@Titus
The elect in Ephesians did not get In Christ the way Bakers religion teaches.
God foreknew who would be in Christ long ago because He knew who would by their freewill choose to obey the gospel.
The apostle John said that you and your false religion is a lie.
John 1:13
“Which were born, not of blood
, nor of
the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.”
Do I need to give more proof? John rules out three main sources men would claim that plays a part in the new birth. Man's will, the will of another man desiring folks to be born again, and blood as many of the Jews and modern day fundamentalist's believes that the Jews are God chosen people simply by the fact they are Jews by nature.
Romans 6:3,
- know ye not that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christwere baptized into His death
Water baptism does indeed put us
INTO Christ,
into his rellgion/faith/teachings, etc. When one is baptized, he is confessing that he believes the record God gave of his Son and he is making a commitment to live according to the teaching of the word of God conceding Jesus Christ.
1st Peter 3:21
“The like figure whereunto
even baptism doth also now save us (
not the putting away of the filth of the flesh,
but the answer of a
good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:”
The like figure.
There are two figures or pictures here – the ark in the previous verse, baptism in this verse. A figure is a symbolic picture representing something in reality (Romans 519; Hebrews 9:9. The adjective like indicates the figure of baptism is similar to another figure in context. The adverb also in this first clause further confirms at least two things being considered. Noah’s ark and water baptism are two figures: both are a picture of salvation in Christ. Most translations and commentators have only one figure – the ark is a figure of baptism! They have a vested interest in baptism not being a figure – for most are baby sprinklers.
There are four requirements for a scriptural baptism, and this one verse teaches three of them. The three requirements taught here are the proper subject, mode, and design of baptism. It is amazing to see what modern translations have done to corrupt all three requirements.
Baptism is a figure of resurrection, as the verse’s grammar requires, and as the Bible teaches. The grammar, by ignoring the parenthetical element, connects the figure to resurrection. Bible baptism, which is immersion or submersion, is a picture of burial and resurrection. Paul thoroughly identified the burial and resurrection figure of water baptism (Romans 6:1-5). Without this understanding of baptism = resurrection, you have no hope with 1st Corinthians 15:29.
Whereunto even baptism.
Having introduced Noah and the ark for several reasons, Peter applied its figure to baptism. To this point in 1st Peter 3:18-22, no reader could know where he was going until these words.
Doth also now save us.
The adverb also in this first clause further confirms at least two figures are being considered. The ark literally saved from water; Jesus literally saved His elect from the second death. The ark figuratively saved by figuring Jesus; baptism figuratively saves by figuring Jesus. How does baptism save?
It saves figuratively, because baptism has been defined as a figure. There is real salvation in Jesus Christ’s resurrection mentioned in this verse (Romans 4:25).
Baptism pictures that resurrection in a figure by its burial and rising again from water. There is no real saving efficacy, power, value in baptism, for the next clause confirms it. When the Bible says baptism washes away sins (Acts 22:16)
, it only does so figuratively. A good conscience answering God in baptism is evidence of eternal life (Mark 16;16). The will and works of man are entirely rejected as having any role in eternal life whatsoever.
Not the putting away of the filth of the flesh.
A very damning and destructive heresy in church history is the premise that baptism saves. Once you accept this premise for your reasoning, then you will corrupt so much more truth. Since water may not be available for an immersion, you will invent sprinkling or pouring. Since many died in infancy, heretics comforted mothers by baptizing their babies, and the consistent Presbyterians doing this will also stuff the Lord’s Supper in their little mouths. Since infants miscarry, and they hold to original sin, they also use intrauterine baptism.
Since Campbellites baptize believers, they deny original sin for the age of accountability. Since Mormons require a Mormon baptism, they invented baptism for dead relatives. Baptismal regeneration or salvation is a terrible lie that has corrupted “Christianity.” Modern translations and commentators show a profane perversity by corrupting this point. They must at all costs maintain the RCC heresy and premise that baptism saves the soul. Therefore, when they find God denying their profanity, they alter His words like in Eden. They change the words filth of the flesh … to … dirt of the body in words or meaning. The terms here define, demand, and prove design of water baptism – no means of salvation. Water baptism does not remove or take away sins or sin nature in any literal or real way.
The condition for baptism is a good conscience, which requires maturity and regeneration! A bad conscience is under condemnation and guilt of sin without remedy (Hebrews 10:1-3). A good conscience must hear and believe the true gospel of forgiveness and justification.
By the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Proper baptism, burial and resurrection in water, is a figurative picture of Jesus’ resurrection. The connection here defines, demands, and proves the mode of water baptism – immersion. Baptism must be a figure of salvation in Jesus Christ, for that is what is written thus far. Baptism must be a figure of Jesus Christ’s resurrection by connection to this last phrase. Only baptism by immersion has a figure or picture of any kind at all of body resurrection.