You haven't proven 1Corinthians 12:13 is Holy Spirit baptism.
https://berean-apologetics.community.forum/threads/all-believers-are-baptized-into-the-body-of-christ.507/#post-11028
You haven't proven 1Corinthians 12:13 is Holy Spirit baptism.
Prove it with Scripture.Using examples in order to refute this from events which took place before what is described in Acts 2:4 is irrelevant
Prove it with Scripture.
Prove the Holy Spirit baptism saved Paul in Acts 9.Those events which you wrote about took place before the New Covenant went into effect. (Mark 14:24)
It proves many received the Holy Spirit yet this was not how any of them were saved.Then it is in error because one cannot have a gift of the Spirit without having the Holy Spirit.
Using examples in order to refute this from events which took place before what is described in Acts 2:4 is irrelevant.
You provided no evidence that supports your claim. You looked back at old comments where your arguments have been demonstrated with Scripture to be in error.Your way of ignoring the evidence I provided.
You provided no evidence that supports your claim. You looked back at old comments where your arguments have been demonstrated with Scripture to be in error.
I didn't say you didn't supply anything. I said you didn't supply anything that advances or supports your argument that has not already been shown to be in error.I supplied quite a bit. Pretending it's not there is your ridiculous tactic.
I said you didn't supply anything that advances or supports your argument that has not already been shown to be in error.
LOL, nice pun. But insulting me does not advance your argument. You advocate the position that an exception to the rule (Cornelius, which is not really an exception, but you see it as one) invalidates the rule. But exceptions are only that, exceptions, and they do not invalidate the rule. God established the rule that we are born again through water and the Spirit (John 3:5). The Apostles taught that we receive the gift of salvation from God when we are immersed in water (Acts 8:36, Acts 2:38, Acts 22:16, Rom 6:1-7, Col 2:11-14, 1 Pet 3:21, Gal 3:26-27, Eph 5:26-27, etc.), provided that we have also repented (Acts 3:19) and confessed Jesus as Lord (Rom 10:9-10). Since that is the rule, identifying "exceptions" (real or imagined) do not invalidate the rule. They simply identify cases where, in the first century, there was a "special case". But as noted before, Cornelius is not an exception to this rule. Cornelius received miraculous empowerment of praise and speaking in tongues when the Spirit fell on him, nothing more. He was not saved, he was not brought into the Kingdom of God, and the Holy Spirit did not enter into residence in his heart. If these things had occurred, then he would not have needed to be baptized in water afterwards. But he did require baptism still (Acts 10:47-48), because he had not been saved, and was not in the kingdom, and did not have the indwelling of the Spirit yet. These things require water, just as Jesus told Nicodemus in John 3.Not proved on your part.
I see you are suffering from truth decay. It's time you brush up on what the Bible teaches.
Rom 6:1-7, Col 2:11-14, Gal 3:26-27,
Sorry, but that is not the "baptism with the Holy Spirit", and there is NO evidence that it is. You want it to be because that would support your preconception. But Scripture refutes your ideas.The baptism with the Holy Spirit.
You have never been able to refute the evidence I supplied that demonstrates this.
Sorry,
but that is not the "baptism with the Holy Spirit",
Your insinuated insults are meaningless.You should be.
You gave none.Then one day you cab actually try to refute the evidence I gave that it is the baptism with the Holy Spirit.
Your insinuated insults are meaningless.
You gave none.
I don't have any false doctrines. Anything that I believe that can be disproved through Scripture, I change my belief. But you have not disproved anything I have said.So is your false doctrine.
If all you have is insults and trite blustering, we are done here. Come up with an honest argument from Scripture or quit wasting our time here.Try opening your eyes first.
I don't have any false doctrines.
If all you have is insults and trite blustering, we are done here. Come up with an honest argument from Scripture or quit wasting our time here.Which proves you are still in denial.
If all you have is insults and trite blustering, we are done here.
Come up with an honest argument from Scripture
or quit wasting our time here.
I haven't seen any evidence you have supplied. Where is it?Done?
You never refuted the evidence I supplied to begin with.
Post it again, because I can't find it.I already did.
My eyes are wide open, both physically and spiritually.Quit keeping your eyes closed.