No need to be so evasive. So Christ died on the cross. That wasn't so hard was it? That's what I believe too.
Uh. You say you believe the same thing about the complexity of understanding the metaphysical aspect of the divine Son dying on the cross. We'll stick with that for now.
How many years? I have been debating men like you for over fifty years. You never commented on Revelation 1....why? I know why. Btw, you prove not one thing against what I posted, and did not one thing to add to your position, and the reason being, you do not have truth, you and your running mate are void of the Spirit of God.
The "one who knew no sin" became sin according to 2 Cor. 5:21. So the one who knew no sin is just Jesus' body and nothing to do with his sinless soul and spirit?
What's your question regarding Rev 1?
Yes I have the truth. Unfortuantely, you are blind to it.
You missed my edit.
So it wasn't a "big sin" in your opnion, but you seem to agree that "the one who knew no sin" became sin. Correct? So if you believe Jesus is God then why are you charging God with sin?
You are the one asking a nonsensical question, not me. Your question shows your inability to understand scripture.
You've been running from Scripture like the devil ever since I've been asking you. Why are you so evasive about what you believe? Could it be because you aren't really sure about what you believe?
You do not accept scripture. You twist it. this is a case of pearls before swine. Your answers are so preposterous that no one really should be trying to have a serious discussion with you.
That describes you precisely. The day in which people will not accept sound doctrine is embodied in you. You have wild theories about God dying and becoming sin. It's chaos. Atleast you've stopped quoting Scripture to try to justify it. Feel free to quote the Catholic dogmas if you're looknig for resources that explain what you believe because the Bible won't help you.
You cannot even keep the Christian doctrines properly in view. You distort what i say and then ridicule me for having those distorted concepts. Right "catholic" as referring to the whole Christian church. You choose heretical dogmas instead of catholic ones.
Catholics and Protestants aren't Christians, but Catholics are far superior Trinitarians than Protestants. You would make a fine Catholic.
stupid misunderstanding on your part. There is the catholic church that is all Christians. Then there is the Roman Catholic church which is whatever it is. Trinitarians are of the catholic church and the catholic church is Trinitarians. Your confusion continues unhindered.
If you count the tail as a leg, how many legs does a dog have? If you said five you're wrong. The answer is still four. The fact that one counted the tail as a leg does not make it a leg. The fact you people call yourself Christians doesn't make it so. I have not seen any teachings of Christ that you follow, hence you would make a fine Catholic.
We have not spoken much of the teachings of Christ except those where he points out his divinity. You cannot see those teachings because you are blind. You somehow think you are one of the exactly 144000 that will be saved or that is close to what your seem to reflect in your beliefs. You have had over a year of time around here to convince people that your heresy should be followed. You have not made a decent argument yet.
I have only ever seen you drone on about your trinity which is not a teaching of Christ or a teaching in the Bible. Jesus explicitly defined God as only the Father repeatedly. So you don't follow the teachings of Christ so yeah you're not a Christian. Let's call a spade a spade, it's just how it is.
you have missed what Christ taught so I do not see any significance for your comments.
You obviously would deny Jesus directly to his face about the Father being the only true God or give him some kind of twisted argument. You're doing it to me, you would do it to him.
you have hallucinations of persecution.
