koberstein
Active member
But they are still the apple of Adonai's eye.
Israel is more a righteous nation than America.
Total Genesis
- Thread starter Olde Tymer
- Start date
Israel is more a righteous nation than America.
civic
Well-known member
we haven't talked since and they were the ones that knocked on our day and set up the conditions for breeding and what we would get from letting them use our dog.
civic
Well-known member
Are they still the apple ? yes
are they more righteous that depends on whos standards we are measuring mans righteousness by.
koberstein
Active member
You have a different standard than Adonai's?Are they still the apple ? yes
are they more righteous that depends on whos standards we are measuring mans righteousness by.
Olde Tymer
Well-known member
~
● Gen 28:22a . . And this stone, which I have set up as a pillar, shall be God's
abode;
Jacob's pillow stone wasn't really meant to be a dwelling or a container as we
typically think of human habitat or animal cages. It was meant to be a sort of
monitoring device. An 8th century BC Aramaic treaty inscription from Sfire, in
Syria, terms each upright stone on which the treaty is inscribed as an abode of the
gods.
The Hebrew word for "God" is 'elohiym (el-o-heem') which is a plural word
pertaining to deities of every possible description: both the good and the bad, the
true and the false, the celestial and the terrestrial, the essential and the
superfluous, the visible and the invisible, the supreme and the subordinate.
The stone(s) symbolize a divine presence(s) monitoring fulfillment and/or
infractions of the terms of a treaty or a vow. So Jacob's pillar was not only the
custodian of his vow, but was also its regulatory agency taking note whether Jacob
and Jehovah keep their promises to each other. The very same thing turns up again
in Gen 31:44-52.
● Gen 28:22b . . and of all that You give me, I will set aside a tithe for You.
This is probably the very first Biblical instance of the so-called "faith promise".
Though coming from a wealthy family; and heir apparent to his father Isaac's
personal fortune, the fulfillment of this particular vow was contingent, not upon
what Jacob possessed already; but upon God's future providence.
Jacob didn't promise a set dollar figure, but promised a "tithe" which in English
Bibles is commonly translated a tenth; but in reality the Hebrew word 'asar (aw
sar') just means to apportion; which Webster's defines as: to divide and share out
according to a plan; especially to make a proportionate division or distribution of.
The value of a nondescript tithe therefore is left up to individual discretion. (cf.
2Cor 8:10-12 & 2Cor 9:7)
Jacob was under no obligation to reciprocate and compensate God for the promises.
Their fulfillment was dependent neither upon Jacob's generosity nor his piety.
Fulfillment was dependent solely upon God's own personal integrity.
So why should Jacob dedicate a tithe? Well; like I said, he didn't have to. Jacob's
response was totally spontaneous and voluntary. His tithe was motivated from a
sense of fair play rather than a response to God's edicts. In other words: Jacob
reciprocated God's generosity with some generosity of his own.
A faith that gives out of friendship, rather than obligation, is much better than a
religion that requires a mandatory tithe. And the gift should be given where the
giver feels whole-hearted about it; viz: they should have some say in where their
offering goes, and they should be able to feel quite satisfied about it rather than
feel as though their pockets were picked.
So; how was Jacob going to transfer some of his assets into God's account? There
was neither Temple nor synagogue in his day, and certainly no Aaronic priesthood.
Abraham did his business with Melchizedek but there is no record of either Isaac or
Jacob doing business with one of Mel's successors.
When all else fails, a very, very good way to give to God is by helping people less
fortunate than yourself; in other words: pay it forward.
"He who is generous to the poor makes a loan to The Lord: He will repay him his
due." (Prv 19:17)
There are lots of charities benefiting disadvantaged people. United Way lists quite
few to pick from; and just about every city has at least one gospel-oriented rescue
mission. For sure; those causes are a whole lot more satisfying than just mindlessly
tossing money into a basket passed around on a Sunday morning.
_
● Gen 28:22a . . And this stone, which I have set up as a pillar, shall be God's
abode;
Jacob's pillow stone wasn't really meant to be a dwelling or a container as we
typically think of human habitat or animal cages. It was meant to be a sort of
monitoring device. An 8th century BC Aramaic treaty inscription from Sfire, in
Syria, terms each upright stone on which the treaty is inscribed as an abode of the
gods.
The Hebrew word for "God" is 'elohiym (el-o-heem') which is a plural word
pertaining to deities of every possible description: both the good and the bad, the
true and the false, the celestial and the terrestrial, the essential and the
superfluous, the visible and the invisible, the supreme and the subordinate.
The stone(s) symbolize a divine presence(s) monitoring fulfillment and/or
infractions of the terms of a treaty or a vow. So Jacob's pillar was not only the
custodian of his vow, but was also its regulatory agency taking note whether Jacob
and Jehovah keep their promises to each other. The very same thing turns up again
in Gen 31:44-52.
● Gen 28:22b . . and of all that You give me, I will set aside a tithe for You.
This is probably the very first Biblical instance of the so-called "faith promise".
Though coming from a wealthy family; and heir apparent to his father Isaac's
personal fortune, the fulfillment of this particular vow was contingent, not upon
what Jacob possessed already; but upon God's future providence.
Jacob didn't promise a set dollar figure, but promised a "tithe" which in English
Bibles is commonly translated a tenth; but in reality the Hebrew word 'asar (aw
sar') just means to apportion; which Webster's defines as: to divide and share out
according to a plan; especially to make a proportionate division or distribution of.
The value of a nondescript tithe therefore is left up to individual discretion. (cf.
2Cor 8:10-12 & 2Cor 9:7)
Jacob was under no obligation to reciprocate and compensate God for the promises.
Their fulfillment was dependent neither upon Jacob's generosity nor his piety.
Fulfillment was dependent solely upon God's own personal integrity.
So why should Jacob dedicate a tithe? Well; like I said, he didn't have to. Jacob's
response was totally spontaneous and voluntary. His tithe was motivated from a
sense of fair play rather than a response to God's edicts. In other words: Jacob
reciprocated God's generosity with some generosity of his own.
A faith that gives out of friendship, rather than obligation, is much better than a
religion that requires a mandatory tithe. And the gift should be given where the
giver feels whole-hearted about it; viz: they should have some say in where their
offering goes, and they should be able to feel quite satisfied about it rather than
feel as though their pockets were picked.
So; how was Jacob going to transfer some of his assets into God's account? There
was neither Temple nor synagogue in his day, and certainly no Aaronic priesthood.
Abraham did his business with Melchizedek but there is no record of either Isaac or
Jacob doing business with one of Mel's successors.
When all else fails, a very, very good way to give to God is by helping people less
fortunate than yourself; in other words: pay it forward.
"He who is generous to the poor makes a loan to The Lord: He will repay him his
due." (Prv 19:17)
There are lots of charities benefiting disadvantaged people. United Way lists quite
few to pick from; and just about every city has at least one gospel-oriented rescue
mission. For sure; those causes are a whole lot more satisfying than just mindlessly
tossing money into a basket passed around on a Sunday morning.
_
koberstein
Active member
Are charities truly helping people or are they enablers?
Aeliana
Well-known member
I'm sorry for your bad experience and I'm sure you forgave them. I'm sorry you missed out on the yellow lab puppies they're the best. The situation I'm in I can only have small dogs but big or small I love them all. Here's a photo of my latest, Buddy He's from an animal rescue. Only had him a few months but I've definitely already fallen in love with him.
Olde Tymer
Well-known member
~
● Gen 29:1 . . Jacob resumed his journey and came to the land of the Easterners.
The geographic region in Turkey where Jacob went wasn't actually east by his
reckoning. It was just about dead north. But the people who populated that region
had roots in the east. Here's another version.
"Then Jacob went on his journey, and came to the land of the sons of the east."
Many of the peoples in and around Haran, although they lived northward from
Canaan, were actually descendants of early pioneers who migrated out west from
the world of Babylon; just as Abraham and his dad Terah had done many years
prior to Jacob's birth. (cf. Gen 11:1-2)
● Gen 29:2a . .There before his eyes was a well in the open.
The balance of Jacob's trip, from Luz to this well, is passed over in silence.
Apparently nothing of significance occurred along the way. If Jacob traveled at, say,
25 miles per day, it would have taken him about eighteen days to reach Haran.
If he stuck to the trade route, he could have stopped in Damascus and took in
some of the local sights and maybe stayed at a "motel" before pushing on. Food
wouldn't really be a problem because there surely were plenty of settlements
and/or vendors along the trade route.
Major highways, like the old US routes 66, and 101, always had lots of merchants
offering overnight accommodations, plus all the goods and services a traveler would
likely need to see them through. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if there existed in that
day food cart equivalents of McDonalds and Burger King.
● Gen 29:2b-3 . .Three flocks of sheep were lying there beside it, for the flocks
were watered from that well. The stone on the mouth of the well was large. When
all the flocks were gathered there, the stone would be rolled from the mouth of the
well and the sheep watered; then the stone would be put back in its place on the
mouth of the well.
Apparently this well wasn't fed by an artesian source but was a variety that kept
itself filled by seepage out of a substrate aquifer. A well like that-- which is more
like a cistern --can become rancid very quickly by bird droppings, dead critters, and
debris if it's not kept covered. Although structuring the watering time created a
rush hour, it was sensible. That way the well wasn't left open for too long a time
and there was less chance of polluting it.
● Gen 29:4a . . Jacob said to them: My friends, where are you from?
Exactly what language Jacob spoke in his greeting isn't said; but during his era;
Akkadian was a common language in Mesopotamia where Laban lived.
I don't think this well is the very same one where Abraham's servant met Rebecca.
For one thing, it's out in the open, not actually connected with any specific town. If
it had been, then Jacob could have assumed the shepherds lived nearby and not
asked them where they were from.
This particular well was within walking distance of pasture land. Any grasses close
in to the towns were likely over-grazed. That's just one of the natural results of
progress and urban sprawl.
