Christendom's Trinity: Where Did It Come From?

Alone is an accurate English representation. The issue isn't translation. It is application.

You can be in a crowded room and be alone. Right?
Glad you said that. Now I will answer you.

You posted this: Joh 8:16 But even if I do judge, My judgment is true, because I am not alone; I am with the Father who sent Me.

Do you agree that if the Son and the Father are not together, then they are each alone? Because Jesus said he is not alone because he is with the Father. Therefore, the reverse must be true. The Father in the category of God is alone as the true God.

And your example "You can be in a crowded room and be alone." In this example you are sayin that in a crowded room the Father is alone as the true God? Then I agree with that.
 
I responded directly to:


Yes, unity/one is a central aspect of Trinitarianism - a fusion of 3 into one.

I agree that Jesus and God had a unique Father/Son relationship but that relationship did not fuse them together into one. The same as the intimate act of a husband and wife does not literally fuse them together.

BTW. Our very existence "mimics" the Holy Trinity. It why all of Creation is crafted the way it is crafted.
 
Glad you said that. Now I will answer you.

You posted this: Joh 8:16 But even if I do judge, My judgment is true, because I am not alone; I am with the Father who sent Me.

Do you agree that if the Son and the Father are not together, then they are each alone? Because Jesus said he is not alone because he is with the Father. Therefore, the reverse must be true. The Father in the category of God is alone as the true God.

And your example "You can be in a crowded room and be alone." In this example you are sayin that in a crowded room the Father is alone as the true God? Then I agree with that.
Okay....

No. When they are together, they are also alone. They are unique in the context you're describing as being "alone".

Relative to the category of "God", they are both God.
 
Good... good. Reasoned. Reasonable. Will you remain that way......

Service isn't an indication of "rank". Do you have a husband or wife?

People often make this mistake. In more detailed evaluations of the Holy Trinity, these "come to light" as the conversation progresses. There is "much" to God. We can't "boil it down" like Unitarians try to simplify God.

There are differences/uniqueness in details.

So when you serve a friend, is your friend greater than you?
I believe what Jesus was teaching was humility. I believe my original point was: The one sent is not equal to the one who sent him.
 
So if you sent your husband/wife somewhere, that means you're not equal?

In what way? People conflate terms and references. Lets not do this. Please answer about your relationship to your mate.
If I sent my husband to the store, he is the agent sent to carry out what I, the sender, gave him to do - pick up what I need from the store but in our relationship as husband and wife - he is my head and I submit to his authority.

But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God. [1 Cor. 11:3]
 
If I sent my husband to the store, he is the agent sent to carry out what I, the sender, gave him to do - pick up what I need from the store but in our relationship as husband and wife - he is my head and I submit to his authority.

But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God. [1 Cor. 11:3]

Good. Reasoned. Reasonable.

As a Trinitarian, we wouldn't deny that the Father is the "head" of the Holy Trinity. The "First Person" of the Holy Trinity.

Does that make any difference to you?
 
Okay....

No. When they are together, they are also alone. They are unique in the context you're describing as being "alone".

Relative to the category of "God", they are both God.
For the sake of argument, let's say Jesus and the Father are together as God. They are together, but only one of them is Alone. If the Father is alone as the true God, even with Jesus, then it must be true that if Jesus is God then he isn't God in the same sense or the same way the Father is and that is what Scripture supports as well.

Many humans are referred to as god in the Bible: "You are gods" (Psalm 82:6.) Calling someone a god is not the same thing as them being God Almighty. Many people are a god in their own right, meaning they are extraordinary, powerful, revered, but not the supreme singular God like the Father is. Jesus could be a god in the same sense Moses and the other sons of Gods are, but not The God.
 
Good. Reasoned. Reasonable.

As a Trinitarian, we wouldn't deny that the Father is the "head" of the Holy Trinity. The "First Person" of the Holy Trinity.

Does that make any difference to you?
Yes since we are created in Gods image ( us, we) there is rank/ roles within a marriage which directly reflects Gods likeness. The same with the other Divine institution created by God- the church. Both of these Divine institutions reflect Gods image as One in unity. The body is One with many members just as marriage is One having two persons. God is One yet 3 in Persons which Jesus alludes to in the great commission- One Name( One God) who is the Father, Son, Holy Spirit

The uni camp puts on its blinders to deny the above truth.
 
For the sake of argument, let's say Jesus and the Father are together as God. They are together, but only one of them is Alone. If the Father is alone as the true God, even with Jesus, then it must be true that if Jesus is God then he isn't God in the same sense or the same way the Father is and that is what Scripture supports as well.

Many humans are referred to as god in the Bible: "You are gods" (Psalm 82:6.) Calling someone a god is not the same thing as them being God Almighty. Many people are a god in their own right, meaning they are extraordinary, powerful, revered, but not the supreme singular God like the Father is. Jesus could be a god in the same sense Moses and the other sons of Gods are, but not The God.

Okay.

I never said that the Father is alone as the true God. That is your construct that isn't supported by the word "Alone" or "monos". You made that argument. Not me. I don't believe that argument is valid.

Alone has context. It is not the absence of Diety/Divinity "alone" to the exclusion of the Son.

I agree. We are "called gods". In fact, the goal of God in creating man is make man is His own image and after His own likeness, right? The "New Birth" relative to Eternal things.

Not that I believe I originate anything. I tried to have that conversation with you previously. If you would have "worked with me" in that, you will change your mind..... or plunge deeper into your mistakes.
 
Yes since we are created in Gods image ( us, we) there is rank/ roles within a marriage which directly reflects Gods likeness. The same with the other Divine institution created by God- the church. Both of these Divine institutions reflect Gods image as One in unity. The body is One with many members just as marriage is One having two persons. God is One yet 3 in Persons which Jesus alludes to in the great commission- One Name( One God) who is the Father, Son, Holy Spirit

The uni camp puts on its blinders to deny the above truth.
Well said!
 

Yeah. Spoken by a man that can't operate unless he is the "lead" of everything.....

You do realize that you're not going to control your wife for long.... Right?

Such things are temporal. When you judge all things "God", you should consider such.

I've learned that my wife knows how to lead. It isn't bad to be "hen pecked" when you're "pecked by the right hen". When you have a good relationship. You do everything TOGETHER. Agreement is everything. You think the same way. You finish each other's sentences. You operate as ONE.

You can't fathom that because you've never experienced it yourself.
 
Back
Top Bottom