As I have said, I don't always agree with your Philosophy, but I enjoy the discussions. My reply was based on the Holy scriptures that I posted in which God defines for me who His Law was for.Not necessarily, my friend. That covenant was specific to my son. I may have another covenant to offer that stranger. My son required to learn to do the dishes and I required the dishes to be done. The stranger may require a different thing and I may require from the stranger a different thing.
Certainly, I get your point that God offers, in essence, the same thing for mankind (forgiveness, a fresh start) and demands from mankind the same things (repentance, obedience). God would not reject a broken, contrite heart of any person at any time in history, from any religion, race or culture.
What I mean is that the specific terms of the covenant can vary according to God's plans, which include the ability for men to understand, at least to some extent, the terms He proposes.
Perhaps I was mistaken to use the analogy of your home, and your son, and your kingdom. Of course, you are free to make your own rules and apply them to whom you will in your own home.
I stand corrected.
The Ninevites, for example, were not required to keep the Sabbath.
You have no evidence to support this assertion, in my view, will all respect. They were told to repent of their sins, and they did, according to Scriptures. But there is no definition of Sin given by God to us until the Exodus. Amalek feared the wrath of God for the Sin of Adultery. But there is nothing in scriptures which define adultery as a Sin until the Exodus. Noah knew the difference between clean and unclean animals, and yet there is no defining the difference between them until the Exodus.
Abraham was included by God in His plans Because "For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the LORD, to do justice and judgment; that the LORD may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him."
Isaac was told that he was blessed "Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws."
And yet there is no enumeration of God's definition of justice or His Judgments, or of the "Way of the Lord" that Abraham would command his children to keep, nor of God's Statutes, Commandments and Laws that Abraham obeyed, until the Exodus.
So for me, it seems presumptuous to assume God's Laws, Judgments, definition of Justice, Commandments and Statutes didn't exist before the Exodus, just because God didn't enumerate them before the Exodus, given the evidence against such presumption.
Does God's Sabbath Commandment, or Adultery Commandment matter? Perhaps not. But to say it doesn't matter "because" God didn't enumerate His Laws until the Exodus is a poor argument, in my view, given what is actually written.
That was a requirement for the children of Israel.
And for the Stranger that would sojourn among them.
"the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God."
And for "the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to serve him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, every one that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant; Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of prayer for all people".
Should a man not also believe these Words?
The covenant that God presented to the Ninevites should have been as simple as this: "If you turn away from your evil ways, I will save you"
They did their part, and God did His.
Well my friend, "Sabbath" is mentioned 116 times in the Holy scriptures. Unclean is mentioned 158 times. Adultery is mentioned 33 times. Steal is mentioned 21 times.
I guess this goes back to one of our disagreements. The Centurian who watched as a righteous man was murdered. Would he not seek more about this man? Would he not seek the God of Abraham that this man promoted? Or do you think he would leave and seek out more Roman gods, or travel to a foreign country and adopt their religion which promoted a different Christ?
I can tell you, I don't know what God has in store for those who reject or question HIS definition of Holy, Clean, Just and Good, other than what HE says in the holy Scriptures. I only know how His Words apply to me. My argument on this forum is mostly tied to misrepresenting, omitting or ignoring what is written to justify a certain religious philosophy.
I don't believe God Laws were just given to Israel, because the Bible doesn't teach this. Jesus didn't teach this, and Paul didn't teach this, Moses didn't teach this, and Isaiah didn't teach this.
As for God's sabbaths, for me I have strived to honor God in them for almost 30 years now. I understand why they are made for man, by reason of use. Much in the same way I suppose, that a man can't truly understand what it is like to perform surgery on another human, unless they actually engage in the practice.
Anyway, such discussions are good to have among men seeking God's Truth.
I do respect and enjoy much of your perspectives. Thanks for sharing with me.