All Claims of The Son's Deity

[Runningman]

sure, Philippians 2:6 "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:" Philippians 2:7 "But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:" Philippians 2:8 "And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross."

Now, the term "form" in verse 6 is the Greek word,
G3444 μορφή morphe (mor-fee') n.
1. form.
2. (intrinsically) fundamental nature.
[perhaps from the base of G3313 (through the idea of adjustment of parts)]
KJV: form
Root(s): G3313

definition #2. clearly states that the NATURE of the Lord Jesus is Spirit, because God is a, a, a, a, ONE "Spirit", (Per John 4:24a).

KNOWING THAT, the question come, "how is the Lord Jesus nature is EQUAL ... with.... no equal to, but EQUAL "WITH" God is found in the root of G3444 μορφή morphe (mor-fee') n. which is,
G3313 μέρος meros (me'-ros) n.
1. a portion (i.e. an amount allotted, a part of something). THERE IS OUR ANSWER IN DEFINITION #1. "a portion" what is another word for "Portion?" answer, "SHARE". this can be found at, Word Hippo, under the heading, "A part of a whole" https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/another-word-for/portion.html

let back this up in scripture, John 3:34 "For he whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God: for God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto him."
the word "MEASURE" is the Greek term,
G3358 μέτρον metron (me'-tron) n.
1. a measure (“metre”).
2. (by implication) a limited portion (degree).
{literally or figuratively}
[an apparently primary word]
KJV: measure

There is our ANSWER, "PORTION".... without measure, meaning "EQUAL" just as John 3:34 clearly states, and Philippians 2:6. both are saying the same thing, just using two different words. this is why we must be led by the spirit to understand these things.

if you have any other questions just ask. was that a good enough scriptural citation? all definitions can be reproduce

on the definition above, 101G used the Mickelson's Enhanced Strong's Dictionaries of the Greek and Hebrew Testaments. and the word "PORTION" synonyms, was given above at word hippo, with the link.

101G.

Plainly, Philippians 2:5-8 identifies Jesus as a human. You are reading too far into it.

 

[mikesw]

Five verses from the Old Testament...​

Israel 44:6,8
I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.
Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.

Israel 45:21-22
there is no God else beside me; a just God and a Saviour; there is none beside me.
for I am God, and there is none else.

Hosea 13:4
Yet I am the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me:

View attachment 2366

If we carry this to humanity, a human son of a human father is not a human.

But you use trinitarian verses to make this weird claim
Isaiah 45:21-22
Jesus is the one who saved us and hence the Savior. Since he is not a separate god then he is of the same God and confirmed in that with Isaiah 45:21-22
Unitarians cannot help but show the divinity of Christ.

 

[Peterlag]

If we carry this to humanity, a human son of a human father is not a human.

But you use trinitarian verses to make this weird claim
Isaiah 45:21-22
Jesus is the one who saved us and hence the Savior. Since he is not a separate god then he is of the same God and confirmed in that with Isaiah 45:21-22
Unitarians cannot help but show the divinity of Christ.

Is that your concept? That because the Scriptures say God fathered Adam and Jesus that they are little God's.

 

[mikesw]

Is that your concept? That because the Scriptures say God fathered Adam and Jesus that they are little God's.

Not my concept. I'm sharing scriptural concepts that Jesus is the only Son of God. While Jesus, as the incarnation of God into a human born among man points to both his humanity and divinity. that differentiates him from anything else in scripture. Also, John 1:18 in the earliest Greek shows Jesus is God. Of course that was said earlier in John as well. Recognizing the unique divinity of Christ among humanity is so clear that people have to want to reject that if they are denying that.

