The Hyper Calvinist

I will add to the above a hyper calvinists is one who declares TULIP is the gospel.
Why do you get to add definitions to terms?

What in "TULIP" is synonymous with any of the other definitions of "Hypercalvinism"?
What is gained by creating a strawman that redefines "Calvinism" (often defined as synonymous with TULIP) with "Hyper-Calvinism"? You have no need of a prefix (Hyper-) if you are going to redefine Hyper-Calvinism = Calvinism = TULIP.
 
Why do you get to add definitions to terms?

What in "TULIP" is synonymous with any of the other definitions of "Hypercalvinism"?
What is gained by creating a strawman that redefines "Calvinism" (often defined as synonymous with TULIP) with "Hyper-Calvinism"? You have no need of a prefix (Hyper-) if you are going to redefine Hyper-Calvinism = Calvinism = TULIP.
It came from a Calvinist :)
 
Let’s see, is there any exclusion to “everyone” or “on them all”…?

Doug
Yes, the all there are the elect out from amongst both the jews and the gentiles. Also the Mercy Paul is speaking of is Salvation Mercy, it saves them He had Mercy upon, He regenerates and saves them according to Mercy Titus 3:5

5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

God doesnt have mercy on all mankind without exception, what about the vessels of wrath in distinction to the vessels of Mercy he just wrote about in Chapter 9 Rom 9:20-24

20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?

21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:

23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,

24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?

Do you really suppose that God all of the sudden changed His Mind and Purpose and just has mercy on all mankind, including the vessels of wrath ?

And Gods Mercy is confined to a remnant , an elect remnant Micah 7:18

18 Who is a God like unto thee, that pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of his heritage? he retaineth not his anger for ever, because he delighteth in mercy.
 
Yes, the all there are the elect out from amongst both the jews and the gentiles. Also the Mercy Paul is speaking of is Salvation Mercy, it saves them He had Mercy upon, He regenerates and saves them according to Mercy Titus 3:5

5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

God doesnt have mercy on all mankind without exception, what about the vessels of wrath in distinction to the vessels of Mercy he just wrote about in Chapter 9 Rom 9:20-24

20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?

21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:

23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,

24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?

Do you really suppose that God all of the sudden changed His Mind and Purpose and just has mercy on all mankind, including the vessels of wrath ?

And Gods Mercy is confined to a remnant , an elect remnant Micah 7:18

18 Who is a God like unto thee, that pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of his heritage? he retaineth not his anger for ever, because he delighteth in mercy.
Simple grammar tells us that the “on them all” refers directly back to those who were “bound to disobedience”. (And the reverse is equally true.)


Doug
 
God has mercy on everyone without exception, That’s universalism, Patrick!
ἐλεήσῃ is in the subjective mood, which shows potential for salvation, not a completed action. He did one thing so that he could then do another.

The important thing is there is no exclusive subset linked to the potential for mercy, it is for the whole segment that was “bound in disobedience!” Syntax is a killer…


Doug
 
ἐλεήσῃ is in the subjective mood, which shows potential for salvation, not a completed action. He did one thing so that he could then do another.

The important thing is there is no exclusive subset linked to the potential for mercy, it is for the whole segment that was “bound in disobedience!” Syntax is a killer…


Doug
Perhaps (I can neither confirm nor refute your claims of the Greek), however, you asked a question …
Let’s see, is there any exclusion to “everyone” or “on them all”…?

… and the answer (based upon your denial of Universalism) is “Yes, there is an exclusion.”
(Which brings us back to to the 500 year old Arminian vs Calvinist debate over WHY all are not saved.)

Just for the record, you don’t need to work to convince any Classic Arminian or Calvinist that people disobey. The debate tends to be over WHO and WHY of obedience. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom