Christ's Finished Atonement or Christ's Failure Atonement

The atonement didn't fail those in hell because the atonement only opened up access to God for forgiveness for which it was successful but doesn't make anyone access it. That was their responsibility.

Intertwined inside of your statements of "The atonement didn't fail those in hell" (about atonement) and "because the atonement only opened up access to God for forgiveness for which it was successful but doesn't make anyone access it. That was their responsibility." (about salvation), you detached atonement from salvation in your explanation, after which you left atonement as everyone everywhere in all time but you limited your focus down to only people who have salvation. You broke the classes of people about whom you were talking because when you changed your focus to salvation then you left Christ's atonement in a state of failure for people like "Nancy of the world".

You switched from atonement over to salvation, then you tried to use your wrongly shifted argument for salvation to address the specific point about atonement.

You believe that Christ's atonement applies to everybody everywhere in all time (the whole world) which means that you believe Christ atoned for people in hell. See the opening post in this thread.

I believe that Christ's atonement applies to only the people whom Christ chooses (the whole world) which means I believe Christ atoned exclusively to people Christ places in the Kingdom of Heaven.

He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world
(1 John 2:2)

you did not choose Me, but I chose you
(John 15:16)

I chose you out of the world
(John 15:19, includes atonement)

The Word of God is Truth (John 14:6).

In Christ,
Kermos
 
@civic, your words sound like you've not heard of the flesh nor walking according to the Spirit! Paul says it quite well:
14For we know that the Law is spiritual, but I am of flesh, sold into bondage to sin. 15For what I am doing, I do not understand; for I am not practicing what I would like to do, but I am doing the very thing I hate. 16But if I do the very thing I do not want to do, I agree with the Law, confessing that the Law is good. 17So now, no longer am I the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me. 18For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh; for the willing is present in me, but the doing of the good is not. 19For the good that I want, I do not do, but I practice the very evil that I do not want. 20But if I am doing the very thing I do not want, I am no longer the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me.​
21I find then the principle that evil is present in me, the one who wants to do good. 22For I joyfully concur with the law of God in the inner man, 23but I see a different law in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin which is in my members. 24Wretched man that I am! Who will set me free from the body of this death? 25Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, on the one hand I myself with my mind am serving the law of God, but on the other, with my flesh the law of sin.​
1Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. 2For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death. 3For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh, 4so that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. 5For those who are according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who are according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit. 6For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace, 7because the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, for it is not even able to do so, 8and those who are in the flesh cannot please God.​

@civic, @TibiasDad, and @Kampioen (you last 2 are included because of your hearty agreement (Like) with @civic), see that we Christians walk according to the Holy Spirit of the Living God which means that Christ's love controls us Christians (2 Corinthians 5:14).

Your words indicate that you do not believe that Christ's love controls you.

You still have people like Nancy of the world who died and goes to hell being atoned for by Christ, so you cling to Christ's failure atonement (see the opening post).
you are projecting once again by saying we do not believe Christs love controls us.

nice try Paul is describing himself as a jew/pharisee under the law but as he says Christ has set him free from the law.

thanks for admitting Christ does not actually in reality control you.

next fallacy
 
you do not understand the atonement which is obvious. Just like the snake Moses held up in the wilderness when the Israelites were bitten- those who looked upon it in faith were healed, those who did not died. Those who look to Jesus sacrifice for their sins in faith have their sins atoned, forgiven and those who remain in unbelief do not. Its exactly what Jesus taught in John in John 3.

hope this helps !!!

You believe that Christ's atonement applies to everybody everywhere in all time (the whole world) which means that you believe Christ atoned for people in hell. I do understand your free-willian philosophy, but you have no way out by to your own initiative.

I'm so glad that you brought up "the serpent in the wilderness" mentioned by Lord Jesus which He sandwiched between the requirement for man to be born of the Holy Spirit in order to perceive the Kingdom of God (John 3:3) and God's control of man in doing good even man coming to Christ (John 3:21) thus your free-willian philosophy nullifies the Word of God. On to Christ's use of the word "world" in relation with "the serpent in the wilderness".

The Word "World" in John 3:16 (John 3:14-16)​


The first order is to look at Lord Jesus' words as recorded by the Apostle John:

"As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up; so that every believing will in Him have eternal life, for God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that every believing in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life." (John 3:14-16).

