The doctrine of election

Since we are conceived in sin and born as sinners yet must reject that sinfulness comes from this as our creation, then we must assume that we were created, existed and lived in the spirit before we were sown into mankind, into Adam, and that we were only sown into Adam because we were already sinners due to our free will choice to be sinners pre-earth.
I think I will leave you to your own new religion, which is unknown to the church. It would be a waste of precious time even trying to discuss the truth with you.

Matthew 15:13,14​

“But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up. Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.”
 
Last edited:
I think I will leave you to your own new religion, which is unknown to the church. It would be a waste of precious time even trying to discuss the truth with you.

My NEW religion???
PCE is an ancient concept as old as the theory of our being created on earth at our conception, taught in early rabbinic literature and can be seen to be in the Bible, both the protestant bible and expressly in the Catholic bible though Christianity as a whole denies this interpretation of what is written in favour of the current favorite theory that we are created on earth...as sinners....contrary to GOD's attribute of perfect holiness, ie, HE cannot create evil by any means.

Judaism
In rabbinic literature, the souls of all humanity are described as being created during the six days of creation (Book of Genesis). When each person is born, a pre-existing soul is placed within the body. (See Tan., Pekude, 3). Tan., Pekude, 3: http://tinyurl.com/cnpetph

This was loooong before Origen, ( c. 185 – c. 253), the first practical theologian in Christendom who invented nothing but was led to accept our pre-conception existence as the truth of our creation by the Bible itself.

Bible: [including only 3 verses out of 3 dozen verses available]
In Jeremiah 1:5 we read, "Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations." which Origen also quoted in his explanation of HIS pce pov.

But Origen claimed his strongest impulse to accept PCE theology arose from his study of Romans 9:11-14 For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth; It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.
Origen argued that God could not love Jacob and hate Esau until Jacob had done something worthy of love and Esau had done something worthy of hatred, therefore, this passage must mean that Jacob and Esau who had not yet done good or evil in this life that their conduct before this life was the reason why Esau would serve Jacob. He rejected the position that God loves or hates a soul based on its inclination toward good or evil, before the soul actually commits a good or evil act.

I add to his understanding of this story the biblical fact that GOD said they were fighting, trying to crush each other to pieces, over who would be first born so I ask: "How did Jacob and Esau in the womb know of the law of primogeniture and that they would be born into the Hebrew community and that it would follow the law of primogeniture IF they were tabula rasa, just created and unaware of anything???"

Jn 9:1-3 The question Christ's disciples asked about the man born blind, suggests that they believed in the pre-existence of the man's spirit.
1 As he passed by, he saw a man blind from birth.
2 And his disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”
3 Jesus answered, “It was not that this man sinned, or his parents, but that the works of God might be displayed in him.

How does it make sense that the disciples ask if the man was born blind due to his own sin, if they did not believe in the pre-existence of the spirit/person able to sin before their existence by birth on earth? Notice Jesus did not chastise them for making an error about our creation but only about the reason for his suffering, nor did He correct them!

Catholicism:
The Wisdom of Solomon 8:20 As a child, I was born to excellence and a noble soul fell to my lot; or rather, I myself was noble, and I entered into an unblemished body ......
or
I was a boy of happy disposition. I had received a good soul as my lot, or that, being good, I had entered an undefiled body.
pretty straight forward unless you are a created on earth believing Catholic or a Protestant denying that the Wisdom of Solomon is scripture...

To believe that GOD creates sinners by having them born into Adam's progeny is an incredible bit of doublethink, believing the opposites that GOD is indeed hallowed yet that HE creates evil at the same time. !!!
 
