Replacement Theology: What It Is and Why It Matters for Christians

[Tothalordbeallglory]

Then so does every one else.

you didnt catch what he said . Remember when i told us we got a harlot at work
and she has infil trated every known realm .
YOU remember this , THE FLESH profits none . IT profits NONE .
A jew will wail as loudly as do anyone else , meaning gentile
IF THEY REJECT JESUS THE CHRIST .
There are far more under the spell of anti christ and its inclusivism ways than many now realize .
This sheep has done what i could and that by grace to continually remind us all
NO FAITH IN JESUS , MEANS ONE THING , DAMNATION and much wailing from all who rejected
HIS gospel that ALL APOSTELS , including paul , did teach .
Remember this day well . I am free of the blood of men , for i shunned NOT
to delcare the TRUE COUNSEL of GOD , TRUE GOSPEL OF GOD
This sheep never gave out false hope at all . IT WAS JESUS and that would include HIS teachings
That i reminded all about . Muhammed and all his followers WILL WAIL loudly on the day of the LORD
even budda an d all his followers WILL wail loudly on the day of the LORD
IN fact anyone and everyone who FAILED to BELEIVE ON JESUS THE CHRIST and chose rather
their false religoin , GONNA WAIL on the day of the LORD .
NO LOVE of GOD would dared to have ever pointed TO ANYTHING , any act , any work
any love , that in any way contradicted HIS SON .
YOU all remember this day . I aint the monster , i am not the hater
I have condemned no man . THEY CONDMEN themselves WHEN THEY CHOOSE
to follow another jesus or any other religoin to include athesim .
I POINT TO JESUS . now if that s eems harsh .
Let me encourage you with a reminder .
YOu go today and you stand in front on your own mirror .
WHEN YOU DO , tell me , DO YOU TH INK in any way that YOU , your works
can j ustify you or save you , OR DO YOU FIRMLY KNOW that what you see in the mirror
NEEDED JESUS TO BE SAVED . THUS THEY ALL NEED HIM TO BE SAVED .
man cannot save himself . BUT JESUS CAN . AND it is about high time
we ret urn to preaching THE ONLY NAME with the dire reminder of how dire important it is
TO BELIEVE ON HIM to be saved . THERE IS nothing good in me , B UT THE SPIRIT OF GOD .
I KNOW without a doubt , I NEED JESUS . I mean WITHOUT a doubt i know that .
AND SO DO THEY .

 

[Tothalordbeallglory]

DWELL on this which you said
It remains True for the Body of Christ

let us dwell on this
EVERY WORD OF GOD BE TRUE .
Let GOD be true but every man a liar .
I honestly dont know which they cast out fast er now
The very words of GOD , of the prophets , OF CHRIST
or those who bring such words . I think its about the same now .
A man who stands on b iblical truth gets cast out
for they have already cast out HIS WORDS in favor of a WHORE and her love .
WELL NOT ON MY WATCH .
And yet they think its we who love not GOD or people.
BUT IT AINT ME allowing sin upon them or unbelif .
ITS THEY who hate , NOT US . they love evil and sheep hate evil
their love wont be saving them . IT rejects T RUTH . and thus REJECTS GOD
and thus , WELL it wont be saving them .
MANY now love a lie . few love the truth . But no matter the cost
let us who name the NAME OF JESUS expose all that is contrary to Him .
For what is cont rary to CHRIST , IS CONTRARY TO GOD . and again that b e a fact .

 

[Tothalordbeallglory]

Then so does every one else.

Since we are on the subject of w hom is blessed .
Allow me to sum up just WHO is blessed .
HE whose hope and trust and faith be IN GOD is blessed .
And beleive me when i do say
IF Ones hope , trust and faith IS NOT IN JESUS
WELL THEN ITS NOT IN GOD . see how simple that is my friend .
And if our trust is not IN HIS WORDS , then its not IN HIM .

