Cornelius: Mixed Heritage Hebrew

[101G]

You are one duped person.
Not only is it biologically impossible but there is no Scripture saying God made all people one blood.
When doctors look at the RNA and DNA they find distinction in the races. So, what type blood are we all? Type O? Type B?
Negative? Positive?
As I said you are one duped person.

Acts 17:24 "God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;" Acts 17:25 "Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;" Acts 17:26 "And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;" Acts 17:27 "That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:"

NEXT.......

101G (AKA the spiritual saboteur), (AKA the anti-christ)

 

[jeremiah1five]

Acts 17:24 "God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;" Acts 17:25 "Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;" Acts 17:26 "And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;" Acts 17:27 "That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:"

NEXT.......

101G (AKA the spiritual saboteur), (AKA the anti-christ)

As a Hebrew Luke used "nations" in its original meaning going way back to Genesis where "nations" was used of the descendants of Ishmael and Esau. As a historian Luke was careful to bring out the original terminology which connected his words to Hebrew history. God is consistent in writing to the Hebrew people. Luke quotes from the Old Covenant writings.

 

[101G]

As a Hebrew Luke used "nations" in its original meaning going way back to Genesis where "nations" was used of the descendants of Ishmael and Esau. As a historian Luke was careful to bring out the original terminology which connected his words to Hebrew history. God is consistent in writing to the Hebrew people. Luke quotes from the Old Covenant writings.

LOL, LOL, LOL, ALL Nations..... ALL are of Ishmael and Esau., then that include you too. for all is qualified here, that is the most IGNORANT thing 101G has ever heard. see, when this promise was given to ABRAHAN, was he a Jew? NO, so those Nations after him included you too.... lol, lol, lol,

101G. (AKA the spiritual saboteur), (AKA the anti-christ)

 

[Quintus5]

I ran the OP essay by Chat GPT. Its' response below

"This essay presents a fascinating argument but appears to misinterpret both the context and the theology of Cornelius's narrative in Acts 10. Here's why I disagree:

1. Cornelius's Identity as a Gentile​

• Acts 10 clearly identifies Cornelius as a centurion of the Italian Regiment and a God-fearer (Acts 10:1-2). The term "God-fearer" is widely understood to refer to Gentiles who worshiped the God of Israel but had not converted fully to Judaism (e.g., by circumcision). This categorization aligns with the broader narrative of Acts, which demonstrates the inclusion of Gentiles into the covenant community through faith in Jesus Christ.

2. Misinterpretation of the Abrahamic Covenant​

• The claim that "families of the earth" in Genesis 12:3 exclusively refers to Abraham's descendants is inconsistent with the text's broader interpretation. Genesis 12:3 states, "In you all the families of the earth shall be blessed." The apostle Paul interprets this in Galatians 3:8 as a promise that God would justify the Gentiles through faith, clearly showing that the blessing was not limited to Abraham's physical descendants but extended to all nations.

3. The Role of the Mosaic Covenant​

• The essay asserts that the Mosaic Covenant was exclusively for the Israelites and excluded Gentiles. While this is true in a sense, it overlooks the fact that the covenant also allowed Gentiles to join the community of Israel. For example, Ruth (a Moabite) and Rahab (a Canaanite) were incorporated into Israel and the Messianic line.

4. The New Covenant's Inclusion of Gentiles​

• The New Covenant, as prophesied in Jeremiah 31:31-34 and fulfilled in Christ, is not limited to ethnic Israelites. Ephesians 2:11-22 explicitly describes how Gentiles, who were once "strangers to the covenants of promise," have now been brought near by the blood of Christ. They are made "fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God."

5. Cornelius as the First Gentile Convert​

• Cornelius’s reception of the Holy Spirit is presented in Acts 10 as a watershed moment in the inclusion of Gentiles into the Church. Peter’s vision of the unclean animals (Acts 10:9-16) symbolizes that God no longer makes a distinction between Jews and Gentiles. Peter explicitly states, "God has shown me that I should not call any man impure or unclean" (Acts 10:28), and he later declares, "God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation the one who fears him and does what is right" (Acts 10:34-35).

6. Joel’s Prophecy Misinterpreted​

• Joel 2:28's "all flesh" is indeed fulfilled at Pentecost (Acts 2), but the outpouring of the Spirit expands beyond Israel to include Gentiles. Peter explicitly links the events of Pentecost and Cornelius's household as part of the same movement of the Spirit (Acts 11:15-17), indicating the inclusion of Gentiles in the fulfillment of this prophecy.