● Gen 29:4b-6a . . And they said: We are from Haran. He said to them: Do you
know Laban the son of Nahor? And they said: Yes, we do. He continued: Is he well?
Laban's location, and his state of affairs, would of course be Jacob's primary
concern. After all, he just traveled nearly 500 miles to find him. If the man was
dead or moved away, then the trip was all for nothing; and in those days, there
was no way to call ahead.
● Gen 29:1 . . Jacob resumed his journey and came to the land of the Easterners.
The geographic region in Turkey where Jacob went wasn't actually east by his
reckoning. It was just about dead north. But the people who populated that region
had roots in the east. Here's another version.
"Then Jacob went on his journey, and came to the land of the sons of the east."
Many of the peoples in and around Haran, although they lived northward from
Canaan, were actually descendants of early pioneers who migrated out west from
the world of Babylon; just as Abraham and his dad Terah had done many years
prior to Jacob's birth. (cf. Gen 11:1-2)
_
● Gen 29:1 . . Jacob resumed his journey and came to the land of the Easterners.
The geographic region in Turkey where Jacob went wasn't actually east by his
reckoning. It was just about dead north. But the people who populated that region
had roots in the east. Here's another version.
"Then Jacob went on his journey, and came to the land of the sons of the east."
Many of the peoples in and around Haran, although they lived northward from
Canaan, were actually descendants of early pioneers who migrated out west from
the world of Babylon; just as Abraham and his dad Terah had done many years
prior to Jacob's birth. (cf. Gen 11:1-2)
● Gen 29:2a . .There before his eyes was a well in the open.
The balance of Jacob's trip, from Luz to this well, is passed over in silence.
Apparently nothing of significance occurred along the way. If Jacob traveled at, say,
25 miles per day, it would have taken him about eighteen days to reach Haran.
If he stuck to the trade route, he could have stopped in Damascus and took in
some of the local sights and maybe stayed at a "motel" before pushing on. Food
wouldn't really be a problem because there surely were plenty of settlements
and/or vendors along the trade route.
Major highways, like the old US routes 66, and 101, always had lots of merchants
offering overnight accommodations, plus all the goods and services a traveler would
likely need to see them through. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if there existed in that
day food cart equivalents of McDonalds and Burger King.
● Gen 29:2b-3 . .Three flocks of sheep were lying there beside it, for the flocks
were watered from that well. The stone on the mouth of the well was large. When
all the flocks were gathered there, the stone would be rolled from the mouth of the
well and the sheep watered; then the stone would be put back in its place on the
mouth of the well.
Apparently this well wasn't fed by an artesian source but was a variety that kept
itself filled by seepage out of a substrate aquifer. A well like that-- which is more
like a cistern --can become rancid very quickly by bird droppings, dead critters, and
debris if it's not kept covered. Although structuring the watering time created a
rush hour, it was sensible. That way the well wasn't left open for too long a time
and there was less chance of polluting it.
● Gen 29:4a . . Jacob said to them: My friends, where are you from?
Exactly what language Jacob spoke in his greeting isn't said; but during his era;
Akkadian was a common language in Mesopotamia where Laban lived.
I don't think this well is the very same one where Abraham's servant met Rebecca.
For one thing, it's out in the open, not actually connected with any specific town. If
it had been, then Jacob could have assumed the shepherds lived nearby and not
asked them where they were from.
This particular well was within walking distance of pasture land. Any grasses close
in to the towns were likely over-grazed. That's just one of the natural results of
progress and urban sprawl.
● Gen 29:4b-6a . . And they said: We are from Haran. He said to them: Do you
know Laban the son of Nahor? And they said: Yes, we do. He continued: Is he well?
Laban's location, and his state of affairs, would of course be Jacob's primary
concern. After all, he just traveled nearly 500 miles to find him. If the man was
dead or moved away, then the trip was all for nothing; and in those days, there
was no way to call ahead.
● Gen 29:1 . . Jacob resumed his journey and came to the land of the Easterners.
The geographic region in Turkey where Jacob went wasn't actually east by his
reckoning. It was just about dead north. But the people who populated that region
had roots in the east. Here's another version.
"Then Jacob went on his journey, and came to the land of the sons of the east."
Many of the peoples in and around Haran, although they lived northward from
Canaan, were actually descendants of early pioneers who migrated out west from
the world of Babylon; just as Abraham and his dad Terah had done many years
prior to Jacob's birth. (cf. Gen 11:1-2)
_
Olde Tymer
Well-known member
~
● Gen 29:2a . .There before his eyes was a well in the open.
The balance of Jacob's trip, from Luz to this well, is passed over in silence.
Apparently nothing of significance occurred along the way. If Jacob traveled at, say,
25 miles per day, it would have taken him about eighteen days to reach Haran.
If he stuck to the trade route, he could have stopped in Damascus and took in
some of the local sights and maybe stayed at a "motel" before pushing on. Food
wouldn't really be a problem because there surely were plenty of settlements
and/or vendors along the trade route.
Major highways, like the old US routes 66, and 101, always had lots of merchants
offering overnight accommodations, plus all the goods and services a traveler would
likely need to see them through. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if there existed in that
day food cart equivalents of McDonalds and Burger King.
● Gen 29:2b-3 . .Three flocks of sheep were lying there beside it, for the flocks
were watered from that well. The stone on the mouth of the well was large. When
all the flocks were gathered there, the stone would be rolled from the mouth of the
well and the sheep watered; then the stone would be put back in its place on the
mouth of the well.
Apparently this well wasn't fed by an artesian source but was a variety that kept
itself filled by seepage out of a substrate aquifer. A well like that-- which is more
like a cistern --can become rancid very quickly by bird droppings, dead critters, and
debris if it's not kept covered. Although structuring the watering time created a
rush hour, it was sensible. That way the well wasn't left open for too long a time
and there was less chance of polluting it.
● Gen 29:4a . . Jacob said to them: My friends, where are you from?
Exactly what language Jacob spoke in his greeting isn't said; but during his era;
Akkadian was a common language in Mesopotamia where Laban lived.
I don't think this well is the very same one where Abraham's servant met Rebecca.
For one thing, it's out in the open, not actually connected with any specific town. If
it had been, then Jacob could have assumed the shepherds lived nearby and not
asked them where they were from.
This particular well was within walking distance of pasture land. Any grasses close
in to the towns were likely over-grazed. That's just one of the natural results of
progress and urban sprawl.
● Gen 29:4b-6a . . And they said: We are from Haran. He said to them: Do you
know Laban the son of Nahor? And they said: Yes, we do. He continued: Is he well?
Laban's location, and his state of affairs, would of course be Jacob's primary
concern. After all, he just traveled nearly 500 miles to find him. If the man was
dead or moved away, then the trip was all for nothing; and in those days, there
was no way to call ahead.
● Gen 29:6b . .They answered: Yes, he is; and there is his daughter Rachel, coming
with the flock.
According to Gen 31:1 Laban had sons too, not just daughters. But the boys may
have been too young at the time to go out in the fields alone. So big sister had to
do all the ropin' and brandin' till her little brothers grew a few more hat sizes.
Does that maybe indicate Rachel was a bit of a tomboy? Maybe. Personally; I think
she was. But I don't think she was one of those hard, masculine kinds of tomboys,
like some tough she-male working shoulder to shoulder with roughneck oil drillers,
or packing a 9mm Glock, a nightstick, and a can of pepper spray as a cop, or
putting out fires with a hook and ladder company, or dressed full-out for combat in
Afghanistan.
I think Rachel was one of those women who can survive in a man's world if need
be; yet retain their feminine side too. They still like cosmetics, dinner out,
husbands, family and children, pampering themselves with a trip to the beauty
parlor, and shopping for new shoes and a purse-- but don't mind running a lawn
mower, trimming the hedges, or spinning up a leaf blower when they have to.
There's a lot of single moms out there nowadays who haven't much choice but to
wear a man's hat now and again-- not to prove a point, but just to get by.
Herding sheep out in the open is risky for a lone woman. But apparently Rachel
wasn't afraid of any of the local men; who no doubt were motivated by male
chivalry to look out for her; and besides, we're going to see just up ahead that her
dad was not a man to trifle with. Anybody who messed with Rachel would have to
answer to Laban; and he was a man who took nothing lying down.
Jacob is going to fall for this tomboy-ish angel in a very short time; and no
surprise. Men often hook up with women that resemble their moms. That is so
weird because some of those very same guys were brought up by moms from hell.
But that's what they're used to. So, without even thinking about it, they often
gravitate to those very same attributes in a girl.
Well, Rachel and Rebecca were like peas in a pod. They were both confident,
fearless, and decisive: not to mention tens to boot. I think Jacob felt very secure
with women like that.
_
● Gen 29:2a . .There before his eyes was a well in the open.
The balance of Jacob's trip, from Luz to this well, is passed over in silence.
Apparently nothing of significance occurred along the way. If Jacob traveled at, say,
25 miles per day, it would have taken him about eighteen days to reach Haran.
If he stuck to the trade route, he could have stopped in Damascus and took in
some of the local sights and maybe stayed at a "motel" before pushing on. Food
wouldn't really be a problem because there surely were plenty of settlements
and/or vendors along the trade route.
Major highways, like the old US routes 66, and 101, always had lots of merchants
offering overnight accommodations, plus all the goods and services a traveler would
likely need to see them through. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if there existed in that
day food cart equivalents of McDonalds and Burger King.
● Gen 29:2b-3 . .Three flocks of sheep were lying there beside it, for the flocks
were watered from that well. The stone on the mouth of the well was large. When
all the flocks were gathered there, the stone would be rolled from the mouth of the
well and the sheep watered; then the stone would be put back in its place on the
mouth of the well.
Apparently this well wasn't fed by an artesian source but was a variety that kept
itself filled by seepage out of a substrate aquifer. A well like that-- which is more
like a cistern --can become rancid very quickly by bird droppings, dead critters, and
debris if it's not kept covered. Although structuring the watering time created a
rush hour, it was sensible. That way the well wasn't left open for too long a time
and there was less chance of polluting it.
