Diserner
Active Member
Matthew 23:8,10
But you are not to be called 'Rabbi,' for you have one Teacher, and you are all brothers. Neither be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Christ.
I give you permission not to call me Rabbi.
Matthew 23:8,10
But you are not to be called 'Rabbi,' for you have one Teacher, and you are all brothers. Neither be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Christ.
my teacher can beat up your teacher!!!
R.B. Thieme Jr would study eight hours a day and then teach his church six nights a week. Not the run of the mill
pastor teacher.
I couldn't find any commentary on the site...?
You can stream some messages here to get an idea:
https://rbthieme.org/stream/specials/index.html?special=armor_of_god&ref=armor_of_god
grace and peace .....................................
Ok, more homiletical type stuff.
I'm not against that.
But let me know if he has any commentary.
What do you mean by "commentary?"
Like writing about books of the Bible?
He did it live in class....
Try this for a list of books he taught exegetically.
https://www.rbthieme.org/PDF/LessonListingForWeb2014.pdf
Verse by verse exegesis.
And where might one listen to those?
Which youtube video would you most recommend of Mr. Utley? Does he have a good grasp of Koine Greek? Is he into Hebrew as you are?Same here-check him out, you won't be disappointed. I keep on referring members to this valuable source-which is not a commentary. I am more interested in the Morphologies of the Koine Text and not so much the meaning of the words.
LXX is what I use. That's what I mean by the Greek OT.Joh 1:1 ἘνG1722|PREP|In [the] ἀρχῇG746|N-DSF|beginning ἦνG1510|G5707|V-IAI-3S|was ὁG3588|T-NSM|the ΛόγοςG3056|N-NSM|Word, καὶG2532|CONJ|and ὁG3588|T-NSM|the ΛόγοςG3056|N-NSM|Word ἦνG1510|G5707|V-IAI-3S|was πρὸςG4314|PREP|with τὸνG3588|T-ASM|- ΘεόνG2316|N-ASM|God, καὶG2532|CONJ|and ΘεὸςG2316|N-NSM|God ἦνG1510|G5707|V-IAI-3S|was ὁG3588|T-NSM|the ΛόγοςG3056|N-NSM|Word.
Joh 1:2 ΟὗτοςG3778|D-NSM|He ἦνG1510|G5707|V-IAI-3S|was ἐνG1722|PREP|in [the] ἀρχῇG746|N-DSF|beginning πρὸςG4314|PREP|with τὸνG3588|T-ASM|- ΘεόνG2316|N-ASM|God.
This is how I have studied for many years and familiar with the tenses-both Hebrew and Greek-but watch out for Westcott and Hort. There is also the LXX which I use.
What reference book are you making use of here? Who authored that Greek to what seems to be a Hebrew translation? My Hebrew is nonexistant so when it comes to the NT I never refer to a Hebrew translation. I guess there's some merit to that.Bereshis (in the Beginning) was the Dvar Hashem [YESHAYAH 55:11; BERESHIS 1:1], and the Dvar Hashem was agav (along with) Hashem [MISHLE 8:30; 30:4], and the Dvar Hashem was nothing less, by nature, than Elohim! [Psa 56:11(10); Yn 17:5; Rev. 19:13]
See here-the Deity of Yeshua confirmed.
Johann.
Interesting. What insightful teachings does he offer? Does he teach election, predestination, or Christology? Does he teach from a Koine Greek NT or a Hebrew OT point of view?I believe its over 11,000 hours of teaching they have recorded. Near impossible to stream all that.
You can navigate this web page and see how you can order classes (no money asked) either an MP3 CD, or on thumb drive.
https://www.rbthieme.org/index.html
The ministry also offers many publications for order.
You can call the Church and speak about making an order, or look for the online ordering form.
R. B. Thieme, Jr., Bible Ministries is a grace ministry and operates entirely on voluntary contributions. There is no price list for any of our material. No money is requested. When gratitude for the Word of God motivates a believer to give, he has the privilege of contributing to the dissemination of Bible doctrine.
grace and peace .............
www-freebiblecommentary.org-and yes-he has a thorough grasp in Hebrew and Greek.Which youtube video would you most recommend of Mr. Utley? Does he have a good grasp of Koine Greek? Is he into Hebrew as you are?
