Could you clarify that a little bit please? How could you possibly know what everyone here thinks?…. and everyone here thought that Acts 2:38 was an option or just some random verse.
Opposed? not to the word of God, but to your corrupt understanding of Acts 2:38. In its context we love it, for its flows perfectly with all scriptures, when properly understood~you and your 3000 as you called them labor to put Acts 2:38 in a vacuum, as desire to make others believe it is, so you can labor to isolate it from other scriptures, in order to attempt to support your false gospel. It may work on the minds of the unlearned, but not on those who have and know the truth.Because everybody is opposed to obeying it. There may be an occasional exception, but the rule is Acts 2:38 is unnecessary.
Modern Christendom? There you go again. If one knows the history of the Christian faith you must confess that your "jesus only baptism" for the remission of sins, is modern, not church taught what you teach up until around 1913, or so. The movement likely began in 1913 with R.E. McAlister, who, following the formula for baptism found in the Acts of the Apostles (2:38) rather than that in the Gospel According to Matthew, taught that water baptism in the early church was done not according to the familiar Trinitarian formula. See also: On April 15, 1914, Ewart and Glenn Cook publicly baptized each other in "the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, but as the one name of Jesus, not as a Trinitarian formula." This is considered to be the historical point when Oneness Pentecostalism emerged as a distinct movement.This is modern Christendom at its worst.
Agreed 100%I don't believe smoking cigarettes are sin either. I've never smoked, I just can't stand the smell of them. I heard somebody say one time that smoking cigarettes won't keep a Christian out of heaven it'll just make it smell like hell when they get there.
Same thing with alcohol. I don't think drinking in moderation Is a problem. But drunkenness is a different story.
Galatians 5:19–21: "The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: ... drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God." Ephesians 5:18: "Do not get drunk on wine, which leads to debauchery.
Never said they were never real, that was not my point in posting what I said. I carefully said this to you:So are you saying that my experience of being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of my sins in 1979 and instantly losing the desire to drink and smoke cigarettes, including the desire to use the Lord‘s name in vain, etc., and control my other passions was not real?
So, your instant deliverance may only changed you into a modern day Pharisee, that I do not know, you must decide by being honest to yourself and that by using the scriptures.
Not modern day deliverance as preach by folks like you, Jimmy Swaggart, and many others. Some things are easily put off immediately, others over time by learning God's will more perfectly which comes with spiritual growth and faith.I guess you don’t believe in deliverance ministry, huh?
No one here as far as I can remember has ever said one can be a child of God without repenting of their former life. The old former life clothes come off slowly over time for the most part. We do immediately repent of known sins "that the word of God calls sins" which is the transgression of God's laws, not a transgression of man's made commandments! Our practical sanctification is progressive.To say that you are saved without repenting
Do you know that Christians had their own Egypt bonds of sinning to deal with? They had their own pharaoh devil etc to deal with. They had their own red sea deliverance, which is a type of water baptism in the name of Jesus? They had their own shouting on the other side experience, which is a type of receiving the Holy Ghost? do you believe in any of that?
Personably, you are not making a lot of biblical sense~Paul's saw it much different than what you are attempting to say.Also, in the tabernacle, the priest killed the animal…Jesus died…and we die.
The priest washed at the laver…Jesus was baptized…and we are baptized.
The priest entered into the holiest of holies…Jesus passed the veil…and we pass the veil by receiving the Holy Ghost. All of this is done by obeying Acts 2:38.
Unless we follow Jesus, this particular way through his death, burial, and resurrection then we are not in the priesthood of God today.
Your post is a perfect example of what I am saying.Opposed? not to the word of God, but to your corrupt understanding of Acts 2:38. In its context we love it, for its flows perfectly with all scriptures, when properly understood~you and your 3000 as you called them labor to put Acts 2:38 in a vacuum, as desire to make others believe it is, so you can labor to isolate it from other scriptures, in order to attempt to support your false gospel. It may work on the minds of the unlearned, but not on those who have and know the truth.
Modern Christendom? There you go again. If one knows the history of the Christian faith you must confess that your "jesus only baptism" for the remission of sins, is modern, not church taught what you teach up until around 1913, or so. The movement likely began in 1913 with R.E. McAlister, who, following the formula for baptism found in the Acts of the Apostles (2:38) rather than that in the Gospel According to Matthew, taught that water baptism in the early church was done not according to the familiar Trinitarian formula. See also: On April 15, 1914, Ewart and Glenn Cook publicly baptized each other in "the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, but as the one name of Jesus, not as a Trinitarian formula." This is considered to be the historical point when Oneness Pentecostalism emerged as a distinct movement.
Now, who is modern and who are historically scriptural? Actually as I said earlier, we baptized new converts "in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, even in the name of Jesus Christ"~not that it adds anything to their salvation, but all bases are fully covered from allowing gainsayers like you have anything to say. For the truth is:
Galatians 6:15~“For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.”
Why did you bring up Swaggert?Never said they were never real, that was not my point in posting what I said. I carefully said this to you:
Not modern day deliverance as preach by folks like you, Jimmy Swaggart, and many others. Some things are easily put off immediately, others over time by learning God's will more perfectly which comes with spiritual growth and faith.