● Gen 29:4a . . Jacob said to them: My friends, where are you from?
Exactly what language Jacob spoke in his greeting isn't said; but during his era;
Akkadian was a common language in Mesopotamia where Laban lived.
I don't think this well is the very same one where Abraham's servant met Rebecca.
For one thing, it's out in the open, not actually connected with any specific town. If
it had been, then Jacob could have assumed the shepherds lived nearby and not
asked them where they were from.
This particular well was within walking distance of pasture land. Any grasses close
in to the towns were likely over-grazed. That's just one of the natural results of
progress and urban sprawl.
● Gen 29:4b-6a . . And they said: We are from Haran. He said to them: Do you
know Laban the son of Nahor? And they said: Yes, we do. He continued: Is he well?
Laban's location, and his state of affairs, would of course be Jacob's primary
concern. After all, he just traveled nearly 500 miles to find him. If the man was
dead or moved away, then the trip was all for nothing; and in those days, there
was no way to call ahead.
● Gen 29:6b . .They answered: Yes, he is; and there is his daughter Rachel, coming
with the flock.
According to Gen 31:1 Laban had sons too, not just daughters. But the boys may
have been too young at the time to go out in the fields alone. So big sister had to
do all the ropin' and brandin' till her little brothers grew a few more hat sizes.
Does that maybe indicate Rachel was a bit of a tomboy? Maybe. Personally; I think
she was. But I don't think she was one of those hard, masculine kinds of tomboys,
like some tough she-male working shoulder to shoulder with roughneck oil drillers,
or packing a 9mm Glock, a nightstick, and a can of pepper spray as a cop, or
putting out fires with a hook and ladder company, or dressed full-out for combat in
Afghanistan.
I think Rachel was one of those women who can survive in a man's world if need
be; yet retain their feminine side too. They still like cosmetics, dinner out,
husbands, family and children, pampering themselves with a trip to the beauty
parlor, and shopping for new shoes and a purse-- but don't mind running a lawn
mower, trimming the hedges, or spinning up a leaf blower when they have to.
There's a lot of single moms out there nowadays who haven't much choice but to
wear a man's hat now and again-- not to prove a point, but just to get by.
Herding sheep out in the open is risky for a lone woman. But apparently Rachel
wasn't afraid of any of the local men; who no doubt were motivated by male
chivalry to look out for her; and besides, we're going to see just up ahead that her
dad was not a man to trifle with. Anybody who messed with Rachel would have to
answer to Laban; and he was a man who took nothing lying down.
Jacob is going to fall for this tomboy-ish angel in a very short time; and no
surprise. Men often hook up with women that resemble their moms. That is so
weird because some of those very same guys were brought up by moms from hell.
But that's what they're used to. So, without even thinking about it, they often
gravitate to those very same attributes in a girl.
Well, Rachel and Rebecca were like peas in a pod. They were both confident,
fearless, and decisive: not to mention tens to boot. I think Jacob felt very secure
with women like that.
_
I will pray you can witness to them and share the gospel.
civic
Well-known member
Thanks
Olde Tymer
Well-known member
~
● Gen 29:7 . . He said: It is still broad daylight, too early to round up the animals;
water the flock and take them to pasture.
The Hebrew word translated "broad" basically means great (in any sense). It's been
variously translated as high day, the sun is high, early in the day, and much
daylight.
Apparently the usual time for watering flocks was later in the afternoon just prior to
bedding them down for the night.
* Jacob just blew into the neighborhood and he's already telling strangers what to
do! No doubt an attitude he brought with him from Isaac's ranch. Down there the
servants jumped when Jacob said something. Up here in Haran though, things were
just a wee bit different.
● Gen 29:8 . . But they said: We cannot, until all the flocks are rounded up; then
the stone is rolled off the mouth of the well and we water the sheep.
Actually, someone may have owned that well; and set the rules for it's use. In
those days, whoever dug for water usually had the rights to it; somewhat like a
prospector's claim in the gold fields out in 1850s California. Apparently the owner
didn't mind people using the water as long as they respected his feelings about it.
But Jacob had a mind of his own, and seemed to care very little for the property
rights of others.
There's a clash of cultures going on in this scene. Jacob was from the frontier lands
of Canaan where men of mettle did pretty much as they wished. I'm guessing that
Haran was a bit more civilized.
And then too; Jacob was a privileged kid born with a silver spoon in his mouth. I've
seen the kind of superiority complex that kind of upbringing sometimes instills
within children. Well; that's going to change. Jacob is entering the school of hard
knocks, and he's going to learn a thing or two from professor Laban. But when it's
all over, Jacob will be a better man for it.
● Gen 29:9-10 . .While he was still speaking with them, Rachel came with her
father's flock; for she was a shepherdess. And when Jacob saw Rachel, the
daughter of his uncle Laban, and the flock of his uncle Laban, Jacob went up and
rolled the stone off the mouth of the well, and watered the flock of his uncle Laban.
Violating local customs is an insolent thing to do; and almost certainly guaranteed
to get you off on the wrong foot. And besides: fair is fair. The other shepherds were
there ahead of Rachel, and no telling how long they'd been waiting. Word of Jacob's
favoritism, and his disdain for fair play, would surely spread.
Coming from a privileged family; Jacob was accustomed to doing pretty much as he
pleased and answering to no one for it. But arriving in Haran, he was a nobody: a
homeless drifter. Now he's going to learn what it's like to be just another face in the
crowd; and he is also going to learn what it's like to do as you're told. Unkie Laban
is just the bull o' the woods for some long overdue rich-kid attitude adjustment.
● Gen 29:11 . .Then Jacob kissed Rachel, and broke into tears.
Poor Jacob. He'd been under a lot of stress lately; and probably feeling very alone
in the world. His cousin must have seemed to him like an angel of mercy come to
rescue his soul from the abyss. First he helped water her flock; for no apparent
reason to Rachel other than courtesy; which she seemed to accept without any
fuss. But then he impulsively kissed her (on the cheek I hope) and started sobbing.
Rachel must have stared at Jacob like a man gone mad from a brain tumor.
● Gen 29:12 . . Jacob told Rachel that he was her father's kinsman, that he was
Rebecca's son; and she ran and told her father.
Zoom! Out of there like a bottle rocket (so to speak). Boy that girl sure takes after
auntie Becky. Rachel lit out of there like the critters sent from Jessie the Cowgirl to
fetch Sheriff Woody in Toy Story2.
● Gen 29:13a . . On hearing the news of his sister's son Jacob, Laban ran to greet
him;
I seriously doubt that Laban sprinted. The man was over 100 by now and near the
age of Jacob's mom; maybe even older than her. Isaac and Rebecca were married
twenty years before her first child, and Jacob is around 75 at this point. For a man
Laban's age "rushed" and/or "hurried" seems more reasonable than ran.
_
● Gen 29:7 . . He said: It is still broad daylight, too early to round up the animals;
water the flock and take them to pasture.
The Hebrew word translated "broad" basically means great (in any sense). It's been
variously translated as high day, the sun is high, early in the day, and much
daylight.
Apparently the usual time for watering flocks was later in the afternoon just prior to
bedding them down for the night.
* Jacob just blew into the neighborhood and he's already telling strangers what to
do! No doubt an attitude he brought with him from Isaac's ranch. Down there the
servants jumped when Jacob said something. Up here in Haran though, things were
just a wee bit different.
● Gen 29:8 . . But they said: We cannot, until all the flocks are rounded up; then
the stone is rolled off the mouth of the well and we water the sheep.
Actually, someone may have owned that well; and set the rules for it's use. In
those days, whoever dug for water usually had the rights to it; somewhat like a
prospector's claim in the gold fields out in 1850s California. Apparently the owner
didn't mind people using the water as long as they respected his feelings about it.
But Jacob had a mind of his own, and seemed to care very little for the property
rights of others.
There's a clash of cultures going on in this scene. Jacob was from the frontier lands
of Canaan where men of mettle did pretty much as they wished. I'm guessing that
Haran was a bit more civilized.
And then too; Jacob was a privileged kid born with a silver spoon in his mouth. I've
seen the kind of superiority complex that kind of upbringing sometimes instills
within children. Well; that's going to change. Jacob is entering the school of hard
knocks, and he's going to learn a thing or two from professor Laban. But when it's
all over, Jacob will be a better man for it.
● Gen 29:9-10 . .While he was still speaking with them, Rachel came with her
father's flock; for she was a shepherdess. And when Jacob saw Rachel, the
daughter of his uncle Laban, and the flock of his uncle Laban, Jacob went up and
rolled the stone off the mouth of the well, and watered the flock of his uncle Laban.
Violating local customs is an insolent thing to do; and almost certainly guaranteed
to get you off on the wrong foot. And besides: fair is fair. The other shepherds were
there ahead of Rachel, and no telling how long they'd been waiting. Word of Jacob's
favoritism, and his disdain for fair play, would surely spread.
Coming from a privileged family; Jacob was accustomed to doing pretty much as he
pleased and answering to no one for it. But arriving in Haran, he was a nobody: a
homeless drifter. Now he's going to learn what it's like to be just another face in the
crowd; and he is also going to learn what it's like to do as you're told. Unkie Laban
is just the bull o' the woods for some long overdue rich-kid attitude adjustment.
● Gen 29:11 . .Then Jacob kissed Rachel, and broke into tears.
Poor Jacob. He'd been under a lot of stress lately; and probably feeling very alone
in the world. His cousin must have seemed to him like an angel of mercy come to
rescue his soul from the abyss. First he helped water her flock; for no apparent
reason to Rachel other than courtesy; which she seemed to accept without any
fuss. But then he impulsively kissed her (on the cheek I hope) and started sobbing.
Rachel must have stared at Jacob like a man gone mad from a brain tumor.
● Gen 29:12 . . Jacob told Rachel that he was her father's kinsman, that he was
Rebecca's son; and she ran and told her father.
