All Claims of The Son's Deity

Oh my. You are worried just because the OT has not fully identified a name or designation for the Angel of the Lord as Yahweh too. I sympathize with your unease though.
So now we have proven that YHWH is the Father only, the only Creator, and the only true God. That's Scripture. Angels of God are not God.
 
So now we have proven that YHWH is the Father only, the only Creator, and the only true God. That's Scripture. Angels of God are not God.
See again! You misinterpret what I said because you misinterpret scripture overall. The point you are rejecting has been proven before. God is the Angel in Hosea
Hos 12:3-5
In the womb he took his brother by the heel, And in his maturity he contended with God. Yes, he wrestled with the angel and prevailed; He wept and sought His favor. He found Him at Bethel And there He spoke with us, Even the LORD, the God of hosts, The LORD is His name.

You get so busy denying Jesus that you cannot read the scripture clearly
 
See again! You misinterpret what I said because you misinterpret scripture overall.
Scriptural evidence is that there is no other God other than the Father. I am not trying to interpret anything you say at this point. I am simply preaching. You're free to reply if you wish.
 
Scriptural evidence is that there is no other God other than the Father. I am not trying to interpret anything you say at this point. I am simply preaching. You're free to reply if you wish.
Again you are arguing against a polytheistic view. You cannot win an argument by using a view that someone does not hold.
I typed this too late for your response:

The point you are rejecting has been proven before. God is the Angel in Hosea
Hos 12:3-5
In the womb he took his brother by the heel, And in his maturity he contended with God. Yes, he wrestled with the angel and prevailed; He wept and sought His favor. He found Him at Bethel And there He spoke with us, Even the LORD, the God of hosts, The LORD is His name.

You get so busy denying Jesus that you cannot read the scripture clearly
 
Again you are arguing against a polytheistic view. You cannot win an argument by using a view that someone does not hold.
I typed this too late for your response:

The point you are rejecting has been proven before. God is the Angel in Hosea
Hos 12:3-5
In the womb he took his brother by the heel, And in his maturity he contended with God. Yes, he wrestled with the angel and prevailed; He wept and sought His favor. He found Him at Bethel And there He spoke with us, Even the LORD, the God of hosts, The LORD is His name.

You get so busy denying Jesus that you cannot read the scripture clearly
The trinity is polytheism. "Three person who are one god" or "God was with God" is polytheism. That's actually a big reason why you lose any credibility regarding the trinity.

The angel in Hosea 12:3-5 isn't YHWH and besides the angel lost the wrestling match with Jacob. It's ludicrous that you think YHWH would be dominated in a wrestling match by a mere human. You misunderstand the concept agency and authority that God's messengers carry and act on in God's name without themselves being YHWH.
 
The trinity is polytheism. "Three person who are one god" or "God was with God" is polytheism. That's actually a big reason why you lose any credibility regarding the trinity.

The angel in Hosea 12:3-5 isn't YHWH and besides the angel lost the wrestling match with Jacob. It's ludicrous that you think YHWH would be dominated in a wrestling match by a mere human. You misunderstand the concept agency and authority that God's messengers carry and act on in God's name without themselves being YHWH.
That is so incredible that you miss the direct wording in Hosea 12:3-5. Cannot help you until your eyes are opened.
You have to modify the passage with the word "agent" so that you can deny the Angel of the Lord. "Agent" should not even be in your Unitarian Pocket Dictionary.
 
That is so incredible that you miss the direct wording in Hosea 12:3-5. Cannot help you until your eyes are opened.
You have to modify the passage with the word "agent" so that you can deny the Angel of the Lord. "Agent" should not even be in your Unitarian Pocket Dictionary.
:oops: wow. Jacob wrestled with YHWH and won? You sure about that? Read it again Mike.

Hosea 11
4Yes, he struggled with the angel and prevailed;
he wept and sought His favor;
he found Him at Bethel
and spoke with Him there —
5the LORD God of Hosts,
the LORD is His name of renown.
 
Boy do we have problems in our current Christian time.

Here are the oldest Bibles...

Geneva Bible of 1587

onely begotten Sonne
Bishops' Bible of 1568
onely begotten sonne
Coverdale Bible of 1535
onely begotte sonne
Tyndale Bible of 1526
only begotte sonne

Here's two Catholic Bibles that probably have some age to them...
Douay-Rheims Bible
only begotten Son
Catholic Public Domain Version
only-begotten Son

Now here lies the problem... we now have trinity Bibles that say something
completely different. Here's 19 of them...