 

[101G]

There is a hierarchy under God, but God is always at the top of the chain of command. Do you agree with that? So, did Jesus receive power, authority, etc. from God? Is what Jesus received the same kind of authority "those who overcome" can receive? Scripture says Yes. There aren't many differences between the kind of authority Jesus has and what believers can inherit. If you believe this part, you'll be a step closer to understanding who Jesus actually is and who God actually is.

read carefully what 101G is about to say. First there is no hierarchy in God, that's your first correction. Second, God is an ECHAD of himself in flesh that was to come in an G2758 κενόω kenoo (ke-no-ō') state. supportive scripture, #1. Deuteronomy 6:4 "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:"
ONE: H259 אֶחָד 'echad (ech-awd') adj.
1. (properly) united, i.e. one.
2. (as an ordinal) first.
[a numeral from H258]
KJV: a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any(-thing), apiece, a certain, (dai-)ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together.
Root(s): H258

do you understand what an Ordinal mean? if not ask, or see post #1,694 above.

101G.

 

[101G]

Plainly, Philippians 2:5-8 identifies Jesus as a human. You are reading too far into it.

no, and no, listen carefully, if the Lord Jesus was a human as you and I, then transfigure yourself as he did then. just let 101G know when you will transfigure so 101G can put his sunglasses on.

101G.

 

[Runningman]

What disqualifies the Critical Text alone is that Westcott & Hort weren't saved men:
https://www.bibleready.org/westcott-and-hort
https://www.sociedadrvg.com/en/post/westcott-hort-their-heresies-and-occult-activities

William Tyndale, on the other hand, was.

“Lord, open the king of England’s eyes!” These were the last words of William Tyndale (1494-1536)
on Friday, October 6th, 1536, just before he was strangled and burned at the stake.

Eventually, along came a king, James VI and I, & God answered that prayer!

King of Scotland (1566–1625), England and Ireland (1603–25) James VI and I was King of Scotland as James VI from
24 July 1567 and King of England and Ireland as James I from the union of the Scottish and English crowns on
24 March 1603 until his death in 1625. Though he long attempted to get both countries to adopt a closer
political union, the kingdoms of Scotland and England remained sovereign states, with their own
parliaments, judiciaries, and laws, ruled by James in personal union.

James VI and I, King of England, Scotland, and Ireland, died on 27 March 1625
at Theobalds, and was buried at Westminster Abbey on 7 May 1625.

A traditional rhyme that commemorates the failure of the Gunpowder Plot, a conspiracy
to assassinate King James VI and I in 1605. Learn the lyrics, history and meaning
of this poem associated with Guy Fawkes Night in the UK.

The Fifth of November (Guy Fawkes Night Poem)

Remember, remember!
The fifth of November,
The Gunpowder treason and plot;
I know of no reason
Why the Gunpowder treason
Should ever be forgot!
Guy Fawkes and his companions
Did the scheme contrive,
To blow the King and Parliament
All up alive.
Threescore barrels, laid below,
To prove old England's overthrow.
But, by God's providence, him they catch,
With a dark lantern, lighting a match!
A stick and a stake
For King James's sake!
If you won't give me one,
I'll take two,
The better for me,
And the worse for you.
A rope, a rope, to hang the Pope,
A penn'orth of cheese to choke him,
A pint of beer to wash it down,
And a jolly good fire to burn him.
Holloa, boys! holloa, boys! make the bells ring!
Holloa, boys! holloa boys! God save the King!
Hip, hip, hooor-r-r-ray!

"I feel he is saved, therefore what he said is true." Does not follow from a sound premise to a reasonable conclusion and it is not a valid argument.

 

[Runningman]

GINOLJC, to all.
well Run since you can not understand what 101G is saying, let's make it simple as to who is God the Governor. listen carefully, Isaiah 66:22 "For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the LORD, so shall your seed and your name remain."

the LORD said that he will make the NEW HEAVENS and the NEW EARTH. now this, Revelation 21:5 "And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful." Revelation 21:6 "And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely."

who sits on the throne that is the Alpha and Omega and the beginning and the end? answer, Revelation 1:8 "I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty."

it is the Lord who sits on the throne that makes the NEW HEAVEN, and the NEW EARTH. now if the LORD and the Lord is not the same one person then God LIED, (God forbid), or you is correct.... and who is correct? God, so, that means you lied RUN.

READ Isaiah 66:22 and Revelation 21:5 & 6 and get back with 101G. ...... will bw looking for your answer.

101G.

