Jesus denied being God

There's no accuse or refusing to answer. You make no sense with half statements pieced together from words pulled out of context scattered all over the Bible. I am an expert in biblical data and you need to ask a question that makes sense for me to answer. You guys got nothing. Something that is openly admitted by theologians that is not known by many Christians is that the doctrine of the Trinity is not stated in the Bible, but is actually “built” by piecing together statements that are said to support it. Since most Christians believe the Trinity is a mystery and not to be understood is a huge reason why doctrinal discussions about it are often avoided or brushed aside and ignored. Worse, the teaching that the Trinity is a“mystery” has been used as a club to beat down doubters and dissenters, and those people are often branded as “heretics” and their role in Christianity minimized.
Sorry you had just given one

I challenged the idea that the word was an impersonal thing

this was my argument based on Phil 2:6


You were asked multiple questions on how an impersonal thing could

Have an attitude or mind?

no answer

consider?

no answer


humble himself?

no answer

exist in the form of God?

We know God has no outward appearance

and the information provided as to the meaning morphe was mixed

Being (ὑπαρχων [huparchōn]). Rather, “existing,” present active participle of ὑπαρχω [huparchō]. In the form of God (ἐν μορφῃ θεου [en morphēi theou]). Μορφη [Morphē] means the essential attributes as shown in the form. In his preincarnate state Christ possessed the attributes of God and so appeared to those in heaven who saw him. Here is a clear statement by Paul of the deity of Christ. A prize (ἁρπαγμον [harpagmon]). Predicate accusative with ἡγησατο [hēgēsato]. Originally words in -μος [-mos] signified the act, not the result (-μα [-ma]). The few examples of ἁρπαγμος [harpagmos] (Plutarch, etc.) allow it to be understood as equivalent to ἁρπαγμα [harpagma], like βαπτισμος [baptismos] and βαπτισμα [baptisma]. That is to say Paul means a prize to be held on to rather than something to be won (“robbery”). To be on an equality with God (το εἰναι ἰσα θεοι [to einai isa theoi]). Accusative articular infinitive object of ἡγησατο [hēgēsato], “the being equal with God” (associative instrumental case θεῳ [theōi] after ἰσα [isa]). Ἰσα [Isa] is adverbial use of neuter plural with εἰναι [einai] as in Rev. 21:16. Emptied himself (ἑαυτον ἐκενωσε [heauton ekenōse]). First aorist active indicative of κενοω [kenoō], old verb from κενος [kenos], empty. Of what did Christ empty himself? Not of his divine nature. That was impossible. He continued to be the Son of God

A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), Php 2:6.

The first word which we must carefully study is “form.” The Greek word has no reference to the shape of any physical object. It was a Greek philosophical term. Vincent has an excellent note on the word. In discussing it, he has among other things, the following to say: “We must here dismiss from our minds the idea of shape. The word is used in its philosophical sense to denote that expression of being which carries in itself the distinctive nature and character of the being to whom it pertains, and is thus permanently identified with that nature and character … As applied to God, the word is intended to describe that mode in which the essential being of God expresses itself.

Kenneth S. Wuest, Wuest’s Word Studies from the Greek New Testament: For the English Reader (vol. 5; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997), 62.

Being in the form of God (ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων). Being. Not the simple εἶναι to be, but stronger, denoting being which is from the beginning. See on Jas. 2:15. It has a backward look into an antecedent condition, which has been protracted into the present. Here appropriate to the preincarnate being of Christ, to which the sentence refers. In itself it does not imply eternal, but only prior existence. Form (μορφή). We must here dismiss from our minds the idea of shape. The word is used in its philosophic sense, to denote that expression of being which carries in itself the distinctive nature and character of the being to whom it pertains, and is thus permanently identified with that nature and character

Marvin Richardson Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament (vol. 3; New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1887), 430.

in the form of God (not merely the nature of God, which however is implied: but, as in Heb. 1:3, the ἀπαύγασμα τ. δόξης κ. χαρακτὴρ τ. ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ—cf. John 5:37, οὔτε εἶδος αὐτοῦ ἑωράκατε, with ib. 17:5, τῇ δόξῃ ᾗ εἶχον πρὸ τοῦ τὸν κόσμον εἶναι παρὰ σοί

Henry Alford, Alford’s Greek Testament: An Exegetical and Critical Commentary (vol. 3; Grand Rapids, MI: Guardian Press, 1976), 166.

