The Elect

There you go again. Suggesting we need to keep up with you. How about just make your arguments and we will to and let readers decide.

You're playing checkers.....looking at things in one dimension. God is playing chess. It might offend you but God can do anything with his sovereignty he wants to do. When you say God HAS TO do a certain thing because he has the power and ability to do so God might be saying to you how about just stop trying to order me around. Just because I have the power to do something

doesn't mean I have to. And even if the other would have brought me pleasure doesn't mean I have to listen to you and enforce it. He has a right to allow his character to direct whatever he does with his power and if his character is such to give men genuine free choice it would be his sovereign right to do so.
Amen the God you have described shows the ultimate Sovereignty. And a God who allows creatures to be free , have choices is the most Sovereign and never threatened by such freedom. It’s the God of the Bible. Creating man in His own image and likeness. A truly Sovereign and loving God. :)
 
That’s up for debate :) Augustine got many things wrong about God.

According to the classical theism of Augustine, Anselm, Aquinas and their adherents, God is radically unlike creatures and cannot be adequately understood in ways appropriate to them. God is simple in that God transcends every form of complexity and composition
I don't know what ways they (you?) think is appropriate to them. Not sure what they (you?) are saying there.
 
There you go again. Suggesting we need to keep up with you. How about just make your arguments and we will to and let readers decide.
No, I was suggesting that is what you are trying to claim. You said that Calvinists claim ownership of the term, Sovereignty, but that they no more3 do so than those who deny that God controls all things (yes, that is my paraphrase).
You're playing checkers.....looking at things in one dimension. God is playing chess.
That's poetic, but you supposing that it goes deeper than my simple description of causation is neither stated in Scripture nor warranted by reason. If you could prove it, that would be one thing, but you can do no more than assert it and explain why you believe it.
It might offend you but God can do anything with his sovereignty he wants to do.
Why would that offend me? It is what I claim!
When you say God HAS TO do a certain thing because he has the power and ability to do so God might be saying to you how about just stop trying to order me around. Just because I have the power to do something doesn't mean I have to.
Where have I said that "God HAS TO do a certain thing because he has the power and ability to do so."? Really? How about stop trying to tell me what I think, and then positing a remonstrance from Almighty God against me for thinking it?
And even if the other would have brought me pleasure doesn't mean I have to listen to you and enforce it. He has a right to allow his character to direct whatever he does with his power and if his character is such to give men genuine free choice it would be his sovereign right to do so.
Of course, and he does give men genuine free choice. What is self-contradictory is your notion that free choice of creatures is its own first cause.
 
Why would that offend me? It is what I claim!

That is false.

You do not allow for God to delegate autonomous choices to his creatures without in some way determining what is chosen.

{If you stand by what you have previously written.)

Where have I said that "God HAS TO do a certain thing because he has the power and ability to do so."? Really?

Yes, "really."

You said the logic of LFW is "self-contradictory" in post #161.

How about stop trying to tell me what I think, and then positing a remonstrance from Almighty God against me for thinking it?

How about you own up to what you are saying, instead of playing the dip, duck, dodge and dive game?

Maybe then you'd see the relevance of an ACTUAL self-contradictory position and it's relevant rebuke.

Of course, and he does give men genuine free choice. What is self-contradictory is your notion that free choice of creatures is its own first cause.

"Genuine free," huh.

Stick a few more adjectives on there to make it sound even MORE authentic!

Except it never really is "free" of God's determination, is it?
 
You said that Calvinists claim ownership of the term, Sovereignty, but that they no more3 do so than those who deny that God controls all things (yes, that is my paraphrase).
Makesend I'm not a new kid on the block when it comes to talking to Calvinists through the years. People of your position always gravitate towards the sovereignty theme as a main plank of your arguments.

Even Wikipedia points this out about Calvinism, "It emphasizes the sovereignty of God and the authority of the Bible."

That's poetic, but you supposing that it goes deeper than my simple description of causation is neither stated in Scripture nor warranted by reason. If you could prove it, that would be one thing, but you can do no more than assert it and explain why you believe it.
And I said you're playing checkers and God is playing chess because you're demanding of him he's got to stay within the confines of a very one dimensional way of thinking about sovereignty how you define it. It's valid to say in our natural realm a King can be sovereign and yet he decides to what degree he wants to insist upon everything his way. For him to be able to decide this MEANS he's sovereign . Calvinists obviously want to take that away from him actually making him NOT sovereign.


 
Rockson said:
"It might offend you but God can do anything with his sovereignty he wants to do."

makesends said:
"Why would that offend me? It is what I claim!"

That is false.

You do not allow for God to delegate autonomous choices to his creatures without in some way determining what is chosen.

{If you stand by what you have previously written.)
It's not false. I'll just say you are wrong instead of telling you to stop lying about what I say. I said that God can do anything with his sovereignty he wants to, and I meant it. What makes you think he wants to do something self-contradictory? Does God consider whether he wants to make something too big for himself to pick up?

makesends said:
"Where have I said that "God HAS TO do a certain thing because he has the power and ability to do so."? Really?"
Yes, "really."

