Mark 16:16~"He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

That's not Paul's Gospel, that you posted.

Here is Paul's Gospel.

"The Preaching of the Cross... Is the Power of God unto SALVATION....for/to everyone who Believes".

Here is another way to see it .....

"All who Call on the Name of JESUS.. .shall be saved"..'

Here is How Jesus explained it... "ALL who believe in Me.... i give unto you.....Eternal Life, and you shall NEVER go to Hell (perish).'"

And here is Paul again.

"To THOSE who worketh not.. .but BELIEVE On HIM who Justifies.. the... UN-God-Ly... = their FAITH.... is Counted by God, as (Christ's) Righteousness".
So this was written backwards?...

16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved;


It should have said this?...

16 He that believeth and is SAVED shall be BAPTIZED;?

That is what you just said.

You need to stop cherry picking scripture and read the AND IS.
 
I seriously doubt that it's even possible for you to make demons tremble. You're giving yourself way too much credit.

You say you have faith, for you believe that there is one God. Good for you! Even the demons believe this, and they tremble in terror. James 2:19

James is talking about passive faith. So your statement is taking away out of context.

James implies that demonic faith is greater than the fraudulent faith of a false professor, for demonic faith produces fear, whereas unsaved men have “no fear of God before their eyes” ( Rom. 3:18 ). If the demons believe, tremble, and are not saved, what does that say about those who profess to believe and don’t even tremble? (cf. Isa. 66:2 , 5 ). From "The faith that doesn't work" by J MacArthur
I don't make them tremble...the name of Jesus I speak does.

It is not what you think but what you say...

17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils...
 
So this was written backwards?...

16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved;


It should have said this?...

16 He that believeth and is SAVED shall be BAPTIZED;?

That is what you just said.

You need to stop cherry picking scripture and read the AND IS.

Paul said..>"Christ sent me NOT to Water Baptize"..

And that "not' does not mean....>"dont water baptize"........
= Paul is explaining, ""im not here for that, im here to Preach the Cross because "The Cross is the POWER of GOD, unto Salvation to everyone one who BELIEVES...""......not Water Baptism.


So....The reason that Damnation is only related to BELIEVING< in your verse, is because the Water is not the SALVATION Part., so it can't be a part of the damnation.
 
Paul said..>"Christ sent me NOT to Water Baptize"..

And that "not' does not mean....>"dont water baptize"........
= Paul is explaining, ""im not here for that, im here to Preach the Cross because "The Cross is the POWER of GOD, unto Salvation to everyone one who BELIEVES...""......not Water Baptism.


So....The reason that Damnation is only related to BELIEVING< in your verse, is because the Water is not the SALVATION Part., so it can't be a part of the damnation.
And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.

Did Paul teach that baptism is unnecessary or did he give the duty to others?
 
Did Paul teach that baptism is unnecessary or did he give the duty to others?

Paul did baptize, and Paul was baptized.

However, the reason Paul goes to heaven, is because He is born again.

Water can't deal with your sin... because sin is in your heart/mind, and water baptism can't touch that........but the BLOOD of JESUS does..

Paul is explaining, ""im not here, im not sent by Jesus to water baptize ....., im sent by Jesus to Preach the Cross because "The Cross is the POWER of GOD, unto Salvation to everyone one who BELIEVES...""......not Water Baptism.

Always remember that you can be Born again and never be water baptized, and another person will go to Hell, who has been water baptized a few times, ..

And why do they go to hell?

Its because they were not born again...they were only Water Baptized and Religious.
 
I don't make them tremble...the name of Jesus I speak does.

It is not what you think but what you say...

17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils...
So how many demons have you spoken to in the name of Jesus that started trembling?
Let's start here...

38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.


...do you agree with the highlighted portion?
Actually that's not called highlighting that's called yelling. It's just annoying. This is how you highlight text
 
An exhortation to all.

I don't care if you teach 1 person, 2, 3 or 4 persons.