 

[DavidTree]

verily verily i do type unto thee
Actually IT SURE DO apply to the body of CHRIST .
Spiritual .
IF any comes and brings NOT this doctrine let them NOT in your house , neither b id them godspeed
FOR HE who do SO is partaker of his evil deeds .
AND guess what david
OUR OL ENCUMEINCAL WHORE has LIED to us all . though she aint my HO , no mo .
SHE done got christendom YOKED UP UNEQUALLY . entering into houses and covenants WHICH NONE who lips the name of JESUS would dared to have entered into .
Eat not with those who lip His name but love they sin .
OH i understood INSTANTLY what you meant my friend .
THUS i dont keep COMPANY WITH anything or anyone of that ecumeincal WHORES false love .
I do what ican to help and to warn them . BUT aint NO YOKING UP with them for this sheep .
IN fact
IN VERY fact
IN aboslute truth
WHAT DID JESUS SAY we should do if we preach the gospel to them
and they reject it .
was it
A . OH who cares we all serve the same GOD anyway .
B . Oh just find common ground
C . SHAKE THE DUST OFF against them .
C be the answer
AND paul knew it
as he too said
AFTER the first or second adomintion , REJECT THEM . THEY A HERETICK , THEY CONDEMN themselves .
AMIGO is not the monster many have made me out to be .
BY GRACE AMIGO SIMPLY CHOOSES TO FOLLOW JESUS and not men . NO RETREAT , NO SURRENDER
and if i die so be it . BUT JESUS WILL BE G LORIFIED ON my watch ,
AND OH YEAH , HOW I KNOW I NEED HIM FOR THIS . AMIGO declares war against the harlot
and her ecumeincal anti christ fake love , false unity , LIE .

YEPPER

The false-humility has most duped.

 

[FreeInChrist]

YEPPER

The false-humility has most duped.

And is doubly difficult when that includes family.

 

[jeremiah1five]

The Holy Spirit is HE a 'Gentile' or a 'Jew'???

This is where you are blaspheming the Work of the Holy Spirit = by excluding all nations whom the FATHER Calls.

This is God's attitude towards "all nations" (Gentiles).

17 All nations before him are as nothing;
And they are counted to him less than nothing, and vanity.
Isaiah 40:17.

God commanded His Chosen people Israel to "not mingle with the Gentile nations nor learn their ways."
Why is that? Because Gentiles are outside the covenants of God and they are a people that serve false idols and worship gods of stone, and wood, and God is against them. When Jesus returns "all nations" will be gathered against Israel and Jesus returns and destroys them with the breath of His mouth.

 

[jeremiah1five]

Then so does every one else.

The New Covenant prophesied by Jeremiah the prophet is between God and the House of Israel and the House of Judah.

31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD,
That I will make a new covenant
With the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Jeremiah 31:31.

There are no Gentiles in this covenant. NONE.

 

[FreeInChrist]

The New Covenant prophesied by Jeremiah the prophet is between God and the House of Israel and the House of Judah.

31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD,
That I will make a new covenant
With the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Jeremiah 31:31.

There are no Gentiles in this covenant. NONE.

@jeremiah1five I encourage you to stick with your Old Testament covnants, but for me and my house we will follow Jesus'.​

Bible passages with ‘Covenant’ in the book Matthew​

Matthew 26:28 For this is my blood of the new covenant, which shall be shed for many as a remission of sins.Matthew 26:28

Number of the word / term Covenant in Matthew: 1

Mark 14:24 And he said to them: “This is my blood of the new covenant, which shall be shed for many.Mark 14:24

Number of the word / term Covenant in Mark: 1

Luke 22:20 Similarly also, he took the chalice, after he had eaten the meal, saying: “This chalice is the new covenant in my blood, which will be shed for you.Luke 22:20

Number of the word / term Covenant in Luke: 1

Acts 7:8 And he gave him the covenant of circumcision. And so he conceived Isaac and circumcised him on the eighth day. And Isaac conceived Jacob, and Jacob, the twelve Patriarchs.Acts 7:8

Number of the word / term Covenant in Acts: 1

Romans 11:27 And this will be my covenant for them, when I will take away their sins.”Romans 11:27

Number of the word / term Covenant in Romans: 1

@jeremiah1five I want you to read the following very carefully and I can assure you I am not wanting you to be a believer in the Covenant Jesus gave us.
You follow the Father's covenants, and I will follow the one who the Father gave to His Son to give to us....