The second order is to examine the history of "the serpent in the wilderness" that Jesus mentions (see John 3:14):
Then YHWH said to Moses, "Make a fiery [serpent], and set it on a standard; and it shall come about, that everyone who is bitten, when he looks at it, he will live." And Moses made a bronze serpent and set it on the standard; and it came about, that if a serpent bit any man, when he looked to the bronze serpent, he lived.

The third order is to listen to the Master.

Jesus sets "the serpent in the wilderness" "lifted up" in relation to "the Son of Man" "lifted up" (all in John 3:14).

Jesus then states "so that every believing will in" Jesus "have eternal life" (John 3:15), but He intensifies this statement by repeating it right away.

Jesus continues with "for God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son" (John 3:16), and here is where Jesus mentions "world".

Jesus follows up with intensifying his prior declaration (John 3:15) with "that every believing in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life" (John 3:16).

The fourth order is to acknowledge the Master's words.

Jesus mentioned "the serpent in the wilderness", so by this He brings up the account of the bronze serpent (John 3:16 includes Numbers 21:8-9).

The relation that Jesus set between the bronze serpent lifted up and Himself lifted up bears significance upon the population of persons that Jesus establishes for the word "world" in John 3:16.

For the next four paragraphs, we see the Word of God speaking to Moses (Numbers 21:8) in relation to the Word of God speaking to Nicodemus (John 3:16).

Notice how "everyone who is bitten" (Numbers 21:8) relates to "world" (John 3:16).

Notice how "when he" (Numbers 21:8) relates to "that every one" (John 3:16, note that the singular (not plural) Greek word pas [Strongs 3956] translates accurately as "every one" not so much as the unfettered promiscuous "whosoever" [KJV] or "whoever" [NASB]).

Notice how "look" (Numbers 21:8) relates to "believing" (John 3:16).

Notice how "live" (Numbers 21:8) relates to "eternal life" (John 3:16).

God told Moses that a person bitten by one of the serpents "will live" when the person looks at "the serpent in the wilderness".

Based on God's command about "the serpent in the wilderness" (Numbers 21:8) and the results of the bronze serpent that Moses set on the standard (Numbers 21:9), the population of persons that certainly were affected by God's command about "the serpent in the wilderness" in order to live were ONLY each bitten person that looked at "the serpent in the wilderness".

In other words, the population of persons associated with living by looking at "the serpent in the wilderness" was restricted to ONLY the bitten persons that looked at the bronze serpent. For simplicity, I'll call this the "population of bitten look livers".

Furthermore, there is a different population of persons. This population of persons are not in the "population of bitten look livers". For example, this population of persons could include bitten persons that DID NOT LOOK AT "the serpent in the wilderness" after the "the serpent in the wilderness" was set on a pole/standard (Numbers 21:9). As another example, this population of persons certainly includes bitten persons that DID NOT LOOK AT "the serpent in the wilderness" due to the many people of Israel (Numbers 21:6) who were dead before God Almighty commanded Moses to make the "the serpent in the wilderness" "and set it on a standard" (Numbers 21:8). This population of persons I'll call the "population of bitten-non-lookers".

Therefore, there are separate populations of persons identified in Jesus' words as recorded by the Apostle John (John 3:14-16). There was the "population of bitten look livers"; meanwhile, there was the "population of bitten-non-lookers".

Jesus utilized a comparator in which a group of many persons in the "population of bitten-non-lookers" were incapable of looking at the "the serpent in the wilderness" because that subset of people were dead prior to Moses fashioning the bronze serpent (Numbers 21:9), so Jesus sets the same standard for a subset of persons in the "world" (John 3:16) because that group of people are incapable of seeing King Jesus (John 3:3-8).

God requires for persons to believe in Jesus in order to be granted eternal life by God (John 3:15, John 3:16).

So, it follows, when Lord Jesus says "God so loved the world" (John 3:16), then specifically He is saying God loves the ones who will believe in Jesus whom the Father has sent (John 6:29).

This relation set by Jesus establishes that the word "world" as used by Jesus in John 3:14-16 includes ONLY the population of persons that currently believe in Jesus or will in the future believe in Jesus.

The Word of God conclusively proves that the context establishes the "world" as the population of God's chosen persons ONLY.

Before and after saying "world", Jesus establishes the requirement of believing in Jesus in order for persons to be in the population of persons granted eternal life by God.

Jesus, the Word of God, says "This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent" (John 6:29).