Never make the mistake of calling God a liar just because you can't understand how you are wrong about something. If I understand you correctly, you believe Jesus is God because one of a very few titles he has in common with God. What about the dozens of other names or titles Jesus doesn't share with God such as God, Almighty, YHWH, the only true God, etc? What you're doing is called cherry picking the cherries you want while ignoring the cherries that either challenge or debunk your conclusion. False equivalence over generalization fallacy.

What I have picked up on is that most of the cults here have their own little corner of Scripture they camp out in. Don't do that. Just as soon as you make an argument, there are 100 other Scriptural points that make your conclusions impossible.

 

[Runningman]

sure, Philippians 2:6 "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:" Philippians 2:7 "But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:" Philippians 2:8 "And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross."

Now, the term "form" in verse 6 is the Greek word,
G3444 μορφή morphe (mor-fee') n.
1. form.
2. (intrinsically) fundamental nature.
[perhaps from the base of G3313 (through the idea of adjustment of parts)]
KJV: form
Root(s): G3313

definition #2. clearly states that the NATURE of the Lord Jesus is Spirit, because God is a, a, a, a, ONE "Spirit", (Per John 4:24a).

KNOWING THAT, the question come, "how is the Lord Jesus nature is EQUAL ... with.... no equal to, but EQUAL "WITH" God is found in the root of G3444 μορφή morphe (mor-fee') n. which is,
G3313 μέρος meros (me'-ros) n.
1. a portion (i.e. an amount allotted, a part of something). THERE IS OUR ANSWER IN DEFINITION #1. "a portion" what is another word for "Portion?" answer, "SHARE". this can be found at, Word Hippo, under the heading, "A part of a whole" https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/another-word-for/portion.html

let back this up in scripture, John 3:34 "For he whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God: for God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto him."
the word "MEASURE" is the Greek term,
G3358 μέτρον metron (me'-tron) n.
1. a measure (“metre”).
2. (by implication) a limited portion (degree).
{literally or figuratively}
[an apparently primary word]
KJV: measure

There is our ANSWER, "PORTION".... without measure, meaning "EQUAL" just as John 3:34 clearly states, and Philippians 2:6. both are saying the same thing, just using two different words. this is why we must be led by the spirit to understand these things.

if you have any other questions just ask. was that a good enough scriptural citation? all definitions can be reproduce

on the definition above, 101G used the Mickelson's Enhanced Strong's Dictionaries of the Greek and Hebrew Testaments. and the word "PORTION" synonyms, was given above at word hippo, with the link.

101G.

You explain too much before your first point is even addressed. Why would you feel the need to explain such a thing without some input first?

Does God need to consider equality with Himself? Not my God. My God already knows He's equal with Himself so there is nothing to take into consideration in that regard. So once again, you have not provided anything convincing about why your conclusions make any sense.

Philippians 2:5-8 is a teaching to the church of Philippi about how to have the mind of Jesus. Was Paul telling them to take it into consideration that they are equal with God when he explained what Jesus thinks? No? See, if you don't stop and really think about what you're reading you won't understand it. I can help you think critically about what you want to say before you actually type it and post it.

 

[101G]

Never make the mistake of calling God a liar just because you can't understand how you are wrong about something. If I understand you correctly, you believe Jesus is God because one of a very few titles he has in common with God. What about the dozens of other names or titles Jesus doesn't share with God such as God, Almighty, YHWH, the only true God, etc? What you're doing is called cherry picking the cherries you want while ignoring the cherries that either challenge or debunk your conclusion. False equivalence over generalization fallacy.

What I have picked up on is that most of the cults here have their own little corner of Scripture they camp out in. Don't do that. Just as soon as you make an argument, there are 100 other Scriptural points that make your conclusions impossible.

"If I understand you correctly?"...... if, if, if, you're doing a bad job of that.

101 G

 

[101G]

You explain too much before your first point is even addressed. Why would you feel the need to explain such a thing without some input first?

smile.......
101G.