Jesus explicitly said​

“This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you.” (Luke 22:20)

Those words came from Jesus Christ Himself.
If someone denies the New Covenant, they are denying Jesus’ own words, not Paul, not theology — Jesus.

There is no hermeneutical escape hatch here.

A covenant requires blood — and Jesus’ blood was new​

Every biblical covenant is ratified by blood.

***Old Covenant → animal blood, repeated endlessly
***New Covenant → Christ’s blood, once for all

“He is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance.” (Hebrews 9:15)


If the Old Covenant were still sufficient, Christ’s death was unnecessary — a conclusion the NT flatly rejects.

​

PAY ATTENTION.....

The Old Covenant​

Ethnic descent never saved Israel — faith always did.

“Not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel.” (Romans 9:6)
“Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.” (Romans 4:3)

***Lineage gave privilege, not salvation.
***Faith was the instrument — even in the OT.

The New Covenant solves the OT problem the Law could not​

The Law revealed sin , condemned sinners , required constant sacrifices , could not perfect the conscience

The New Covenant forgives sin fully , cleanses the conscience , ends sacrifice forever , grants eternal life

“By a single offering He has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified.” (Hebrews 10:14)

If nothing changed, this verse is meaningless.

Gentiles are explicitly included — not grafted into Moses, but into Christ​

Gentiles are not saved by becoming Hebrews.

PAY ATTENTION.....

“There is neither Jew nor Greek… for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)

“He has made both one… abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances.” (Ephesians 2:14–15)

The unity is in Christ, not ethnicity, Torah observance, or covenantal inheritance by bloodline.

Denying the New Covenant denies the gospel itself​

If there is no New Covenant Christ’s blood didn’t inaugurate something new and salvation is still ethnic

Then the cross accomplished nothing new , the Church has no covenant standing , Gentile salvation is an illusion , the NT authors were deceived or deceptive

That position cannot coexist with the NT.

YOU NEED TO LEARN THIS...... you should memorize it.

Jesus Himself declared that His blood inaugurated a New Covenant (Luke 22:20). The Old Covenant, based on the Law and animal sacrifices, could never remove sin or perfect the conscience, which is why Christ offered Himself once for all (Heb. 9–10). Salvation was never by Hebrew lineage but by faith, even under the Old Covenant (Rom. 4). The New Covenant fulfills God’s promises by forgiving sins completely and uniting Jew and Gentile in Christ, not ethnicity (Eph. 2; Gal. 3). To deny the New Covenant is to deny the purpose and efficacy of Christ’s death.
1 Corinthians 11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”1 Corinthians 11:25

 

[DavidTree]

This is God's attitude towards "all nations" (Gentiles).

17 All nations before him are as nothing;
And they are counted to him less than nothing, and vanity.
Isaiah 40:17.

AGREE = and which nation does God single-out as "sin-full"

Isaiah 1:2-4
Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth!
For the Lord has spoken:
“I have nourished and brought up children,
And they have rebelled against Me;
The ox knows its owner
And the donkey its master’s crib;
But Israel does not know,
My people do not consider.”
Alas, sinful nation = Hebrews/Israel
A people/Hebrews laden/FULL with iniquity,
A brood of evildoers,
Children who are corrupters!
They have forsaken the Lord,
They have provoked to anger
The Holy One of Israel,
They have turned away backward.

 

[Tothalordbeallglory]

AGREE = and which nation does God single-out as "sin-full"

Isaiah 1:2-4
Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth!
For the Lord has spoken:
“I have nourished and brought up children,
And they have rebelled against Me;
The ox knows its owner
And the donkey its master’s crib;
But Israel does not know,
My people do not consider.”
Alas, sinful nation = Hebrews/Israel
A people/Hebrews laden/FULL with iniquity,
A brood of evildoers,
Children who are corrupters!
They have forsaken the Lord,
They have provoked to anger
The Holy One of Israel,
They have turned away backward.

