The deception within Dispensational Premillennialism is that Christ's return is NOT imminent. It can't actually happen at any time because a whole bunch of stuff has to happen first. Israel has to regain all its territory. The Jews have to build another temple. Then they have to re-establish the Levitical priesthood and the Mosaic Law, and then they have to re-institute animal sacrifices. There's a big bunch of stuff Dispensationalism teaches will have to happen before Jesus returns. Out of one set of words they preach imminence but then they teach the exact opposite position with a different set of words. If Jesus can come right this minute, then EVERYTHING in this op is wrong.
That is your depection. Christ's return is ALWAYS imminent, precisely because we do not know when. And, if you have been paying attention to what dispensationalists have been saying, there are no prophecies left to be fulfilled before the end times can begin. There are prophecies to be fulfilled DURING the end times, but the curtain is ready to rise at any time. If you have been following the news, they have already reestablished the Levitical priesthood, and apparently even know who the descendant of Aaron alive today is, and they have already performed ceremonies on the temple mount. They have already imported the red heifers necessary to sanctify the people as Aaron did. They have already created all the temple implements, all the priestly vestments/garments, etc. They have been practicing the sacrifices (and have been arrested for it.) There is nothing that says that the temple has to be rebuilt BEFORE the end times begins. (We are in the last days, the end times rolls up the Jesus second coming and begins with the prince of the people in Daniel 9 strengthening a covenant with the many. It ends with his destruction and the salvation of Jerusalem.)
There is absolutely no way to avoid that blatant contradiction! Either all of the stuff listed in this op has to happen first, and imminence is delayed, or the op is wrong.
Why did Peter write to explain to the people that God has His own plan, and that He isn't breaking His promise, or being slow with His promise, but is keeping to His will and perfect timing? Why didn't Peter say that when Jesus spoke about an imminent return, He didn't mean it? Instead Peter explained how it isn't God being slow. Peter couldn't say much more because just as Jesus said, no one knows when Jesus will return. Note the parable about the foolish servant, who, not knowing when the master would return, partied, and basically did what he wanted. The master came back by surprise (showing the masters return was always imminent), and caught the servant playing the fool, and punished him. That not knowing when the master was going to return, made the return of the master always imminent. At hand. As such, we are to live as though it could be today, or even tomorrow. That is why scripture keeps pushing to perseverance. No matter what happens, if God tarries some time in the return, do not lose hope, persevere. It will happen.
So..... I, once again, urge you caution defending someone else's op, especially when that person has not bothered to answer the simplest of op-relevant inquiries.
- Dispensationalism says it teaches salvation by grace through faith and not works but its eschatology inescapably results in the opposite.
No, no it does not. That is a blatant lie. (However, there may be fringe elements that do.) Salvation was alwasy by grace through faith. Israel being saved will be like when Paul was saved. Jesus met Paul personally on the road to Damascus. Jesus will personally meet the remnant of Israel at Jersualem, and as Paul recognized Jesus, they will recognize Jesus. Instant regeneration. What follows regeneration? Are you now going to say that regeneration is by works?
- Dispensational Premillennialism teaches the doctrine of imminent return but its eschatology inescapaby necessitates a complete contradiction of that doctrine.
Also not true. It is true, however, that they put an insane amount of time into something Jesus said is not for us to know. It is one thing to be watching, as Jesus does give the parable of the fig tree, it is another to be preoccupied with it to the point that you may/do lead people astray. We are living on borrowed time in that every prophecy that needs to be fulfilled for the end times to begin, has been fulfilled. Everything depends on what one believes marks the start of the end times. The start of the last week of the world.
- Dispensationalism is a new and radically different theology that is irreconcilable with core doctrines the Church has held since its inception. Either Dispensational Premillennialism is correct and 2000 years of Christian thought, doctrine, and practice are wrong, or 2000 years of Christian thinking, doctrine, and practice are correct, and the radically different and irreconcilable newcomer is wrong.
That would be true if dispensationalism did not have a historical tradition going all the way back to the first century. One place I read said the biggest difference between historical premillennialism and dispensational premillennialism, is how much stress is put on the distinction between Israel and the church. Also, the timeframe for Jesus second coming, as taught by the historical premillennialists passed about 1500 years ago.
And all I would currently like is an actual direct answer to the one question I have asked. When will the events described in this op happen? Please be as specific as you feel comfortable being. Delay is subterfuge. Attempts to change the topic are subterfuge. Attempts at fallacy are subterfuge.
Why isn't what Jesus said enough for you? What do you have against Him that you can't just trust Him, and as it states in many places to include Revelation, persevere? Why do you have to have an answer in order to persevere? Why do you accuse God of subterfuge? He is delaying and Peter told us why. For the sake of the salvation of the elect. It means that out there somewhere, there may be someone who has yet to repent, and God is waiting. What do you have against that? Why do you not trust God? Jesus Himself said that His second coming would be visible. Everyone will see Him, and all the nations of the world will mourn. Do you think that someone would fail to pass that on if it has happened? And a question I don't recall ever getting an answer to, if Jesus kingdom is now, and scripture is clear that it is on Earth, why is the reflection of the Kingdom more in line with Satan being in charge, and not Jesus? The state of a kingdom is a reflection of its ruler. Is Jesus' Kingdom marked by sin, or is Satan's rule/dominion, permitted by God for a short while, marked by sin?
The reason Jesus could say, in His day, that the Kingdom has come is because Jesus was on Earth, and He, at the time, was the Prince Daniel mentioned. When the disciples asked, in Matthew 24, about signs of His coming, they were asking when He would throw off His "disguise" and would be revealed openly as King and come in to the Kingdom as revealed King. And when He left, the asked "Will you now restore the kingdom to Israel?" They were expecting Jesus to take His position as King and bring about the end then. All they had to go off of was Jewish eschatology, and what they had been taught. They were not ignorant of eschatology.
Dispensational Premillennialists should all be concerned there exist among them people who make predictions they cannot or will not address in a discussion board. Don't post it if you're going to refuse to discuss it.
Now, I do not listen to anyone who puts a date on the return of Christ, and I believe that they should be thoroughly condemned if they do so. I give the same answer as Jesus gave. We cannot know the time, and to question about the time is to question Jesus Himself. The answer He gave was in the parable of the foolish servant. His return can be at any time, hence imminent/at hand. Imminent and at hand are not a measure of time, that one can say, oh, that means 5 minutes from now. They are the words you have when you don't have a time. Can you understand that the possible reason that we are told to endure and persevere is that we may be saying His return is imminent for an incredibly long time?
Oh, and stop hijacking the thread. Talk about how these things can't be future, or support that they are future. Isn't that what the op is about? If you want to deal with an actual time, make your own thread. Start it by saying that there is a thread that speaks of things that must be future. Someone tell me WHEN in the future, when it will happen. Of course, it is quite possible that no one will take you up on it, but that is on excuse to hijack someone else's thread. The discussion should be why the op is stating that these events are future. I think they were in the past and this is why. That is the discussion that should be happening.