the Spirit had not been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified. Is this referring to the Holy Spirit, the third person of the Trinity or is this talking about the gift of holy spirit Jesus would pour out on the day of Pentecost?
<snip>
Yes, Jesus walked on water . . . what's that got to do with anything?
So, you believe Jesus poured out the third person of the Trinity on the day of Penecost . . . ok.
#14 Pneuma Hagion. This expression (which occurs fifty times) without articles, is never used of the Giver (the Holy Spirit), but always of His Gift. What this gift is may be seen by comparing Acts 1.4,5 with Luke xxiv. 49, where "the promise of the Father" is (in Acts) called
pnuema hagion (holy spirit), and (in Luke) it is called "power from on high". This "power" includes whatever spiritual gifts the Holy Spirit may be pleased to bestow. . . . . Whenever spirit is said to
fall, or
to be given, or to
fill, or
be baptized with, it is always
pneuma without the article, or
pneuma hagion. (Word Studies on the Holy Spirit, p. 214)
Your thinking could still be corrected while you are alive
Seriously though I do acknowledge that someone could come out with a better description of the Godhead than the current recognition. That was one curiosity I had when first discussing stuff on what became unitarian adherents.
Your thinking can be corrected while you are alive also!
After all these years, I think 'a better description of the Godhead' has given way to "it's a mystery" . . . .