Are we better than they , Nope . For we have before proved that ALL ARE UNDER SIN
there is none who is righteous .
Paul , a jew , knew the truth . That by faith the gentiles would be saved
through faith the jews would be saved . He always made mention of the two and that they BOTH need Christ .
And that the two are made ONE body IN JESUS CHRIST . whatever road jeremiah five has went down
IS a seriously slippery slope and its dire necessary that man get back into the bible for to learn .

 

[DavidTree]

@jeremiah1five I encourage you to stick with your Old Testament covnants, but for me and my house we will follow Jesus'.​

Bible passages with ‘Covenant’ in the book Matthew​

Number of the word / term Covenant in Matthew: 1


Number of the word / term Covenant in Mark: 1


Number of the word / term Covenant in Luke: 1


Number of the word / term Covenant in Acts: 1


Number of the word / term Covenant in Romans: 1

@jeremiah1five I want you to read the following very carefully and I can assure you I am not wanting you to be a believer in the Covenant Jesus gave us.
You follow the Father's covenants, and I will follow the one who the Father gave to His Son to give to us....

Jesus explicitly said​

“This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you.” (Luke 22:20)

Those words came from Jesus Christ Himself.
If someone denies the New Covenant, they are denying Jesus’ own words, not Paul, not theology — Jesus.

There is no hermeneutical escape hatch here.

A covenant requires blood — and Jesus’ blood was new​

Every biblical covenant is ratified by blood.

***Old Covenant → animal blood, repeated endlessly
***New Covenant → Christ’s blood, once for all

“He is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance.” (Hebrews 9:15)


If the Old Covenant were still sufficient, Christ’s death was unnecessary — a conclusion the NT flatly rejects.

​

PAY ATTENTION.....

The Old Covenant​

Ethnic descent never saved Israel — faith always did.

“Not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel.” (Romans 9:6)
“Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.” (Romans 4:3)

***Lineage gave privilege, not salvation.
***Faith was the instrument — even in the OT.

The New Covenant solves the OT problem the Law could not​

The Law revealed sin , condemned sinners , required constant sacrifices , could not perfect the conscience

The New Covenant forgives sin fully , cleanses the conscience , ends sacrifice forever , grants eternal life

“By a single offering He has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified.” (Hebrews 10:14)

If nothing changed, this verse is meaningless.

Gentiles are explicitly included — not grafted into Moses, but into Christ​

Gentiles are not saved by becoming Hebrews.

PAY ATTENTION.....

“There is neither Jew nor Greek… for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)

“He has made both one… abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances.” (Ephesians 2:14–15)

The unity is in Christ, not ethnicity, Torah observance, or covenantal inheritance by bloodline.

Denying the New Covenant denies the gospel itself​

If there is no New Covenant Christ’s blood didn’t inaugurate something new and salvation is still ethnic

Then the cross accomplished nothing new , the Church has no covenant standing , Gentile salvation is an illusion , the NT authors were deceived or deceptive

That position cannot coexist with the NT.

YOU NEED TO LEARN THIS...... you should memorize it.

Jesus Himself declared that His blood inaugurated a New Covenant (Luke 22:20). The Old Covenant, based on the Law and animal sacrifices, could never remove sin or perfect the conscience, which is why Christ offered Himself once for all (Heb. 9–10). Salvation was never by Hebrew lineage but by faith, even under the Old Covenant (Rom. 4). The New Covenant fulfills God’s promises by forgiving sins completely and uniting Jew and Gentile in Christ, not ethnicity (Eph. 2; Gal. 3). To deny the New Covenant is to deny the purpose and efficacy of Christ’s death.
1 Corinthians 11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”1 Corinthians 11:25

Ethnic descent never saved Israel — faith always did.

