Jesus denied being God

I see that you are accusing him of such behavior, but you provide no evidence, and I have read his posts and have found that he honors and worships the SAME God that Jesus honored and worshipped. In fact, the EXACT Same God. And although he is privy to other gods (that are no gods), like Mithra, Zeus etc., he doesn't treat them in the same way as he does the One True God, the Father of the Jesus of the Bible.

I'm not sure why you would accuse him of such things.

There is an "image of God" that is created and promoted by this world's religions, "who come in Christ's Name". It is an image of God created in the likeness of a very handsome, long-haired man. There are statues and billboards and pictures of this "image of God", worshipped as God all over this world. The Jesus "of the Bible" that I have come to know, would never engage in or advocate in such behavior as it goes against the first and greatest commandment given us by His Father. As HE Himself teaches.

Luke 4: 3 And the devil said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, command this stone that it be made bread.

4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, "but by every word of God".

5 And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.

6 And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: "for that is delivered unto me"; and to whomsoever I will I give it.

I know you will not answer my questions, as I have asked you questions many times, but to no avail. Nevertheless, I will ask another. "Who gave satan the power over all the kingdoms of this world?" And again: Was the religious sect of the Pharisees a "Kingdom of this world"?

7 If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.

8 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the "Lord thy God", and him only shalt thou serve.

Didn't the Jesus "of the bible" say ""Seek you first the Kingdom of God and HIS Righteousness".

And when we find Him, what will HE do? Will HE not give us to HIS Son for cleansing?

Where is the Jesus "of the Bible" right now, if not at His Father's Mansion preparing a place for us? Where is the Jesus "of the Bible" at right now, if not at His Father's Right Hand, advocating between us and His God and my God? What is the Jesus "of the Bible" doing right now, if not Praying to His Father that HE might give the Spirit of Truth to those "true worshippers who worship His Father in Spirit and in Truth"?
All I can assume is that you are not following the discussions. He says all these religions are pointing to the same god and all people have to do is repent within their religion and they will be saved.
 
yet you do not use exegesis in your method but instead eisegesis since you read every passage in the Bible through a unitarian lens which is biased and reveals your personal presuppositions when reading the scriptures.

That is a fact and you failed the college course of Hermeneutics 101.

conclusion : guilty as charged. :)

hope this helps !!!
I do believe there's no trinity and I find no trinity in every verse that you say supports the trinity. It got very heated when conversing with another on here who would accuse not what I posted as being not correct, but saying because I did not personally write what I was posting that somehow that made the data not correct. Such thinking I consider foolish.

Concerning what you post above... yeah, I am 100 percent biased because I don't see the trinity anywhere. I have not really been given the opportunity to post many verses that I believe teach Jesus was a man because the group here keep yelling for me to answer their questions.

I believe even if I did post data showing that Jesus was a man that it would just be met with well, that was his man part being talked about because he put his God part aside. Even though there's no teaching that he put his man part aside or even how that could be possible. And even that is met with that all things are possible with God. So I can't win a debate where the rules are not the same. Things have to be possible and my side needs to be posted and talked about and not just ignored and then they post 25 other verses and ask me to respond to them.

So I'm taking a break from the thread for a while.
 
I do believe there's no trinity and I find no trinity in every verse that you say supports the trinity. It got very heated when conversing with another on here who would accuse not what I posted as being not correct, but saying because I did not personally write what I was posting that somehow that made the data not correct. Such thinking I consider foolish.

Concerning what you post above... yeah, I am 100 percent biased because I don't see the trinity anywhere. I have not really been given the opportunity to post many verses that I believe teach Jesus was a man because the group here keep yelling for me to answer their questions.

I believe even if I did post data showing that Jesus was a man that it would just be met with well, that was his man part being talked about because he put his God part aside. Even though there's no teaching that he put his man part aside or even how that could be possible. And even that is met with that all things are possible with God. So I can't win a debate where the rules are not the same. Things have to be possible and my side needs to be posted and talked about and not just ignored and then they post 25 other verses and ask me to respond to them.

So I'm taking a break from the thread for a while.
We can leave the " Trinity " out of the discussion for all I care.

The issue is what does the text say regarding Christ. And in many places He is identified as God in the text and called God by several Apostles in their writings. He is also worshiped and prayed to things only a Jew would apply to God, no mere man.
 
We can leave the " Trinity " out of the discussion for all I care.

The issue is what does the text say regarding Christ. And in many places He is identified as God in the text and called God by several Apostles in their writings. He is also worshiped and prayed to things only a Jew would apply to God, no mere man.
Your point about "Trinity" not needing to be part of this discussion is useful. My first concern is that people recognize the deity of Christ. When examining the NT writings, there was no challenge against the deity of Christ and thus no clarification of doctrines about that in the NT
 
We can leave the " Trinity " out of the discussion for all I care.

