Judaism exposed in Peter

[praise_yeshua]

You'd probably get better engagement if you didn't order people around, seriously.

Just saying.

I don't expect you to actually give an answer. Excuses. Yes. I already know the answer.

You said he repented. You have no evidence of it. That is why I asked. Do as you please.

The context of the discussion demands you deal with this. You don't have to. Run away. Yet, don't pretend you're not running away. You are.

In all this, I'm not asking you to comply with me. I'm asking to you comply with the demands of reason and intellectual discourse.

 

[praise_yeshua]

For the sake of others who might read this ...
The passage was not designed to show the complete sequence of events and any correction by Peter. The passage functionally is to contribute to seeing Paul's consistency in standing against works of the law. If we fail to recognize Paul's purpose, we can be a backseat driver and try to tell Paul what he should have included in his account.

More excuses from you. Remember what excuses are....... Remember you're not a teacher. Debate is for teachers. If you want to learn, then ask.

For the sake of everyone......

Paul wrote a letter to believers to revealing Peter's sin to everyone. There is no evidence that Peter repented. None. In fact, in analyzing where this letter fits into revelation of the NT.......

Compare the timing of this letter to Peter's vision.....

Not that "mikesw" will admit this. His goals obviously are not the truth. His goal is his own personal narrative. Thank God for the Scriptures.

 

[Studyman]

Not true at all. I included the Scriptures that provided the narrative. That details what he did.



Do I really have to state the obvious again.

If this was a "one time" event. Then Paul would have talked to him personally. The Scriptures demand it. Are you really that dense?

Paul rebuked HIM before ALL...... and then told all those in Galatia about it in A LETTER that we still have today. So every one can know about it.

Pay attention to what you read.

I never said Peter wasn't in the wrong, nor did I even imply that Paul's rebuke was not justified. But you said I did. Now you want to move on as if you didn't.

Perhaps you should pay attention to what you write and be a man when you get caught lying, and repent. I am happy to forgive you if you do. I'm sure God will too, if your repentance is from the heart.