My NEW religion???
PCE is an ancient concept as old as the theory of our being created on earth at our conception, taught in early rabbinic literature and can be seen to be in the Bible, both the protestant bible and expressly in the Catholic bible though Christianity as a whole denies this interpretation of what is written in favour of the current favorite theory that we are created on earth...as sinners....contrary to GOD's attribute of perfect holiness, ie, HE cannot create evil by any means
Ted,

Maybe your teaching may not be new in the sense of just beginning, but it very could be a resurrected old lie, that I do not know, not knowing all that the so-called church father's believed in ~ as a matter of facts I know little, since most of what I have read, I quickly lose my desire to keep reading behind them, the reason being is that I can see just how quickly most of them left the truth as the Apostles taught, which is recorded for us in the scriptures, and when I speak the scriptures, I'm not referring to the Catholic bible, which is the very source of many of the church's heretics that so soon came after the faithful apostles of the Lord Jesus.

Judaism
In rabbinic literature, the souls of all humanity are described as being created during the six days of creation (Book of Genesis). When each person is born, a pre-existing soul is placed within the body. (See Tan., Pekude, 3). Tan., Pekude, 3: http://tinyurl.com/cnpetph

This was loooong before Origen, ( c. 185 – c. 253), the first practical theologian in Christendom who invented nothing but was led to accept our pre-conception existence as the truth of our creation by the Bible itself.
Again Ted, Judaism, or the Jews' religion ~ Galatians 1:14, deteriorated into one of the world's added false religion, if not its leading one by the time Jesus Christ's death took place. No one should ever consider using them as a source of truth, who are lovers of the truth.

Bible: [including only 3 verses out of 3 dozen verses available]
In Jeremiah 1:5 we read, "Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations." which Origen also quoted in his explanation of HIS pce pov.

But Origen claimed his strongest impulse to accept PCE theology arose from his study of Romans 9:11-14 For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth; It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.
Ted, there's is not one, much less three dozen, that is wishing thinking on your part, and whoever else holds to this lie.

God's knowledge is infinite as I'm sure you know, he knows the end from the beginning, and "in this sense", he knew all of us before we were ever form in the womb of our mother's. God's purposes are eternal, thereby what he purpose to do in time he knew from the foundation of the world, every single event, and thoughts of all, not one thing was a surprised to him, not one. We do not have the power to know even seconds before it happens ~ God's knowledge is infinite.

Isaiah 46:9,10​

“Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me, Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:”
Jn 9:1-3 The question Christ's disciples asked about the man born blind, suggests that they believed in the pre-existence of the man's spirit.
1 As he passed by, he saw a man blind from birth.
2 And his disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”
3 Jesus answered, “It was not that this man sinned, or his parents, but that the works of God might be displayed in him.

How does it make sense that the disciples ask if the man was born blind due to his own sin, if they did not believe in the pre-existence of the spirit/person able to sin before their existence by birth on earth? Notice Jesus did not chastise them for making an error about our creation but only about the reason for his suffering, nor did He correct them!
I just told you above.
To believe that GOD creates sinners by having them born into Adam's progeny is an incredible bit of doublethink, believing the opposites that GOD is indeed hallowed yet that HE creates evil at the same time. !!!
God created Adam and Eve after his image, which was in spiritual knowledge, understanding, wisdom, and true righteousness, and made him the head of his posterity, and placed us in Adam, which we can see the wisdom of God in doing so. His nature in which Adam was created in, had no sin in his members as we all have coming from Adam after he sinned, we all inherited his fallen nature, which is no fault of God, but Adam's and we in him.

Why does evil exist? Some believe Jehovah created all things for Himself. But they limit His dominion by suggesting that wicked men and their sinful actions are outside His plan and control. To correct this false notion, Solomon (Proverbs 16:4) immediately included even the wicked and their judgment in Jehovah’s creating of all things for Himself. Even wicked men and their eventual destruction are for God’s glory.

Evil exists because God gave Satan a free will. Rather than be content with his office, he swelled up in pride (I Tim 3:6). God gave him privilege and freedom, and he used it to rebel against his Creator. The blessed God was not surprised or even disappointed; Satan is responsible for his wicked deed; God is righteous in tormenting him forever for his sin.

Where does suffering come from? Satan brought his rebellion to earth. He lied to your first parents, and Adam chose his foolish wife over God. Jehovah made man very good in a perfect world, but man corrupted the earth by sinning against His Maker (Gen 1:31; 3:16-19; Eccl 7:29). Adam chose the curse of sin for his family over Paradise with God. The whole creation groans in pain, travail, and death due to his sin (Rom 5:12-14; 8:22).

