Pancho Frijoles
Well-known member
I agree that the purpose of hell is not suffering for the sake of suffering.It is not a place of suffering for the sake of suffering.
It is suffering for the sake of something else. Suffering has a purpose.
What would this purpose be?
You mention in your post two purposes:
- To remove evil
- To protect the good from contamination from evil.
TO REMOVE EVIL:
I agree with you, but if the damned continue to be evil for eternity, how is that evil removed?
There are only 2 ways to remove evil: by annihilation or by transformation/purification. Both are represented symbolically by fire.
TO PROTECT THE GOOD FROM CONTAMINATION:
I agree with you again, but I have two questions:
- Why would the threat of contamination be permanent over the good ones? The ideal society is not one that keeps its jails full of prisoners for life, but one that performs a successful rehabilitation of those criminals so that they can get back to society as honest, productive men. The ideal society is the one that keeps its jails almost empty.
- Wouldn't isolation /separation be enough? Why would the criminals need to be tortured day and night forever? When you go to visit a prisoner, you don't want to see him or her being tortured. You want to see him/her reading, learning pottery or computers or theater, doing sports.