Jesus defines righteous faith/belief such that a person believing in Jesus whom the Father has sent is the work of God (John 6:29).

Jesus attributes a complete package, a whole gift, a finished work which He refers to as "that you believe in Him whom He has sent".

God deposits "that you believe in Him whom He has sent" in a person as a complete, sufficiently functioning work by God unto salvation of the person with nothing additional by the person as necessary, no choice by the person, no work of a decision by the person, no acceptance by the person, nothing by the person to achieve salvation.

So, "that you believe in Him whom He has sent" is a complete thing with nothing more to add by the person to the righteous faith/belief deposited by God unto being saved from the wrath of God.

Jesus clearly explains that the "believe in Him whom He has sent" is locked inside of the "you" specified by Jesus (John 6:29).

This "locking" is "the work of God" for God secures all of God's own persons unto eternal life (John 10:27-29).

The whole pagkage is done, finished, and complete.

There is nothing more "to be done" by the "you" with the finished package in order to obtain the gift of eternal life in God.

Thus, the only persons with righteous faith/belief implanted by God for a person's salvation are in the population of persons with eternal life in God (John 6:29, John 3:16).

The Word of God conclusively proves that the context establishes the "world" as the population of God's chosen persons ONLY.

When self-willed persons (2 Peter 2:9-10) define the "world" in John 3:16 as everyone everywhere without exception, then such persons assert that the Truth (Jesus - John 14:6) tells a lie. The deception results because such persons have Jesus losing persons eternally in spite of Him saying "I give eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand" (John 10:28).

The "no one" in "no one will snatch them out of My hand" means no one, not the devil, not the person himself or herself, not another person. The "no one" means absolutely NO ONE.

If the word "world" in John 3:16 includes the population of persons who die while in disbelief/unfaith, then God lost some persons to eternal punishment instead of eternal life.

Since believing in the Son of God whom God the Father has sent is the work of God (John 6:29) and no one will snatch a God rooted believer out of Jesus' hand (John 10:28), then the population of persons represented by the word "world" by Jesus as recorded by the Apostle John (John 3:16) must of necessity be only persons who currently believe in Jesus or will in the future believe in Jesus unto eternal life in God.

The Word of God conclusively proves that the context establishes the "world" as the population of believers, God's chosen persons, existing or yet to be ONLY.

The word "world" in John 3:16 is the population of persons who currently are or in the future will be imparted the work of God unto salvation that is faith/belief in Lord Jesus Christ whom the Father has sent (John 6:29).
 
@civic, your words sound like you've not heard of the flesh nor walking according to the Spirit! Paul says it quite well:

14For we know that the Law is spiritual, but I am of flesh, sold into bondage to sin. 15For what I am doing, I do not understand; for I am not practicing what I would like to do, but I am doing the very thing I hate. 16But if I do the very thing I do not want to do, I agree with the Law, confessing that the Law is good. 17So now, no longer am I the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me. 18For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh; for the willing is present in me, but the doing of the good is not. 19For the good that I want, I do not do, but I practice the very evil that I do not want. 20But if I am doing the very thing I do not want, I am no longer the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me.

21I find then the principle that evil is present in me, the one who wants to do good. 22For I joyfully concur with the law of God in the inner man, 23but I see a different law in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin which is in my members. 24Wretched man that I am! Who will set me free from the body of this death? 25Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, on the one hand I myself with my mind am serving the law of God, but on the other, with my flesh the law of sin.

1Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. 2For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death. 3For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh, 4so that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. 5For those who are according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who are according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit. 6For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace, 7because the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, for it is not even able to do so, 8and those who are in the flesh cannot please God.
(Romans 7:14-25-Romans 8:1-8)

@civic, @TibiasDad, and @Kampioen (you last 2 are included because of your hearty agreement (Like) with @civic), see that we Christians walk according to the Holy Spirit of the Living God which means that Christ's love controls us Christians (2 Corinthians 5:14).

Your words indicate that you do not believe that Christ's love controls you.

You still have people like Nancy of the world who died and goes to hell being atoned for by Christ, so you cling to Christ's failure atonement (see the opening post).

To you, living according to the flesh, lacking love, displeasing God and ending up in hell is all monergism, lest any man should boast.
 
Hello @TibiasDad,

The atoning sacrifice of Christ is reconciliation wrapped with forgiveness called salvation.

