My full defense of PSA

[praise_yeshua]

Penal Substitutionary Atonement is a Reformation invention that finds no support throughout the first millennium of the church. It has also been criticized as a distortion of Scripture, nowhere clearly taught in the Old or New Testaments. It has been blasted as a barbaric distortion of God’s character that places Him in the category of pagan gods such as Molech, depicting Him as a “monster God” It shows God as some sort of violent, pagan deity. Is it incompatible with the loving God of the Bible as revealed through Jesus Christ

Death itself carries a sense of wrath. The value of His death for us is far more than any thought of God punishing the humbled servant for pleasure. PSA is overstated and down right nonsense at times.

 

[civic]

Death itself carries a sense of wrath. The value of His death for us is far more than any thought of God punishing the humbled servant for pleasure. PSA is overstated and down right nonsense at times.

It’s twisted and actually mocks Gods Good name and character

 

[Whosoever]

 

[civic]

he nailed it as I have been saying for a while- tulip goes hand in hand with PSA. it was invented to support tulip. he has done his historical homework in reformation thought and doctrine.