Zoom! Out of there like a bottle rocket (so to speak). Boy that girl sure takes after
auntie Becky. Rachel lit out of there like the critters sent from Jessie the Cowgirl to
fetch Sheriff Woody in Toy Story2.
● Gen 29:13a . . On hearing the news of his sister's son Jacob, Laban ran to greet
him;
I seriously doubt that Laban sprinted. The man was over 100 by now and near the
age of Jacob's mom; maybe even older than her. Isaac and Rebecca were married
twenty years before her first child, and Jacob is around 75 at this point. For a man
Laban's age "rushed" and/or "hurried" seems more reasonable than ran.
_
koberstein
Active member
Toda Raba Thank you for the trip down memory lane.
Olde Tymer
Well-known member
~
● Gen 29:13b . . he embraced him and kissed him,
Foreign customs often offend Americans. I was visiting the home of a Portuguese
man in San Diego a number of years back when his son and daughter-in-law
showed up unexpectedly. Dad and son greeted each other with a hug; and kissed
full on the lips. I just about died; it was so gross. And then he kissed the daughter
in-law full on the lips too. I think you have to grow up in those kinds of customs to
really be comfortable with them.
● Gen 29:13c-14a . . and took him into his house. He told Laban all that had
happened, and Laban said to him: You are truly my bone and flesh.
Adam said pretty much the very same thing about Eve at Gen 2:23 because she
wasn't created from the dust as he had been, but was constructed from already
existing human tissue amputated from his own body. In other words: ol' Laban was
saying "You and I are one and the same" because tricking a father in order to
supplant a brother was just the thing Laban would have thought of himself had he
been in Jacob's shoes.
● Gen 29:14b-15 . .When he had stayed with him a month's time, Laban said to
Jacob: Just because you are a kinsman, should you serve me for nothing? Tell me,
what shall your wages be?
It's curious that Laban would offer Jacob employment. I'm guessing that Jacob had
offered to help out around Laban's ranch only just long enough for the heat blow
over back home; but Laban became impressed with Jacob's work ethic and wanted
him on permanently. Sometimes good help is very hard to find; and worth paying
for.
● Gen 29:16-17a . . Now Laban had two daughters; the name of the older one was
Leah, and the name of the younger was Rachel. Leah had weak eyes;
According to Jewish folklore, Leah had weak eyes from crying all the time at the
prospect of being forced to marrying Esau.
The Hebrew word for "weak" basically means tender, soft, weak, and/or gentle, and
quite possibly young and youthful.
So the word doesn't necessarily mean that something is feeble. It can also mean
that someone's eyes convey kindness as opposed to eyes that look at you with
knives.
Pity. Leah was a good girl; but just about bankrupt in what really matters to most
guys; and as any woman with assets can vouch; most men think better with their
eyes than with their brains. In other words: when it comes to women, men's brains
switch off and it's all about the view after that: if you know what I mean.
● Gen 29:17b-18a . . Rachel was shapely and beautiful. Jacob loved Rachel;
In other words, her sister Leas wasn't shapely and beautiful.
But there is something very missing in this story-- Rachel's love for Jacob. The man
was ga-ga over her. But how did she really feel about him?
Jacob was fortunate about something. In those days, a man didn't have to win a
woman's heart. He had to win her custodian's heart. So men could pick out a girl
like they might pick out a shirt or a new car. Girls, through no fault of their own,
could easily get stuck with a very disagreeable man.
● Gen 29:18b-19 . . so he answered: I will serve you seven years for your younger
daughter Rachel. Laban said: Better that I give her to you than that I should give
her to an outsider. Stay with me.
Done! And just like that; a girl became engaged. Jacob traded seven years of his
life for Rachel. But it wasn't really about money, and they actually dickered over
wages later. What Jacob actually proposed was a service commitment; like the
contracts musicians sign with recording companies; and professional athletes sign
with big league teams like the Blazers or the Mets; and like the terms of service to
which young men commit themselves to the armed forces.
So Rachel was more like a bonus for signing up as a full-time employee with Laban.
And the seven years weren't Laban's idea. They were Jacob's; and I think he made
it so many years because he wanted to offer Laban a deal so lucrative that he
couldn't possibly refuse it.
* Abraham's servant paid Rebecca's family a dowry and no doubt Isaac's servants
would've done the same for Rachel's had Jacob's circumstances been favorable.
_
● Gen 29:13b . . he embraced him and kissed him,
Foreign customs often offend Americans. I was visiting the home of a Portuguese
man in San Diego a number of years back when his son and daughter-in-law
showed up unexpectedly. Dad and son greeted each other with a hug; and kissed
full on the lips. I just about died; it was so gross. And then he kissed the daughter
in-law full on the lips too. I think you have to grow up in those kinds of customs to
really be comfortable with them.
● Gen 29:13c-14a . . and took him into his house. He told Laban all that had
happened, and Laban said to him: You are truly my bone and flesh.
Adam said pretty much the very same thing about Eve at Gen 2:23 because she
wasn't created from the dust as he had been, but was constructed from already
existing human tissue amputated from his own body. In other words: ol' Laban was
saying "You and I are one and the same" because tricking a father in order to
supplant a brother was just the thing Laban would have thought of himself had he
been in Jacob's shoes.
● Gen 29:14b-15 . .When he had stayed with him a month's time, Laban said to
Jacob: Just because you are a kinsman, should you serve me for nothing? Tell me,
what shall your wages be?
It's curious that Laban would offer Jacob employment. I'm guessing that Jacob had
offered to help out around Laban's ranch only just long enough for the heat blow
over back home; but Laban became impressed with Jacob's work ethic and wanted
him on permanently. Sometimes good help is very hard to find; and worth paying
for.
● Gen 29:16-17a . . Now Laban had two daughters; the name of the older one was
Leah, and the name of the younger was Rachel. Leah had weak eyes;
According to Jewish folklore, Leah had weak eyes from crying all the time at the
prospect of being forced to marrying Esau.
The Hebrew word for "weak" basically means tender, soft, weak, and/or gentle, and
quite possibly young and youthful.
So the word doesn't necessarily mean that something is feeble. It can also mean
that someone's eyes convey kindness as opposed to eyes that look at you with
knives.
Pity. Leah was a good girl; but just about bankrupt in what really matters to most
guys; and as any woman with assets can vouch; most men think better with their
eyes than with their brains. In other words: when it comes to women, men's brains
switch off and it's all about the view after that: if you know what I mean.
● Gen 29:17b-18a . . Rachel was shapely and beautiful. Jacob loved Rachel;
In other words, her sister Leas wasn't shapely and beautiful.
But there is something very missing in this story-- Rachel's love for Jacob. The man
was ga-ga over her. But how did she really feel about him?
Jacob was fortunate about something. In those days, a man didn't have to win a
woman's heart. He had to win her custodian's heart. So men could pick out a girl
like they might pick out a shirt or a new car. Girls, through no fault of their own,
could easily get stuck with a very disagreeable man.
● Gen 29:18b-19 . . so he answered: I will serve you seven years for your younger
daughter Rachel. Laban said: Better that I give her to you than that I should give
her to an outsider. Stay with me.
Done! And just like that; a girl became engaged. Jacob traded seven years of his
life for Rachel. But it wasn't really about money, and they actually dickered over
wages later. What Jacob actually proposed was a service commitment; like the
contracts musicians sign with recording companies; and professional athletes sign
with big league teams like the Blazers or the Mets; and like the terms of service to
which young men commit themselves to the armed forces.
So Rachel was more like a bonus for signing up as a full-time employee with Laban.
And the seven years weren't Laban's idea. They were Jacob's; and I think he made
it so many years because he wanted to offer Laban a deal so lucrative that he
couldn't possibly refuse it.
* Abraham's servant paid Rebecca's family a dowry and no doubt Isaac's servants
would've done the same for Rachel's had Jacob's circumstances been favorable.
_
Olde Tymer
Well-known member
● Gen 29:20 . . So Jacob served seven years for Rachel and they seemed to him
but a few days because of his love for her.
It's a fact of human experience that men will sell their souls to satisfy their wants.
But I'm guessing there was more to Rachel than just her looks. After seven years
living in such close proximity, Jacob still wanted her. If she had been one of those
tough, thin skinned, defensive, obtuse, chafing and demeaning Tomb Raider kind of
girls, I'm pretty sure Jacob would have lost interest by then. I say "pretty sure"
because there are some men who will live with a witch in spite of the abuse they
endure just so's they can sleep with the woman of their dreams; viz: a trophy wife
rather than a man's best friend forever. Relative to BFF, it turned out that Leah was
the better choice.
● Gen 29:21 . .Then Jacob said to Laban: Give me my wife, for my time is fulfilled,
that I may cohabit with her.
The word "cohabit" is not actually in the Hebrew. It should read "go near". What
Jacob said, in the common colloquialism of our day, is what men sometimes say
when they want to sleep with a particular girl. They sometimes say: Wow! I'd sure
like to get next to that! (chuckle) Very expressive.
● Gen 29:22-23 . . And Laban gathered all the people of the place and made a
feast. When evening came, he took his daughter Leah and brought her to him; and
he cohabited with her.
Jacob has got to rank as just about the dumbest groom in history. He knew both of
those girls like the back of his hand. For seven years he lived right next door and
saw them both every day. Leah and Rachel didn't even resemble each other. The
one was shapely and beautiful. The other was not. Even if he couldn't see well
enough in the dark to tell the difference, he certainly should have been able to feel
the difference; and to recognize the difference in their voices.
Was that man so totally plastered with booze from the reception that he couldn't
even tell who, or what, he slept with that night? Haw-Haw-Haw-Haw-Haw!
But the real mystery was Leah. Wouldn't you think that she would have spoken up
and said something before things got out of hand? That sly girl. (chuckle)
Personally I think she had a big crush on Jacob. Later on Leah will try very hard to
get Jacob to transfer his affections to her and forget about Rachel.