New International Version

only Son, who is himself God
New Living Translation
unique One, who is himself God
English Standard Version
only God
Berean Standard Bible
only Son, who is Himself God
Berean Literal Bible
only begotten God

NASB 1995

only begotten God

NASB 1977
only begotten God

Legacy Standard Bible
only begotten God

Aramaic Bible in Plain English

Only Begotten God

Amplified Bible

only begotten God

Christian Standard Bible
only Son, who is himself God

Contemporary English Version

only Son, who is truly God

Good News Translation

only Son, who is the same as God

International Standard Version
The unique God

NET Bible
only one, himself God

Literal Standard Version

only begotten God

Berean Literal Bible
only begotten God

New American Bible

only Son, God

New Revised Standard Version

God the only Son

And here's a list of 22 not counting the 6 I listed
above that
are the oldest English non-trinity Bibles...

King James Bible
only begotten Son
New King James Version
only begotten Son
New American Standard Bible
only Son

Holman Christian Standard Bible
Only Son
American Standard Version
only begotten Son
English Revised Version
only begotten Son
GOD'S WORD® Translation
God's only Son
New Heart English Bible
The only Son
Webster's Bible Translation
only begotten Son
Weymouth New Testament
only Son
Majority Standard Bible
only Son
World English Bible
only born Son
Young's Literal Translation
only begotten Son
Smith's Literal Translation
only born Son
Lamsa Bible
firstborn of God
Anderson New Testament
only begotten Son
Godbey New Testament
only begotten Son
Haweis New Testament
only begotten Son
Mace New Testament
only begotten son
Weymouth New Testament
only Son
Worrell New Testament
only begotten Son
Worsley New Testament
only-begotten Son
 
:oops: wow. Jacob wrestled with YHWH and won? You sure about that? Read it again Mike.

Hosea 11
4Yes, he struggled with the angel and prevailed;
he wept and sought His favor;
he found Him at Bethel
and spoke with Him there —
5the LORD God of Hosts,
the LORD is His name of renown.
you confirm your blindness. That was described as struggling with God. that is why people cannot trust your interpretations.
In the womb he took his brother by the heel,
And in his maturity he contended with God.
4 Yes, he wrestled with the angel and prevailed;

You are partly right that the Angel as Yahweh is distinguished from the Yahweh that sends him. But both are Yahweh.
 
Boy do we have problems in our current Christian time.

Here are the oldest Bibles...

Geneva Bible of 1587

onely begotten Sonne
Bishops' Bible of 1568
onely begotten sonne
Coverdale Bible of 1535
onely begotte sonne
Tyndale Bible of 1526
only begotte sonne

Here's two Catholic Bibles that probably have some age to them...
Douay-Rheims Bible
only begotten Son
Catholic Public Domain Version
only-begotten Son

Now here lies the problem... we now have trinity Bibles that say something
completely different. Here's 19 of them...

New International Version

only Son, who is himself God
New Living Translation
unique One, who is himself God
English Standard Version
only God
Berean Standard Bible
only Son, who is Himself God
Berean Literal Bible
only begotten God

NASB 1995
only begotten God


NASB 1977
only begotten God

Legacy Standard Bible
only begotten God

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
Only Begotten God


Amplified Bible
only begotten God


Christian Standard Bible
only Son, who is himself God

Contemporary English Version
only Son, who is truly God


Good News Translation
only Son, who is the same as God


International Standard Version
The unique God

NET Bible
only one, himself God

Literal Standard Version
only begotten God


Berean Literal Bible
only begotten God

New American Bible
only Son, God


New Revised Standard Version
God the only Son


And here's a list of 22 not counting the 6 I listed
above that
are the oldest English non-trinity Bibles...

King James Bible
only begotten Son
New King James Version
only begotten Son
New American Standard Bible
only Son

Holman Christian Standard Bible
Only Son
American Standard Version
only begotten Son
English Revised Version
only begotten Son
GOD'S WORD® Translation
God's only Son
New Heart English Bible
The only Son
Webster's Bible Translation
only begotten Son
Weymouth New Testament
only Son
Majority Standard Bible
only Son
World English Bible
only born Son
Young's Literal Translation
only begotten Son
Smith's Literal Translation
only born Son
Lamsa Bible
firstborn of God
Anderson New Testament
only begotten Son
Godbey New Testament
only begotten Son
Haweis New Testament
only begotten Son
Mace New Testament
only begotten son
Weymouth New Testament
only Son
Worrell New Testament
only begotten Son
Worsley New Testament
only-begotten Son
No problems in reality. The Son is God incarnate. Thanks for another post that says nothing.
 