Lord Jesus Christ says "Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is the slave of sin" (John 8:34) and "if the Son makes you free, you will be free indeed" (John 8:36), so the monumental wrong with your "The cause of reconciliation is the whole process in order: atonement, God not counting men’s sins against them, conviction of sin, confess and repentance of sin, forgiveness of those sins, and the Holy Spirit entering the heart of man making him spiritually alive and one with God" is because God not counting men’s sins against them is forgiveness of sins for Christ shedding His Blood on the cross absolutely results in forgiveness without exception for the Holy Spirit reveals to us Christians "without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins" (Hebrews 9:22) and "we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son" (Romans 5:10) and the Holy Spirit revealing of Christ that "He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world" (1 John 2:2).

Upon God not counting men’s sins against them, we Christians know we are forgiven. You do not believe that God not counting men’s sins against them means that you are forgiven.

Your "reconciliation process order" is dead wrong.

(You neglected to post a reply directly to post #70 and post #89 which was the fourth of five posts about your "order of reconciliation", so this is post maintains sequence.)

You still have people like Nancy of the world who died and goes to hell being atoned for by Christ, so you cling to Christ's failure atonement (see the opening post).
 
Hello @TibiasDad,

The atoning sacrifice of Christ is reconciliation wrapped with forgiveness called salvation.

Lord Jesus Christ says "Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is the slave of sin" (John 8:34) and "if the Son makes you free, you will be free indeed" (John 8:36), so the monumental wrong with your "The cause of reconciliation is the whole process in order: atonement, God not counting men’s sins against them, conviction of sin, confess and repentance of sin, forgiveness of those sins, and the Holy Spirit entering the heart of man making him spiritually alive and one with God" is because God not counting men’s sins against them is forgiveness of sins for Christ shedding His Blood on the cross absolutely results in forgiveness without exception for the Holy Spirit reveals to us Christians "without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins" (Hebrews 9:22) and "we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son" (Romans 5:10) and the Holy Spirit revealing of Christ that "He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world" (1 John 2:2).

Upon God not counting men’s sins against them, we Christians know we are forgiven. You do not believe that God not counting men’s sins against them means that you are forgiven.

Your "reconciliation process order" is dead wrong.

(You neglected to post a reply directly to post #70 and post #89 which was the fourth of five posts about your "order of reconciliation", so this is post maintains sequence.)

You still have people like Nancy of the world who died and goes to hell being atoned for by Christ, so you cling to Christ's failure atonement (see the opening post).
Since you keep posting the same thing over and over again, I am always responding to the same thing over and over again, so what you say in post 70 and 89 has been said in all your other posts.

The atonement, in and of itself, is not forgiveness. You were not forgiven when Jesus died. If you were, then you were already saved when you were born!

Moreover, if you are correct, “the whole world” is atoned for, not just current believers, which means the whole world is saved. That is objectively not true!

Think Kermos! There is nothing in the text that says “the whole world” is only referring to believers. It is not in the text! You are doing yourself a great disservice by doing what you’re doing. Quit putting things in the text that the text does not allow.

The “sins of the whole world” are atoned for -that’s what the text says- and we know that the whole world is not actually saved. So atonement cannot actually mean forgiveness has been given.

Scripture tells us that confession (1 John 1:9) and repentance (Acts 2:38) are both necessary for forgiveness to occur. Conviction of sin by the Holy Spirit necessarily precedes forgiveness, for we cannot confess or repent of actions that we have not been made aware of/convicted of.

One last time, Kermos, and with all due respect, but your rote thinking is reminiscent of the JWs who can only communicate what they have been taught to say. They don’t respond well to questions that divert them from their script.

The scriptural order is exactly what I have stated. “Not counting men’s sins against them” is the first step toward forgiveness, not forgiveness itself. That allows God to show love instead of wrath, to offer salvation to the man he previously could only condemn. Thus he says, “whoever believes in [Jesus] shall not perish but have [take possession of] eternal life. [Which includes/assumes forgiveness being given.]

Belief precedes forgiveness and eternal life! Thus the Holy Spirit is not given prior to belief. We cannot be born again prior to belief. Otherwise, scripture is meaningless!

Doug
 
Last edited:
Hello @TibiasDad,

The atoning sacrifice of Christ is reconciliation wrapped with forgiveness called salvation.