This so reminds me of Sadie Hawkin's day in the Little Abner comics of the old
days. In the town of Dog Patch, men didn't grow on trees; there just wasn't enough
to go around; and on top of that, some of the hillbilly girls weren't much to look at
either. Subsequently, some of the local gals had a tough time getting husbands.
So, in memorial of an old spinster lady named Sadie Hawkins, a special day was set
aside each year wherein the bachelorettes had a chance to get hitched. All they had
to do was run down one of the unattached men; and whoever they caught,
absolutely had to marry them; no exchanges and no returns.
But hey! Where was Rachel!?! Was she tied up out in the barn or something? Well;
I hate to say it, but I really don't think she ever did want to marry Mr. Jacob. I
really think she was in on the whole scam all along and I think Rachel was seriously
hoping Jacob would settle for Leah and forget all about herself. But alas; such was
not to happen. Jacob was very determined. He accepted his fate with Leah, but
kept on pursuing Rachel.
NOTE: The covenant that Moses' people eventually agreed upon with God per Lev
18:18 protects sisters like Rachel and Leah so that men are not permitted to
cohabit with both girls at the same time. But seeing as how that law had not yet
been codified in Jacob's day, then he couldn't be indicted for breaking it because
the laws of God aren't retroactive. (Deut 5:2-4, Rom 4:15, Rom 5:13, and Gal
3:17)
● Gen 29:24 . . Laban had given his maidservant Zilpah to his daughter Leah as her
maid.
Zilpah kept the cat in the bag. In fact she very likely assisted Leah to bathe and
prepare for her wedding night. Poor Jacob. He was so defeated. It was like the
whole world, and even the stars above in their courses, were in a grand conspiracy
to dupe the old boy that night.
_
but a few days because of his love for her.
It's a fact of human experience that men will sell their souls to satisfy their wants.
But I'm guessing there was more to Rachel than just her looks. After seven years
living in such close proximity, Jacob still wanted her. If she had been one of those
tough, thin skinned, defensive, obtuse, chafing and demeaning Tomb Raider kind of
girls, I'm pretty sure Jacob would have lost interest by then. I say "pretty sure"
because there are some men who will live with a witch in spite of the abuse they
endure just so's they can sleep with the woman of their dreams; viz: a trophy wife
rather than a man's best friend forever. Relative to BFF, it turned out that Leah was
the better choice.
● Gen 29:21 . .Then Jacob said to Laban: Give me my wife, for my time is fulfilled,
that I may cohabit with her.
The word "cohabit" is not actually in the Hebrew. It should read "go near". What
Jacob said, in the common colloquialism of our day, is what men sometimes say
when they want to sleep with a particular girl. They sometimes say: Wow! I'd sure
like to get next to that! (chuckle) Very expressive.
● Gen 29:22-23 . . And Laban gathered all the people of the place and made a
feast. When evening came, he took his daughter Leah and brought her to him; and
he cohabited with her.
Jacob has got to rank as just about the dumbest groom in history. He knew both of
those girls like the back of his hand. For seven years he lived right next door and
saw them both every day. Leah and Rachel didn't even resemble each other. The
one was shapely and beautiful. The other was not. Even if he couldn't see well
enough in the dark to tell the difference, he certainly should have been able to feel
the difference; and to recognize the difference in their voices.
Was that man so totally plastered with booze from the reception that he couldn't
even tell who, or what, he slept with that night? Haw-Haw-Haw-Haw-Haw!
But the real mystery was Leah. Wouldn't you think that she would have spoken up
and said something before things got out of hand? That sly girl. (chuckle)
Personally I think she had a big crush on Jacob. Later on Leah will try very hard to
get Jacob to transfer his affections to her and forget about Rachel.
This so reminds me of Sadie Hawkin's day in the Little Abner comics of the old
days. In the town of Dog Patch, men didn't grow on trees; there just wasn't enough
to go around; and on top of that, some of the hillbilly girls weren't much to look at
either. Subsequently, some of the local gals had a tough time getting husbands.
So, in memorial of an old spinster lady named Sadie Hawkins, a special day was set
aside each year wherein the bachelorettes had a chance to get hitched. All they had
to do was run down one of the unattached men; and whoever they caught,
absolutely had to marry them; no exchanges and no returns.
But hey! Where was Rachel!?! Was she tied up out in the barn or something? Well;
I hate to say it, but I really don't think she ever did want to marry Mr. Jacob. I
really think she was in on the whole scam all along and I think Rachel was seriously
hoping Jacob would settle for Leah and forget all about herself. But alas; such was
not to happen. Jacob was very determined. He accepted his fate with Leah, but
kept on pursuing Rachel.
NOTE: The covenant that Moses' people eventually agreed upon with God per Lev
18:18 protects sisters like Rachel and Leah so that men are not permitted to
cohabit with both girls at the same time. But seeing as how that law had not yet
been codified in Jacob's day, then he couldn't be indicted for breaking it because
the laws of God aren't retroactive. (Deut 5:2-4, Rom 4:15, Rom 5:13, and Gal
3:17)
● Gen 29:24 . . Laban had given his maidservant Zilpah to his daughter Leah as her
maid.
Zilpah kept the cat in the bag. In fact she very likely assisted Leah to bathe and
prepare for her wedding night. Poor Jacob. He was so defeated. It was like the
whole world, and even the stars above in their courses, were in a grand conspiracy
to dupe the old boy that night.
_
Olde Tymer
Well-known member
~
● Gen 29:25 . .When morning came, there was Leah! So he said to Laban: What is
this you have done to me? I was in your service for Rachel! Why did you deceive
me?
The ultimate blame for this situation has to fall upon Jacob himself. They say to
never look a gift horse in the mouth. But I think your wedding night has to be the
exception. For crying out loud, you'd think the man would have enough sense to
make sure the woman in his bed was the one who was supposed to be there. Yes,
Laban was a rascal. But then so was Leah, and so was Zilpah; and Rachel too. And
maybe this gave Jacob cause to remember how he tricked his own dad back home
into giving him Esau's blessing. (chuckle) There's an old saying: What goes around,
comes around.
● Gen 29:26 . . Laban said: It is not the practice in our place to marry off the
younger before the older.
Jacob lived in "our place" for seven years. I tend to think he knew full well their
customs.
Perhaps Jacob expected the locals would make an exception for him because he
was a rich boy from down south. But no; local custom was local custom, and even
Mr. Silver Spoon In His Mouth was going to have to accept it.
NOTE: I suspect the guests all knew that Jacob was being tricked on his wedding
night, but I also suspect that they never forgot his lack of fair play back at the well
when he first blew into town. You know, when you're unfair with people, you have
to expect that they will be unsympathetic when unfairness comes your way.
● Gen 29:27 . .Wait until the bridal week of this one is over and we will give you
that one too, provided you serve me another seven years.
Serving Laban the first seven years for Rachel was Jacob's idea; except that instead
of getting Rachel; he got Leah. Now Laban's proviso is that Jacob serve yet another
seven years for Rachel; which will total fourteen for a girl he was supposed to get in
seven. I think most any normal red-blooded man would have refused.
But Jacob was an Ethan Frome kind of guy. I don't think he wanted to hurt Leah,
and maybe even felt partially responsible for her predicament.
That's a crummy reason to marry a girl, but I don't think Jacob could have lived
with himself if he threw Leah back now. After all, Jacob was her first love, and it's
not like she was used goods or anything.
It's true that Jacob was not above fraud; but basically, he was a fairly honorable
man.
● Gen 29:28-29 . . Jacob did so; he waited out the bridal week of the one, and then
he gave him his daughter Rachel as wife. Laban had given his maidservant Bilhah
to his daughter Rachel as her maid.
Maidservants weren't just female commodities. They were actually a part of the
household, and often treated with a pretty fair degree of respect.
● Gen 29:30 . . And Jacob cohabited with Rachel also; indeed, he loved Rachel
more than Leah. And he served him another seven years.
I'm sure Jacob never mistreated Leah. But he wasn't crazy about her in a romantic
way. It's like the relationship between Robert Philip and his fiancé Nancy Tremaine
in the Disney movie Enchanted. Nancy is neither a bad girl nor a bad choice-- the
chemistry just isn't there.
Unfortunately, human nature being what it is, Jacob's situation probably led to
some favoritism. And in this case, I think Jacob began spending most of his time
with Rachel and leaving Leah out in the cold; so to speak; viz: she was in the
unenviable limbo of a burden to her husband. However, since Jacob chose to keep
Leah, he was morally obligated to treat her as if he was infatuated with her, even if
he really wasn't.
_
● Gen 29:25 . .When morning came, there was Leah! So he said to Laban: What is
this you have done to me? I was in your service for Rachel! Why did you deceive
me?
The ultimate blame for this situation has to fall upon Jacob himself. They say to
never look a gift horse in the mouth. But I think your wedding night has to be the
exception. For crying out loud, you'd think the man would have enough sense to
make sure the woman in his bed was the one who was supposed to be there. Yes,
Laban was a rascal. But then so was Leah, and so was Zilpah; and Rachel too. And
maybe this gave Jacob cause to remember how he tricked his own dad back home
into giving him Esau's blessing. (chuckle) There's an old saying: What goes around,
comes around.
● Gen 29:26 . . Laban said: It is not the practice in our place to marry off the
younger before the older.
Jacob lived in "our place" for seven years. I tend to think he knew full well their
customs.
Perhaps Jacob expected the locals would make an exception for him because he
was a rich boy from down south. But no; local custom was local custom, and even
Mr. Silver Spoon In His Mouth was going to have to accept it.
NOTE: I suspect the guests all knew that Jacob was being tricked on his wedding
night, but I also suspect that they never forgot his lack of fair play back at the well
when he first blew into town. You know, when you're unfair with people, you have
to expect that they will be unsympathetic when unfairness comes your way.
● Gen 29:27 . .Wait until the bridal week of this one is over and we will give you
that one too, provided you serve me another seven years.
Serving Laban the first seven years for Rachel was Jacob's idea; except that instead
of getting Rachel; he got Leah. Now Laban's proviso is that Jacob serve yet another
seven years for Rachel; which will total fourteen for a girl he was supposed to get in
seven. I think most any normal red-blooded man would have refused.