But scripture settles this

Hebrews 1:3 (KJV 1900) — 3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

Now explain how an impersonal thing could be

the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power,

so you really have not met the obligation put to you.
 
Sorry you had just given one

I challenged the idea that the word was an impersonal thing

this was my argument based on Phil 2:6


You were asked multiple questions on how an impersonal thing could

Have an attitude or mind?

no answer

consider?

no answer


humble himself?

no answer

exist in the form of God?

We know God has no outward appearance

and the information provided as to the meaning morphe was mixed

Being (ὑπαρχων [huparchōn]). Rather, “existing,” present active participle of ὑπαρχω [huparchō]. In the form of God (ἐν μορφῃ θεου [en morphēi theou]). Μορφη [Morphē] means the essential attributes as shown in the form. In his preincarnate state Christ possessed the attributes of God and so appeared to those in heaven who saw him. Here is a clear statement by Paul of the deity of Christ. A prize (ἁρπαγμον [harpagmon]). Predicate accusative with ἡγησατο [hēgēsato]. Originally words in -μος [-mos] signified the act, not the result (-μα [-ma]). The few examples of ἁρπαγμος [harpagmos] (Plutarch, etc.) allow it to be understood as equivalent to ἁρπαγμα [harpagma], like βαπτισμος [baptismos] and βαπτισμα [baptisma]. That is to say Paul means a prize to be held on to rather than something to be won (“robbery”). To be on an equality with God (το εἰναι ἰσα θεοι [to einai isa theoi]). Accusative articular infinitive object of ἡγησατο [hēgēsato], “the being equal with God” (associative instrumental case θεῳ [theōi] after ἰσα [isa]). Ἰσα [Isa] is adverbial use of neuter plural with εἰναι [einai] as in Rev. 21:16. Emptied himself (ἑαυτον ἐκενωσε [heauton ekenōse]). First aorist active indicative of κενοω [kenoō], old verb from κενος [kenos], empty. Of what did Christ empty himself? Not of his divine nature. That was impossible. He continued to be the Son of God

A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), Php 2:6.

The first word which we must carefully study is “form.” The Greek word has no reference to the shape of any physical object. It was a Greek philosophical term. Vincent has an excellent note on the word. In discussing it, he has among other things, the following to say: “We must here dismiss from our minds the idea of shape. The word is used in its philosophical sense to denote that expression of being which carries in itself the distinctive nature and character of the being to whom it pertains, and is thus permanently identified with that nature and character … As applied to God, the word is intended to describe that mode in which the essential being of God expresses itself.

Kenneth S. Wuest, Wuest’s Word Studies from the Greek New Testament: For the English Reader (vol. 5; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997), 62.

Being in the form of God (ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων). Being. Not the simple εἶναι to be, but stronger, denoting being which is from the beginning. See on Jas. 2:15. It has a backward look into an antecedent condition, which has been protracted into the present. Here appropriate to the preincarnate being of Christ, to which the sentence refers. In itself it does not imply eternal, but only prior existence. Form (μορφή). We must here dismiss from our minds the idea of shape. The word is used in its philosophic sense, to denote that expression of being which carries in itself the distinctive nature and character of the being to whom it pertains, and is thus permanently identified with that nature and character

Marvin Richardson Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament (vol. 3; New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1887), 430.

in the form of God (not merely the nature of God, which however is implied: but, as in Heb. 1:3, the ἀπαύγασμα τ. δόξης κ. χαρακτὴρ τ. ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ—cf. John 5:37, οὔτε εἶδος αὐτοῦ ἑωράκατε, with ib. 17:5, τῇ δόξῃ ᾗ εἶχον πρὸ τοῦ τὸν κόσμον εἶναι παρὰ σοί

Henry Alford, Alford’s Greek Testament: An Exegetical and Critical Commentary (vol. 3; Grand Rapids, MI: Guardian Press, 1976), 166.

But scripture settles this

Hebrews 1:3 (KJV 1900) — 3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

Now explain how an impersonal thing could be

the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power,

so you really have not met the obligation put to you.
Is that what you're asking... if a word has a personally? It's a stupid question and that's why I did not understand the question. Words are not living things.
 