Lord Jesus Christ says "Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is the slave of sin" (John 8:34) and "if the Son makes you free, you will be free indeed" (John 8:36), so the monumental wrong with your "The cause of reconciliation is the whole process in order: atonement, God not counting men’s sins against them, conviction of sin, confess and repentance of sin, forgiveness of those sins, and the Holy Spirit entering the heart of man making him spiritually alive and one with God" is because God not counting men’s sins against them is forgiveness of sins for Christ shedding His Blood on the cross absolutely results in forgiveness without exception for the Holy Spirit reveals to us Christians "without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins" (Hebrews 9:22) and "we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son" (Romans 5:10) and the Holy Spirit revealing of Christ that "He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world" (1 John 2:2).

Upon God not counting men’s sins against them, we Christians know we are forgiven. You do not believe that God not counting men’s sins against them means that you are forgiven.

Your "reconciliation process order" is dead wrong.

(You neglected to post a reply directly to post #70 and post #89 which was the fourth of five posts about your "order of reconciliation", so this is post maintains sequence.)

You still have people like Nancy of the world who died and goes to hell being atoned for by Christ, so you cling to Christ's failure atonement (see the opening post).

Walmart sells to all but not everyone buys. And Walmart doesn't intend to give their products away. But that doesn't mean Walmart failed. Why would we say God failed?

But do you believe God can do other than predetermine us? Do you believe God had any other existing option or idea or ability than to predetermine us? ...

You have God fail. You make God and us monergized robots.
 
Walmart sells to all but not everyone buys. And Walmart doesn't intend to give their products away. But that doesn't mean Walmart failed. Why would we say God failed?

But do you believe God can do other than predetermine us? Do you believe God had any other existing option or idea or ability than to predetermine us? ...

You have God fail. You make God and us monergized robots.
Spot on brother
 
I'm so glad that you brought up "the serpent in the wilderness" mentioned by Lord Jesus which He sandwiched between the requirement for man to be born of the Holy Spirit in order to perceive (emphasis mine: TibiasDad) the Kingdom of God (John 3:3) and God's control of man in doing good even man coming to Christ (John 3:21) thus your free-willian philosophy nullifies the Word of God. On to Christ's use of the word "world" in relation with "the serpent in the wilderness"
John 3:3 Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again.”

Meaning nobody can go to, or experience the Kingdom of God.

Ellicott: To “see” the kingdom is, in New Testament usage, equivalent to “enter into the kingdom,”

Barnes Notes: He cannot see - To "see," here, is put evidently for enjoying - or he cannot be fitted for it and partake of it.

Cambridge Bible: he cannot see] i.e. so as to partake of it. Comp. to ‘see corruption,’ Psalm 16:10; to ‘see evil,’ Psalm 90:15; to ‘see death,’ John 8:51; Luke 2:26.

Doug
 
To you, living according to the flesh, lacking love, displeasing God and ending up in hell is all monergism, lest any man should boast.

A person who says "I chose Jesus" is the person who boasts.

Since I agree with the Apostle Paul's writing in Romans 7:14-25-Romans 8:1-8, then your response makes it sound like you adamantly disagree with the Apostle Paul regarding Romans 7:14-25-Romans 8:1-8.

Interestingly, you failed to respond to the post #121 specifically directed to you!
 
A person who says "I chose Jesus" is the person who boasts.

Since I agree with the Apostle Paul's writing in Romans 7:14-25-Romans 8:1-8, then your response makes it sound like you adamantly disagree with the Apostle Paul regarding Romans 7:14-25-Romans 8:1-8.

Interestingly, you failed to respond to the post #121 specifically directed to you!
Nope the person who says yes to Christ is the one who is humble and boasts in the Lord.
 
A person who says "I chose Jesus" is the person who boasts.

Since I agree with the Apostle Paul's writing in Romans 7:14-25-Romans 8:1-8, then your response makes it sound like you adamantly disagree with the Apostle Paul regarding Romans 7:14-25-Romans 8:1-8.

Interestingly, you failed to respond to the post #121 specifically directed to you!
I’m not sure what Rom 7 means to you, or why you think it’s relative, so let’s deal with Rom 8.

Rom 8:12Therefore, brothers and sisters, we have an obligation—but it is not to the flesh, to live according to it. 13For if you live according to the flesh, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live.

We have an obligation, which means we have a choice between the flesh and the Spirit. 8:13 makes this clear; “For if you live according to the flesh…but if by the Spirit…

So the aspect of “choice” is clearly defined in Romans 8, and that choice is, broadly speaking, about choosing to follow the Spirit, and thus, choosing to follow Jesus.