 

[Victoria]

You are comparing the Old Testament addressed to Isreal with the New Testament and thus you're comparing oranges with apples. What is written directly to the Jews, belongs to and is for the Jews. What is written directly to the Gentiles, belongs to and is for the Gentiles. What is written directly to the Church of God, belongs to and is for the Church of God. What does God mean when He tells us that the visions shown to Isaiah was concerning Judah and Jerusalem? It was not addressed to us or written concerning us, but it was addressed to and concerning Judah and Jerusalem. It would be dishonest for the Church of God to interpret to the Church of God what God said concerns Israel. If we do not rightly divide to whom it's addressed—the Jew, Gentile, or the Church of God, we will use one truth to contradict another truth, and we will use what is true for one group in contrast to what is also true for another group.

Jesus Christ is God Almighty, Lord & Saviour of both Israel & The Body of Christ. The God of the OT is the same exact God of the NT. Who is the Word? Jesus Christ, from the beginning of Genesis to the end of Revelation.

Genesis 1:1; 2:3; John 1:1-3; 14

 

[Victoria]

Five verses from the Old Testament...​

Israel 44:6,8
I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.
Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.

Israel 45:21-22
there is no God else beside me; a just God and a Saviour; there is none beside me.
for I am God, and there is none else.

Hosea 13:4
Yet I am the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me:

View attachment 2366

Godhead:
"Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:" Matthew 28:19

Deity:
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." John 3:16

"For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." 1 John 5:7

If someone doesn't believe that Jesus Christ is God Almighty & believe the Gospel (1 Corinthians 15:1-4; Ephesians 1:13-14; 4:30)... then they're not a Christian.

 

[Victoria]

"I feel he is saved, therefore what he said is true." Does not follow from a sound premise to a reasonable conclusion and it is not a valid argument.

Does it say "begotten" Son, or "only" Son in your translation? Begotten is accurate, only is inaccurate. Therefore, that translation is in error.

Does 1 John 5:7 include "these three are one" in your translation, or is it omitted? If omitted, that translation is in error as well. Satan has been attacking God's Word since the garden, so I test to see if I have the real deal or a counterfeit.

Conclusion & point... I don't trust a translation as the written Word of God having that major of an error in it.

William Tyndale Bible 1534 New Testament:
https://www.textusreceptusbibles.com/Tyndale/62/5

I wanted to add that the best translators of King James's day got it right, begotten. William Tyndale only wanted the entire Bible, both OT & NT, to be translated into the English language so that English speaking people could hold their very own copy in their hands. Why is another story, but the job of Westcott & Hort was to counter-attack the Protestants.

 

[Peterlag]

Godhead:
"Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:" Matthew 28:19

Deity:
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." John 3:16

"For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." 1 John 5:7

If someone doesn't believe that Jesus Christ is God Almighty & believe the Gospel (1 Corinthians 15:1-4; Ephesians 1:13-14; 4:30)... then they're not a Christian.

The early church was always baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus until the development of the Trinity doctrine in the 2nd century. The Catholics acknowledge baptism was changed and Scripture such as Matthew 28:19 that was never in the Bible was added by them.

Baptism was changed from the name of Jesus to the words Father, Son and Holy Ghost in the 2nd Century. - Britannica Encyclopedia, 11th Edition, Volume 3, page 365.

The early church baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus until the second century. - Canney Encyclopedia of Religion, page 53.

Christian baptism was administered using the words "in the name of Jesus." page 377. Baptism was always done in the name of Jesus until the time of Justin Martyr, page 389. - Hastings Encyclopedia of Religion,Volume 2.

Here the authors acknowledged that the baptismal formula was changed by their church. - Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume 2, page 263.

The New Testament knows only the baptism in the name of Jesus. - Schaff & Herzog Religious Encyclopedia, Volume 1, page 435.

It must be acknowledged that the three fold name of Matthew 28:19 does not appear to have been used by the primitive church, but rather in the name of Jesus, Jesus Christ or Lord Jesus. - Hastings Dictionary of Bible, page 88.

And concerning 1 John 5:7-8 where it has the words "In heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost, and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth" are words that are not found in any Greek Manuscript before the 15th or 16th century and in no ancient Version. - E. W. Bullinger., A Critical Lexicon and Concordance to the English and Greek New Testament: (London: Samuel Bagster & Sons, 1975), p. 11 of Appendix A.