The issue is what does the text say regarding Christ. And in many places He is identified as God in the text and called God by several Apostles in their writings. He is also worshiped and prayed to things only a Jew would apply to God, no mere man.
Jesus is not identified in the Bible as God. You see the trinity only if you read it with your Catholic brain. And don't say you're not Catholic because the trinity is a Catholic concept. Nobody ever wrote about it until they did. You say yeah the Bible did. I disagree.
 
Jesus is not identified in the Bible as God. You see the trinity only if you read it with your Catholic brain. And don't say you're not Catholic because the trinity is a Catholic concept. Nobody ever wrote about it until they did. You say yeah the Bible did. I disagree.
Again we see that element common with the JWs about anachronistically attributing the nature of God narrowly to (Roman) Catholic doctrine. Also, Peterlag did not agree to focus on the deity of Christ issue rather than the Triune nature of God. The Council of Nicea was in 325 and only involves Christ. This is much earlier decision on the best representation of Christ's deity and avoids supposed politics of later years.
 
Last edited:
Jesus is not identified in the Bible as God. You see the trinity only if you read it with your Catholic brain. And don't say you're not Catholic because the trinity is a Catholic concept. Nobody ever wrote about it until they did. You say yeah the Bible did. I disagree.
You are Turning a blind eye to scripture and denying the clear teaching of the Apostles who called Him God. Those , John, Peter, Paul and the Author of Hebrews all identify Christ as God.
 
Last edited:
You are Turing a blind eye to scripture and denting the clear teaching of the Apostles who called Him God. Those , John, Peter, Paul and the Author of Hebrews all identify Christ as God.
I figured out the turing part quickly. The denting point was harder to deny. Forgive me for noting the typos.
 
All I can assume is that you are not following the discussions. He says all these religions are pointing to the same god and all people have to do is repent within their religion and they will be saved.

He readily gives Glory to the God of Abraham and His Son, the Jesus "of the Bible", he just believes it was this same God that influenced other religions as well. He believes God will unite all religions unto Him. I don't agree with that and would hope he might consider that satan deceives through this world's religions, according to the Jesus of the Bible. But he isn't trying to convert you or me to his religion or discourage you from following the true teaching of Jesus at all. Just the opposite actually.
 
He readily gives Glory to the God of Abraham and His Son, the Jesus "of the Bible", he just believes it was this same God that influenced other religions as well. He believes God will unite all religions unto Him. I don't agree with that and would hope he might consider that satan deceives through this world's religions, according to the Jesus of the Bible. But he isn't trying to convert you or me to his religion or discourage you from following the true teaching of Jesus at all. Just the opposite actually.
You miss it. He is rejecting the divinity of Christ in the Godhead. That is quite severe. He reduces Jesus to the equivalent of mere men.
 
We can leave the " Trinity " out of the discussion for all I care.

The issue is what does the text say regarding Christ. And in many places He is identified as God in the text and called God by several Apostles in their writings. He is also worshiped and prayed to things only a Jew would apply to God, no mere man.
And he does the things only Yahweh is stated to do
 
Your point about "Trinity" not needing to be part of this discussion is useful. My first concern is that people recognize the deity of Christ. When examining the NT writings, there was no challenge against the deity of Christ and thus no clarification of doctrines about that in the NT
(y)(y)
 
Again we see that element common with the JWs about anachronistically attributing the nature of God narrowly to (Roman) Catholic doctrine. Also, Peterlag did not agree to focus on the deity of Christ issue rather than the Triune nature of God. The Council of Nicea was in 325 and only involves Christ. This is much earlier decision on the best representation of Christ's deity and avoids supposed politics of later years.
Call it JW's, Deity, Triune, or before or after Nicea. Jesus is still not God and there's no God head person called the Holy Spirit.
 
You are Turning a blind eye to scripture and denying the clear teaching of the Apostles who called Him God. Those , John, Peter, Paul and the Author of Hebrews all identify Christ as God.
I don't see that in any Scripture. I believe if you do that something is wrong somewhere. Either a bad translation, or the verse taken out of context, or not understanding how the word was used in the culture.
 
I don't see that in any Scripture. I believe if you do that something is wrong somewhere. Either a bad translation, or the verse taken out of context, or not understanding how the word was used in the culture.
How much plainer can you get than the lord and my God. And Jesus blessing upon those who would so believe even though not having seen him
 
Back
Top Bottom