All Claims of The Son's Deity

Still nothing H3442 in your given verse. Can't you post your verse that contain it here?

Jos 22:4 “And now H6258 R1 the LORD H3068  your God H430  has given H5117  rest H5117  to your brothers H251 , as He spoke H1696  to them; therefore turn H6437  now H6258  and go H1980  to your tents H168 , to the land H776  of your possession H272 , which H834  Moses H4872  the servant H5650  of the LORD H3068  gave H5414  you beyond H5676  the Jordan H3383
GINOLJC, to all.

Read read post #888 again......
101G.
 

There's no verse anywhere that says Jesus laid aside his deity...

And Jesus never taught the trinity. In fact, nobody ever taught the trinity. If there is a trinity then why not just come out and say it? Why do we have to jump all over the Bible cutting and pasting pieces of words that are scattered all over the Bible? Why not just teach it? I know enough about how the Bible is written in the New Testament and in the Gospels to know if there was a trinity it would have been taught. The Gospels would have clearly said...

Verily, verily I say unto you that I am Jesus and I'm also God.
The Epistles would have writings like...

Yay, I Paul do testify that Jesus who is God came down from heaven to be a man for us. And we do know and testify that this same Jesus who you crucified is God. And so let us bow our knee to the one and only true God-Man Jesus Christ.

And yet there's nothing like that anywhere. Not in the Old or New Testament. Not even one complete verse like that.
This is correct.
 
Okay. Unitarian kills the Christians who recognize the Triune God. But the difference is that the Christians, like Christ Jesus are resurrected.
Unitarians are the Christians.

I'm not sure if this is fully correct, but Christ being born into human flesh can be called the Son due to being born into humanity while also the Son of God since his essence is divine in his preexistence state.
So Jesus was born a human like everyone else. God was never born a human, He is eternal and uncreated.
Duh. Do you think there was a human body for Christ that just was a fluke of nature? I'm not sure how the Unitarians become unable to see the basic ideas.
This is a weird question. Jesus was descended from Adam.

Uh. Isn't immortality the life that goes on forever? Peterlag seems to deny what resurrection means. Also, Peterlag has to guess the metaphysical situation of what happened to Jesus and his divinity upon death of the body. I bet Peterlag has a passage to explain exactly the related metaphysics since he is a hyperliteralist.
So did you know Jesus died? The Bible says someone else resurrected him after he died. That someone else is God.
Oh my. That is a real show stopper. Jesus emptied himself of something of his divine form and being. Did Peterlag know something about brain development of the incarnated Son and whether that would be an element or not?
So you're claiming Jesus empoted himself of his divine form and being. So Jesus isn't God then?
Uh. Does Peterlag think the Son is going to do things contrary to the Father? This really is a confirmation that he is acting not of a mere man doing as he wants. It is showing he is acting in the will of the Father. Also, Jesus sees what the Father is doing when other people cannot do likewise.

Wow. Imagine Jesus' body not physically being in two places at one time. That is such an amazing discovery by Peterlag. Not!!!!!!
Did you know Jesus is a human? 🤔
It is amazing that out of the six verses that Peterlag shared, those all spoke against his unitarian heresy. The more arguments Peterlag shares, the more stronger the Trinitarian view becomes.
Thanks for the comedic relief. You seemed to have intentionally misunderstood them so you can prolong your abiding in darkness.
 
Unitarians are the Christians.
The picture shows the unitarians persecuting and murdering Christians and putting them in a coffin while not realizing that the death is followed by resurrection.
So Jesus was born a human like everyone else. God was never born a human, He is eternal and uncreated.
Like mentioned so many times... the unitarian thinks only of the human state of the Son of God instead of the Father who initiated the incarnation of the Son. The unitarian misses the whole point of the virgin birth.
This is a weird question. Jesus was descended from Adam.
I had said: "Duh. Do you think there was a human body for Christ that just was a fluke of nature? I'm not sure how the Unitarians become unable to see the basic ideas." This was in response to the Jesus living because of the Father.
Unitarians bring up weird ideas so naturally a question that arises in response to their ideas can seem weird. You are denying that the Father gave life to the human body? I'm not sure what your perception of the world is. It seems to deny the Father at this point. Do you honestly think that Jesus lived on earth without the Father's intent and action?
So did you know Jesus died? The Bible says someone else resurrected him after he died. That someone else is God.
You must have secret sources of ideas of metaphysics to identify exactly what happened upon the Son of God's death on the cross. You are further lacking understanding because you only have the mind of man, not of Christ.
So you're claiming Jesus empoted himself of his divine form and being. So Jesus isn't God then?
I showed the error of Peterlag's ignorance. You wish to pursue his ignorance further? I think Peterlag only explained the idea of Jesus emptying himself of his Messiah status even though Jesus remains Messiah. go figure.

Did you know Jesus is a human? 🤔
Hmmm. You do not even know basic knowledge why the Trinitarian doctrine exists? I mean apart from your oddball theories. (Maybe you can explain why people came to the reasoning of God as a Trinity before you state your rejections of it. We can see if you are honest about that detail.) I do not think you even read what people are sharing since you wish to deny the truth.

Thanks for the comedic relief. You seemed to have intentionally misunderstood them so you can prolong your abiding in darkness.
I showed the fallacies of Peterlag's post. Sure, the response to his stupid picture was comedic, but you reject even probable explanations of each thing he posted.
 
Last edited:
Unitarians are the Christians.


So Jesus was born a human like everyone else. God was never born a human, He is eternal and uncreated.

This is a weird question. Jesus was descended from Adam.


So did you know Jesus died? The Bible says someone else resurrected him after he died. That someone else is God.

So you're claiming Jesus empoted himself of his divine form and being. So Jesus isn't God then?

Did you know Jesus is a human? 🤔

Thanks for the comedic relief. You seemed to have intentionally misunderstood them so you can prolong your abiding in darkness.
So trinitarians are not Christian’s, believers in Christ ? Is that your pov ?
 
The picture shows the unitarians persecuting and murdering Christians and putting them in a coffin while not realizing that the death is followed by resurrection.
It's a picture with a hammer that says "Unitarianism" not "Unitarians" putting nails in the coffin of "Trinitarians." It's about one theology defeating another, not about murder. Your reply is almost hysterical and makes me think I should leave you alone for a while to let you cool off, but, before I do, one question; are you developing a persecution complex watching Trinitarianism get its theological 🫏 🥾'ed by Unitarianism?
 
It's a picture with a hammer that says "Unitarianism" not "Unitarians" putting nails in the coffin of "Trinitarians." It's about one theology defeating another, not about murder. Your reply is almost hysterical and makes me think I should leave you alone for a while to let you cool off, but, before I do, one question; are you developing a persecution complex watching Trinitarianism get its theological 🫏 🥾'ed by Unitarianism?
Okay. So unitarians are not following unitarianism?
I'm not feeling persecuted. I'm just explaining the post by Peterlag.
I see that the hyperliteralist unitarians cannot understand such explanations either.
 
Back
Top Bottom