Conclusion​

The essay reflects a misunderstanding of the narrative of Acts and the overarching message of the New Testament. The story of Cornelius is a pivotal moment demonstrating the expansion of God’s covenant to include Gentiles, breaking the ethnic boundaries of the old covenants. To argue that Cornelius was a Hebrew undermines the very purpose of Acts 10—to proclaim the inclusion of the Gentiles into the body of Christ through faith, not ancestry."

Thanks, Chat.

 

[jeremiah1five]

LOL, LOL, LOL, ALL Nations..... ALL are of Ishmael and Esau., then that include you too. for all is qualified here, that is the most IGNORANT thing 101G has ever heard. see, when this promise was given to ABRAHAN, was he a Jew? NO, so those Nations after him included you too.... lol, lol, lol,

101G. (AKA the spiritual saboteur), (AKA the anti-christ)

Abraham was not a Jew since the term "Jew" comes from the tribe of Judah who wasn't born yet.
But Abraham was a descendant of Eber from whom the term "Hebrew" originates.

God made covenant with Abram the Hebrew (Gen. 14:13) and with his Hebrew seed.

End of story.

 

[101G]

Abraham was not a Jew since the term "Jew" comes from the tribe of Judah who wasn't born yet.
But Abraham was a descendant of Eber from whom the term "Hebrew" originates.

God made covenant with Abram the Hebrew (Gen. 14:13) and with his Hebrew seed.

End of story.

ERROR, so then, these so called Jews and Hebrews should be Ebionites,,, (smile) just as the descendants of Ishmael, all Ebionites for Abraham was the father of Ishmael as well.

now as far as Abraham being Hebrew or Jewish, is anachronistic because he Abram was born in the Mesopotamia area what is today Iraq, then UR, so you can get that Jewish and Hebrew stuff out of here.

101G.

 

[jeremiah1five]

ERROR, so then, these so called Jews and Hebrews should be Ebionites,,, (smile) just as the descendants of Ishmael, all Ebionites for Abraham was the father of Ishmael as well.

now as far as Abraham being Hebrew or Jewish, is anachronistic because he Abram was born in the Mesopotamia area what is today Iraq, then UR, so you can get that Jewish and Hebrew stuff out of here.

101G.

Seems to me you have no respect for the Word of God.

Proof Abraham (Abram) was Hebrew (descendant of Eber.)

13 And there came one that had escaped, and told Abram the Hebrew;
Gen. 14:13.

And proof the Abraham Covenant included Abraham and his Hebrew seed (since he was married to his niece who was also from Eber. Isaac married a Hebrew descendant as did Jacob.)

7 And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.
Gen. 17:7.

 

[101G]

Seems to me you have no respect for the Word of God.

personal opinion? thought so.

Proof Abraham (Abram) was Hebrew (descendant of Eber.)

so was Ishmael his son.

13 And there came one that had escaped, and told Abram the Hebrew;
Gen. 14:13.

so? was this not the translators adding this from a post move in time? this is nothing new... EXAMPLE, Exodus 6:3 "And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by [the name of] God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them." so Abraham didn't Know God as JEHOVAH, right.... right.... Now this, Genesis 22:14 "And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said [to] this day, In the mount of the LORD it shall be seen."
STOP, did God LIE? (God forbid), so why is the Name JEHOVAH in Abraham mouth when Abraham didn't know that Name? and Genesis do come before Exodus. see how translator LIE, you better have proof as to what you're reading.

Now as for Abraham, at this time of Genesis 14:13 he was dwelling in the plain of Mamre the Amorite. so was there any Hebrews then? MAYBE, if so post scripture. but it just might be. the only mention of a Hebrew was in reference to Joseph. and that was where he was in EGYPT. KNOWING THAT LET'S LOOK CLOSER AT THIS TERM "HEBEWS".

Hebrew means people who came over from the flood. So not only does Hebrew mean a descendant of Eber, but it identifies a people who came from “the east” and “crossed over” from the “other side”. and all of Noah Sons dwelt in the east of the flood. NOTE THAT. So, crossover? from WHERE? let the bible speak, Joshua 24:2-3,
2 And Joshua said unto all the people, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham, and the father of Nachor: and they served other gods.
3 And I took your father Abraham from the other side of the flood, and led him throughout all the land of Canaan, and multiplied his seed, and gave him Isaac.
Flood: H5104 נָהָר nahar (naw-hawr') n-m.
1. a stream (including the sea).
2. (especially) the Nile, Euphrates, etc.
3. (figuratively) prosperity.
[from H5102]
KJV: flood, river.
Root(s): H5102

also Flood here can mean, H5674; properly a region across; but used only adverbially (with or without a preposition) on the opposite side (especially of the Jordan; usually meaning the east): – X against, beyond, by, X from, over, passage, quarter, (other, this) side, straight.

