The Hypostatic Union- the 2 Natures in Christ

man in eden is not man on this earth in this ape body prison
this is not a ape body, but a fallen temporal body with blood. but just not in fellowship. understand the relationship between God and man never changed... he is our Father, and we are his sons... but the enjoyment of that relationship which was broken fellowship when Adam disobeyed. as said we will get new bodies when he return.... but from the beginning all that he made was "GOOD".

101G
 
this is not a ape body, but a fallen temporal body with blood. but just not in fellowship. understand the relationship between God and man never changed... he is our Father, and we are his sons... but the enjoyment of that relationship which was broken fellowship when Adam disobeyed. as said we will get new bodies when he return.... but from the beginning all that he made was "GOOD".

101G
this body and earth are not what He made.
 
if jesus was in a body such as yours then it was a sin body. fallen body. having or not an earthly father is not relevant to that.
Let's open with what John has to say on the subject. I John 4 "2 By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, 3 and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God." So why do you believe that Jesus did not come in the flesh, in the form (likeness and nature) of a man? God says in scripture that sin entered the world by way of ONE MAN, not a woman, and by sin death. The sin nature, which is not the nature of man but has corrupted God's perfect creation of man by the sin of Adam, is passed on by the father to the children. So, by not having an earthly father, Jesus did not have a sin nature. Flesh, in and of itself, that is matter, is not evil. It is the gnostic heretics that teach the flesh/matter is evil in and of itself. What does that say of God who created it?
 
Last edited:
Athanasius (in On the Incarnation) :

“The Word was not hedged in by his body, nor did his presence in the body prevent his being present elsewhere as well. When he moved his body he did not cease also to direct the universe by his mind and might. No. The marvelous truth is, that being the Word, so far from being himself contained by anything, he actually contained all things himself…

“As with the whole, so also is it with the part. Existing in a human body, to which he himself gives life, he is still source of life to all the universe, present in every part of it, yet outside the whole; and he is revealed both through the works of his body and through his activity in the world. It is, indeed, the function of soul to behold things that are outside the body, but it cannot energize or move them. A man cannot transport things from one place to another, for instance, merely by thinking about them; nor can you or I move the sun and the stars just by sitting at home and looking at them. With the Word of God in his human nature, however, it was otherwise. His body was for him not a limitation, but an instrument, so that he was both in it and in all things, and outside all things, resting in the Father alone. At one and the same time—this is the wonder—as man he was living a human life, and as Word he was sustaining the life of the universe, and as Son he was in constant union with the Father…”
I’m not sure why this topic is even up for debate with Trinitarians. Soldier on @civic. As you articulated in this thread and the other threads the son of God is eternal.
 
Back
Top Bottom