John Piper: Born again through faith in the gospel

Never said such a thing although
You did say Ezekiel 36 which is a prophesy of a new heart, far in the future of their obedience. That proves obedience is ahead of the new heart. Calvinists will immediately deny that fact with statements like what you just wrote.
you do live under the New Covenant correct? Of which the text refers.
Obedience precedes new heart also in the NT. For the NT, it's no longer longer in the far future. If you want to trash the OT then go right ahead. Calvinists always trash the Bible whenever it does not conform to their presuppositions.
 
E
You did say Ezekiel 36 which is a prophesy of a new heart, far in the future of their obedience. That proves obedience is ahead of the new heart. Calvinists will immediately deny that fact with statements like what you just wrote.
Exactly. It's about obedience in the New Covenant not under the OC. Keep looking for a way out.
 
Exactly. It's about obedience in the New Covenant not under the OC.
Obedience precedes new heart also in the NT. For the NT, it's no longer longer in the far future. If you want to disregard the truths of the OT in opposition to the NT then go right ahead. Calvinists always trash the Bible whenever it does not conform to their presuppositions.
Keep looking for a way out.
You're projecting again.
 
Obedience precedes new heart also in the NT. For the NT, it's no longer longer in the far future. If you want to trash the OT then go right ahead. Calvinists always trash the Bible whenever it does not conform to their presuppositions.

You're projecting again.
No it don't. LOL Read it again. Your given the new heart to obey not because you obeyed. FAIL

Keep looking for a way out
 
Guess who is the audience. FAIL.

The Bible holds the truth, not you. You agreed that obedience precedes new heart in the OT? Right? For the NT, it's no different except that it is no longer in the far future.
The New Covenant. It's future tense. LOL

NEVER AGREED to any such thing.

The New Covenant is not yet in force??

Amateur
 
So you don't agree that the new heart in Ez 36 is a prophesy given to believers? Talk about denying the Bible.

You're projecting again.
No. For the second time. It's in the future tense. Believers in the NC. It's about the New Covenant.

What about that don't you get other than all of it?

.
 
Who said you were saved without faith?
No one! It was a rhetorical question…



Hence, it is gifted to you. Part of the process.
Nothing says it was a gift; (the grammar of Eph 2:8-9 has been irreducibly shown to demonstrate this) and it is only given as a part of the Imago Dei. The ability to trust, believe, have faith in something or someone is as much a part of human nature as the ability to breathe.

We cannot believe, however, if nothing is presented as being believable. We cannot enter into a relationship unless the other person is willing. The gospel is God saying he is willing, in spite of ourselves, and only asks us to trust in his willingness above all others in whom we have trusted.


Ezekiel 36 is quite specific. We are given a new heart whereby God causes our obedience.
But faith precedes the new heart, for it is through, by means of our faith that God extends his graciousness to give us a new heart. The result of his graciousness is, in part, his Spirit indwelling us, which causes us to be capable of being obedient to the Lord.

Doug
 
@synergy
Obedience precedes new heart also in the NT
This is a classic oxymoron statement if I have ever heard one! That is a proud statement that God will never allow to go unpunished ~more strong delusions will surely come to such a person and rightly so.
If you want to trash the OT then go right ahead. Calvinists always trash the Bible whenever it does not conform to their presuppositions.
You constantly are bashing Calvinism because you vainly and proudly think it makes your arguments look more according to the scriptures because so many others with you despise and war against free justification by grace alone ~ by the obedience and faith of Jesus Christ alone. You have no clue what truth is if it hit you right between your eyes, for that's the only place it will hit you at, since you are guilty of closing your heart to the truth, thereby, God has harden your heart to his truth, by withholding the very mercy we preach that MUST FIRST BE GIVEN to a sinner before he can see, hear, and obey which you proudly, consistently, reject.
The Bible holds the truth, not you.
That's deep! My youngest grandson knows that truth and a lot more.
No. For the second time. It's in the future tense. Believers in the NC. It's about the New Covenant
You have zero understanding of the New Covenant, if you think you do, then let us two start a thread and discuss the New Covenant, or we can just go to Psalm 89 and I'll put forth my understanding concerning God's faithfulness, while you exalt your god of synergetic theology, and we shall see who the scriptures will support...btw, the it will not take very long to see this.
 
@TibiasDad Da
You obviously don’t know what an oxymoron is, for your statement is a tidy mess.
Doug,

I agree, but I was not trying to be free of error in my writing, and truly very seldom check to impress my readers in this area, I try harder to make sure my doctrine is agreeable to God's testimony ~for when I stand before the Lord, nothing will ever be mention about my writings skills, but each one of us will give an account of how we handle the word of God.

But that being said, my assessment was true, for he did make an oxymoronic statement and all who agreed with his statement are guilty.

