so, you're a "monotheistic single Creator YHWH believer that harmonizes both the OT of the Hebrews of their sh'ema and the NT ". good glad to hear that. since you harmonizes both the OT and the NT, please tell us, "who laid the foundation of the Earth". was it A. the LORD/Father, or B. the Lord/Son, or C. if both, meaning the same one person. your answer please. then we will see if you're monotheistic or not.
please just A, B, or C.... that's all and we can discuss after.
101G
Deja vu all over again and and now if I can go down memory lane with you101G..about 2-3 years ago...
I've done this exercise with you before....
I remember I answered A. and you said C...and even if someone answered B., .the fireworks would predictably explode and you would write, ERROR!
Then without a pause, you would quickly follow up as if trying to capture prey, with these types of statement I recalled you making to others and myself
---you wrote----------
God the "Elohim" is a plurality in TIME, PLACE, ORDER, and RANK.
God is a "Elohim" in "TIME" the BEGINNING, Genesis 1:1 the "ORDER", the Ordinal FIRST, "RANK", the LORD, "PLACE", Alone, and by himself, Father, CREATOR, and MAKER"
And these types of statement you made a couple of years ago I could never grasp and not even now..
So if your goal is to educate then you might need an assistant to communicate it much better or if your intent is to try and ram it down someone's throat then I guess you are doing a great job with hardly any success..
Diversification is Spirit is not a takeaway I get from scripture at all 101G.
I might as well add some more of your writings whilst I remember them..
(you said)....the Offspring of his OWN-SELF, as the equal SHARE of his OWN-SELF in Flesh, he is speaking to his Spirit, and from Heaven, the Spirit is speaking to his BODY, the ONLY Church on Earth.
This all does not make any sense at all...
You never define the basic buidling blocks of your theory. Ii is always a moving target and you then cannot be pinned down by any answer someone provides you.....
and you then go on and continue with more of your endless supply of really outlandish statements that are meant to be understood in scripture ..they are very original indeed...like
"....the LORD Jesus was at Genesis 1:1, but the Lord Jesus to Come
was in him at Genesis1:1. Just as Eve was in Adam on day three..."
So until you can slow down, take a chill pill and really start from 101 and describe your theory and building blocks and why, very clearly, you are wasting your time once again on this diversification in (ONE?/PLURAL?)Spirit theory.
Still, I do like your persistence and professional attitude for sure...