 

[Victoria]

The early church was always baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus until the development of the Trinity doctrine in the 2nd century. The Catholics acknowledge baptism was changed and Scripture such as Matthew 28:19 that was never in the Bible was added by them.

Baptism was changed from the name of Jesus to the words Father, Son and Holy Ghost in the 2nd Century. - Britannica Encyclopedia, 11th Edition, Volume 3, page 365.

The early church baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus until the second century. - Canney Encyclopedia of Religion, page 53.

Christian baptism was administered using the words "in the name of Jesus." page 377. Baptism was always done in the name of Jesus until the time of Justin Martyr, page 389. - Hastings Encyclopedia of Religion,Volume 2.

Here the authors acknowledged that the baptismal formula was changed by their church. - Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume 2, page 263.

The New Testament knows only the baptism in the name of Jesus. - Schaff & Herzog Religious Encyclopedia, Volume 1, page 435.

It must be acknowledged that the three fold name of Matthew 28:19 does not appear to have been used by the primitive church, but rather in the name of Jesus, Jesus Christ or Lord Jesus. - Hastings Dictionary of Bible, page 88.

And concerning 1 John 5:7-8 where it has the words "In heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost, and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth" are words that are not found in any Greek Manuscript before the 15th or 16th century and in no ancient Version. - E. W. Bullinger., A Critical Lexicon and Concordance to the English and Greek New Testament: (London: Samuel Bagster & Sons, 1975), p. 11 of Appendix A.

It's about Christ's deity, not about water baptism. Please stay on topic. We don't need to go to outside sources for truth, just straight to the source of THEE truth, Jesus Christ!

"But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him." Hebrews 11:6

 

[Peterlag]

It's about Christ's deity, not about water baptism. Please stay on topic. We don't need to go to outside sources for truth, just straight to the source of THEE truth, Jesus Christ!

"But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him." Hebrews 11:6

I never said anything about water. The topic is Jesus is not God and Matthew 28:19 that you quoted does not hold any water.

 

[mikesw]

The early church was always baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus until the development of the Trinity doctrine in the 2nd century. The Catholics acknowledge baptism was changed and Scripture such as Matthew 28:19 that was never in the Bible was added by them.

Baptism was changed from the name of Jesus to the words Father, Son and Holy Ghost in the 2nd Century. - Britannica Encyclopedia, 11th Edition, Volume 3, page 365.

The early church baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus until the second century. - Canney Encyclopedia of Religion, page 53.

Christian baptism was administered using the words "in the name of Jesus." page 377. Baptism was always done in the name of Jesus until the time of Justin Martyr, page 389. - Hastings Encyclopedia of Religion,Volume 2.

Here the authors acknowledged that the baptismal formula was changed by their church. - Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume 2, page 263.

The New Testament knows only the baptism in the name of Jesus. - Schaff & Herzog Religious Encyclopedia, Volume 1, page 435.

It must be acknowledged that the three fold name of Matthew 28:19 does not appear to have been used by the primitive church, but rather in the name of Jesus, Jesus Christ or Lord Jesus. - Hastings Dictionary of Bible, page 88.

And concerning 1 John 5:7-8 where it has the words "In heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost, and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth" are words that are not found in any Greek Manuscript before the 15th or 16th century and in no ancient Version. - E. W. Bullinger., A Critical Lexicon and Concordance to the English and Greek New Testament: (London: Samuel Bagster & Sons, 1975), p. 11 of Appendix A.

Even if the 6 instances that LUke mentions of bapitism in the name of Jesus represents the only way people baptized in the first century, that does not mean that error was not undone by the second century. Amazing how much unitarians work to deny Christ.

 

[Victoria]

I never said anything about water. The topic is Jesus is not God and Matthew 28:19 that you quoted does not hold any water.

Have it your way, Peterlag. No one is forcing you or anyone to become a Christian. Everyone has freewill to choose what they want to believe & there's absolutely nothing wrong w/ that. I'm not looking to engage in meaningless arguments, only to edify, if I can. We can just agree to disagree respectfully. My only desire as an Ambassador for Christ is to follow 1 Timothy 2:3-4, as God instructs believers to do. If you're only desire here is to stir up strife, I'll step away. Have a good rest of your night.