This is a Bible I use from a Messianic viewpoint-Orthodox Jewish Bible-might not be your cup of tea.What reference book are you making use of here? Who authored that Greek to what seems to be a Hebrew translation? My Hebrew is nonexistant so when it comes to the NT I never refer to a Hebrew translation. I guess there's some merit to that.
Thanks brother for sharing your thoughts on the topic.The conundrum:
a free will is an absolute necessity for us to be truly guilty for our sins, for us to be able to become holy and for the heavenly marriage based upon love to actually exist.
Yet, no sinner can have a free will or the words enslaved (addicted) to sin have no meaning and are essentially useless babbel.
Therefore, it seems like we can only have had a free will before we sinned and, if we chose to sin, after our perfect sanctification unto pure hoiness when we are made ready for the Heavenly Mariage.
A free will must be free from all coercions from any source; a corrupted will is coerced by sinfulness to continue to sin in some way with every decision. Sanctification is not the process of HIM zapping us so we are now newly addicted to holiness with no power to sin. It is the process by which HE teaches us to always choose right over wrong and to do right because we now want to do it against what we used to want to do. WE learn to exchange the pleasures and profits of sin for the eternal pleasures and profits of always choosing the loving, righteous and just way.
Are you reading from anyone in particular with Greek Theology from the early church ?Not really but I'm sure he's an excellent Bible teacher. I have alot of respect for Evangelicals but I've since spun off into the Koine Greek OT and NT. That introduced me to Greek Theology, Christology, and Christian Anthroplogy of the first millenia.
I had a quick look at some writings in that website and unfortunately I have to disagree with their understanding of James 2. The following was written:www-freebiblecommentary.org-and yes-he has a thorough grasp in Hebrew and Greek.
Peruse the site-thousands of material available and mp3 and Youtube format-
This is a Bible I use from a Messianic viewpoint-Orthodox Jewish Bible-might not be your cup of tea.
"The Orthodox Jewish Bible (OJB), completed by Phillip Goble in 2002, is an English language version that applies Yiddish and Hasidic cultural expressions to the Messianic Bible.-a helpful source for me though.
After perusing the site-let me know what you think.
May God help us all to rightly cutting straight the D'var of YHVH.
Shalom to you and family.
Johann.
So you are going to throw out the baby with the bathtub?I had a quick look at some writings in that website and unfortunately I have to disagree with their understanding of James 2. The following was written:
When one compares these lexical usages it becomes clear how Paul could use this term in one way (specialized forensic sense of "made righteous") and James in another (shown to be righteous by one's godly living). The term is fluid enough to allow both. But please remember it is a "both/and" situation, not an "either/or." Also be careful of a set theological definition of this term (or any term) which is then read into every usage of the word in Scripture. Words only have meaning in specific contexts!
Source: "https://www.freebiblecommentary.org/new_testament_studies/VOL11/VOL11_02.html".
Actually, both Paul and James do use the term justification in the same sense. We are justified by God through faith and through God-ordained good works together. Paul even goes further and associates good works with everlasting life (Rom 2:7).
Furthermore, James 2:24 destroys any semblance of Sola Fide. What Sola Fideists try to do is to water down James 2:24 so that it has no significant bearing on their soteriology.
Interesting. What insightful teachings does he offer? Does he teach election, predestination, or Christology? Does he teach from a Koine Greek NT or a Hebrew OT point of view?
Church fathers are tough to read. The battles they were fighting are oftentimes different than the battles we face now. There are some exceptions like Arianism and the arianism of the JW's but that's not a topic that is interesting me right now. I'm more interested in contemporary issues that are more pervasive.Are you reading from anyone in particular with Greek Theology from the early church ?
He claims that Paul uses the term justification in one way and James in another way. I totally disagree. I say they both use it in the exact same way. Only one of those 2 statements can be true. I'm sorry but the only way one person can agree to both is if he has 2 minds/personalities.So you are going to throw out the baby with the bathtub?
I understand where Utley is coming from-and remember, this is not a commentary.
This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.
He is saying the term is fluid enough to allow both-what is wrong with that?
In fact-he is affirming what you believe-read it again.
Thanks
Johann.
Interesting. What insightful teachings does he offer? Does he teach election, predestination, or Christology? Does he teach from a Koine Greek NT or a Hebrew OT point of view?