Jesus denied being God

The Bible explicitly says that the "one God" is the Father repeatedly. It's amazing trinitarians simply don't believe that and yet argue so vigorously over a god the Bible never defines.
ahem. Name a trinitarian who says there are many gods. It is again silly of you to repeat JOhn 17:3 is isolation while rejecting that Jesus would regain the glory he had with God before his incarnation. You repeat a lie enough times and it still remains a lie in how you abuse John 17:3 and 5.
 
The Bible explicitly says that the "one God" is the Father repeatedly. It's amazing trinitarians simply don't believe that and yet argue so vigorously over a god the Bible never defines.
I have noticed intelligent and informed input on the subject of debating the Trinity comes from the unitarian camp. It seems low intelligence, ignorance, and an incapacity for critical thought are prerequisites for membership in trinitarian circles.
 
Isaiah 44:6,8
I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.
Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.

Isaiah 45:21-22
there is no God else beside me; a just God and a Saviour; there is none beside me.
for I am God, and there is none else.

Hosea 13:4
Yet I am the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me:
I don't see the " FATHER " mentioned anywhere in those passages.

nice try- its like your same criteria you have for Christians with the Deity of Christ. This works both ways. :)
 
I have noticed intelligent and informed input on the subject of debating the Trinity comes from the unitarian camp. It seems low intelligence, ignorance, and an incapacity for critical thought are prerequisites for membership in trinitarian circles.
This sounds much like what God condemns- Pride comes before a fall. God resists the proud and gives grace to the humble. Your claims/statement is not only biased, but uninformed. You are making an emotional argument not one based upon facts.

I could say just the opposite that Academia is filled with Trinitarians in seminaries and higher education with doctorates, not unitarians.

In fact I just fact checked this with AI- its 98%.

hope this helps !!!
 
Have WE not ALL ONE Father? Has not ONE GOD created US? Why then are we faithless to one another, profaning the covenant of our fathers? [Malachi 2:10]
 
John 17:5 has been used to prove that Jesus is God because of the phrase...

“that I had with you before the world was.” There is no question that Jesus “existed” before the world began. But did he exist literally as a person or in God’s foreknowledge “in the mind of God”? Both Christ and those called to be in the Body of Christ "the Church" existed in God’s foreknowledge before being alive. Christ was part of the intention of God from the beginning, and he became flesh only when he was conceived. It's Trinitarian bias that causes people to read an actual physical existence into this verse rather than a figurative existence in the mind of God. No one tries to prove that we were actually alive with God back when 2 Timothy says that each Christian was given grace “before the world began” (2 Timothy. 1:9). Everyone acknowledges that we were “in the mind of God” i.e., in God’s foreknowledge. The same is true of Jesus Christ. His glory was “with the Father” before the world began, and in John 17:5 he prayed that it would come into manifestation.
 
Did Jesus take on his father's spiritual nature?

John 4:24
God is a Spirit:

Hebrews 2:16
For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.
 
Let's see. We already went over your angel of the Lord argument and you failed to demonstrate that the angel is Jesus. We went over Daniel 7 and you failed to prove that the Son of Man in this chapter is not a future prophecy, actually I proved it's future. We went over the "Word of the Lord" arguments that appear in verses the Old Testament and nothing about it says that it's a pre-existent pre-incarnate Jesus nor shows that it is a distinct person who is God. We went over Abraham's three visitors and you couldn't prove any of them are Jesus. We went over Jacob wrestling with an angel, a rock following the Israelites, etc. Nothing there states that that is a pre-existent Jesus. You have ran out talking points.
We are NOT arguing for a preexistent Jesus of Nazath, but DO see that he before the Incantation as becoming Jesus was "just" fully God, and indeed was Angel of the Lord, Daniel Son of man, one who spoke to Abraham in the OT
 
Alleged christophanies are not provable. Your arguments are essentially "that's the pre-existent Jesus because I said so" which isn't a valid argument. No one said that Jesus pre-existed as an angel. No one said Jesus pre-existed at all. Your pre-existence doctrine is not supported by Scripture. I also believe you have already been shown that your argument about Jesus being foreknown doesn't mean pre-existence since others were foreknown by God as well. I really would not want to be in your shoes. You're going to be on the defense for as long as you are on this board and I have no intention of releasing you anytime soon.
being very God in his nature before the Incarnation is what you are spiritually blinded to as truth
 
Isaiah 44:6,8
I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.
Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.

Isaiah 45:21-22
there is no God else beside me; a just God and a Saviour; there is none beside me.
for I am God, and there is none else.

Hosea 13:4
Yet I am the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me:
And Jesus is called savior, as he shall save his people from their sins
 
I have noticed intelligent and informed input on the subject of debating the Trinity comes from the unitarian camp. It seems low intelligence, ignorance, and an incapacity for critical thought are prerequisites for membership in trinitarian circles.
Trinitarians saying the trinity is an incomprehensible mystery is the only intelligent thing I have seen them say about the topic. Most of the trinitarians I have talked to in real life admit to not understanding it, not being able to explain it, and having no references to it throughout the entire Bible. We can work with that kind of honesty and humility.

I think most of them want to be honest and non-combative about it and have good intentions, though, and most importantly are willing to listen to sound doctrine about God that can actually be explained with good reason and solid Biblical support, but most of the ones I have seen very militant about it are on message boards. There are literally a handful of the same people on every message board I have seen that will fight over it, lose every Scriptural debate about it, and still keep trucking. Why? Because Scripture, common sense, and logic can't change what someone believes if their heart and mind are not predisposed to truth. The trinity a spiritual prison for some of them.
 
Have WE not ALL ONE Father? Has not ONE GOD created US? Why then are we faithless to one another, profaning the covenant of our fathers? [Malachi 2:10]
Also:
But now, O LORD, you are our Father;
we are the clay, and you are our potter;
we are all the work of your hand. [Isaiah 64:8]
and another:

For you are our Father, though Abraham does not know us, and Israel does not acknowledge us; you, O LORD, are our Father,
our Redeemer from of old is your name. [Isaiah 63:16]
 
Last edited:
Did Jesus take on his father's spiritual nature?

John 4:24
God is a Spirit:

Hebrews 2:16
For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.
Duhhh. That is sort of an adoptionist view you are speaking again. Is that how unitarians get confused? They create strawmen based on heresies as if that speaks against the scriptural testimony of the deity of Christ. Obviously Jesus starts with preexistence as deity which then allows him to take on humanity. However, the translation used by Peterlag is wrong.

Heb 2:16 (ESV)
For surely it is not angels that he helps, but he helps the offspring of Abraham.

For Christians who read this post, Heb 2:16 makes sense with this explanation
The picture of Christ, the ἀρχηγός, taking hold of his followers on the way to glory is in perfect conformity with the imagery of the whole passage. That action is not simply a part of Christ’s past but, as the present tense suggests, one in which he is yet engaged.178
Harold W. Attridge and Helmut Koester, The Epistle to the Hebrews Hermeneia, Fortress Press, 1989, 94.
 
Back
Top Bottom