They did not believe. That's why it's not applied to them. Plain and simple. What's there not to understand?
Since I don't hold to that premise therefore I'm not party to that contradiction.
Carry on with your closet Universalism if you must.
Why All Is Not Ordained
- Thread starter Rockson
- Start date
Carry on with your closet Universalism if you must.
praise_yeshua
Well-known member
I'll be glad to when you admit that you're abandoning Job 42:2.
It's sufficient for all, intended for some
Good deflecting though
Isiah 14:27. Man's word as well??
praise_yeshua
Well-known member
He should confess that the Blood of Jesus Christ is sufficient and stop limiting God.
praise_yeshua
Well-known member
Sufficient for all but limited..... Got it. Which is it? Is your god too small to save everyone?
Calvinist 101. Don't make argument you don't know the answer to.
Not abandoning anything. I was just wondering if Isaiah 14:27 is simply man's word as well??
They're accusing God of failure when it's man who is the failure. What utter blasphemy coming from them.
Never intended to save everyone or even give it His best effort. Those He intends to save will be saved.
LOL, you yourself said God is ATTEMPTING to save everyone. How is He doing so far?
praise_yeshua
Well-known member
Admit you're abandoning Job 42:2 and post the translation of your choice of Isa 14:27. Make a choice and stop abandoning your appeals to the "laws of no contradictions".
You're accusing God of failure when it's man who is the failure. What utter blasphemy coming from you.
The Rogue Tomato
Well-known member
I'm more impressed with Job 42:13 And he also had seven sons and three daughters. 14 The first daughter he named Jemimah, who went on to build a successful pancake syrup empire until some "woke" bozos took her picture off the bottle.
Isiah 14:27, just man's word as well??
praise_yeshua
Well-known member
Which is it sufficient or not? No law of contradicts. If the Blood of Jesus Christ is sufficient for all, then you must apply it all or you're teaching that God is a respecter of persons.
Sufficient for all, effectual for some. For those for whom it was intended. Should I say it slower?
praise_yeshua
Well-known member
Your god is too small to save everyone. Why are you limiting God?
And your God is a failure. He is attempting to save all but almighty man thwarts His purpose.
praise_yeshua
Well-known member
If it helps you understand, say it slower. I can read just fine.
Is it sufficient or not? You say it is sufficient and then limit its sufficentacy. You are contradicting yourself.
