Your Views on The Trinity

[Peterlag]

Scripture conflicts with their beliefs and their beliefs seem to be more important to them than what the Scripture says. So they look for ways to argue around everything, explain it all away, deny everything, but I find peace in the fact they can't change the Bible. They can make new Bible versions, retranslate words, but they ultimately can't change anything anymore.

Yeah, well... they have some serious trinity leaning translations that when I straighten the verse out, they tell me I'm changing the Bible.

 

[Runningman]

That is the problem. You don't see.

If you could find a good argument for your view and convince capable scholars and theologians, you might have a bit of basis to accept your new, novel, gnostic belief. No one on his own should be pushing his private doctrines on people when they are so contrary to sound teaching.

Yes I see, you do not. You reject clear and explicit Scripture because it debunks trinitarianism.

Care to explain away Jesus having a temporary reign and being eternally subject to God?

Paul tells you exactly what happens after Jesus is done at the right hand of God. His reign there will end and he will be eternally subject to God along with everyone else.

1 Corinthians 15
24Then the end will come, when He hands over the kingdom to God the Father after He has destroyed all dominion, authority, and power. 25For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet. 26The last enemy to be destroyed is death. 27For “God has put everything under His feet.” Now when it says that everything has been put under Him, this clearly does not include the One who put everything under Him. 28And when all things have been subjected to Him, then the Son Himself will be made subject to Him who put all things under Him, so that God may be all in all.

 

[mikesw]

Yeah, well... they have some serious trinity leaning translations that when I straighten the verse out, they tell me I'm changing the Bible.

Maybe you need to consider the feedback.

If you could find a good argument for your view and convince capable scholars and theologians, you might have a bit of basis to accept your new, novel, gnostic belief. No one on his own should be pushing his private doctrines on people when they are so contrary to sound teaching.

 

[Runningman]

Maybe you need to consider the feedback.

If you could find a good argument for your view and convince capable scholars and theologians, you might have a bit of basis to accept your new, novel, gnostic belief. No one on his own should be pushing his private doctrines on people when they are so contrary to sound teaching.

Can you say Amen to the below passage?

1 Corinthians 15
24Then the end will come, when He hands over the kingdom to God the Father after He has destroyed all dominion, authority, and power. 25For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet. 26The last enemy to be destroyed is death. 27For “God has put everything under His feet.” Now when it says that everything has been put under Him, this clearly does not include the One who put everything under Him. 28And when all things have been subjected to Him, then the Son Himself will be made subject to Him who put all things under Him, so that God may be all in all.

 

[mikesw]

Yes I see, you do not. You reject clear and explicit Scripture because it debunks trinitarianism.

Care to explain away Jesus having a temporary reign and being eternally subject to God?

Paul tells you exactly what happens after Jesus is done at the right hand of God. His reign there will end and he will be eternally subject to God along with everyone else.

1 Corinthians 15
24Then the end will come, when He hands over the kingdom to God the Father after He has destroyed all dominion, authority, and power. 25For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet. 26The last enemy to be destroyed is death. 27For “God has put everything under His feet.” Now when it says that everything has been put under Him, this clearly does not include the One who put everything under Him. 28And when all things have been subjected to Him, then the Son Himself will be made subject to Him who put all things under Him, so that God may be all in all.

What is wrong with expressing that? At best, your point might be to revise the way we look at the Triune God.

You have to deny the pre-existent One who became flesh, as found in John 1.

If you could find a good argument for your view and convince capable scholars and theologians, you might have a bit of basis to accept your new, novel, gnostic belief. No one on his own should be pushing his private doctrines on people when they are so contrary to sound teaching.