now the book of Joshua said, " Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time" note fathers here is plural, and all who came out of EGYPT was not all Israelites, now go back and read your bible on that. and since the word fathers is plural and Eber as well as all of post flood fathers was on the other side, which all trace back to Noah, not only Eber is a Hebrew, but according to the definition, all on the east side of the flood was then .... "HEBREWS?" . .. or was "YOUR father meant only a single line from Eber? Hmmmm,101G must research this out further. for many of Noah descendent crossed over the Jordan as well as the Nile. and it's interesting that Joseph who was sold into slavery was called a Hebrew, in a land that crossed over also by Noah descendent and was found in Egypt, Hmmmmm, yes this is very interesting now.

so, the point remains, when was he called a Hebrew, or was he ever called a Hebrew, and that name was JUST given him as Jehovah was given to God by the Jewish translators.

101G.

 

[jeremiah1five]

personal opinion? thought so.

so was Ishmael his son.

so? was this not the translators adding this from a post move in time? this is nothing new... EXAMPLE, Exodus 6:3 "And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by [the name of] God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them." so Abraham didn't Know God as JEHOVAH, right.... right.... Now this, Genesis 22:14 "And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said [to] this day, In the mount of the LORD it shall be seen."
STOP, did God LIE? (God forbid), so why is the Name JEHOVAH in Abraham mouth when Abraham didn't know that Name? and Genesis do come before Exodus. see how translator LIE, you better have proof as to what you're reading.

Now as for Abraham, at this time of Genesis 14:13 he was dwelling in the plain of Mamre the Amorite. so was there any Hebrews then? MAYBE, if so post scripture. but it just might be. the only mention of a Hebrew was in reference to Joseph. and that was where he was in EGYPT. KNOWING THAT LET'S LOOK CLOSER AT THIS TERM "HEBEWS".

Hebrew means people who came over from the flood. So not only does Hebrew mean a descendant of Eber, but it identifies a people who came from “the east” and “crossed over” from the “other side”. and all of Noah Sons dwelt in the east of the flood. NOTE THAT. So, crossover? from WHERE? let the bible speak, Joshua 24:2-3,
2 And Joshua said unto all the people, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham, and the father of Nachor: and they served other gods.
3 And I took your father Abraham from the other side of the flood, and led him throughout all the land of Canaan, and multiplied his seed, and gave him Isaac.
Flood: H5104 נָהָר nahar (naw-hawr') n-m.
1. a stream (including the sea).
2. (especially) the Nile, Euphrates, etc.
3. (figuratively) prosperity.
[from H5102]
KJV: flood, river.
Root(s): H5102

also Flood here can mean, H5674; properly a region across; but used only adverbially (with or without a preposition) on the opposite side (especially of the Jordan; usually meaning the east): – X against, beyond, by, X from, over, passage, quarter, (other, this) side, straight.

now the book of Joshua said, " Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time" note fathers here is plural, and all who came out of EGYPT was not all Israelites, now go back and read your bible on that. and since the word fathers is plural and Eber as well as all of post flood fathers was on the other side, which all trace back to Noah, not only Eber is a Hebrew, but according to the definition, all on the east side of the flood was then .... "HEBREWS?" . .. or was "YOUR father meant only a single line from Eber? Hmmmm,101G must research this out further. for many of Noah descendent crossed over the Jordan as well as the Nile. and it's interesting that Joseph who was sold into slavery was called a Hebrew, in a land that crossed over also by Noah descendent and was found in Egypt, Hmmmmm, yes this is very interesting now.

so, the point remains, when was he called a Hebrew, or was he ever called a Hebrew, and that name was JUST given him as Jehovah was given to God by the Jewish translators.

101G.

Yeah, right.
The Scripture does not record any non-Hebrews in the Hebrew covenants.
Your interpretation that non-Hebrew Gentiles are in the Hebrew covenants are just plain wrong. That's the bottom line here.

 

[101G]

eah, right.
The Scripture does not record any non-Hebrews in the Hebrew covenants.

All are Hebrews. or NONE are Hebrews..... (smile)...

Your interpretation that non-Hebrew Gentiles are in the Hebrew covenants are just plain wrong. That's the bottom line here.

101G interpretation? as said, argue not with 101G, but with God and his word. .... good day.

101G. (AKA the spiritual saboteur), (AKA the anti-christ)

 

[jeremiah1five]

All are Hebrews. or NONE are Hebrews..... (smile)...

101G interpretation? as said, argue not with 101G, but with God and his word. .... good day.

101G. (AKA the spiritual saboteur), (AKA the anti-christ)

---

101G