Btw, thanks for the lesson, but I had rather be taught truths from God's word, that's what we are called to do~ my children and their children have their true Doctor of Philosophy~but sad to say, lack biblical knowledge to the degree they should be learning. I have the least education of them all~eight of them finished college studies and beyond with a 4.0, but could not explain some of the most simple doctrines of the scriptures, again to their own shame.
 
No one! It was a rhetorical question…




Nothing says it was a gift; (the grammar of Eph 2:8-9 has been irreducibly shown to demonstrate this) and it is only given as a part of the Imago Dei. The ability to trust, believe, have faith in something or someone is as much a part of human nature as the ability to breathe.

We cannot believe, however, if nothing is presented as being believable. We cannot enter into a relationship unless the other person is willing. The gospel is God saying he is willing, in spite of ourselves, and only asks us to trust in his willingness above all others in whom we have trusted.



But faith precedes the new heart, for it is through, by means of our faith that God extends his graciousness to give us a new heart. The result of his graciousness is, in part, his Spirit indwelling us, which causes us to be capable of being obedient to the Lord.

Doug
Salvation is a gift including the means that brings it about which is 100% of God. The grammar in Ephesians 2:8,9 favors the Reformed position and thats not even in dispute really except for those with a more man centered theology such as yourself. Paul asks, "what do you have you have not recieved"? I can say nothing. You could say everything but my faith of course. That's a blessing of a hardened heart right Doug?
 
They are part of the OC. It's prophecy concerning the NC. For the how many times now?
So you have nothing to say about Ezekiel's immediate audience other than "they are part of the OC"? Are you saying that they are stuck forever in the OC with no hope for a prophetic new heart? Reveal to us what happens to them according to your calvinist presuppositions.
 
@synergy

This is a classic oxymoron statement if I have ever heard one! That is a proud statement that God will never allow to go unpunished ~more strong delusions will surely come to such a person and rightly so.
So now you're God's spokesman, telling us what God will do or not do. What happened to the Bible? You still can't produce even one verse that explicitly demonstrates that regeneration precedes belief in Christ.
You constantly are bashing Calvinism
The Bible does that. I'm just the messenger.
because you vainly and proudly think it makes your arguments look more according to the scriptures because so many others with you despise and war against free justification by grace alone ~ by the obedience and faith of Jesus Christ alone. You have no clue what truth is if it hit you right between your eyes, for that's the only place it will hit you at, since you are guilty of closing your heart to the truth, thereby, God has harden your heart to his truth, by withholding the very mercy we preach that MUST FIRST BE GIVEN to a sinner before he can see, hear, and obey which you proudly, consistently, reject.
You don't understand or refuse to understand that God's preordained good works, that He elected for each one of us, is part of His Grace. Why do you continuously refuse to acknowledge that part of God's Grace?
That's deep! My youngest grandson knows that truth and a lot more.
You're corrupting young minds, I see.
You have zero understanding of the New Covenant, if you think you do, then let us two start a thread and discuss the New Covenant, or we can just go to Psalm 89 and I'll put forth my understanding concerning God's faithfulness, while you exalt your god of synergetic theology, and we shall see who the scriptures will support...btw, the it will not take very long to see this.
The Apostles called themselves Synergists in the Greek. Why do you continue to bad mouth them?
 
So you have nothing to say about Ezekiel's immediate audience other than "they are part of the OC"? Are you saying that they are stuck forever in the OC with no hope for a prophetic new heart? Reveal to us what happens to them according to your calvinist presuppositions.
The audience is Old Covenant saints dealing with the covenant which was to come. Pretty simple for most.
 
Salvation is a gift including the means that brings it about which is 100% of God. The grammar in Ephesians 2:8,9 favors the Reformed position and thats not even in dispute really except for those with a more man centered theology such as yourself. Paul asks, "what do you have you have not recieved"? I can say nothing. You could say everything but my faith of course. That's a blessing of a hardened heart right Doug?

Ad hominem attacks instead of exegesis…nothing I espouse is man-centered. My theological premise is relationship between God and man, and understanding the proper perspective of each party.

We broke the relationship, and only God, as the offended party, can restore it/allow it to be restored. Man has no power, or influence over God. Man’s actions cannot obligate God to act. Salvation is all of God through faith in his promises.

Doug
 
Ad hominem attacks instead of exegesis…nothing I espouse is man-centered. My theological premise is relationship between God and man, and understanding the proper perspective of each party.

We broke the relationship, and only God, as the offended party, can restore it/allow it to be restored. Man has no power, or influence over God. Man’s actions cannot obligate God to act. Salvation is all of God through faith in his promises.

Doug
I disagree.

But YOUR faith does obligate to act.
 
Back
Top Bottom