Do you have a verse that says "the son is God Incarnate?" Or is this just another post of yours that says nothing?
I guess you are suggesting God was walking in the midst of Judea without a body. You are just showing hyperliteralist tendencies to demand God provide more specific wording for you to reject it instead of conveying it they way he decided to teach us.
 
you confirm your blindness. That was described as struggling with God. that is why people cannot trust your interpretations.
In the womb he took his brother by the heel,
And in his maturity he contended with God.
4 Yes, he wrestled with the angel and prevailed;

You are partly right that the Angel as Yahweh is distinguished from the Yahweh that sends him. But both are Yahweh.
Contended with God's angel is effectually contending with God's authority. God isn't an angel though nor the angel of the Lord. I see you know absolutely nothing about agency.

Scripture teaches the angel of the Lord is not the Lord. They are speaking to one another and it should be clear to any rational person that God isn't His own messenger.

Zechariah
12Then the angel of the Lord said, ‘O Lord of hosts, how long will you have no mercy on Jerusalem and the cities of Judah, against which you have been angry these seventy years?’ 13And the Lord answered gracious and comforting words to the angel who talked with me.
 
Contended with God's angel is effectually contending with God's authority. God isn't an angel though nor the angel of the Lord. I see you know absolutely nothing about agency.

Scripture teaches the angel of the Lord is not the Lord. They are speaking to one another and it should be clear to any rational person that God isn't His own messenger.

Zechariah
12Then the angel of the Lord said, ‘O Lord of hosts, how long will you have no mercy on Jerusalem and the cities of Judah, against which you have been angry these seventy years?’ 13And the Lord answered gracious and comforting words to the angel who talked with me.
Are you going to just confirm that the Angel is Yahweh or do you have an argument to make? It is noted how you avoid the Hosea 12 passage and seek something to deny Jesus again.
Are we to assume you are being deceptive by not pointing out that the continuation of this encounter specifically shows this Angel to be Yahweh?

Zeph 1:20 Then the LORD showed me four craftsmen.

The Angel is distinct but also the same as Yahweh.
 
Are you going to just confirm that the Angel is Yahweh or do you have an argument to make? It is noted how you avoid the Hosea 12 passage and seek something to deny Jesus again.
Are we to assume you are being deceptive by not pointing out that the continuation of this encounter specifically shows this Angel to be Yahweh?

Zeph 1:20 Then the LORD showed me four craftsmen.

The Angel is distinct but also the same as Yahweh.
Scripture teaches the angel of the Lord is not the Lord. They are speaking to one another and it should be clear to any rational person that God isn't His own messenger.

Zechariah
12Then the angel of the Lord said, ‘O Lord of hosts, how long will you have no mercy on Jerusalem and the cities of Judah, against which you have been angry these seventy years?’ 13And the Lord answered gracious and comforting words to the angel who talked with me.
 
Scripture teaches the angel of the Lord is not the Lord. They are speaking to one another and it should be clear to any rational person that God isn't His own messenger.

Zechariah
12Then the angel of the Lord said, ‘O Lord of hosts, how long will you have no mercy on Jerusalem and the cities of Judah, against which you have been angry these seventy years?’ 13And the Lord answered gracious and comforting words to the angel who talked with me.
You must have an abridged bible so you do not have to look at passages that contradict your view. You just pretended that verse 20 was not in the scripture. There is no argument from you but only skipping verses you do not like because they testify against
you.
Edited: I presume if you had an argument against verse 20, you would have shared that already.
 
You must have an abridged bible so you do not have to look at passages that contradict your view. You just pretended that verse 20 was not in the scripture. There is no argument from you but only skipping verses you do not like because they testify against
you.
Edited: I presume if you had an argument against verse 20, you would have shared that already.
Zechariah 1:12,13 is an explicit example of God not being the angel of the Lord. Deal with it.
 
Zechariah 1:12,13 is an explicit example of God not being the angel of the Lord. Deal with it.
I take that as further confirmation that you cannot explain verse 20. It continues to testify against your view.
Zechariah 1:20 (NASB95)
20Then the LORD showed me four craftsmen.

The Angel of the Lord now is the directly the Yahweh who is showing Zechariah these things.
 
Back
Top Bottom