I don't care if you are pretrib or post.

I don't care what religion you subscribe to.

I don't care about our micro doctrines.

I only care if you obtain remission of sins by obeying Acts 2:38.
I don't care if it rains or freezes as long as I got my plastic Jesus riding on the dashboard of my car on my way to get baptized.
 
Without a doubt, the greatest controversy over baptism has centered on its role in salvation. As 50 pages of this thread most certainly shows us. Must a person be baptized to experience the new birth? This question has been an enormous point of contention in the history of the church.

One of the most stirring descriptions of the church is found in Ephesians 4:4–6, where we read: “There is one body and one Spirit—just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call—one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all.” The church is one body filled with one Spirit and united around one hope, worshiping one Lord and one God in one faith. And, we are told, there is one baptism.

Thanks to this passage and numerous other biblical affirmations, the sacrament of baptism has occupied a central role in the church throughout its history and is an important aspect of Christian worship. Yet we find that a great deal of controversy surrounds the subject of baptism.

It seems there are questions over just about every aspect of the sacrament: the origin or institution of baptism; the meaning of baptism; the administration of baptism' such as who is allowed. to baptize people.

The formula for baptism. Which one seems to have gotten a lot of traction in this thread. The question that arises Is baptism to be administered only in the name of Jesus or in the names of all three persons of the Trinity?

Then there's the mode of baptism, is baptism to be by sprinkling, pouring, dipping, or immersion and the proper recipients of baptism. Is it restricted to adults who have made credible professions of faith or may infants be baptized as well?

Another major controversy has to do with the efficacy of the sacrament. Such as what does baptism actually accomplish in the lives of those who receive it?

Most of these have been touched on in this thread and hopefully we can dig a Little Deeper
 
Its actually "Jesus THE Christ".....

And "all who call on the NAME of = Jesus/Yeshua, shall be saved".
Matt 1:18 - "Now the birth of Jesus Christ took place in this way."
Acts 2:38 - "And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."
1 Cor 8:6 - "and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things"
Phil 2:11 - "and that every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father."
Phil 3:20 - "But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ,"
Tit 2:13 - "Waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ,"
Heb 13:5 - "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today, and forever."
1 John 2:1 - "But if anyone does sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous."
Rev 1:5 - "And from Jesus Christ the faithful witness"

Sure, Christ is a title, not a name, but He is the only one to whom that title belongs, so it is as good as a name. There are many people today who bear the name Jesus, but none of them are worthy of the title Christ. Messiah is the Hebrew word with the same meaning as the Greek Christ (both transliterated into English).

"God has many names throughout the Bible: Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6), Elohim (Genesis 1:1), El Roi (Genesis 16:13), among several others. What about Jesus Christ? Every language has a different name for him, a different pronunciation. But does he have one true and proper name?

Yeshua Hamashiach means Jesus the Messiah. The original Hebraic name for Jesus would’ve been yeshu’a. Does this mean that we’ve pronounced Jesus’ name incorrectly this whole time? Does he only go by the name Yeshua Hamashiach? And has paganism corrupted Jesus’ name to the name we now pronounce?

This article will argue that although those who lived during Jesus’ time may have pronounced his name like “Yeshua,” we do not forsake our prayers or petitions unto the Lord by saying “Jesus” or “Hisus K’ristos” or “Isus Krist” or any other pronunciation in any other language.

God calls us to call upon his name, whether Jesus or Yeshua Hamashiach.

Where Did The Controversy of Yeshua vs. Jesus Start?

“What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?”

To say the Bible and Ancient Greek culture rubbed each other the wrong way is an understatement. From the Maccabean revolt against Antiochus Epiphanes IV to the Sadducees absorbing one too many Hellenistic traditions, those in Jesus’ day and beyond had a sore spot when it came to Hellenization.

Jesus’ name from Yeshua Hamashiach got Hellenized from the Greek word “IZEUS” or son of Zeus. This, of course, would be a far cry from proper theology if we took Jesus’ name to mean “Son of Zeus.” After all, Antiochus Epiphanes IV desecrated the temple by putting a statue of Zeus within it.

