The words "resulting in" are not in the Greek. It's literally "to righteousness" and "to salvation". You believe it means "resulting in". I believe it means "pointing to", or affirming salvation and righteousness.
And yes, I DO understand basic English. No I do NOT understand basic Greek. Do you? If you do, then you know that "resulting in" is NOT in the Greek, so why are you being dishonest, in telling us that it is?
The flood was just a symbol? Tell that to the multiplied billions who drowned in it. It is baptism that is the symbol. Apparently you don't know basic English.
It is in baptism that the Holy Spirit takes action to save us by the power of Jesus' blood? Tell that to Cornelius and his family and friends. The Holy Spirit "took action" and saved them BEFORE they were baptized.
Yes, both repentance and baptism are required. Repentance, in order to be saved and baptism after one is saved.
Who's eliminating water? Not me. Who's ignoring the context ? You are by inserting baptism in John 3:5, but it's not there. The topic that Nicodemus brought up was natural birth. Jesus, staying with that understanding said that both natural birth - born of water - and spiritual birth - born of the Spirit - are required.
Romans 10:9-10,
The Greek says confession with the mouth and belief in Jesus leads to righteousness leads to salvation.
Never does the Greek in these verses teach one is saved when he confesses with the mouth or is saved the moment he believes.
Forget about the Greek for a moment.
Think from a logical reading of the context.
Does not Paul give two conditions for being made righteous and being saved?
Yes he does.
Therefore how could salvation be the instant one believes when he will also confess with his mouth?
You see logically one must become a believer before he confesses faith in Christ.
Those two things do not happen simultaneously.
So since one believes first. He cannot instantly be saved the moment he believes because he has yet to confess.
But also, does Paul even teach in chapter 10 that instantly he is saved the moment he confesses?
No because the Greek says unto. This Greek word is eis.
You can look up the definition of the word eis. What you will learn is, this word always in every verse its used means towards, leading to. It is pointing toward a result in the future. Never points backwards to the past. It leads to a goal.
Romans 10:9-10,
- that if thou shall confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus and shalt believe in thy heart that God raised Him from the dead thou shalt be saved
- for with the heart man believeth
unto(eis leads to a result) righteousness
and with the mouth confession is made
unto(eis leads to a result) salvation
Notice Paul said nothing about repentance in these two verses. So these two verses alone do not teach the full gospel of salvation.
If you keep reading Paul says whosoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.
This is not confession with the mouth alone.
Calling on the name of the Lord does not occur when one confesses with the mouth.
Paul shows in verse 14 that there is an order by which all these acts take place.
They do not all occur simultaneously.
Notice Paul says the steps of salvation in reverse logical order.
Paul is reasoning backwards from calling on the name of the Lord.
Romans 10:13-14,
- for whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved
- how then shall they call on Him in whom they have not
believed
- and how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not
heard
- and how shall they
hear without a preacher
1. Call on Him --> leads to salvation.
2. Believe in Him --> must happen before you can truly call on the name of the Lord.
3. Hear of Him --> must happen before you can believe.
4. Preacher sent --> must happen before hearing.
Let's flip to chronological order.
1. A preacher is sent.
2. People hear the message.
3. They believe the message.
4. They call on the name of the Lord, which from Acts 22:16 and Acts 2:21-38 includes baptism.
So Paul clearly is not saying confession and believing instantly saves. It is a process towards calling on the name of the Lord where then salvation is obtained.
Let's learn how folks called on the name of the Lord from other passages.
Acts 2:21-38,
- and it shall come to pass that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved
Read the whole chapter.
Eventually they ask Peter how to call on the name of the Lord.
They clearly dont know how because they ask Peter what they need to do.
Acts 2:36-38,
- therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God hath made this same Jesus whom ye have crucified both Lord and Christ,
- now when they heard this they were
pricked in their heart(by the sword of the Spirit)
and said unto Peter and the rest of the apostles
Men and brethrenwhat shall we do
Now listen, Peter is going to teach them how to call upon the name of the Lord,
V. 38,
- Then Peter said unto them,
Repent and be baptized everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of sins and ye shal, recieve the gift of the Holy Spirit
That is how one calls on the name of the Lord.
Paul recounts how he called on the name of the Lord when his sins were washed away,
Acts 22:16,
- and now why are you waiting, Arise and be
baptized and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord
Put Gods plan of saving man all together.
Hear, Romans 10:14
Believe, Romans 10:9-10 ; Acts 2:37
Repent, Acts 2:38
Confess, Romans 10:9-10 ; Acts 8:37
Be baptized, Romans 10:13-14 ; Acts 2:38 ; Acts 22:16
They all occur in a step by step process not simultaneously.
So Romans 10:9-10 cannot be interpreted as instant salvation.
If you're interested I'll prove why your understanding of Cornelius' salvation story is unbiblical.