“Not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel.” (Romans 9:6)
“Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.” (Romans 4:3)

***Lineage gave privilege, not salvation.
***Faith was the instrument — even in the OT.

100% TRUTH and no other
BUT - can you prove this???
Clue = there is one NT verse that "proves" your statement as TRUTH = find it

Denying the New Covenant denies the gospel itself​

Denying the New Covenant means one is denying MESSIAH, the FATHER and the RUACH HaKODESH

 

[FreeInChrist]

100% TRUTH and no other
BUT - can you prove this???
Clue = there is one NT verse that "proves" your statement as TRUTH = find it

Are you referring to Galatians 3:8 which explicitly states that the gospel was preached to Abraham and that justification was by faith? Therefore, salvation has always been by faith, not ethnicity or Law. Lineage gave covenant privilege, not righteousness.

Denying the New Covenant means one is denying MESSIAH, the FATHER and the RUACH HaKODESH

 

[jeremiah1five]

@jeremiah1five I encourage you to stick with your Old Testament covnants, but for me and my house we will follow Jesus'.​

Bible passages with ‘Covenant’ in the book Matthew​

Number of the word / term Covenant in Matthew: 1
Number of the word / term Covenant in Mark: 1
Number of the word / term Covenant in Luke: 1
Number of the word / term Covenant in Acts: 1
Number of the word / term Covenant in Romans: 1

@jeremiah1five I want you to read the following very carefully and I can assure you I am not wanting you to be a believer in the Covenant Jesus gave us.
You follow the Father's covenants, and I will follow the one who the Father gave to His Son to give to us....

What covenant Jesus "gave us"? If "us" to you means non-Hebrew Gentiles, then you are mistaken. God never gave a covenant nor promises to Gentiles. And for those that are the seed of Abraham are BORN INTO the covenant God made with Abraham and with the children of Israel. No one chooses to be in covenant with God. Every Hebrew born to Abraham and Sarah (Isaac, Jacob, etcetera) are BORN INTO covenant with God.

Jesus explicitly said​

“This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you.” (Luke 22:20)
Those words came from Jesus Christ Himself.
If someone denies the New Covenant, they are denying Jesus’ own words, not Paul, not theology — Jesus.
There is no hermeneutical escape hatch here.

A covenant requires blood — and Jesus’ blood was new​

Every biblical covenant is ratified by blood.
***Old Covenant → animal blood, repeated endlessly
***New Covenant → Christ’s blood, once for all
“He is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance.” (Hebrews 9:15)
If the Old Covenant were still sufficient, Christ’s death was unnecessary — a conclusion the NT flatly rejects.
PAY ATTENTION.....

The Old Covenant​

Ethnic descent never saved Israel — faith always did.

“Not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel.” (Romans 9:6)
“Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.” (Romans 4:3)

***Lineage gave privilege, not salvation.
***Faith was the instrument — even in the OT.

The New Covenant solves the OT problem the Law could not​

The Law revealed sin , condemned sinners , required constant sacrifices , could not perfect the conscience

The New Covenant forgives sin fully , cleanses the conscience , ends sacrifice forever , grants eternal life

“By a single offering He has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified.” (Hebrews 10:14)

If nothing changed, this verse is meaningless.

Gentiles are explicitly included — not grafted into Moses, but into Christ​

Then you teach Jesus changed the Law and having changed it, destroyed the Law. But thank God your interpretation is incorrect. Christ was Promised to the children of Israel and to the children of Israel He came. He declares this in Matthew 15.

24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Matthew 15:24.

Gentiles are not saved by becoming Hebrews.

PAY ATTENTION.....

“There is neither Jew nor Greek… for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)

“He has made both one… abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances.” (Ephesians 2:14–15)

The unity is in Christ, not ethnicity, Torah observance, or covenantal inheritance by bloodline.

Denying the New Covenant denies the gospel itself​

If there is no New Covenant Christ’s blood didn’t inaugurate something new and salvation is still ethnic

Then the cross accomplished nothing new , the Church has no covenant standing , Gentile salvation is an illusion , the NT authors were deceived or deceptive

That position cannot coexist with the NT.

YOU NEED TO LEARN THIS...... you should memorize it.