You said the logic of LFW is "self-contradictory" in post #161.
Yes, I said the logic of LFW is self-contradictory. Where does that say that "God HAS TO do a certain thing because he has the power and ability to do so."?

makesends said:
"How about stop trying to tell me what I think, and then positing a remonstrance from Almighty God against me for thinking it?"

How about you own up to what you are saying, instead of playing the dip, duck, dodge and dive game?

Maybe then you'd see the relevance of an ACTUAL self-contradictory position and it's relevant rebuke.
Demonstrate how I'm doing that, and demonstrate the "relevance of an ACTUAL self-contradictory position and its relevant rebuke", whatever you mean by that. Just telling me that I'm doing this or that is not convincing.

makesends said:
Of course, and he does give men genuine free choice. What is self-contradictory is your notion that free choice of creatures is its own first cause.

"Genuine free," huh.
It is genuine, because it is actual choice of a willed agent, choosing according to his own inclinations.
Stick a few more adjectives on there to make it sound even MORE authentic!
Clever.

Stick a few words together and claim you've come up with something actually possible and not self-contradictory.
Except it never really is "free" of God's determination, is it?
Of course it is not free of God's determination! Why should it be? What do you think man is and what do you think God is?

"Autonomy" of creatures can at the most mean that they act independent of other creatures.
 
Makesend I'm not a new kid on the block when it comes to talking to Calvinists through the years. People of your position always gravitate towards the sovereignty theme as a main plank of your arguments.

Even Wikipedia points this out about Calvinism, "It emphasizes the sovereignty of God and the authority of the Bible."
So what? Your claim was that they do not own it anymore than those who oppose Calvinism. So there you go claiming ownership of it. That was the whole point of what you were saying!
And I said you're playing checkers and God is playing chess because you're demanding of him he's got to stay within the confines of a very one dimensional way of thinking about sovereignty how you define it. It's valid to say in our natural realm a King can be sovereign and yet he decides to what degree he wants to insist upon everything his way. For him to be able to decide this MEANS he's sovereign . Calvinists obviously want to take that away from him actually making him NOT sovereign.
No. I'm not demanding anything of him. I'm saying that I do not entertain self-contradictory notions, if I see them for what they are.

Certainly, if God decides to do whatever he decides to do, he can sovereignly do so. Nobody can stop him. I'm not going to try. But you have a long way to go to demonstrate that God "delegates autonomy" to his creatures, in the sense that "autonomy" means that creatures act independent of God's causation. God has no interest, as far as I can tell from Scripture and from reason, to do anything that is logically self-contradictory.
 
Choose ye this day

is not equal to

I choose for you this day

Words are being robbed of their meaning.
I don't say he chooses for us. That is a stretch imposed on what I do say, that he chooses and so we too choose. There is no fact that is not established by God, the one and only First Cause, from which all other fact and principle logically descends, causally.

You sound like you think he is just another resident (though a more powerful ruler) within the same frame of reality we inhabit.
 
I don't say he chooses for us. That is a stretch imposed on what I do say, that he chooses and so we too choose. There is no fact that is not established by God, the one and only First Cause, from which all other fact and principle logically descends, causally.

You sound like you think he is just another resident (though a more powerful ruler) within the same frame of reality we inhabit.

It borders on Deism, that God just spun out creation and left it to do what it wants. And yet God somehow knows the finest details of future events and says so through His prophets. Oh, right, that's foresight, not sovereignty. /s
 
"God MEANT it"

is not equal to

"God ALLOWED it"

Words are being robbed of their meaning.

Hope this helps.

I never said it did.

Problem is you remove half the verse.

Not a very honest thing to do, is it?

Then accuse me of using a playground insult I never used.

Not a very honest thing to do, is it?
 
People want God to match their priorities instead of his ("I don't like God letting things out of control.")

This is why I reject both Pelagianism and Calvinism as ditches on both sides of the road.

Perennial dilemma.
 
People want God to match their priorities instead of his ("I don't like God letting things out of control.")

This is why I reject both Pelagianism and Calvinism as ditches on both sides of the road.

Perennial dilemma.
You sound as though your view is the truth. Yours is the road.
 
Choose ye this day

is not equal to

I choose for you this day

Words are being robbed of their meaning.
Yes they are. And the sad thing Calvinists won't admit is that their God predestinating everything is the same thing as saying God does all the choosing. And as you pointed out God told US......Choose you this day.
 
Yes they are. And the sad thing Calvinists won't admit is that their God predestinating everything is the same thing as saying God does all the choosing. And as you pointed out God told US......Choose you this day.
And the sad thing is, Self-Determinists don't realize that when a person chooses, they always choose what God had planned all along.
 
And the sad thing is, Self-Determinists don't realize that when a person chooses, they always choose what God had planned all along.
Do you have scriptures that teach God does that will all mankind not just a few select prophets of His ?
 
Back
Top Bottom