Is that what you're asking... if a word has a personally? It's a stupid question and that's why I did not understand the question. Words are not living things.
No I was challenging your idea the Word of John 1:1 was an impersonal thing

and you still have not addressed my argument

You were asked multiple questions on how an impersonal thing could

Have an attitude or mind?

no answer

consider?

no answer


humble himself?

no answer

exist in the form of God?

We know God has no outward appearance

and the information provided as to the meaning morphe was mixed

Being (ὑπαρχων [huparchōn]). Rather, “existing,” present active participle of ὑπαρχω [huparchō]. In the form of God (ἐν μορφῃ θεου [en morphēi theou]). Μορφη [Morphē] means the essential attributes as shown in the form. In his preincarnate state Christ possessed the attributes of God and so appeared to those in heaven who saw him. Here is a clear statement by Paul of the deity of Christ. A prize (ἁρπαγμον [harpagmon]). Predicate accusative with ἡγησατο [hēgēsato]. Originally words in -μος [-mos] signified the act, not the result (-μα [-ma]). The few examples of ἁρπαγμος [harpagmos] (Plutarch, etc.) allow it to be understood as equivalent to ἁρπαγμα [harpagma], like βαπτισμος [baptismos] and βαπτισμα [baptisma]. That is to say Paul means a prize to be held on to rather than something to be won (“robbery”). To be on an equality with God (το εἰναι ἰσα θεοι [to einai isa theoi]). Accusative articular infinitive object of ἡγησατο [hēgēsato], “the being equal with God” (associative instrumental case θεῳ [theōi] after ἰσα [isa]). Ἰσα [Isa] is adverbial use of neuter plural with εἰναι [einai] as in Rev. 21:16. Emptied himself (ἑαυτον ἐκενωσε [heauton ekenōse]). First aorist active indicative of κενοω [kenoō], old verb from κενος [kenos], empty. Of what did Christ empty himself? Not of his divine nature. That was impossible. He continued to be the Son of God

A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), Php 2:6.

The first word which we must carefully study is “form.” The Greek word has no reference to the shape of any physical object. It was a Greek philosophical term. Vincent has an excellent note on the word. In discussing it, he has among other things, the following to say: “We must here dismiss from our minds the idea of shape. The word is used in its philosophical sense to denote that expression of being which carries in itself the distinctive nature and character of the being to whom it pertains, and is thus permanently identified with that nature and character … As applied to God, the word is intended to describe that mode in which the essential being of God expresses itself.

Kenneth S. Wuest, Wuest’s Word Studies from the Greek New Testament: For the English Reader (vol. 5; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997), 62.

Being in the form of God (ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων). Being. Not the simple εἶναι to be, but stronger, denoting being which is from the beginning. See on Jas. 2:15. It has a backward look into an antecedent condition, which has been protracted into the present. Here appropriate to the preincarnate being of Christ, to which the sentence refers. In itself it does not imply eternal, but only prior existence. Form (μορφή). We must here dismiss from our minds the idea of shape. The word is used in its philosophic sense, to denote that expression of being which carries in itself the distinctive nature and character of the being to whom it pertains, and is thus permanently identified with that nature and character

Marvin Richardson Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament (vol. 3; New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1887), 430.

in the form of God (not merely the nature of God, which however is implied: but, as in Heb. 1:3, the ἀπαύγασμα τ. δόξης κ. χαρακτὴρ τ. ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ—cf. John 5:37, οὔτε εἶδος αὐτοῦ ἑωράκατε, with ib. 17:5, τῇ δόξῃ ᾗ εἶχον πρὸ τοῦ τὸν κόσμον εἶναι παρὰ σοί

Henry Alford, Alford’s Greek Testament: An Exegetical and Critical Commentary (vol. 3; Grand Rapids, MI: Guardian Press, 1976), 166.

But scripture settles this

Hebrews 1:3 (KJV 1900) — 3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

Now explain how an impersonal thing could be

the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power,

so you really have not met the obligation put to you. Do you want to do so now?
 
You're so silly. So whenever someone teaches a subject that is not his own, like Quantum Physics, then automatically he is not a good teacher?!?! No matter how well he knows the subject? Your logic is becoming more wacky the more you open your mouth. 🤪
Compared to God none are good or a good teacher. Means Jesus isn’t equal to God.
 
The only thing you've proven is that you're an Adoptionist Heretic! :ROFLMAO:
🥱 that’s it? Would be more interesting if you could quote where I said I believe something I don’t believe in. And who cares if you believe that or not.
 
