I just wanted to know if that was the case with anyone of us so that we can take appropriate actions to remedy that. Thanks for that clarification.
I just wanted to know if that was the case with anyone of us so that we can take appropriate actions to remedy that. Thanks for that clarification.
Subject Heading:- "Paul's Theology #2 "Rightly divide"
Introducing the subject of right division under the heading of 'Paul's Theology'
You do realize that at the moment that Paul wrote those words there was no NT. So "Paul's doctrines" were actually not his doctrines. They were OT doctrines that he was proclaiming and announcing.Actually @Complete ..
Its Paul's verse that tells us to "rightly divide".
That is more of Paul's doctrine, so, that is of course the Thread's point.
You do realize that at the moment that Paul wrote those words there was no NT. So "Paul's doctrines" were actually not his doctrines. They were OT doctrines.
Hello @Behold,Actually @Complete ..
Its Paul's verse that tells us to "rightly divide".
That is more of Paul's doctrine, so, that is of course the Thread's point.
Hello @Behold,
Yes, I realise that they are the words of Paul, but He is speaking as an Apostle of the risen Christ. So the doctrine is of God, and not of Paul. He is only the mouthpiece.
You have a very faulty understanding of the timeline of when the letters of the New Testament were written and in what order. They aren't arranged in order of oldest to newest in the common English New Testament.Not correct.
See, Paul's Epistles were in the Hands of the Churches that He planted, and that is nearly every Epistle.
Corinthians
Ephesisans
Galatians
All of these and more are "local bodies of Christ' that Paul created, in those areas, and They had Paul's letters (copies), as did Peter and the Apostles..
So, these letters, are Scripture, are doctrine, that later were assembled into a New Testament, so that the entire body of Christ, could have Paul's doctrine.
If you read Peter's 2 epistles, You'll find that Peter has Paul's letters and refers to them ALREADY.... at that time... "pre-NT", as "Scripture".
This is one of the original 12 that Jesus walked with, who is describing the letters of a non-original Apostle as : SCRIPTURE. = to the "Torah".
You have a very faulty understanding of the timeline of when the letters of the New Testament were written and in what order. They aren't arranged in order of oldest to newest in the common English New Testament.
'But rise, and stand upon thy feet:Jesus chose this "apostle to the gentiles", to deliver "church doctrine".
Paul is very specific about that and told His disciples and us, to tend to this ""doctrine.""
Paul said that "no man" gave it to him, but it came from Jesus, Himself.
So, when we want to understand how to understand the NT, and how to walk in perfected discipleship, we turn to the one who wrote the doctrine for the Church, and who told us he had "finished his course" and said..>"be a follower of Me, as i follow Christ".
Now, Paul is not saying "worship" or "idolize" me.. He is saying.."im your example"... "emulate me" = "follow".
Nothing that you wrote disproves anything that I said. No "gotcha". Just the truth. And just because your icon has "Jesus" as an image, does not somehow make you the expert on subjects.You like to post what you can't prove, .... and pretend your game of "gotcha" is a reason for you to be on the Forum.
Let me show you something, @EclipseEventSigns ......
One of the reasons that it can be that a verse one apostle writes, seems to contradict something that another one wrote..
1.) You are not rightly dividing the word.
But, it can also be.. that the Apostle at the time they wrote a verse, that seems to contradict.....is because at the time they wrote it, they didnt have all the revelation that they would have later.
I'll give you an example.
In Acts 2, .. You have Peter preaching both John the Baptist's baptism, and Christ on the Cross.
So, that is all he knew at that time........to do.
10 Yrs later, God is showing Peter that Gentiles can be saved, as Peter didnt know that in Acts 2.
And in Acts 15, Peter is now talking about GRACE.......and that is because all the Apostles got together with Paul, and from that, they were all finally on the same page, theologically.
I agree with what you say, but the doctrines that Paul delivered, were not His own,
Multiple Churches were already planted and thriving decades before Paul's first Epistle was even written, let alone even distributed to all those Churches. The Churches already had Apostolic structure decades before Paul's first Epistle. How does that historical fact fit in with your way of thinking?Not correct.
See, Paul's Epistles were in the Hands of the Churches that He planted, and that is nearly every Epistle.
Corinthians
Ephesisans
Galatians
All of these and more are "local bodies of Christ' that Paul created, in those areas, and They had Paul's letters (copies), as did Peter and the Apostles..
So, these letters, are Scripture, are doctrine, that later were assembled into a New Testament, so that the entire body of Christ, could have Paul's doctrine.
If you read Peter's 2 epistles, You'll find that Peter has Paul's letters and refers to them ALREADY.... at that time... "pre-NT", as "Scripture".
This is one of the original 12 that Jesus walked with, who is describing the letters of a non-original Apostle as : SCRIPTURE. = to the "Torah".
'But I certify you, brethren,Here is something interesting to understand.
Paul said that Jesus delivered to Him... .the Gospel....
Then, Paul said that this Gospel, is "MY Gospel"... 3x in the New Testament.
Do you even know what the word "gospel" means? Substitute "good news" everywhere where it occurs. The meaning becomes clear and does not imply what you think it implies.Here is something interesting to understand.
Paul said that Jesus delivered to Him... .the Gospel....
Then, Paul said that this Gospel, is "MY Gospel"... 3x in the New Testament.
Nothing that you wrote disproves anything that I said.
Yes, and I read what people write and compare it with Scripture. And a lot of what you write misses the mark. And you will be continually called out when you do that. Even if you do not like it. Because, again, just because you use an image of Christ to give authority to your writing, you are not speaking in the authority of Jesus.I dont Teach, to disprove.
I Teach to reveal.
See, im not some carnal baby who comes to a forum everyday and night, to try to "win" an argument.
God knows that there are enough of these diaper christians who do nothing for God in real life, , and all they do is park and preach on forums some argument they learned from their cult or cult commentary.
Its sickening, its harmful to real believers,, and its a faith killer regarding a new Christian who stumbles into one of these forums..... but that is what a "christian" forum, allows, and often, its all that its really able to produce.
Im grateful that this one, is not a Calvin worshiping theological sewer, as that is what many of them have become... unfortunately.
So, what i do, is expose heresy, so that the real student of the word, can discern, and in this, they learn who is truth and who is false, and what is Theologically right and what isnt'.
The real student of the word of God, will come to understand that the way you find out what is TRUE, is to learn how to discern what is NOT true.
And what i do for believers, on forums is Teach Paul's Doctrine, and i Preach Christ Crucified, as this is the LIGHT of Revelation, that allows someone to find it, and begin to exist there... and remain.
Do you even know what the word "gospel" means? Substitute "good news" everywhere where it occurs. The meaning becomes clear and does not imply what you think it implies.
Well, then you truly do NOT understand how the word is used by the authors of the New Testament.That word "gospel" is meaningless, unless its taught as "God's Grace", as then it becomes CHRISTianity.
See, let me show you..
Last Saturday, 8 days ago... A Gospel of Islam, was commanding Human devils to burn Jewish Babies, and slaughter old Jewish women, among others.
They were obeying their "Gospel".. as there are many Gospels, and all are cures, save for one.
Galatians 1:8
Yes, and I read what people write and compare it with Scripture. And a lot of what you write misses the mark.
I have. That's a fact.You can't quote anything by me that proves your continued lying innuendo.... @EclipseEventSigns
That's a fact.
Believe it.