Your Views on The Trinity

[Keiw1]

Yeppers.... 99% correct. The Godhead did it all. The one Godhead...... I absolutely agree.

AI says... The term "Godhead" is typically used as a singular noun to refer to the divine essence or nature of God, particularly in Christian theology.

but AI furthers things with However, it can imply a plurality in the context of the Trinity, which includes the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

But the most important question I ask you is why you do not believe scripture from the new testament?

NLT
In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

He existed in the beginning with God.

God created everything through him, and nothing was created except through him.
The Word gave life to everything that was created, and his life brought light to everyone.

Now, IF YOU CAALL JOHN A LIAR in the new testament... which you do by the fact that you deny the Word was at creation,
WHO ELSE are you calling a liar in the new testament?

Your illusion stems from the fact that the Word was not called capitol G God at John 1:1 in Greek. Any can look it up for self. 2 spots in NT where more than 1 is being called God or god in Greek=John 1:1-2Cor 4:4. Thus when one sees the Greek they find-The true living God=God is called a different Greek word than either the Word or satan is called--Yet trinity translation has god for satan and God for the Word translating the same exact word, thus one of those is error= The Word getting capitol G God. The Word would have been called the same word the true God is called if it translated-God for him.
In 1822 Abner Kneeland a Greek scholar, compared Greek and English side by side in his NT translation to prove to the world a god is correct to the Word at John 1:1-- 19 other translations by Greek scholars in history has a god to the Word as well-3 had was divine, 1 had was godlike.

 

[Keiw1]

For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him.
Colossians 1:16


The Son created all things according to the will of the Father.

The Son created the heavens and the earth.

The Son is God; YHWH


But to the Son He says:
“Your throne, O God, is forever and ever;
A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom.
You have loved righteousness and hated lawlessness;
Therefore God, Your God, has anointed You
With the oil of gladness more than Your companions.”
And: “You, LORD, in the beginning laid the foundation of the earth,
And the heavens are the work of Your hands.
Hebrews 1:8-10

Its 100% undeniable fact-Through= another did the creating= HE, not we or us.

 

[Peterlag]

All things except for Gods master worker=Jesus= created direct-first and last=Only begotten son.

It does not say all things except Gods master worker. It says thrones, dominions, principalities, and powers. Those are the things Jesus will need to govern in his new up coming kingdom. Those are the all things he will need.

 

[FreeInChrist]

Your illusion stems from the fact that the Word was not called capitol G God at John 1:1 in Greek. Any can look it up for self. 2 spots in NT where more than 1 is being called God or god in Greek=John 1:1-2Cor 4:4. Thus when one sees the Greek they find-The true living God=God is called a different Greek word than either the Word or satan is called--Yet trinity translation has god for satan and God for the Word translating the same exact word, thus one of those is error= The Word getting capitol G God. The Word would have been called the same word the true God is called if it translated-God for him.
In 1822 Abner Kneeland a Greek scholar, compared Greek and English side by side in his NT translation to prove to the world a god is correct to the Word at John 1:1-- 19 other translations by Greek scholars in history has a god to the Word as well-3 had was divine, 1 had was godlike.

Oh stop it.

The Greek interlinear has it capital G ... Here is the link so you can read because you will accuse me of
changing it. and it does not copy and paste well.

John 1:1 Interlinear: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

The only small g I have ever seen has been the NWT. JW bible.

Aramaic was common for that day also....

Lamsa Bible
THE Word was in the beginning, and that very Word was with God, and God was that Word.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
In the origin The Word had been existing and That Word had been existing with God and That Word was himself God.

 

[Peterlag]

Oh stop it.

The Greek interlinear has it capital G ... Here is the link so you can read because you will accuse me of
changing it. and it does not copy and paste well.

John 1:1 Interlinear: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

The only small g I have ever seen has been the NWT. JW bible.

Aramaic was common for that day also....

Lamsa Bible
THE Word was in the beginning, and that very Word was with God, and God was that Word.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
In the origin The Word had been existing and That Word had been existing with God and That Word was himself God.

I use the Aramaic Bible in Plain English a lot, but do keep in mind the guy's a big time Trinity person. Here's how I see John 1

The word "logos" (Word) denotes (I) "the expression of thought" as embodying a conception or idea. λόγος "logos" is something said (including the thought). So the word "logos" means an expression of thought. It makes perfect sense if we use this understanding everywhere the word "logos" is used. So in John 1:1 the Word is not Jesus, but rather it became flesh, which is God's expression of thought or plan that became flesh with the coming of Jesus Christ.

 

[mikesw]

I use the Aramaic Bible in Plain English a lot, but do keep in mind the guy's a big time Trinity person. Here's how I see John 1

The word "logos" (Word) denotes (I) "the expression of thought" as embodying a conception or idea. λόγος "logos" is something said (including the thought). So the word "logos" means an expression of thought. It makes perfect sense if we use this understanding everywhere the word "logos" is used. So in John 1:1 the Word is not Jesus, but rather it became flesh, which is God's expression of thought or plan that became flesh with the coming of Jesus Christ.

Peterlag does not read my posts. If John 1:1 were the only verse, peterlag would almost have a point. Some reason, he cannot get beyond verse 1 to see that the logos was with God and the Logos is God. In the hyperliteralism of unitarians, such verses have to be disregarded because a word cannot be with God nor can a word be God.
One thing we can recognize here is the failure to use the principle that words (like logos) do not particularly carry the baggage of its meaning in one passage into another passage. The balancing statement is sometimes a word has the same baggage from its use in another passage. The hyperliteralists cannot deal with this concept sufficiently and thus we see an extreme liability in their ability to analyze scriptures.
The logical meaning here is that the Logos here reflects who Jesus is -- of him being with God and being God. This indicates that Jesus is the message of God to humanity. Those who do not recognize this then fail to recognize the Messiah from God. Jesus as the Logos is why those who have seen him have seen the Father. This is why Jesus is called exact image of the Father, the expression of God to the world.
Share this again so Peterlag may not remain in the dark.