Regardless of your interpretation of 8:1-8, 8:12-13 demonstrate the act of choice as a part of the equation.

Doug
 
Nope the person who says yes to Christ is the one who is humble and boasts in the Lord.

On the contrary, a prideful person says he chooses the Creator of all things (which includes faith, itself) (Proverbs 16 :18), and the prideful person boasts in his own power.

A humble person acknowledges the Christ's exclusive deliverance (Matthew 5:5), and the humble person boasts in the Power of God (2 Corinthians 10:17; 1 Corinthians 1:24).
 
Then what is the right order according to you?

Doug

This thread is titled "Christ's Finished Atonement or Christ's Failure Atonement". Your question deviates from the Holy Spirit's population specified in the whole world as referenced in "He is the atonement for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world" (1 John 2:2).

You believe that Christ's atonement applies to everybody everywhere in all time (the whole world) which means that you believe Christ atoned for people in hell; in other words, you believe in Christ's failure atonement. See the opening post in this thread.

I believe that Christ's atonement applies to only the people whom Christ chooses (the whole world) which means I believe Christ atoned exclusively to people Christ places in the Kingdom of Heaven.

He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world
(1 John 2:2)

you did not choose Me, but I chose you
(John 15:16)

I chose you out of the world
(John 15:19, includes atonement)
In other words, I believe in Christ's finished atonement.

The Word of God is Truth (John 14:6).

In Christ,
Kermos
 
This thread is titled "Christ's Finished Atonement or Christ's Failure Atonement". Your question deviates from the Holy Spirit's population specified in the whole world as referenced in "He is the atonement for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world" (1 John 2:2).

You believe that Christ's atonement applies to everybody everywhere in all time (the whole world) which means that you believe Christ atoned for people in hell; in other words, you believe in Christ's failure atonement. See the opening post in this thread.

I believe that Christ's atonement applies to only the people whom Christ chooses (the whole world) which means I believe Christ atoned exclusively to people Christ places in the Kingdom of Heaven.
He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world
you did not choose Me, but I chose you
I chose you out of the world
(John 15:19, includes atonement)​
In other words, I believe in Christ's finished atonement.

The Word of God is Truth (John 14:6).

In Christ,
Kermos
Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

Doug
 
This thread is titled "Christ's Finished Atonement or Christ's Failure Atonement". Your question deviates from the Holy Spirit's population specified in the whole world as referenced in "He is the atonement for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world" (1 John 2:2).

You believe that Christ's atonement applies to everybody everywhere in all time (the whole world) which means that you believe Christ atoned for people in hell; in other words, you believe in Christ's failure atonement. See the opening post in this thread.

I believe that Christ's atonement applies to only the people whom Christ chooses (the whole world) which means I believe Christ atoned exclusively to people Christ places in the Kingdom of Heaven.
He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world
you did not choose Me, but I chose you
I chose you out of the world
(John 15:19, includes atonement)​
In other words, I believe in Christ's finished atonement.

The Word of God is Truth (John 14:6).

In Christ,
Kermos
You are arguing a fallacy known as a false dichotomy.

next fallacy.
 
The purpose of the atonement, according to scripture, was to reconcile the world to the Father. That’s what happened, so Christ did not fail! The atonement gave the Father the means to not count men’s sins against them. That happened, so Christ did not fail!

Doug

Not according to your Free-willian Philosophy because you believe that Christ's atonement applies to everybody everywhere in all time (the whole world) as per your interpretation of "He is the atonement for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world" (1 John 2:2) which means that you believe Christ atoned for people in hell; in other words, you believe in Christ's failure atonement. See the opening post in this thread.

There is so much incredibly wrong with your "The cause of reconciliation is the whole process in order: atonement, God not counting men’s sins against them, conviction of sin, confess and repentance of sin, forgiveness of those sins, and the Holy Spirit entering the heart of man making him spiritually alive and one with God" (proof post #67) that it requires this another post.

You have conviction of sin outside of the Holy Spirit, yet the Christ of us Christians says "And He, when He comes, will convict the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment" (John 16:8).

Your "reconciliation process order" is wrong.

You still have people like Nancy of the world who died and goes to hell being atoned for by Christ, so you cling to Christ's failure atonement (see the opening post).
 
Back
Top Bottom