The idea that Jesus’ name came from anything related to the Greek pantheon would’ve been repugnant to Jews and Christians alike.

Of course, Jesus’ name may also have been a transliteration. After all, they wrote the New Testament in Greek, and so not all names will translate using the same letters across alphabets of different languages. The Latin transliteration took the Greek IESOUS and changed it to IESUS, where we get the English version “Jesus.”

It’s important to note the distinction between a translation and transliteration. In Spanish, my first name is Esperanza (translation). If we were to transliterate my name, it would probably be Jop (the J makes an “h” sound, and the ō makes a long “oh” sound)."
 
Christendom does not like to say Jesus in public. Notice it as you watch ministers pray at big events.

They say "God" or "Christ", but it makes them socially uncomfortable to say Jesus.

It is borderline demonic.(demons influence them from saying Jesus).
I have never noticed, or felt, any such reluctance. But then, since there is only one Christ, saying "Christ" is the same as saying "Jesus", and since Jesus is God, saying "Christ" is the same as saying "God".
 
Paul did baptize, and Paul was baptized.

However, the reason Paul goes to heaven, is because He is born again.

Water can't deal with your sin... because sin is in your heart/mind, and water baptism can't touch that........but the BLOOD of JESUS does..

Paul is explaining, ""im not here, im not sent by Jesus to water baptize ....., im sent by Jesus to Preach the Cross because "The Cross is the POWER of GOD, unto Salvation to everyone one who BELIEVES...""......not Water Baptism.

Always remember that you can be Born again and never be water baptized, and another person will go to Hell, who has been water baptized a few times, ..

And why do they go to hell?

Its because they were not born again...they were only Water Baptized and Religious.
An example of mass baptisms in the name of Jesus that you find irrelevant...


12 But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.

13 Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles and signs which were done.

14 Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John:

15 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost:

16 (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)
 
The Roman Catholic Church says the instrumental cause of justification is baptism. Rome proclaims that a person is justified when he or she is baptized by a priest. At baptism, the person receives an infusion, an inpouring, of grace in the soul. This grace is sometimes called the grace of the righteousness of Christ or the grace of justification. When it is infused into the soul of the person who is being baptized, that person enters a state of grace.

Denominations other than Roman Catholic say that justification is by faith alone. That little word by is critical to our understanding of how justification takes place. It does not mean that faith is meritorious and obligates God to save us. Rather, the word by indicates grammatically what we call the instrumental dative, which describes the means by which a thing comes to pass. So, faith is the instrumental cause of justification, and the widely held view.
 
I have never noticed, or felt, any such reluctance. But then, since there is only one Christ, saying "Christ" is the same as saying "Jesus", and since Jesus is God, saying "Christ" is the same as saying "God".
I ask you for the next month to only say "Jesus" when speaking of God.

I found it refreshing, spiritually.
 
The Roman Catholic Church says the instrumental cause of justification is baptism. Rome proclaims that a person is justified when he or she is baptized by a priest. At baptism, the person receives an infusion, an inpouring, of grace in the soul. This grace is sometimes called the grace of the righteousness of Christ or the grace of justification. When it is infused into the soul of the person who is being baptized, that person enters a state of grace.

Denominations other than Roman Catholic say that justification is by faith alone. That little word by is critical to our understanding of how justification takes place. It does not mean that faith is meritorious and obligates God to save us. Rather, the word by indicates grammatically what we call the instrumental dative, which describes the means by which a thing comes to pass. So, faith is the instrumental cause of justification, and the widely held view.
The RCC was the first official entity to teach others to skip Acts 2:38.

The protestants have not only skipped Acts 2:38 like their mother, they skipped baptism in the name of Jesus for the remission of their sins altogether.

They are way worse than their RCC mother.

They make her blush.
 
Back
Top Bottom