But Jacob was an Ethan Frome kind of guy. I don't think he wanted to hurt Leah,
and maybe even felt partially responsible for her predicament.
That's a crummy reason to marry a girl, but I don't think Jacob could have lived
with himself if he threw Leah back now. After all, Jacob was her first love, and it's
not like she was used goods or anything.
It's true that Jacob was not above fraud; but basically, he was a fairly honorable
man.
● Gen 29:28-29 . . Jacob did so; he waited out the bridal week of the one, and then
he gave him his daughter Rachel as wife. Laban had given his maidservant Bilhah
to his daughter Rachel as her maid.
Maidservants weren't just female commodities. They were actually a part of the
household, and often treated with a pretty fair degree of respect.
● Gen 29:30 . . And Jacob cohabited with Rachel also; indeed, he loved Rachel
more than Leah. And he served him another seven years.
I'm sure Jacob never mistreated Leah. But he wasn't crazy about her in a romantic
way. It's like the relationship between Robert Philip and his fiancé Nancy Tremaine
in the Disney movie Enchanted. Nancy is neither a bad girl nor a bad choice-- the
chemistry just isn't there.
Unfortunately, human nature being what it is, Jacob's situation probably led to
some favoritism. And in this case, I think Jacob began spending most of his time
with Rachel and leaving Leah out in the cold; so to speak; viz: she was in the
unenviable limbo of a burden to her husband. However, since Jacob chose to keep
Leah, he was morally obligated to treat her as if he was infatuated with her, even if
he really wasn't.
_
Olde Tymer
Well-known member
● Gen 29:31 . .The Lord saw that Leah was unloved and he opened her womb; but
Rachel was barren.
God didn't make Rachel barren. She was already that way. And Leah was too. In
fact, every one of the matriarchs were barren women. It must have been in their
genes. But the Lord elected to repair Leah and leave Rachel out of whack for a
while longer.
I really don't think what the Lord did was punishment against Jacob and Rachel. I
think it was a countermeasure to get Jacob to pay a little more attention to Leah.
It's very important for spouses to bond. Allowing Jacob to focus too much of his
attention on Rachel would soon make Leah the odd man out; and a very lonely
woman.
But why would God do that-- take an interest in Leah's problems? Well; God was
pioneering a nation with Jacob; and as such, the man and his wives were important
to God seeing as He is the supreme paterfamilias of that people. And besides; it
was through Leah that the blessing predicted by Gen 12:3 would come into the
world, not Rachel.
● Gen 29:32 . . Leah conceived and bore a son, and named him Reuben; for she
declared: The Lord has seen my affliction. Now my husband will love me.
Reuben's name is from Re'uwben (reh-oo-bane') which means: Look; a son!
● Gen 29:33 . . She conceived again and bore a son, and declared; This is because
The Lord heard that I was unloved and has given me this one also. So she named
him Simeon.
Simeon's name is Shim'own (shim-one') which means: hearing. Leah was obviously
a woman of prayer and had no reservations about sharing her personal problems
with the deity of her choice. (cf. Phil 4:6-7)
● Gen 29:34 . . Again she conceived and bore a son and declared; This time my
husband will become attached to me, for I have borne him three sons. Therefore he
was named Levi.
Children do have a way of bonding a (normal) man to their mother. It doesn't
always work, but often does.
Levi's name is Leviy (lay-vee') which means: attached; viz: bonded.
Jacob was indeed a family man now. In spite of his romantic passions for Rachel, he
would never again feel the same way about Leah. She could never be just another
woman in the house now that she was the mother of his children. Jacob couldn't
help but feel bonded to her. God's idea worked. You say: how do I know it worked?
Because the next boy was named in gratitude to God for saving the marriage.
● Gen 29:35 . . She conceived again and bore a son, and declared; This time I will
praise The Lord. Therefore she named him Judah. Then she stopped bearing.
Well done! And Judah was a real honor too. He became the tribe of Israel's kings;
and from them descended David, and Christ.
The Hebrew word for "Judah" is Yehuwdah (yeh-hoo-daw') which means celebrated;
i.e. famous. The ethnic identity "Jew" comes from Yehuwdah. (2Kgs 16:6, et al)
● Gen 30:1a . .When Rachel saw that she had borne Jacob no children, she became
envious of her sister;
Sibling rivalry is bad enough. But when siblings compete for the affections of the
same love object, it's all the worse. I don't know what it is about kin, but it's much
easier to compete with someone outside the family than those within. Rivalry within
family is not just a competition; it is more like the passions of a blood feud. The
feelings run deep, and hot, and painful. People who never had a brother or sister
cannot understand this. You just have to live it to know what it's like.
_
Rachel was barren.
God didn't make Rachel barren. She was already that way. And Leah was too. In
fact, every one of the matriarchs were barren women. It must have been in their
genes. But the Lord elected to repair Leah and leave Rachel out of whack for a
while longer.
I really don't think what the Lord did was punishment against Jacob and Rachel. I
think it was a countermeasure to get Jacob to pay a little more attention to Leah.
It's very important for spouses to bond. Allowing Jacob to focus too much of his
attention on Rachel would soon make Leah the odd man out; and a very lonely
woman.
But why would God do that-- take an interest in Leah's problems? Well; God was
pioneering a nation with Jacob; and as such, the man and his wives were important
to God seeing as He is the supreme paterfamilias of that people. And besides; it
was through Leah that the blessing predicted by Gen 12:3 would come into the
world, not Rachel.
● Gen 29:32 . . Leah conceived and bore a son, and named him Reuben; for she
declared: The Lord has seen my affliction. Now my husband will love me.
Reuben's name is from Re'uwben (reh-oo-bane') which means: Look; a son!
● Gen 29:33 . . She conceived again and bore a son, and declared; This is because
The Lord heard that I was unloved and has given me this one also. So she named
him Simeon.
Simeon's name is Shim'own (shim-one') which means: hearing. Leah was obviously
a woman of prayer and had no reservations about sharing her personal problems
with the deity of her choice. (cf. Phil 4:6-7)
● Gen 29:34 . . Again she conceived and bore a son and declared; This time my
husband will become attached to me, for I have borne him three sons. Therefore he
was named Levi.
Children do have a way of bonding a (normal) man to their mother. It doesn't
always work, but often does.
Levi's name is Leviy (lay-vee') which means: attached; viz: bonded.
Jacob was indeed a family man now. In spite of his romantic passions for Rachel, he
would never again feel the same way about Leah. She could never be just another
woman in the house now that she was the mother of his children. Jacob couldn't
help but feel bonded to her. God's idea worked. You say: how do I know it worked?
Because the next boy was named in gratitude to God for saving the marriage.
● Gen 29:35 . . She conceived again and bore a son, and declared; This time I will
praise The Lord. Therefore she named him Judah. Then she stopped bearing.
Well done! And Judah was a real honor too. He became the tribe of Israel's kings;
and from them descended David, and Christ.
The Hebrew word for "Judah" is Yehuwdah (yeh-hoo-daw') which means celebrated;
i.e. famous. The ethnic identity "Jew" comes from Yehuwdah. (2Kgs 16:6, et al)
● Gen 30:1a . .When Rachel saw that she had borne Jacob no children, she became
envious of her sister;
Sibling rivalry is bad enough. But when siblings compete for the affections of the
same love object, it's all the worse. I don't know what it is about kin, but it's much
easier to compete with someone outside the family than those within. Rivalry within
family is not just a competition; it is more like the passions of a blood feud. The
feelings run deep, and hot, and painful. People who never had a brother or sister
cannot understand this. You just have to live it to know what it's like.
_
Olde Tymer
Well-known member
● Gen 30:1b . . and Rachel said to Jacob: Give me children, or I shall die.
Somehow Rachel felt the fault was Jacob's as if he were doing something to
deliberately prevent conception. According to Jewish folklore, it was a common
practice in that day for a man with two wives to give the prettier one some sort of
birth control herb to prevent her from getting pregnant and losing her figure. Thus
the prettier of the two was reserved for pleasure; and the other for bearing
children. Genetically, that was a pretty dumb idea since the practice results in the
perpetuation of inferior stock. I seriously doubt you'll ever see breeders of dogs
cats, livestock and/or race horses conducting their business like that.
Jacob wasn't doing anything to Rachel. She was just simply unable to have
children. If only she had followed her sister Leah's example in prayer instead of
getting in one of those moods, then she wouldn't have been so ready to rag on
Jacob for something over which he had no control.
● Gen 30:2a . . Jacob was incensed at Rachel
Jacob's anger was no doubt an unpleasant mixture of hurt and indignation. He
really did love Rachel. She wasn't just a girl toy. For her to insinuate that he was
keeping her around just for pleasure must have bitten deeply into his soul.
Romantic love can easily turn into hate-- very suddenly and very quickly; like
turning a page in a book.
Romantic love is very different than the love of a loyal friend. Romantic love seeks
its own best interests and is very fragile and easily wounded. Fraternal love is much
better. It's like a strong anchor. The more a storm buffets the ship, the deeper the
anchor digs in.
● Gen 30:2b . . and said: Can I take the place of God, who has denied you fruit of
the womb?
I'm sure that just as soon as Jacob lashed out at Rachel he regretted it. His retort
implied that she was a sinner who didn't deserve children. What an ugly thing to
say. But he was upset and felt betrayed by his best girl. So his reaction is
understandable. But isn't there a better way? Yes.
Instead of attacking her husband in an attempt to put blame, Rachel would have
been much better off just finding a nice quiet spot and telling God how she was
feeling about her sterility-- how it was hurting her and making her feel inferior to
her sister; and threatening her marriage. Would God respond to that? Yes. Because
that is exactly what Rachel did do eventually. It's just too bad she didn't think of it
sooner.