Jesus Himself declared that His blood inaugurated a New Covenant (Luke 22:20). The Old Covenant, based on the Law and animal sacrifices, could never remove sin or perfect the conscience, which is why Christ offered Himself once for all (Heb. 9–10). Salvation was never by Hebrew lineage but by faith, even under the Old Covenant (Rom. 4). The New Covenant fulfills God’s promises by forgiving sins completely and uniting Jew and Gentile in Christ, not ethnicity (Eph. 2; Gal. 3). To deny the New Covenant is to deny the purpose and efficacy of Christ’s death.
1 Corinthians 11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”1 Corinthians 11:25

Learn to read. Saul was addressing Jews and Jewish Christians. Look at the passage. Saul is addressing Jews and the word "Greek" does not refer to non-Hebrew Gentiles; it refers to Hellenized Jews (Jews who grew up in Gentile land and were the scattered of the Diaspora of 722 and 586 BC.

23 But before faith came, we [JEWS] were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
24 Wherefore the law was our [JEWS] schoolmaster to bring us [JEWS] unto Christ, that we [JEWS] might be justified by faith.
25 But after that faith is come, we [JEWS] are no longer under a schoolmaster.
26 For ye [JEWS] are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27 For as many of you [JEWS] as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye [JEWS] are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye [JEWS] be Christ’s, then are ye [STILL JEWS AND] Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise. Galatians 3:23–29.

Gentiles were NEVER under the Law. The Jews/Hebrews were. Saul is addressing Jews who became born-again through the Holy Spirit of Promise PROMISED TO ISRAEL and these Jews were concerned with their standing in the Abrahamic promises now that they were Christian (Christ-follower.) Saul tells these Jews that "if ye [Jews] be Christ's, then are you STILL JEWS and heirs according to the Promise (of Abraham.)"

God's Word was NEVER given to non-Hebrew Gentiles. The Holy Word of God was given to a Holy people: The Jews and Jews were under the Law. God does not give that which is Holy to unholy people.

 

[jeremiah1five]

@jeremiah1five I encourage you to stick with your Old Testament covnants, but for me and my house we will follow Jesus'.​

Bible passages with ‘Covenant’ in the book Matthew​

Number of the word / term Covenant in Matthew: 1


Number of the word / term Covenant in Mark: 1


Number of the word / term Covenant in Luke: 1


Number of the word / term Covenant in Acts: 1


Number of the word / term Covenant in Romans: 1

@jeremiah1five I want you to read the following very carefully and I can assure you I am not wanting you to be a believer in the Covenant Jesus gave us.
You follow the Father's covenants, and I will follow the one who the Father gave to His Son to give to us....

Jesus explicitly said​

“This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you.” (Luke 22:20)

Those words came from Jesus Christ Himself.
If someone denies the New Covenant, they are denying Jesus’ own words, not Paul, not theology — Jesus.

There is no hermeneutical escape hatch here.

A covenant requires blood — and Jesus’ blood was new​

Every biblical covenant is ratified by blood.

***Old Covenant → animal blood, repeated endlessly
***New Covenant → Christ’s blood, once for all

“He is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance.” (Hebrews 9:15)


If the Old Covenant were still sufficient, Christ’s death was unnecessary — a conclusion the NT flatly rejects.

​

PAY ATTENTION.....

The Old Covenant​

Ethnic descent never saved Israel — faith always did.

“Not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel.” (Romans 9:6)
“Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.” (Romans 4:3)

***Lineage gave privilege, not salvation.
***Faith was the instrument — even in the OT.

The New Covenant solves the OT problem the Law could not​

The Law revealed sin , condemned sinners , required constant sacrifices , could not perfect the conscience

The New Covenant forgives sin fully , cleanses the conscience , ends sacrifice forever , grants eternal life

“By a single offering He has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified.” (Hebrews 10:14)

If nothing changed, this verse is meaningless.

Gentiles are explicitly included — not grafted into Moses, but into Christ​

Gentiles are not saved by becoming Hebrews.

PAY ATTENTION.....