🥱 that’s it? Would be more interesting if you could quote where I said I believe something I don’t believe in. And who cares if you believe that or not.
It's not my fault that your heretical views, that I previously quoted, are not only boring but wacky as well. 🤪

Just your statement "I believe something I don't believe in" is more wackiness. :ROFLMAO:

You're just too hilarious.
 
It's not my fault that your heretical views, that I previously quoted, are not only boring but wacky as well. 🤪

Just your statement "I believe something I don't believe in" is more wackiness. :ROFLMAO:

You're just too hilarious.
That's what I thought. All hot air and no real substance to back it up. Carry on then.
 
Oh, Jesus claimed he was God?! This is rich. Please, where did Jesus do that? No one has found it yet.
It's not nice to call Apostle John a "No one".

Read John 8:58 and then Ex 3:14. Try not to let your wacky logic and your heretical views get in the way of what those verses say.
 
That's what I thought. All hot air and no real substance to back it up. Carry on then.
It is not only hot air but also wacky logic to say "I believe something I don't believe in". It's like saying I have something I don't have or I see something I don't see.

Now I see what your problem is. You have a dirt poor comprehension of basic logic. So when you say you don't believe that Jesus is God, you really mean that you do believe that Jesus is God. Now I get it. Problem solved. :LOL:
 
It's not nice to call Apostle John a "No one".

Read John 8:58 and then Ex 3:14. Try not to let your wacky logic and your heretical views get in the way of what those verses say.
You are presenting a theological argument, not a quote in which Jesus explicitly claimed to be God. This was also debunked with Acts 3:13 and Exodus 3:14,15 where it's proven that Jesus is not the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but rather His servant. Next.
 
It is not only hot air but also wacky logic to say "I believe something I don't believe in". It's like saying I have something I don't have or I see something I don't see.

Now I see what your problem is. You have a dirt poor comprehension of basic logic. So when you say you don't believe that Jesus is God, you really mean that you do believe that Jesus is God. Now I get it. Problem solved. :LOL:
You made the claim. So far you have proven impotent to support it. That's not a good look for you.
 
No I was challenging your idea the Word of John 1:1 was an impersonal thing

and you still have not addressed my argument

You were asked multiple questions on how an impersonal thing could

Have an attitude or mind?

no answer

consider?

no answer


humble himself?

no answer

exist in the form of God?

We know God has no outward appearance

and the information provided as to the meaning morphe was mixed

Being (ὑπαρχων [huparchōn]). Rather, “existing,” present active participle of ὑπαρχω [huparchō]. In the form of God (ἐν μορφῃ θεου [en morphēi theou]). Μορφη [Morphē] means the essential attributes as shown in the form. In his preincarnate state Christ possessed the attributes of God and so appeared to those in heaven who saw him. Here is a clear statement by Paul of the deity of Christ. A prize (ἁρπαγμον [harpagmon]). Predicate accusative with ἡγησατο [hēgēsato]. Originally words in -μος [-mos] signified the act, not the result (-μα [-ma]). The few examples of ἁρπαγμος [harpagmos] (Plutarch, etc.) allow it to be understood as equivalent to ἁρπαγμα [harpagma], like βαπτισμος [baptismos] and βαπτισμα [baptisma]. That is to say Paul means a prize to be held on to rather than something to be won (“robbery”). To be on an equality with God (το εἰναι ἰσα θεοι [to einai isa theoi]). Accusative articular infinitive object of ἡγησατο [hēgēsato], “the being equal with God” (associative instrumental case θεῳ [theōi] after ἰσα [isa]). Ἰσα [Isa] is adverbial use of neuter plural with εἰναι [einai] as in Rev. 21:16. Emptied himself (ἑαυτον ἐκενωσε [heauton ekenōse]). First aorist active indicative of κενοω [kenoō], old verb from κενος [kenos], empty. Of what did Christ empty himself? Not of his divine nature. That was impossible. He continued to be the Son of God

A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), Php 2:6.

The first word which we must carefully study is “form.” The Greek word has no reference to the shape of any physical object. It was a Greek philosophical term. Vincent has an excellent note on the word. In discussing it, he has among other things, the following to say: “We must here dismiss from our minds the idea of shape. The word is used in its philosophical sense to denote that expression of being which carries in itself the distinctive nature and character of the being to whom it pertains, and is thus permanently identified with that nature and character … As applied to God, the word is intended to describe that mode in which the essential being of God expresses itself.