"Let your speech be alway with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man." Colossians 4:6

 

[e v e]

All Claims of The Son's Deity
In about 45% of the New Testament, 19 witnesses make 50 claims of The Son's Deity in 186 iterations, including 54 iterations by Jesus Himself.


These claims are organized in three ways on separate Pages:




There are far more claims of The Son's deity than I was led to believe by conventional minimalization; but hundreds were not necessary. In God-breathed Scripture, only one of them was necessary to state the truth.


These claims are a more complete portrait of what the apostle John meant when he wrote, "The one who believes in The Son has eternal life. The one who rejects The Son will not see life, but God's wrath remains on him" [John 3:36]. Rejecting The Son's deity is in fact rejecting The Son, which Jesus warns explicitly [John 8:24].


BY CATEGORY


Actions of Yahweh [22]

Answers prayer ⇒ [3x] John 14:13; 14:14; 16:26.

Draws all people to Himself ⇒ [1x] John 12:32.

Eliminates death itself ⇒ [2x] 1 Cor 15:26; 2 Tim 1:10.

Forgives sin ⇒ [1x] Mark 2:5.

Fulfills all things (or: fills the universe) ⇒ [1x] Eph 4:10.

Gives life ⇒ [3x] John 5:21; 21:22; 1 Cor 15:45.

Influences human action (despite no longer being on Earth)

⇒ [7x] 1 Cor 1:8a; 11:32; 16:7; 1 Tim 1:12; 1:16b; 2 Tim 1:12c; Jude 1:24.

Nullified [the power of] The Law ⇒ [1x] Eph 2:15.

Purifies for Himself an elect people (λαός περιούσιος) ⇒ [1x] Titus 2:14.

Resurrects Himself from the dead ⇒ [1x] John 2:19.

Transforms all believers’ bodies into His own likeness ⇒ [1x] Phil 3:21.


Characteristics of Yahweh [30]

Eternal ⇒ [6x] John 1:1a; 1:2; 17:5b; 17:24; 1 John 1:1; 1:2.
Immutable ⇒ [2x] 2 Tim 2:13c; Heb 13:8.
Impassible ⇒ [2x] Phil 2:7a; 2:7b.
Inscrutable ⇒ [2x] Matt 11:27a; John 8:19b.
Sinless ⇒ [2x] John 8:46; 1 John 3:5.
Omniscient (accounting for kenosis and difference in role)

⇒ [4x] John 2:24; 2:25; 16:30a; 21:17.

Otherworldly ⇒ [12x] John 5:34; 6:46; 8:23; 8:42; 13:3; 15:5; 16:28; 16:30c; Rom 8:3;

1 Cor 15:47; Eph 4:9; 1 Tim 1:15.



Conflations, Other [27]

Ascriptions ⇒ [2x]

Luke 1:76 (The Most High); Rom 14:9 (Lord of the Living and the Dead).

Assertions ⇒ [4x]

John 8:12 (I am The Light of the World).

John 11:25 (I am The Ressurection and The Life).

John 14:6 (I am The Way, The Truth, and The Life).

John 16:33 (I have conquered the World).

Born of ⇒ [1x] 1 John 3:1.
Denying Him results in Hell ⇒ [1x] 2 Tim 2:12.
Equal Authority and Ownership to The Father ⇒ [2x] John 16:15; 17:10.
Equal Possessor of God’s glory, which Yahweh shares with no one [« Isa 42:8]

⇒ [1x] John 17:5a.

Knowing The Son equals knowing The Father ⇒ [4x] Matt 11:27b; John 8:19c; 14:7; 14:8.
Knowing equals Eternal Life ⇒ [1x] John 17:3.
One with The Father and/or The Spirit ontologically

⇒ [8x] John 10:30; 10:38; 14:10; 14:11; 14:23; 17:11; 17:21: 17:22.

Seeing The Son equals seeing The Father ⇒ [1x] John 14:9.
Working of The Son equated to working of The Father ⇒ [2x] John 5:17; 5:19.