Evolutionists cannot explain death. It should have evolved away long ago, since it is the most dreaded and hated thing in life. If a slimy salamander can evolve to be a bald eagle, then surely man could have evolved death away. Death is the wages of sin. And the Bible teaches this fact clearly, which no evolutionist will ever find in a test tube or telescope. God created death, in several forms, as just punishment for sin. Therefore, all men die.

Adam’s sin in the Garden of Eden did not surprise or confuse the LORD. He allow the entrance of sin into the human family, Adam freely chose Eve over God without any coercion at all. Adam alone is responsible for his sin and the consequences. God made him perfect, warned him, and gave him only only one commandment to keep. God knew the entrance of sin would come, yet allow it, for the ultimate display of both his wrath and mercy.

Depraved children of Adam, with hearts in all-out rebellion against God and morality, commit atrocities daily. You hear and read about them. They, nor their atrocities, surprise or confuse the LORD. He made them as surely as any creature. He restrains their wickedness, so all they can do is what He will use for Himself (Ps 76:10). They never think about God at all (Ps 10:4); they only want to satisfy themselves (James 1:13-16).

The blessed and holy God does not make men sin, "but He does control and use their sins for wise and righteous purposes". God is perfectly holy and good. Man chooses sin willfully against the light of nature and warnings from God and men. God never puts sinful lusts in men, for He does not need to. They are so full of lust and wickedness, all He needs to do is lift His restraining mercy, and any man will do anything. Believe it!

He controls and directs all wickedness in the universe to His own praise and glory. Even the devil must obtain permission to touch a man or pig (Job 1:12; 2:6; Matt 8:31). He can keep a king from touching a woman (Gen 20:6), and he can use the offspring of incest for His glory (Gen 38:1-30). He used the envy of Joseph’s brothers to get him to Egypt (Gen 45:5; 50:20), and He used Roman cruelty to crucify His Son on a tree (John 18:31-32).

When God needs to reveal His wrath and power against sin, He looses men to rush greedily after their own lusts, and then He punishes them for it. About 6000 years after creation, He drowned the earth with a flood for their sins. He let Satan have David to number Israel, and He killed 70,000 men in punishment for their sins (II Sam 24:1-25). God controls and directs the sins of men and their punishment to magnify Himself.
 
Last edited:
Ted, there's is not one, much less three dozen, that is wishing thinking on your part, and whoever else holds to this lie.
Again, you make your ignorance of what verses I refer to to be proof that I must be wrong.

Quote me just one verse that not just proves pce to be wrong but that even hints that it is impossible.

The word of GOD is not wrong though many interpretations of it are...
 
Again Ted, Judaism, or the Jews' religion ~ Galatians 1:14, deteriorated into one of the world's added false religion, if not its leading one by the time Jesus Christ's death took place. No one should ever consider using them as a source of truth, who are lovers of the truth.

Yet even in the face of this pov, you yourself accept the Jewish interpretation that the 'creation' of Adam in the garden refers to man's total created existence, spirit and body which idea the church has inherited from the rabbis, following what they taught,

while Jesus Himself taught that we are sown, NOT created, into this world, Matt 13:36-39!

Where do I find support for the idea that human beings are spirit beings sown into the world?
Jesus told me in Matthew 13:36-39 Then Jesus dismissed the crowds and went into the house. His disciples came to Him and said, “EXPLAIN to us the parable of the weeds in the field.” An explanation of a metaphor must reduce the metaphor to pain facts without any further metaphor or hyperbole or innuendo hidden in it or it is not an explanation of the metaphor at all but is only an extension of it. To continue...

37 He replied, “The One who SOWS the good seed is the Son of Man. 38 The field is the world, and the good seed represents the sons / PEOPLE of the kingdom. The weeds are the sons / PEOPLE of the evil one, 39 and the enemy who sows them is the devil. The harvest is the end of the age, and the harvesters are angels.

