The Bible doesn't have to repeat all the details of something every time in another area of Scripture
Sure,
That doesn't explain the meaning of 1Corinthians 12:13.
Saying the bible doesn't have to give all the details in every verse, isn't an explanation of any verse.
I asked you to explain the meaning of - For by one Spirit were we all baptized into one body...
I've yet to get an answer.
You claim its Holy Spirit baptism,
Then the verse would say,
- for by one Lord were we all baptized with the Holy Spirit into one body...
The verse doesn't even mention Christ who is the only baptizer of Holy Spirit baptism.
Mark 1:8,
- I indeed baptized you with water,...
How did John baptize with water?
He did it by the Holy Spirit working through him.
So John's water baptism was by the One Spirit's authority.
Just as Jesus water baptized by His authority.
It can be said, by one Spirit were the Jews all baptized.
Mark 1:8,
- I indeed baptized you with water(by the Holy Spirit working in John) but Jesus will baptize you with the Holy Spirit
1Corinthians 12:13 can be water baptism.
But for it to be Holy Spirit baptism Jesus must be the baptizer not the Spirit because the Spirit never baptized anyone Himself.
All of the water baptism that took place were done by the Spirit working through John the baptizer and the apostles whom Jesus baptized with Holy Spirit baptism.
Therefore all water baptism in the new testament were by the One Spirit by His teaching by His authority.
Go back to 1Corinthians.
All what they apostles taught and did was by the One Spirit working in them.
1Corinthians 2:13,
- Which things also we(those under the influence of the Spirit)
- which things also we speak not in the words which mans wisdom
teacheth but which the
Holy Spirit teacheth comparing spiritual things with spiritual
So all of the gospel that is taught by the apostles is by the one Spirit working through them.
Fact: Apostles taught even commanded folks to be water baptized.
Therefore water baptism is teaching from the Holy Spirit.
Therefore water baptism is part of the gospel of Christ.
John 14:26,
- but the Comforter which is the Holy Spirit whom the Father will send in My name He shall teach you ALL things and bring to your remembrance whatsoever I have said unto you
Whatever the apostles taught was what Jesus told them to teach.
Jesus accomplished this through the Holy Spirit working in them.
The gospel of Jesus includes water baptism,
Matthew 28:19-20,
- Go ye therefore and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit teaching them to observe ALL things whatsoever I have commanded you...
To say the great commission which is Jesus' new testament gospel does not include water baptism is going against Jesus' command to observe all commandments that Jesus commanded.
Mark 16:15-16,
- Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved but he that believeth not shall be danmed
Jesus joined belief
and baptism together.
No man can seperate what God has joined together.
Tongues didn't save him.
Having this gift is proof that he was "in the Church" (1 Cor. 12:28) and this took place before he was water baptized.
Correct tongue speaking did not save Cornelius.
You just admitted that the Holy Spirit gift of tongue speaking did not save Cornelius.
That's all Cornelius got from the pouring out of the Spirit, one gift not gifts.
Acts 10:17,
- forasmuch as God gave them the like
gift as he did unto us who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ...
The first gift given to the apostles when Jesus baptized them with the Holy Spirit in Acts 2 was speaking in tongues.
The like gift given to Cornelius was speaking in tongues.
The apostles were not saved by the gift of tongue speaking.
Likewise Cornelius was not saved by tongue speaking.
If the pouring out of different gifts of the Holy Spirit saved.
Then what miraculous gift or gifts did God give you Fred as proof of your salvation?
Tongues didn't save him.
Having this gift is proof that he was "in the Church" (1 Cor. 12:28)
Yes, to prove to the jews.
The Jews needed this miracle as there was no new testament Bible to teach them that gentiles could be Gods elect in the one kingdom of God.
Now is miraculous gift or gifts proof today that we are added to the church?
If so what miraculous gift did you receive Fred?
Tongues didn't save him.
Having this gift is proof that he was "in the Church" (1 Cor. 12:28) and this took place before he was water baptized
Fred was Peter commanding Cornelius to be water baptized in Jesus' gospel?
Was the Holy Spirit commanding Cornelius to be water baptized in Acts 10:47-48?
What does Jesus say in His great commission?
- teaching them to observe ALL things whatsoever I have commanded you...
- and Peter
commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord(by Jesus' authority)
Does your gospel teach to obey some things like belief or..
all things whatsoever I have commanded you
and this took place before he was water baptized
By your reasoning if someone receives miraculous gift before water baptism then they are saved before water baptism.
A big problem with that doctrine is not all recieved the Holy Spirit gift/gifts before they were water baptized.
Some received it after they were water baptized.
You already admitted miraculous gifts does not save.
Acts 19:1-7,
- Paul said unto them,
have ye recieved the Holy Spirit since ye BELIEVED, and they said unto him, we have not so much as heard whether there is a Holy Spirit
- then said Paul John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance saying unto the people that they should
believe on Jesus which should come after John that is on Christ Jesus,
V 5) - when they heard this they were baptized in the name of Jesus Christ(water baptized)
Not yet given miraculous gifts untill after their water baptism in the name of Christ Jesus.
V 6)
- and when Paul had laid His hands on them
the Holy Spirit came upon them AND THEY SPAKE WITH TONGUES AND PROPHESIED
If my preacher was describing a previous sermon by saying, "As I began to preach the Holy Spirit convicted the congregation"
Let's have Peter tell us what convicted Cornelius to obey the gospel unto salvation.
Did Peter say what you said?
That a miraculous gift from the Holy Spirit saved Cornelius BEFORE he heard the full gospel preached to him or the WORDS Peter preached to him?
Acts 11:14,
- who shall tell thee
words(gospel) whereby thou and all thy household shall be saved
We both agree tongue speaking didn't save Cornelius.
But the gospel that Peter was sent to preach to Cornelius did!!!