“There is neither Jew nor Greek… for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)

“He has made both one… abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances.” (Ephesians 2:14–15)

The unity is in Christ, not ethnicity, Torah observance, or covenantal inheritance by bloodline.

Denying the New Covenant denies the gospel itself​

If there is no New Covenant Christ’s blood didn’t inaugurate something new and salvation is still ethnic

Then the cross accomplished nothing new , the Church has no covenant standing , Gentile salvation is an illusion , the NT authors were deceived or deceptive

That position cannot coexist with the NT.

YOU NEED TO LEARN THIS...... you should memorize it.

Jesus Himself declared that His blood inaugurated a New Covenant (Luke 22:20). The Old Covenant, based on the Law and animal sacrifices, could never remove sin or perfect the conscience, which is why Christ offered Himself once for all (Heb. 9–10). Salvation was never by Hebrew lineage but by faith, even under the Old Covenant (Rom. 4). The New Covenant fulfills God’s promises by forgiving sins completely and uniting Jew and Gentile in Christ, not ethnicity (Eph. 2; Gal. 3). To deny the New Covenant is to deny the purpose and efficacy of Christ’s death.
1 Corinthians 11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”1 Corinthians 11:25

The Jews that were born again by the Holy Spirit of Promise PROMISED TO ISRAEL were the people God promised to put His Law in their inward parts.

33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel;
After those days, saith the LORD,
I will put my law in their inward parts,
And write it in their hearts;
And will be their God,
And they shall be my people.
Jeremiah 31:33.

Not even God casts His pearls to swine, nor does He give that which is Holy (God's love) to dogs (unsaved, uncircumcised Gentiles.

 

[DavidTree]

Are you referring to Galatians 3:8 which explicitly states that the gospel was preached to Abraham and that justification was by faith? Therefore, salvation has always been by faith, not ethnicity or Law. Lineage gave covenant privilege, not righteousness.

Gal 3:8 contains the Key 'element' , but i have another scripture in mind.

Stay with the Key 'element' of Gal 3:8

Clue #2 - "once"

 

[FreeInChrist]

What covenant Jesus "gave us"? If "us" to you means non-Hebrew Gentiles, then you are mistaken. God never gave a covenant nor promises to Gentiles. And for those that are the seed of Abraham are BORN INTO the covenant God made with Abraham and with the children of Israel. No one chooses to be in covenant with God. Every Hebrew born to Abraham and Sarah (Isaac, Jacob, etcetera) are BORN INTO covenant with God.

Then you teach Jesus changed the Law and having changed it, destroyed the Law. But thank God your interpretation is incorrect. Christ was Promised to the children of Israel and to the children of Israel He came. He declares this in Matthew 15

The Jews that were born again by the Holy Spirit of Promise PROMISED TO ISRAEL were the people God promised to put His Law in their inward parts.

33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel;
After those days, saith the LORD,
I will put my law in their inward parts,
And write it in their hearts;
And will be their God,
And they shall be my people.
Jeremiah 31:33.

Not even God casts His pearls to swine, nor does He give that which is Holy (God's love) to dogs (unsaved, uncircumcised Gentiles.

I am only replying to this one post of yours because my reply covers both.

The New Covenant is entered ....​

Jesus did not say “You were born into covenant.”

He said “This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you.” (Luke 22:20)

Covenants based on lineage do not require death. This one did.

Scripture is explicit that covenant inheritance under Christ is not ethnic:

“They are not all Israel who are of Israel.” (Romans 9:6)

“If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.” (Galatians 3:29)

Under the New Covenant, seed is defined by union with Christ — not genealogy.

NEVER

Scripture never teaches “born into covenant” — it teaches​

Being born Hebrew never saved anyone, including Abraham.

“Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.” (Romans 4:3)

Jesus did not say “You must be born into Israel.”

He said: “You must be born again.” (John 3:7)

And He made the distinction unmistakable “That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.” (John 3:6)

Flesh birth places no one into covenant life. Only the Spirit does.

The New Covenant is not inherited by bloodline, nationality, or birth status.
It is entered by faith in Christ and sealed by His blood.