Devotion due to Yahweh [21]

Devotional Belief in (not mundane belief, confidence, or trust)

⇒ [9x] John 1:7; 1:12; 14:1; Eph 1:13; 1:15; Col 1:4; 1 Tim 1:16c; 2 Tim 1:12b; Phlm 1:5.

of Equal Honor to The Father ⇒ [1x] John 5:23.
Object of the Highest Love, due only to the God of The Shema

⇒ [4x] Matt 10:37; Luke 14:26; 1 Cor 16:22; Eph 6:24.

United to ⇒ [3x] Rom 7:4; 1 Cor 6:17; Eph 5:32.
Worship of ⇒ [4x] Eph 5:19; Rev 5:13; Rev 22:3; 22:5a-b.



Direct Equation [69]

Called "Lord" in the sense of "Yahweh" ⇒ [22x]

Luke 1:16; 1:17; 1:43; 1:68; 1:76; John 20:28b; Acts 9:17; 19:5; 21:13; 21:14;

Rom 10:9; 10:12; 1 Cor 1:2; 1:8b; 8:6c; 12:3; Eph 4:5; Phil 2:11b; 3:20; Jude 1:4; 1:14;

Rev 22:5c

Called "God" ⇒ [17x]

Luke 1:16; 1:68; John 1:1c; 1:18; 20:28c; Rom 9:5; 14:10; 14:12; 1 Cor 5:13; 1 Tim 3:15-16; Titus 1:3; 2:13; Heb 1:8; 2 Pet 1:1; 1 John 5:20; 2 John 1:9; Jude 1:25.

Equal or Identical to God ⇒ [3x] Phil 2:6a; 2:6b; Heb 1:3b.
Monogenic Sonship which denotes the same essence

⇒ [3x] John 3:16; 3:18; 1 John 4:9.

Called The Kabod YHWH / The Glory of God, who is Yahweh

⇒ [2x] Heb 1:3a; Rev 21:23c.

Called the “I AM” or “I Am He,” who is Yahweh

⇒ [3x] John 8:24 (by cataphora); 8:28 (ibid.); 8:58.

Direct OT Citation or Allusion substituting for Yahweh or The Kabod YHWH [19]

John 1:23 (Isa 40:3); John 3:13 (Prov 30:4); Rom 9:32 (Isa 8:13-14; 28:16);

Rom 10:13 (Joel 2:32); Rom 14:11 (Isa 45:23); 1 Cor 1:31 (Jer 9:24[23]);

1 Cor 2:16 (Isa 40:13); 1 Cor 10:4; 1 Cor 10:9; Eph 4:8 (Isa 68:19-21[Eng. 18-20]);

Eph 5:14a-b (Isa 26:19-20); Eph 5:14c (Isa 60:1-2); Phil 2:10-11a (Isa 45:23-24);

2 Tim 2:19 (Num 16:5); 2 Tim 4:14 (Ps 28:4); Jude 1:5b (e.g., Exod 13:9);

Jude 1:5c (Num 1:35); Rev 21:23b (Isa 60:19-20); Rev 22:5a-b (Isa 60:19-20).


Offices of Yahweh [17]

Apportioner to each human his lot in life ⇒ [2x] 1 Cor 7:17; Eph 4:11.
Creator ⇒ [6x] John 1:3; 1:10; 1:11; 1 Cor 8:6d; Col 3:10 (of the New Man, the born-again

aspect); Heb 1:2c.

Judge, Eschatological/Cosmic ⇒ [3x] John 12:31; 2 Tim 4:1; 4:8.
King of Heaven ⇒ [3x] 1 Cor 15:24; Eph 6:9; Rev 22:5d.
Rewarder of each human [« Prov 24:12, exclusive domain of YHWH]

⇒ [2x] Matt 16:27; Rom 2:6.

Shepherd, Only [1]
⇒ John 10:14-16 (“The Good Shepherd” and “One Shepherd” for His “own”).

All Claims of The Son's Deity, by Category | The Triunity of God

www.thetriunityofgod.com

J.

He is certainly deity. a gorgeous being.

He is not our father...

it is baffling how modern christianity twists christ into the same being as His father, which is a pagan theology view.