Sons cannot refer to words or doctrines or the metaphor is still operative.
To sow cannot mean to create because the devil sows also but he cannot create. Therefore to sow must refer to its original meaning of to move an already created seed from a place of storage to a place of growth.

Since it is people, sons, that are being sown it is a very small and logical step to think these were people in spirit form being moved from one place to another, from a spirit place to a physical place...unless a prior eisegetic commitment to a different theology makes this suggestion to seem absurd.

But since it does no damage to the meaning of the the words of the passage nor the meaning of the interpretation of the passage, this interpretation is not absurd, only contrary to decided doctrine.
 
Romans 9 deals with His will in both election and reprobation. Election, of course, is God’s eternal, sovereign and unconditional choice of certain people in Jesus Christ, both to grace and to glory, to the honour of His name alone. Reprobation, on the other hand, is God’s eternal, sovereign and unconditional purpose to pass by and ordain to destruction all others, in the way of their sins, to the praise of His holy justice.
 
Election, of course, is God’s eternal, sovereign and unconditional choice of certain people
ImCo,
unconditional election means unconditional non-election, people being damned before they sin. It means everyone was just as acceptable for election as everyone else but some did not receive it

Please consider:
1 Timothy 5:21 I charge thee before GOD and the Lord Jesus Christ, and the ELECT angels. Since there are elect angels we can assume that the demonic angels were passed over for election or not considered for election. Angels do not presumably have any racial solidarity, ie, they all are holy or sinful by their own choice, not by anyone else's choice. So now we have to answer the question: were some elected before or after the fall of the Satanic rebellion?

IF they were elected / chosen before the fall then there is no stated reason for the non-election of the others. Unconditional, unmerited, election then also means unconditional unmerited non-election, ie, for no lack of merit or sinful condition at all some were passed over for salvation and NOT chosen to be saved if they should ever sin.

What can we make of such a supposition? Can we say it is loving? Righteous? Just? The best we can say is HE is sovereign and if HE chose this way then who are you to argue, which is not a real answer at all. Why teach us HE is loving, righteous and just if it has no meaning in the biggest question in their existence: Why were some passed over for election!!!

[ASIDE: It is entirely possible that the decision for some to receive unconditional unmerited election and others to receive unmerited rejection for election with no indication that this decision was loving, righteous or just could have precipitated the Satanic war in heaven when the non-elect were subject to a decision that was NOT loving, righteous or just so they committed themselves to war, putting their faith in the belief that YHWH was a false god and a liar, unworthy of being their GOD.]

This is what unconditional implies. It implies 'no reason', not just an 'unknown reason' because if there was a reason there would be merit to being on the side of the reason. Unconditional election means everyone was just as acceptable for election as everyone but some did not receive it....that is what 'without merit' also means! That does NOT sound like GOD at all. IF they were passed over for an evil they did then there is a righteous reason to their being passed over and to the election of those that were not passed over but who got the promise of election because they did not do that evil!!

IF election was a response to the Satanic rebellion to reward those angels who did not rebel and to pass over those angels who did rebel and condemn them on the spot, then election by merit makes sense. Their rebellion to the command to put their faith in the Son and to love one another which they heard in the beginning (ie before election) is then the reason they were passed over to be HIS Bride. The choice by some to accept HIM as their GOD and to put their faith in HIS Son was then the reason they were elected based upon the merit of this choice to obey the commandment.

Thus we probably have a precedent in the angels being chosen for election being based upon merit and proper free will decisions being the condition of being elected.

And since unconditional election is apparently false in the first people elected, I strongly suggest that it is also wrongly used for sinful men who were also elected in the beginning before the foundation of the world, Ephesians 1:4.
 
@TedT

unconditional election means unconditional non-election, people being damned before they sin.

Thats correct, yet they will be damned for their sins, they going to sin, its been predetermined. Likewise the elect are saved from their sins, b4 they sin, but they are going to sin, its predetermined.
 
Back
Top Bottom