Hebrews 12:1~"Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us," New born babes in Christ need to be taught what is sin and what is the will of God for their life. Certain gross sins need not to be taught to be wrong, by nature we know certain sins are wrong.
No one here as far as I can remember has ever said one can be a child of God without repenting of their former life. The old former life clothes come off slowly over time for the most part. We do immediately repent of known sins "that the word of God calls sins" which is the transgression of God's laws, not a transgression of man's made commandments! Our practical sanctification is progressive.
1st Thessalonians 4:1-9~" Furthermore then we beseech you, brethren, and exhort you by the Lord Jesus, that as ye have received of us how ye ought to walk and to please God, so ye would abound more and more. For ye know what commandments we gave you by the Lord Jesus. For this is the will of God, even your sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication: That every one of you should know how to possess his vessel in sanctification and honour; Not in the lust of concupiscence, even as the Gentiles which know not God: That no man go beyond and defraud his brother in any matter: because that the Lord is the avenger of all such, as we also have forewarned you and testified. For God hath not called us unto uncleanness, but unto holiness. He therefore that despiseth, despiseth not man, but God, who hath also given unto us his holy Spirit. But as touching brotherly love ye need not that I write unto you: for ye yourselves are taught of God to love one another. And indeed ye do it toward all the brethren which are in all Macedonia: but we beseech you, brethren, that ye increase more and more;"
Never perfect, constantly increasing.
Personably, you are not making a lot of biblical sense~Paul's saw it much different than what you are attempting to say.
1st Corinthians 10:1-14~'Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;
(no mention of being baptized in Jesus' name as you desire for others to believe...they were baptized unto Moses, not in Jesus' name only~RB)
And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.
(in his deity as I AM THAT I AM)
But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness. Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted. Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play. Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand. Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents. Neither murmur ye, as some of them also murmured, and were destroyed of the destroyer. Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come. Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall. There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it. Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry."
Paul's take on this is much different than yours, his lessons I can and should learn, yours is strange to say the least.
Would you like to debate me one on one on Acts 2:14-40, that determines the truth of what Peter meant when he spoke 2:38? I'm ready, are you?Your post is a perfect example of what I am saying.
You absolutely rejected Acts 2:38 in it.
I' am not, I'm a member of 'The General Assembly, Church of the Firstborn" whose names are written in the Lamb's book of life from the foundation of the world.You are not in the church of 3000, but in a daughter work of the RCC. Your personal origin starts with her….An Acts 2:38 skipper.
Let's debate!Would you like to debate me one on one on Acts 2:14-40, that determines the truth of what Peter meant when he spoke 2:38? I'm ready, are you?
I' am not, I'm a member of 'The General Assembly, Church of the Firstborn" whose names are written in the Lamb's book of life from the foundation of the world.
Hebrews 12:22,23~"But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels, To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,"
@Red BakerNever said they were never real, that was not my point in posting what I said. I carefully said this to you:
Not modern day deliverance as preach by folks like you, Jimmy Swaggart, and many others. Some things are easily put off immediately, others over time by learning God's will more perfectly which comes with spiritual growth and faith.
Hebrews 12:1~"Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us," New born babes in Christ need to be taught what is sin and what is the will of God for their life. Certain gross sins need not to be taught to be wrong, by nature we know certain sins are wrong.
No one here as far as I can remember has ever said one can be a child of God without repenting of their former life. The old former life clothes come off slowly over time for the most part. We do immediately repent of known sins "that the word of God calls sins" which is the transgression of God's laws, not a transgression of man's made commandments! Our practical sanctification is progressive.
1st Thessalonians 4:1-9~" Furthermore then we beseech you, brethren, and exhort you by the Lord Jesus, that as ye have received of us how ye ought to walk and to please God, so ye would abound more and more. For ye know what commandments we gave you by the Lord Jesus. For this is the will of God, even your sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication: That every one of you should know how to possess his vessel in sanctification and honour; Not in the lust of concupiscence, even as the Gentiles which know not God: That no man go beyond and defraud his brother in any matter: because that the Lord is the avenger of all such, as we also have forewarned you and testified. For God hath not called us unto uncleanness, but unto holiness. He therefore that despiseth, despiseth not man, but God, who hath also given unto us his holy Spirit. But as touching brotherly love ye need not that I write unto you: for ye yourselves are taught of God to love one another. And indeed ye do it toward all the brethren which are in all Macedonia: but we beseech you, brethren, that ye increase more and more;"
Never perfect, constantly increasing.
Personably, you are not making a lot of biblical sense~Paul's saw it much different than what you are attempting to say.
1st Corinthians 10:1-14~'Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;
(no mention of being baptized in Jesus' name as you desire for others to believe...they were baptized unto Moses, not in Jesus' name only~RB)
And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.
(in his deity as I AM THAT I AM)
But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness. Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted. Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play. Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand. Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents. Neither murmur ye, as some of them also murmured, and were destroyed of the destroyer. Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come. Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall. There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it. Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry."
Paul's take on this is much different than yours, his lessons I can and should learn, yours is strange to say the least.
I will follow Jesus... no turning back!....Men and brethren, what shall we do?
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins....
The question is...WHAT SHALL YOU DO?
That's not the way I see it. But you should tell him and not me. He seems to do pretty well at explaining what he is talking about.Actually, what he is talking about is making obedience to Acts 2:38 irrelevant.