Kenneth S. Wuest, Wuest’s Word Studies from the Greek New Testament: For the English Reader (vol. 5; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997), 62.

Being in the form of God (ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων). Being. Not the simple εἶναι to be, but stronger, denoting being which is from the beginning. See on Jas. 2:15. It has a backward look into an antecedent condition, which has been protracted into the present. Here appropriate to the preincarnate being of Christ, to which the sentence refers. In itself it does not imply eternal, but only prior existence. Form (μορφή). We must here dismiss from our minds the idea of shape. The word is used in its philosophic sense, to denote that expression of being which carries in itself the distinctive nature and character of the being to whom it pertains, and is thus permanently identified with that nature and character

Marvin Richardson Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament (vol. 3; New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1887), 430.

in the form of God (not merely the nature of God, which however is implied: but, as in Heb. 1:3, the ἀπαύγασμα τ. δόξης κ. χαρακτὴρ τ. ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ—cf. John 5:37, οὔτε εἶδος αὐτοῦ ἑωράκατε, with ib. 17:5, τῇ δόξῃ ᾗ εἶχον πρὸ τοῦ τὸν κόσμον εἶναι παρὰ σοί

Henry Alford, Alford’s Greek Testament: An Exegetical and Critical Commentary (vol. 3; Grand Rapids, MI: Guardian Press, 1976), 166.

But scripture settles this

Hebrews 1:3 (KJV 1900) — 3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

Now explain how an impersonal thing could be

the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power,

so you really have not met the obligation put to you. Do you want to do so now?
I don't answer you because I have no idea what the question is. You make stuff up that is only in your mind and then think I'm supposed to know what you're talking about.
 
I don't answer you because I have no idea what the question is. You make stuff up that is only in your mind and then think I'm supposed to know what you're talking about.
Philippians 2:5–7 (NASB 2020) — 5 Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, as He already existed in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, 7 but emptied Himself by taking the form of a bond-servant and being born in the likeness of men.

Philippians 2:5–8 (KJV 1900) — 5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.




I believe it is plain enough

An impersonal thing cannot

Have an attitude or mind

consider or have thought

empty or make oneself of no reputation (example humility)

exist in the form or nature of God



We know God has no outward appearance

and the information provided as to the meaning morphe (form) was mixed

Being (ὑπαρχων [huparchōn]). Rather, “existing,” present active participle of ὑπαρχω [huparchō]. In the form of God (ἐν μορφῃ θεου [en morphēi theou]). Μορφη [Morphē] means the essential attributes as shown in the form. In his preincarnate state Christ possessed the attributes of God and so appeared to those in heaven who saw him. Here is a clear statement by Paul of the deity of Christ. A prize (ἁρπαγμον [harpagmon]). Predicate accusative with ἡγησατο [hēgēsato]. Originally words in -μος [-mos] signified the act, not the result (-μα [-ma]). The few examples of ἁρπαγμος [harpagmos] (Plutarch, etc.) allow it to be understood as equivalent to ἁρπαγμα [harpagma], like βαπτισμος [baptismos] and βαπτισμα [baptisma]. That is to say Paul means a prize to be held on to rather than something to be won (“robbery”). To be on an equality with God (το εἰναι ἰσα θεοι [to einai isa theoi]). Accusative articular infinitive object of ἡγησατο [hēgēsato], “the being equal with God” (associative instrumental case θεῳ [theōi] after ἰσα [isa]). Ἰσα [Isa] is adverbial use of neuter plural with εἰναι [einai] as in Rev. 21:16. Emptied himself (ἑαυτον ἐκενωσε [heauton ekenōse]). First aorist active indicative of κενοω [kenoō], old verb from κενος [kenos], empty. Of what did Christ empty himself? Not of his divine nature. That was impossible. He continued to be the Son of God

A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), Php 2:6.

The first word which we must carefully study is “form.” The Greek word has no reference to the shape of any physical object. It was a Greek philosophical term. Vincent has an excellent note on the word. In discussing it, he has among other things, the following to say: “We must here dismiss from our minds the idea of shape. The word is used in its philosophical sense to denote that expression of being which carries in itself the distinctive nature and character of the being to whom it pertains, and is thus permanently identified with that nature and character … As applied to God, the word is intended to describe that mode in which the essential being of God expresses itself.