If Rachel felt that God cared about her at all, then she would have recognized that
barrenness was serving some sort of Divine purpose; even if she couldn't think of
one at the time. But Rachel's circumstances were causing her feelings to override
her thinking; and making her emotional and reactive instead of objective and
rational.
● Gen 30:3-5 . . She said: Here is my maid Bilhah. Consort with her, that she may
bear on my knees and that through her I too may have children. So she gave him
her maid Bilhah as concubine, and Jacob cohabited with her. Bilhah conceived and
bore Jacob a son.
That was indeed a strange custom, and a cruel one at that. Why is it nobody ever
thought to ask the maids how they felt about it?
● Gen 30:6 . . And Rachel said: God has vindicated me; indeed, He has heeded my
plea and given me a son. Therefore she named him Dan.
Dan's name means judge, and/or the past tense: judged (or possibly a judgment)
In Rachel's mind, Bilhah's success proved that God wasn't withholding children from
her for being a sinner, as Jacob had insinuated. But Dan wasn't really Rachel's
child. He was only hers by adoption.
But who was going to nurse Dan? There was no such thing as formula in those
days. Somebody had to be his wet nurse. Well . . what about Dan's biological mom?
Didn't she just go through a pregnancy? So Dan remained with his biological
mother at least until he was weaned; and probably longer too. It wasn't like they all
lived miles apart. All four women were practically living under the same roof.
So although Dan was reckoned legally Rachel's child, he wasn't taken away from
home. Trouble is; Bilhah became a single mom with no husband. But she wasn't
really alone. At least she had Dan; and her boy had Jacob; and everyone was
together, in one way or another.
I am he,
As you are he,
As you are me,
And we are all together.
(The Beetles, I Am The Walrus, 1967)
_
Somehow Rachel felt the fault was Jacob's as if he were doing something to
deliberately prevent conception. According to Jewish folklore, it was a common
practice in that day for a man with two wives to give the prettier one some sort of
birth control herb to prevent her from getting pregnant and losing her figure. Thus
the prettier of the two was reserved for pleasure; and the other for bearing
children. Genetically, that was a pretty dumb idea since the practice results in the
perpetuation of inferior stock. I seriously doubt you'll ever see breeders of dogs
cats, livestock and/or race horses conducting their business like that.
Jacob wasn't doing anything to Rachel. She was just simply unable to have
children. If only she had followed her sister Leah's example in prayer instead of
getting in one of those moods, then she wouldn't have been so ready to rag on
Jacob for something over which he had no control.
● Gen 30:2a . . Jacob was incensed at Rachel
Jacob's anger was no doubt an unpleasant mixture of hurt and indignation. He
really did love Rachel. She wasn't just a girl toy. For her to insinuate that he was
keeping her around just for pleasure must have bitten deeply into his soul.
Romantic love can easily turn into hate-- very suddenly and very quickly; like
turning a page in a book.
Romantic love is very different than the love of a loyal friend. Romantic love seeks
its own best interests and is very fragile and easily wounded. Fraternal love is much
better. It's like a strong anchor. The more a storm buffets the ship, the deeper the
anchor digs in.
● Gen 30:2b . . and said: Can I take the place of God, who has denied you fruit of
the womb?
I'm sure that just as soon as Jacob lashed out at Rachel he regretted it. His retort
implied that she was a sinner who didn't deserve children. What an ugly thing to
say. But he was upset and felt betrayed by his best girl. So his reaction is
understandable. But isn't there a better way? Yes.
Instead of attacking her husband in an attempt to put blame, Rachel would have
been much better off just finding a nice quiet spot and telling God how she was
feeling about her sterility-- how it was hurting her and making her feel inferior to
her sister; and threatening her marriage. Would God respond to that? Yes. Because
that is exactly what Rachel did do eventually. It's just too bad she didn't think of it
sooner.
If Rachel felt that God cared about her at all, then she would have recognized that
barrenness was serving some sort of Divine purpose; even if she couldn't think of
one at the time. But Rachel's circumstances were causing her feelings to override
her thinking; and making her emotional and reactive instead of objective and
rational.
● Gen 30:3-5 . . She said: Here is my maid Bilhah. Consort with her, that she may
bear on my knees and that through her I too may have children. So she gave him
her maid Bilhah as concubine, and Jacob cohabited with her. Bilhah conceived and
bore Jacob a son.
That was indeed a strange custom, and a cruel one at that. Why is it nobody ever
thought to ask the maids how they felt about it?
● Gen 30:6 . . And Rachel said: God has vindicated me; indeed, He has heeded my
plea and given me a son. Therefore she named him Dan.
Dan's name means judge, and/or the past tense: judged (or possibly a judgment)
In Rachel's mind, Bilhah's success proved that God wasn't withholding children from
her for being a sinner, as Jacob had insinuated. But Dan wasn't really Rachel's
child. He was only hers by adoption.
But who was going to nurse Dan? There was no such thing as formula in those
days. Somebody had to be his wet nurse. Well . . what about Dan's biological mom?
Didn't she just go through a pregnancy? So Dan remained with his biological
mother at least until he was weaned; and probably longer too. It wasn't like they all
lived miles apart. All four women were practically living under the same roof.
So although Dan was reckoned legally Rachel's child, he wasn't taken away from
home. Trouble is; Bilhah became a single mom with no husband. But she wasn't
really alone. At least she had Dan; and her boy had Jacob; and everyone was
together, in one way or another.
I am he,
As you are he,
As you are me,
And we are all together.
(The Beetles, I Am The Walrus, 1967)
_
Olde Tymer
Well-known member
● Gen 30:7-8 . . Rachel's maid Bilhah conceived again and bore Jacob a second
son. And Rachel said: A fateful contest I waged with my sister; yes, and I have
prevailed. So she named him Naphtali.
rayyyrrr! scratch! Man that woman was scrappy! No second place winner; Rachel
would keep kicking at you even if her arms were pinned down on the mat. Move
over Chyna! (Chyna used to be a WWF professional female wrestler)
"Naphtali" is from Naphtaliy (naf-taw-lee') which means: my wrestling. Not just any
wrestling, but "my" wrestling. Apparently Rachel took things very personal. The
bitter rivalry between her and Leah had become the total focus of Rachel's life.
NOTE: Jacob could've easily disowned both Dan and Naphtali by simply
emancipating Bilhah; same as his grandpa Abraham broke with Ishmael by
emancipating Hagar.
● Gen 30:9 . .When Leah saw that she had stopped bearing, she took her maid
Zilpah and gave her to Jacob as concubine.
Since Jacob favored Rachel, when did he find time for Leah and Zilpah? Well; don't
women have a certain time of the month? It was very unsanitary in those days to
sleep with women during their period and, in fact, was later forbidden by the laws
of the covenant that Moses' people agreed upon with God. (Lev 15:19-24 & 18:19)
So every month, like clockwork, Jacob was forced to sleep with Leah whether he
liked it or not. I guess he could have slept on the couch, but that would look stupid.
So Leah got a shot at him at least one week a month. And she made the most of it,
you can be sure of that! So now she farmed him out to Zilpah's bed for that week
to see what would happen. If Rachel could have children by her maid, then by golly
Leah was going to do it too. Boy, those sisters were really at war!
● Gen 30:10-11 . . And when Leah's maid Zilpah bore Jacob a son, Leah said: What
luck! So she named him Gad.
"Gad" is from gad (gawd) which means: a troop. (chuckle) Leah was having enough
boys to field a recon squad.
● Gen 30:12-13 . .When Leah's maid Zilpah bore Jacob a second son, Leah
declared: What fortune! meaning, Women will deem me fortunate. So she named
him Asher.
Well; what had the local women been deeming her up till then? Women can be so
cruel to each other. Leah wasn't attractive, and she was getting up in years before
she met Jacob. Women in Leah's neighborhood very likely made her the object of
sneering gossip: "Oh, here comes that old maid. Hasn't she found a husband yet?
Poooorrr thing; tsk." And they'd put on their best pity faces for Leah as she walked
by.
"Asher" is from 'Asher (aw-share') which means: happy.
● Gen 30:14 . . Once, at the time of the wheat harvest, Reuben came upon some
mandrakes in the field and brought them to his mother Leah. Rachel said to Leah:
Please give me some of your son's mandrakes.
Mandrake is the common name for any of a genus of herbs. The species to which
the name is particularly applied has two varieties, vernal and autumnal, both native
to the Mediterranean and Himalayan regions and especially to Greece. The whole
plant has a fetid odor. As late as the Middle Ages, a dose of the oddly shaped root
was sometimes given to patients as a narcotic before surgical operations. In the
United States, mayapple is often called mandrake.
The mandrake has traditionally been an object of superstition, largely because of
the resemblance of its forked root to the human figure. Used as an aphrodisiac, the
mandrake was also variously regarded as a charm for pregnancy-- a sort of fertility
drug --also for invulnerability, and for discovering treasure.
Leah certainly didn't need mandrakes to have children. She was doing just fine
without a charm or a fertility drug. But she may have wanted them around the
house for medicinal purposes and home remedies. Rueben was trained to recognize
mandrakes and he brought them home because he knew his mom would want
them; and of course Rachel would want them too because she was infertile.
_
son. And Rachel said: A fateful contest I waged with my sister; yes, and I have
prevailed. So she named him Naphtali.
rayyyrrr! scratch! Man that woman was scrappy! No second place winner; Rachel
would keep kicking at you even if her arms were pinned down on the mat. Move
over Chyna! (Chyna used to be a WWF professional female wrestler)
"Naphtali" is from Naphtaliy (naf-taw-lee') which means: my wrestling. Not just any
wrestling, but "my" wrestling. Apparently Rachel took things very personal. The
bitter rivalry between her and Leah had become the total focus of Rachel's life.
NOTE: Jacob could've easily disowned both Dan and Naphtali by simply
emancipating Bilhah; same as his grandpa Abraham broke with Ishmael by
emancipating Hagar.
● Gen 30:9 . .When Leah saw that she had stopped bearing, she took her maid
Zilpah and gave her to Jacob as concubine.