“For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body — whether Jews or Greeks.” (1 Corinthians 12:13)

That is not opinion...... That is Scripture.
I’ll gladly stand where Scripture places me — justified by faith, not by flesh.

One final clarification.
I am not presenting myself as a teacher.
Jesus is the Teacher.

I am simply repeating what He and His apostles taught.

“You have one Teacher, the Christ.” (Matthew 23:10)

If what I’ve said is wrong, then it must be shown wrong from Scripture, not from lineage, tradition, or assumption.

I’m only delivering the message — the text itself stands as the authority.

 

[FreeInChrist]

Gal 3:8 contains the Key 'element' , but i have another scripture in mind.

Stay with the Key 'element' of Gal 3:8

Clue #2 - "once"

If the key element is “once,” then Scripture answers that directly .....and it strengthens Galatians 3:8, not weakens it.

The gospel was preached once beforehand to Abraham (Galatians 3:8),
and it was accomplished once for all in Christ.

Heb 9:26 states "Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself."

Heb 9:28 states "so Christ also, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time for salvation without reference to sin, to those who eagerly await Him."

The “once” refers to the sufficiency and finality of the sacrifice, not a restriction of who may benefit from it.


That is why justification has always been by faith.....

Abraham ....before the Law
Israel .... under the Law
Jew and Gentile .... after the cross

Same gospel......Same faith......One finished sacrifice.

Lineage gave covenant privilege. Faith has always given righteousness.

 

[DavidTree]

If the key element is “once,” then Scripture answers that directly .....and it strengthens Galatians 3:8, not weakens it.

The gospel was preached once beforehand to Abraham (Galatians 3:8),
and it was accomplished once for all in Christ.

Heb 9:26 states "Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself."

Heb 9:28 states "so Christ also, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time for salvation without reference to sin, to those who eagerly await Him."

The “once” refers to the sufficiency and finality of the sacrifice, not a restriction of who may benefit from it.


That is why justification has always been by faith.....

Abraham ....before the Law
Israel .... under the Law
Jew and Gentile .... after the cross

Same gospel......Same faith......One finished sacrifice.

Lineage gave covenant privilege. Faith has always given righteousness.

You nailed it with Gal 3:8 because it includes the KEY Element of Salvation

You will find the verse by using the clue word "once" in a NT Letter

Clue #3 - "once" is part of the KEY Element

Clue #4 - the word "once" is included in the verse that contains the KEY Element

 

[Tothalordbeallglory]

Are you referring to Galatians 3:8 which explicitly states that the gospel was preached to Abraham and that justification was by faith? Therefore, salvation has always been by faith, not ethnicity or Law. Lineage gave covenant privilege, not righteousness.

I have a question i want everyone to truly ponder on my friend .
How does one know His faith be in GOD , in CHRIST
or was it really in what men said about God about Christ .

 

[FreeInChrist]

I have a question i want everyone to truly ponder on my friend .
How does one know His faith be in GOD , in CHRIST
or was it really in what men said about God about Christ .

One of my favorite televangelists used to say, “I know, because my know knows.”

When you ask how one knows their faith is in God, in Christ .....and not merely in what men have said ..... it comes with a sure awareness that arises from within.

Faith often begins with what men say, because God uses teachers and preachers to proclaim the truth (Romans 10:14). But saving faith does not rest on men. What starts externally must become internally confirmed by God Himself.

Scripture shows this balance: the gospel comes “not in word only, but also in power and in the Holy Spirit and in full assurance” (1 Thessalonians 1:5). Men proclaim; God reveals. Teachers point; the Spirit bears witness (Romans 8:16).

That is why faith can mature beyond “I was told” into “I know whom I have believed” (2 Timothy 1:12). Questioning whether we believed rightly is not unbelief ..... it is discernment, testing what we have heard against Scripture (1 Thessalonians 5:21).

So yes, faith may enter through men, but it endures through God. If it rested only on human authority, it would collapse. If it is grounded in Christ and confirmed by the Spirit, it stands ..... even when teachers fail.