Runningman
Active Member
The Bible explicitly says that the "one God" is the Father repeatedly. It's amazing trinitarians simply don't believe that and yet argue so vigorously over a god the Bible never defines.
The Bible explicitly says that the "one God" is the Father repeatedly. It's amazing trinitarians simply don't believe that and yet argue so vigorously over a god the Bible never defines.
ahem. Name a trinitarian who says there are many gods. It is again silly of you to repeat JOhn 17:3 is isolation while rejecting that Jesus would regain the glory he had with God before his incarnation. You repeat a lie enough times and it still remains a lie in how you abuse John 17:3 and 5.The Bible explicitly says that the "one God" is the Father repeatedly. It's amazing trinitarians simply don't believe that and yet argue so vigorously over a god the Bible never defines.
I have noticed intelligent and informed input on the subject of debating the Trinity comes from the unitarian camp. It seems low intelligence, ignorance, and an incapacity for critical thought are prerequisites for membership in trinitarian circles.The Bible explicitly says that the "one God" is the Father repeatedly. It's amazing trinitarians simply don't believe that and yet argue so vigorously over a god the Bible never defines.
I don't see the " FATHER " mentioned anywhere in those passages.Isaiah 44:6,8
I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.
Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.
Isaiah 45:21-22
there is no God else beside me; a just God and a Saviour; there is none beside me.
for I am God, and there is none else.
Hosea 13:4
Yet I am the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me:
This sounds much like what God condemns- Pride comes before a fall. God resists the proud and gives grace to the humble. Your claims/statement is not only biased, but uninformed. You are making an emotional argument not one based upon facts.I have noticed intelligent and informed input on the subject of debating the Trinity comes from the unitarian camp. It seems low intelligence, ignorance, and an incapacity for critical thought are prerequisites for membership in trinitarian circles.
That's sad.I don't see the " FATHER " mentioned anywhere in those passages.
nice try- its like your same criteria you have for Christians with the Deity of Christ. This works both ways.![]()
Yes it was since you could not prove it was the " FATHER " .That's sad.
never states Jesus was inferior, nor was a created person, but that he agreed while in human flesh upon this Earth to assume the role of the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53Jesus did not eternally exist as God or a being either. Scripture states the Son is inferior to God.
whichdoes NOT preclude Jesus was not also God Himself , as He and the father are OneNo it's not in the Bible anywhere. It explicitly states the Father is alone the true God. (John 17:1-3)
Thomas worshipped Him, as did Stephen, as did the Elders and AngelsNo the Lamb did not receive worship in heaven. See Revelation 5:7-13.
We are NOT arguing for a preexistent Jesus of Nazath, but DO see that he before the Incantation as becoming Jesus was "just" fully God, and indeed was Angel of the Lord, Daniel Son of man, one who spoke to Abraham in the OTLet's see. We already went over your angel of the Lord argument and you failed to demonstrate that the angel is Jesus. We went over Daniel 7 and you failed to prove that the Son of Man in this chapter is not a future prophecy, actually I proved it's future. We went over the "Word of the Lord" arguments that appear in verses the Old Testament and nothing about it says that it's a pre-existent pre-incarnate Jesus nor shows that it is a distinct person who is God. We went over Abraham's three visitors and you couldn't prove any of them are Jesus. We went over Jacob wrestling with an angel, a rock following the Israelites, etc. Nothing there states that that is a pre-existent Jesus. You have ran out talking points.
being very God in his nature before the Incarnation is what you are spiritually blinded to as truthAlleged christophanies are not provable. Your arguments are essentially "that's the pre-existent Jesus because I said so" which isn't a valid argument. No one said that Jesus pre-existed as an angel. No one said Jesus pre-existed at all. Your pre-existence doctrine is not supported by Scripture. I also believe you have already been shown that your argument about Jesus being foreknown doesn't mean pre-existence since others were foreknown by God as well. I really would not want to be in your shoes. You're going to be on the defense for as long as you are on this board and I have no intention of releasing you anytime soon.
And Jesus is called savior, as he shall save his people from their sinsIsaiah 44:6,8
I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.
Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.
Isaiah 45:21-22
there is no God else beside me; a just God and a Saviour; there is none beside me.
for I am God, and there is none else.
Hosea 13:4
Yet I am the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me:
Trinitarians saying the trinity is an incomprehensible mystery is the only intelligent thing I have seen them say about the topic. Most of the trinitarians I have talked to in real life admit to not understanding it, not being able to explain it, and having no references to it throughout the entire Bible. We can work with that kind of honesty and humility.I have noticed intelligent and informed input on the subject of debating the Trinity comes from the unitarian camp. It seems low intelligence, ignorance, and an incapacity for critical thought are prerequisites for membership in trinitarian circles.
Both God and Jesus are mentioned as Savior. God who saved us and Jesus that accomplished God's plan to get it done.And Jesus is called savior, as he shall save his people from their sins
Also:Have WE not ALL ONE Father? Has not ONE GOD created US? Why then are we faithless to one another, profaning the covenant of our fathers? [Malachi 2:10]
Duhhh. That is sort of an adoptionist view you are speaking again. Is that how unitarians get confused? They create strawmen based on heresies as if that speaks against the scriptural testimony of the deity of Christ. Obviously Jesus starts with preexistence as deity which then allows him to take on humanity. However, the translation used by Peterlag is wrong.Did Jesus take on his father's spiritual nature?
John 4:24
God is a Spirit:
Hebrews 2:16
For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.
The picture of Christ, the ἀρχηγός, taking hold of his followers on the way to glory is in perfect conformity with the imagery of the whole passage. That action is not simply a part of Christ’s past but, as the present tense suggests, one in which he is yet engaged.178
Harold W. Attridge and Helmut Koester, The Epistle to the Hebrews Hermeneia, Fortress Press, 1989, 94.