Calvinism & Apologetics DON'T MIX!

[TomL]

Well, making up an answer when there isn't one is *insert invective here* so it is important to use common sense.

There is no need to make up an answer

Either you believe the original manuscripts were inspired or you don't

 

[Frank Russell]

There is no need to make up an answer

Either you believe the original manuscripts were inspired or you don't

I have yet to read them, so unable to make assessment.

Either or is such a small universe to live in.

 

[TomL]

I have yet to read them, so unable to make assessment.

Either or is such a small universe to live in.

as I stated it sounds like a cop out

 

[Frank Russell]

as I stated it sounds like a cop out

I just don't think according to your paradigm.

 

[TomL]

I just don't think according to your paradigm.

it still sounds like a copout

 

[Frank Russell]

it still sounds like a copout

It sounds like you need a thesaurus.

 

[TomL]

It sounds like you need a thesaurus.

No it still sounds like a copout you will not deal with

I wonder why?

 

[Frank Russell]

No it still sounds like a copout you will not deal with

I wonder why?

I have no need to, you think a certain way, and your concerns come off as irrelevant.

 

[TomL]

I have no need to, you think a certain way, and your concerns come off as irrelevant.

To you maybe but I imagine others will wonder why you refuse to affirm the inspiration of the originals

 

[Frank Russell]

To you maybe but I imagine others will wonder why you refuse to affirm the inspiration of the originals

I already said, you didn't accept the answer, not my problem.

 

[TomL]

I already said, you didn't accept the answer, not my problem.

You already stated you will not answer the question, but it appears you will not affirm the inspiration of scripture as originally written

 

[Frank Russell]

You already stated you will not answer the question, but it appears you will not affirm the inspiration of scripture as originally written

You sound like a broken record, it's like this is some occultic trap you're setting. As soon as someone answers the question according to this flawed logic, they enter the trap and become delusional.

 

[TomL]

You sound like a broken record, it's like this is some occultic trap you're setting. As soon as someone answers the question according to this flawed logic, they enter the trap and become delusional.

LOL

Its a simple question

what is your fear of it?

 

[Frank Russell]

LOL

Its a simple question

what is your fear of it?

You're silly, I'll take a break from our discussion.

 

[TomL]

You're silly, I'll take a break from our discussion.

Without ever answering the question

Readers will see and form their views

 

[civic]

I believe God created the whole world, I do not see it in monochrome, I see all the colors.

The first day of creation is about black and white, but there is more to God's process than that.

Which is why there are 6 days of creation not just 1 day. By day 6 there is the full living color of the universe on display. And it was all very good.

 

[brightfame52]

James White destroys Flowers with scripture in context, then Flowers starts appealing to peoples emotions with this baby's being condemned from the womb stuff,he always changes the subject to elict emotionalism.

 

[civic]

James White destroys Flowers with scripture in context, then Flowers starts appealing to peoples emotions with this baby's being condemned from the womb stuff,he always changes the subject to elict emotionalism.

White like Matt Slick got destroyed by Leighton. Neither of them can debate without using ad hominems and answering a direct question without deflecting and moving the goal posts. I could win a debate against them. And Warren Mcgrew the idol killer also took them both to the wood shed.