Kenneth S. Wuest, Wuest’s Word Studies from the Greek New Testament: For the English Reader (vol. 5; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997), 62.

Being in the form of God (ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων). Being. Not the simple εἶναι to be, but stronger, denoting being which is from the beginning. See on Jas. 2:15. It has a backward look into an antecedent condition, which has been protracted into the present. Here appropriate to the preincarnate being of Christ, to which the sentence refers. In itself it does not imply eternal, but only prior existence. Form (μορφή). We must here dismiss from our minds the idea of shape. The word is used in its philosophic sense, to denote that expression of being which carries in itself the distinctive nature and character of the being to whom it pertains, and is thus permanently identified with that nature and character

Marvin Richardson Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament (vol. 3; New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1887), 430.

in the form of God (not merely the nature of God, which however is implied: but, as in Heb. 1:3, the ἀπαύγασμα τ. δόξης κ. χαρακτὴρ τ. ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ—cf. John 5:37, οὔτε εἶδος αὐτοῦ ἑωράκατε, with ib. 17:5, τῇ δόξῃ ᾗ εἶχον πρὸ τοῦ τὸν κόσμον εἶναι παρὰ σοί

Henry Alford, Alford’s Greek Testament: An Exegetical and Critical Commentary (vol. 3; Grand Rapids, MI: Guardian Press, 1976), 166.

But scripture settles this

Hebrews 1:3 (KJV 1900) — 3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

Now explain how an impersonal thing could be

the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power,

so you really have not met the obligation put to you. Do you want to do so now?
 
The main vein in the Bible is that Jesus isn’t God. I’ve proven it repeatedly.
Actually you have not.

The bible affirms it and have simply denied much obvious scripture

but

• Jesus bears the names and titles of deity

• God

• Jehovah What is ascribed only to Jehovah is ascribed to Christ

• I Am

• The Alpha and the Omega

• King of kings and Lord of Lords

• Savior

• Jesus partakes of the prerogatives of deity

• He shares God’s glory

• He receives religious worship

• He receives sacred service

• He is prayed to and invocated

• He is believed on and followed

• He forgives sins

• Jesus possesses the incommunicable attributes of deity

• Independence (aka aseity or self-existence)

• Eternality

• Unchangeableness (aka immutability)

• et al (fullness of deity)

• Jesus is attributed with the works of deity

• Creation

• Final judgment

• Whatever the Father does

• Jesus claimed deity

• One with the Father
 
Last edited:
You made the claim. So far you have proven impotent to support it. That's not a good look for you.
False. You're the one who made the following wacky claim. That's the type of logic that the Unitarian Logic 101 course teaches you:
I believe something I don’t believe in
It's like saying I have something I don't have or I see something I don't see. Carry on with your dirt poor comprehension of basic human logic. :LOL:
 
There is not one verse that says Jesus is God the Son. Nor has there ever been a teaching on it anywhere in the Bible.

These are self-explanatory​

John 14:6-9 ESV / 10 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you had known me, you would have known my Father also. From now on you do know him and have seen him.” Philip said to him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.” Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?

Isaiah 9:6 ESV / 9 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Hebrews 1:8 ESV / 7 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

But of the Son he says, “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever, the scepter of uprightness is the scepter of your kingdom.

Titus 2:13 ESV / 7 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

Waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ,

2 Corinthians 4:4 ESV / 7 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Deuteronomy 6:4 ESV / 5 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.

Jude 1:25 ESV / 4 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

To the only God, our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion, and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen.

John 4:25-26 ESV / 4 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

The woman said to him, “I know that Messiah is coming (he who is called Christ). When he comes, he will tell us all things.” Jesus said to her, “I who speak to you am he.”

Matthew 1:23 ESV / 4 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel” (which means, God with us).

John 14:20 ESV / 3 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

In that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you.

John 10:36 ESV / 3 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

Do you say of him whom the Father consecrated and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I am the Son of God’?

John 1:18 ESV / 3 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known.

Matthew 14:33 ESV / 3 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

And those in the boat worshiped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God.”

Philippians 2:5-8 ESV / 2 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.

John 5:18 ESV / 2 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

This was why the Jews were seeking all the more to kill him, because not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.

John 1:1-3 ESV / 2 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.

Matthew 28:18 ESV / 2 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful​

And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
 
Back
Top Bottom