DavidTree
Active Member
this gave me a good wholesome lol - thank you and Good late morningWell, I know I should so yes I do want to know. Please
Also = fresh ground coffee at my house = all who love the LORD are welcome
this gave me a good wholesome lol - thank you and Good late morningWell, I know I should so yes I do want to know. Please
Peter begins with water???So water cannot save us because it is wet??????? Huh??????
1 Pet 3:21 says that the water of the Flood is symbolic of what now saves you: baptism. The Flood was the symbol, not baptism. But the baptism that saves us must have water (John 3:5) to fit the symbol.
No, I am taking the meaning of a Greek word from a Greek dictionary.Its interpreting the word.
have you actually stuidied the greek word? Have you studied greek histroy and how the word was used. Do youi uinderstand in greek society what a baptizer did?
it does not appear like it.. Your taking an english translation and a church translation. and missing the whole word.
According to whom? You? No thank you.I translated it literally using a possible interpretation for the greek word Baptizo.
Immerse and place into are not the same. I have not seen any Greek interpretation of "baptzo" that means placed into. I can place water into a bucket, but that is not what the word "baptizo" could mean.so is being placed into
If I am immersed or placed into something, does it matter what word I use.
of course not
thank you.I have studied the word "baptizo" in the Greek, and it is used to mean "to immerse," "to submerge," or "to dip". It can also imply cleansing by immersion, or even being overwhelmed.
This is not true.But again, there is only one immersion/baptism in the NT Church.
Why does circumcision not save, but water does?And it is not "Spirit immersion/baptism", although the Spirit is definitely involved in baptism/immersion. The one baptism/immersion in the NT Church requires/demands/is not NT baptism without water (1 Pet 3:21) and human action (Matt 28:19). Without water and human action you don't have NT baptism/immersion.
well I do not know what dictionary you took it from. but it is seriously lackingNo, I am taking the meaning of a Greek word from a Greek dictionary.
lolAccording to whom? You? No thank you.
Immerse and place into are not the same. I have not seen any Greek interpretation of "baptzo" that means placed into. I can place water into a bucket, but that is not what the word "baptizo" could mean.
None of that changes what I posted concerning Matthew 28. Moreover, the meaning of baptize in Matthew 28 cannot be referring to baptism of the Holy Spirit, because the reference there is what the apostles (and we) are commanded to do. There is no command in all of the NT that the apostles or anyone were commanded to baptize with the Holy Spirit.John the baptist
I indeed baptize in water, he will baptize with the hs and fire
Jesus. You will be baptized with the HS
Paul. they were baptized into moses.
so you are both wrong on all counts
You are missing something.So water cannot save us because it is wet??????? Huh??????
1 Pet 3:21 says that the water of the Flood is symbolic of what now saves you: baptism. The Flood was the symbol, not baptism. But the baptism that saves us must have water (John 3:5) to fit the symbol.
what work of the law was required for salvation?So water cannot save us because it is wet??????? Huh??????
no. It says the waters of the flood is another symbols. just as water baptism is.1 Pet 3:21 says that the water of the Flood is symbolic of what now saves you: baptism. The Flood was the symbol, not baptism. But the baptism that saves us must have water (John 3:5) to fit the symbol.
The Bible makes no such claim. It is only you clinging to your false doctrines making that claim. And you are wrong!You can good grief all you want. Cornelius was a forgiven man way b4 Peter preached to him to believe.
Then do it.
None of that changes what I posted concerning Matthew 28. Moreover, the meaning of baptize in Matthew 28
I never said it did now did I. Now your a false accuser.cannot be referring to baptism of the Holy Spirit, because the reference there is what the apostles (and we) are commanded to do.
because spirit baptism is not a commandThere is no command in all of the NT that the apostles or anyone were commanded to baptize with the Holy Spirit.
What you said here in your post, God Commanded Beforehand = Exodus 31:12-17Eph 2: 8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,
2: 9 not a result of works, so that no one may boast.
IOW..Faith is not considered a work in the context of salvation; rather, it is viewed as a gift from God that does not rely on human effort. The Bible teaches that we are saved by grace through faith, not by our works
Requiring anything in addition to faith in Jesus Christ for salvation is a works-based salvation. To add anything to the gospel is to say that Jesus’ death on the cross was not sufficient to purchase our salvation. To say that baptism is necessary for salvation is to say we must add our own good works and obedience to Christ’s death in order to make it sufficient for salvation. Jesus’ death alone paid for our sins
But you all are certainly entitled to your opinions....
@DavidTree mentioned Matthew 28:19 in Reply #2617. I simply expanded on the meaning of the word baptize in that verse. Get of that High Horse you ride all the time and you just might learn something.Matt 28 is believers baptism.
we were not even discussing matt 28. see how you have totally changed things.. then again, I have come to expect that from you.. Remeber, you say you do not believe our works saves us.
Yeah you did. Go back and look at your reply #2602I never said it did now did I. Now your a false accuser.
As if you even knew what that is.Matt 28 is believers baptism.
Yes the word of Salvation is sent to them that are fearing God, the regenerated, for they are the good ground hearers. Acts 13:26i love Acts ch10/Cornelius
Before Peter was sent by the Lord to Cornelius we know that he was hearing the Word of God thru the Jewish people.
For the FATHER was already at work in Cornelius heart
There is a GREAT Precedent that God set in Acts chapter = can you see it
Says a person who has zero understanding of the bibleThe Bible makes no such claim. It is only you clinging to your false doctrines making that claim. And you are wrong!
this is TRUTH which you posted AND it is a "precedent" set by the LJC in His GospelYes the word of Salvation is sent to them that are fearing God, the regenerated, for they are the good ground hearers. Acts 13:26
Men and brethren, children of the stock of Abraham, and whosoever among you feareth God, to you is the word of this salvation sent.
The good ground hearer Matt 13:23
23 But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth the word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.
See a heart that fears God is good by regeneration, and when it hears and receives the word, he will spiritually understand bear fruit, faith
LJC ?this is TRUTH which you posted AND it is a "precedent" set by the LJC in His Gospel
there is another Precedent, established beforehand, AND is being EXPRESSED in Acts ch10
@Tothalordbeallglory @Red Baker
Lord Jesus ChristLJC ?