Trinitarianism wasn't formalized until the 4th century. Jesus' church was formalized in the early 1st century. They didn't believe the same sort of things that you all do. There weren't any who could be possibly recognized as an "orthodox trinitarian" for the next several hundred years, as the early proto-trinitarians would be considered raging heretics by your standards today.
I see, so you were there, so you know that no one in the first century believed the things that we do. And you know that there weren't any in the first century who could be considered an orthodox trinitarian, either in that century, or for several hundred years after that. And you know that if there were, they would be considered raging heretics, "by our standards"? Actually, by our standards, the early proto-trinitarians would be considered closer to the truth than you are today. And I'm not sure why we would think that they would be "raging". Raging anger is more closely associated with anti-Trinitarians like yourself, not us.
It's amazing how much you know - or more properly, how much you make up, out of whole cloth. Since you were not there, you know NONE of the things that you claim to know above. But that is typical of heresy. Just make things up that sound authoritative, make your own history and your own facts, mock those who disagree, and move on to the next gullible sucker.
The majority believed that Jesus was subordinate to God, yet still God, which doesn't make sense and was a fast way to lose a public debate and destroy their credibility way back when.
Wow, I can't believe how much knowledge you have of the 1st century.
Trinitarianism arose over centuries of debates.
Really, and I thought they knew about it even during the time the gospels were written. Huh. How could I have been so wrong?
You all are still developing your religion in the modern day, which is why you guys are still defending your three headed god found no where in the Bible.
Here again, I thought Trinitarianism was a doctrine, not a religion. Not only that but I thought the doctrine was already fully developed. Huh. I'm sure you have historical data to support everything you say.
But for those of us who don't have all the historical knowledge that you do, why don't you just give us the so
urce of your statements made above?
There is actually a movement to repackage and rebrand trinitarianism as a result. It still doesn't make much sense, but it's a step in the right direction.
Please give us the information that you have about trinitarianism being repackaged and rebranded.