Refuting effectually caused faith

My fancy Vatican?

I am not Catholic

Are you arguing for the received majority text over the more modern texts?

Notice carefully that i addressed the "my Vatican" to "Reader".

And im not arguing at all.
Im showing/explaining/revealing = the simple manuscript evidence regarding "extant" Greek Texts.
 
Notice carefully that i addressed the "my Vatican" to "Reader".

And im not arguing at all.
Im showing/explaining/revealing = the simple manuscript evidence regarding "extant" Greek Texts.
Which extant Greek text is that which your trusted Bible is translated from?
 
Notice carefully that i addressed the "my Vatican" to "Reader".

And im not arguing at all.
Im showing/explaining/revealing = the simple manuscript evidence regarding "extant" Greek Texts.
Which you believe favors the received (majority) text?
 
None that state what you claim.
Yes they do, it may not say it in the verbatim letter you are asking,but it doesnt have to be, it can be spiritually discerned by comparing spiritual thigs with spiritual things. You are demanding human wisdom, mere letter. One has to be granted understanding to understand scripture spiritually. 1 Cor 2:14

Lk 24 45

Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,

So it states what I claim, but not in a way you understand.
 
Yes they do, it may not say it in the verbatim letter you are asking,but it doesnt have to be, it can be spiritually discerned by comparing spiritual thigs with spiritual things. You are demanding human wisdom, mere letter. One has to be granted understanding to understand scripture spiritually. 1 Cor 2:14

Lk 24 45

Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,

So it states what I claim, but not in a way you understand.
Sorry that is gobble gook for you do not have a verse
 
Back
Top Bottom