Since Jacob favored Rachel, when did he find time for Leah and Zilpah? Well; don't
women have a certain time of the month? It was very unsanitary in those days to
sleep with women during their period and, in fact, was later forbidden by the laws
of the covenant that Moses' people agreed upon with God. (Lev 15:19-24 & 18:19)
So every month, like clockwork, Jacob was forced to sleep with Leah whether he
liked it or not. I guess he could have slept on the couch, but that would look stupid.
So Leah got a shot at him at least one week a month. And she made the most of it,
you can be sure of that! So now she farmed him out to Zilpah's bed for that week
to see what would happen. If Rachel could have children by her maid, then by golly
Leah was going to do it too. Boy, those sisters were really at war!
● Gen 30:10-11 . . And when Leah's maid Zilpah bore Jacob a son, Leah said: What
luck! So she named him Gad.
"Gad" is from gad (gawd) which means: a troop. (chuckle) Leah was having enough
boys to field a recon squad.
● Gen 30:12-13 . .When Leah's maid Zilpah bore Jacob a second son, Leah
declared: What fortune! meaning, Women will deem me fortunate. So she named
him Asher.
Well; what had the local women been deeming her up till then? Women can be so
cruel to each other. Leah wasn't attractive, and she was getting up in years before
she met Jacob. Women in Leah's neighborhood very likely made her the object of
sneering gossip: "Oh, here comes that old maid. Hasn't she found a husband yet?
Poooorrr thing; tsk." And they'd put on their best pity faces for Leah as she walked
by.
"Asher" is from 'Asher (aw-share') which means: happy.
● Gen 30:14 . . Once, at the time of the wheat harvest, Reuben came upon some
mandrakes in the field and brought them to his mother Leah. Rachel said to Leah:
Please give me some of your son's mandrakes.
Mandrake is the common name for any of a genus of herbs. The species to which
the name is particularly applied has two varieties, vernal and autumnal, both native
to the Mediterranean and Himalayan regions and especially to Greece. The whole
plant has a fetid odor. As late as the Middle Ages, a dose of the oddly shaped root
was sometimes given to patients as a narcotic before surgical operations. In the
United States, mayapple is often called mandrake.
The mandrake has traditionally been an object of superstition, largely because of
the resemblance of its forked root to the human figure. Used as an aphrodisiac, the
mandrake was also variously regarded as a charm for pregnancy-- a sort of fertility
drug --also for invulnerability, and for discovering treasure.
Leah certainly didn't need mandrakes to have children. She was doing just fine
without a charm or a fertility drug. But she may have wanted them around the
house for medicinal purposes and home remedies. Rueben was trained to recognize
mandrakes and he brought them home because he knew his mom would want
them; and of course Rachel would want them too because she was infertile.
_
Olde Tymer
Well-known member
● Gen 30:15a . . But she said to her: Was it not enough for you to take away my
husband, that you would also take my son's mandrakes?
Of the two sisters, Leah is the only one to label Jacob "my" husband. (Personally, I
don't think Rachel ever really thought too much of Jacob.)
One of the very first social skills children learn from their parents is sharing. Jacob's
family was so bitterly divided that his wives, two blood kin sisters, were not even
disposed to display even the simplest of graces towards each other. In other words,
Leah was saying: if you want some mandrakes, go out and find your own!
● Gen 30:15b-16 . . Rachel replied: I promise, he shall sleep with you tonight, in
return for your son's mandrakes. When Jacob came home from the field in the
evening, Leah went out to meet him and said: You are to sleep with me, for I have
hired you with my son's mandrakes. And he lay with her that night.
Haw! Jacob became a gigolo in his own home. His wives were not only fighting
amongst themselves because of him, but they were bartering for him like a
commodity too. Jacob was sure in a pickle. He was probably like most men; just
wanting peace and quiet in his own home. If that's what the women arranged for
him that night, well alright; if it made them happy and kept the noise down then
what the hey.
You would think the home life of the patriarchs would be the most sterling role
models you could ever want. But no. They were actually pretty disappointing. And
why was that? Becuz they were people. They weren't a celestial breed of
supernatural beings whose home planet was located out in space somewhere
between the Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud.
No, the patriarchs didn't glide down here from Jupiter as a superior race of
extragalactic agents, nor did they draft in on the tail of a comet and drop off in the
land of Palestine. None of that. They were just as human as anybody else and they
were all slaves to human proclivities and predilections right along with the rest of
the Adams' family.
● Gen 30:17 . . God heeded Leah, and she conceived and bore him a fifth son.
God was favorably inclined to grant Leah's wishes. But why doesn't God grant the
wishes of all barren women? Is that fair? Why is God sensitive to some while
ignoring the feelings of others? I wish I could answer that. The brutal fact is: God is
merciful to whom He wishes to be merciful. Love it or leave it; we're stuck with a
God who has a mind of His own and does as He pleases. (cf. Matt 20:1-15)
● Gen 30:18 . . And Leah said: God has given me my reward for having given my
maid to my husband. So she named him Issachar.
Issachar's name is Yissaskar (yis-saw-kawr') which means: he will bring a reward
(or possibly; he is a reward). To Leah, Issachar really was worth his weight in gold
to her as a mother.
I really don't understand Leah's reasoning. Why would God approve of putting her
husband in bed with the maid? Sounds like a plot for a soap opera to me. But
nevertheless, Leah was happy with the way things turned out.
You know, that really shows the importance that women in that day put upon
children. Leah was willing to share her husband with another woman as long as it
meant more babies for herself. Isn't that something? How many women would feel
that way today-- especially here in abortion-prone, career-minded, day-care
dependent, glass-ceiling, women's-lib, feminist-active America?
I would like to point something else out too. Leah was crazy about kids and she was
crazy about her husband. That is not so apparent with Rachel. She only wanted kids
out of envy for her sister's fertility. And she even sold Jacob's affections for nothing
more than some wild herbs. A lordly price.
I really shouldn't be too harsh with Rachel. I truly believe she was stuck in an
arranged marriage against her will. After all, it wasn't her idea to marry Jacob. Her
dad engineered the whole thing. And Leah had already worn the shine off Jacob by
the time Rachel got a shot at him so that was no big treat. I just don't think
Rachel's heart was really in it.
I feel sorry for her. She really should have been given a home of her very own; not
thrown into someone else's marriage to wreck it with strife and rivalry-- most
especially not her own sister's. Rachel deserved better than that. She really got a
raw deal in life, that's for sure.
_
husband, that you would also take my son's mandrakes?
Of the two sisters, Leah is the only one to label Jacob "my" husband. (Personally, I
don't think Rachel ever really thought too much of Jacob.)
One of the very first social skills children learn from their parents is sharing. Jacob's
family was so bitterly divided that his wives, two blood kin sisters, were not even
disposed to display even the simplest of graces towards each other. In other words,
Leah was saying: if you want some mandrakes, go out and find your own!
● Gen 30:15b-16 . . Rachel replied: I promise, he shall sleep with you tonight, in
return for your son's mandrakes. When Jacob came home from the field in the
evening, Leah went out to meet him and said: You are to sleep with me, for I have
hired you with my son's mandrakes. And he lay with her that night.
Haw! Jacob became a gigolo in his own home. His wives were not only fighting
amongst themselves because of him, but they were bartering for him like a
commodity too. Jacob was sure in a pickle. He was probably like most men; just
wanting peace and quiet in his own home. If that's what the women arranged for
him that night, well alright; if it made them happy and kept the noise down then
what the hey.
You would think the home life of the patriarchs would be the most sterling role
models you could ever want. But no. They were actually pretty disappointing. And
why was that? Becuz they were people. They weren't a celestial breed of
supernatural beings whose home planet was located out in space somewhere
between the Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud.
No, the patriarchs didn't glide down here from Jupiter as a superior race of
extragalactic agents, nor did they draft in on the tail of a comet and drop off in the
land of Palestine. None of that. They were just as human as anybody else and they
were all slaves to human proclivities and predilections right along with the rest of
the Adams' family.
● Gen 30:17 . . God heeded Leah, and she conceived and bore him a fifth son.
God was favorably inclined to grant Leah's wishes. But why doesn't God grant the
wishes of all barren women? Is that fair? Why is God sensitive to some while
ignoring the feelings of others? I wish I could answer that. The brutal fact is: God is
merciful to whom He wishes to be merciful. Love it or leave it; we're stuck with a
God who has a mind of His own and does as He pleases. (cf. Matt 20:1-15)
● Gen 30:18 . . And Leah said: God has given me my reward for having given my
maid to my husband. So she named him Issachar.
Issachar's name is Yissaskar (yis-saw-kawr') which means: he will bring a reward
(or possibly; he is a reward). To Leah, Issachar really was worth his weight in gold
to her as a mother.
I really don't understand Leah's reasoning. Why would God approve of putting her
husband in bed with the maid? Sounds like a plot for a soap opera to me. But
nevertheless, Leah was happy with the way things turned out.
You know, that really shows the importance that women in that day put upon
children. Leah was willing to share her husband with another woman as long as it
meant more babies for herself. Isn't that something? How many women would feel
that way today-- especially here in abortion-prone, career-minded, day-care
dependent, glass-ceiling, women's-lib, feminist-active America?
I would like to point something else out too. Leah was crazy about kids and she was
crazy about her husband. That is not so apparent with Rachel. She only wanted kids
out of envy for her sister's fertility. And she even sold Jacob's affections for nothing
more than some wild herbs. A lordly price.
I really shouldn't be too harsh with Rachel. I truly believe she was stuck in an
arranged marriage against her will. After all, it wasn't her idea to marry Jacob. Her
dad engineered the whole thing. And Leah had already worn the shine off Jacob by
the time Rachel got a shot at him so that was no big treat. I just don't think
Rachel's heart was really in it.
I feel sorry for her. She really should have been given a home of her very own; not
thrown into someone else's marriage to wreck it with strife and rivalry-- most
especially not her own sister's. Rachel deserved better than that. She really got a
raw deal in life, that's for sure.
_
