brightfame52
Active Member
I have read you correctly, you trust in the blood/flesh relationship with Abraham. Anything else you say comes from that foundationAre you blind and can't read?
I have read you correctly, you trust in the blood/flesh relationship with Abraham. Anything else you say comes from that foundationAre you blind and can't read?
Natural Olive tree Israel became spiritual Olive tree Israel with the promised sending of the Holy Spirit to Israel as promised by God through the prophet Joel. God's Spirit was never promised to Gentiles, and one needs the Holy Spirit to be saved.I have read you correctly, you trust in the blood/flesh relationship with Abraham. Anything else you say comes from that foundation
It is so difficult to talk to someone who does not beleive the BIble is the inspired word of God, but solely the opinions of the writers. So much false teachings flow from that. He isn't giving his opinion. He is saying that it is worthless to put any confidence in the flesh, and then states what confidence in the flesh looks like. He counts all of that loss through all that God the Father Himself taught Paul for three years in the wilderness after conversion. Faith is where it is at. The Spiritual life is where it is at.Saul's OPINIONS are encouraging but what He says does not alter the fact the God has covenant with Israel and Israel shall be saved - everyone - who is the seed of Abraham according to the promises made to Him by God.
Saul can count anything he wants as loss; he doesn't change the fact that by virtue of covenant all Israel SHALL be saved.
Our salvation does not rest in our holding on to His hand, but His holding onto ours:
27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:
28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. 29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father’s hand. John 10:26–29.
And THAT is the bottom line.
The church is NOT Israel. The church is separate. If God breaks His covenants and promises with Israel, what hope does a Gentile have when God says... trust Me? The Israel of God is the elect of Israel that are in the nation of Israel. (Two distinct groups, the physical descendants of Abraham, and the physical/spiritual descendants of Abraham.) Israel, as far as, and all Israel shall be saved, are the elect remnant of Israel who are both physical and spiritaul descendants of Abraham. They receive the physical promises of the covenants/promises, while the Gentiles do not. The Jews and Gentiles of faith BOTH receive the spiritual blessings of the promisise made to Abraham, but only the Jews receive the physical blessings of covenant.The True Israel, the Church are those people who have Abraham’s spiritual faith regardless of their ethnicity Gal 3:7,26-29
7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.
26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Rom 4:16
16 Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all,
Gal 6:16
16 And as many as walk according to this rule[rule of faith], peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God. 7
As usual you trusting in the flesh, blood descendant. The Israel of God isnt born by blood Jn 1:13God made covenant with Abram the Hebrew and his biological seed
Yes it is. Its the congregation of the saints David recognized Ps 89 5The church is NOT Israel.
So you clearly deny progressive prophecy. The word translated as congregation is assembly and speaks to Israel. He is speaking to the remnant in Israel.Yes it is. Its the congregation of the saints David recognized Ps 89 5
And the heavens shall praise thy wonders, O Lord: thy faithfulness also in the congregation of the saints
Ps 149 1
Praise ye the Lord. Sing unto the Lord a new song, and his praise in the congregation of saints.
The psalmist isn't referring to the nation of israel in general, most were not saints, but a remnant.
Now the NT Identifies saved gentiles as being in union with ot saints Eph 2 19
Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
Gentile believers share citizenship with Davids congregation of the Saints, its the Church of the firstborn Heb 12 23
To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,
No I actually affirm it, I deny salvation by ethnicity. Also I just showed you the Church existed under the Old Covenant times. The church was called by David the congregation of the SaintsSo you clearly deny progressive prophecy.
That's the church, the Body of Christ which He is the firstborn 23 To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,Hebrews 12:23 "23 to the company and assembly of the first-born in heaven enrolled, and to God the judge of all, and to spirits of righteous men made perfect,"
You do understand that the books of Hebrews, James, I & II Peter, and Jude are the five Hebraic epistles of the New Testament, correct? They were written to the Jews in the dispersion/diaspora.Who is the Holy Nation ?
1 Pet 2:9
But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;
You can say what you want, but it is clear who Peter is writing to.Many believe this speaks of ethnic national israel over in the middle east, but that is far from the truth. The Holy Nation here is none other than the Body of Christ, the Church comprised of both jew and gentile converts, believers. How do i know this ? Well its by scripture comparison, this same Holy Nation here in 1 Pet 2:9 is called also in Vs 5
On I Peter 2:95 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.
Its called a Spiritual House which has reference to the Temple/Tabernacle of God of God, which is Spiritual.
Now this same epithet is used for the Church in Eph 2:19-22
19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;
21 In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:
22 In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.
There is no doubt in my mind that the Spiritual House of 1 Pet 2:5 and the Holy Temple/Habitation of God through the Spirit of Eph 2:21,22 are the same !
And if that be so, the Church, comprised of both reconciled jew and gentile converts of Eph 2 is the Holy Nation of 1 Pet 2:9
The fulfillment of Ex 19:6
And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.
This isnt replacement theology but fulfillment theology according to the scriptures. 7
I understand them, you don't. They are written to a Spiritual People. Nothing to do with ethnicity. They are written to the Church, the Body of Christ. Anyone of those books could be read in a Gentile congregation of believers. Peter could have sent his epistles to Cornelius and his circle of believers.You do understand that the books of Hebrews, James, I & II Peter, and Jude are the five Hebraic epistles of the New Testament, correct? They were written to the Jews in the dispersion/diaspora.
Wow. Let's use Romans for a second and say you judge, yet are guilty of the same.I understand them, you don't.
Peter gave the audience right off the bat.They are written to a Spiritual People.
It has much to do with ethnicity. God has not left Jewish believers at the time of Peter, strangers scattered throughout Gentile lands, without support, no matter what you say. Peter, as Paul is also quite specific, is the apostle to the circumcised, to the Jews, while Paul is the apostle to the Gentiles, called to be so by God. And Paul is more than happy to point this out.Nothing to do with ethnicity.
Read the "envelope" of Peter's letter againThey are written to the Church, the Body of Christ.
Sure. It wouldn't mean much to them because the issues addressed are not problems the face. You do understand that in writing, each book has a specific purpose, right? Consider Romans. Why is it so large? Why is it so dense in theology and teaching? The best answer is, because he wasn't sure if he was ever going to actually get there. He wrote it and sent it, I believe, a few years before he got a chance to go there. So, since he did not know if he would get to teach them at all, the book is focused on teaching.Anyone of those books could be read in a Gentile congregation of believers.
And they would have sent it back to the return address since they aren't strangers, scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia.Peter could have sent his epistles to Cornelius and his circle of believers.
Why do you make Hebrews and mixed-race Hebrews like Ishmael and Esau and make them into Gentile?It is so difficult to talk to someone who does not beleive the BIble is the inspired word of God, but solely the opinions of the writers. So much false teachings flow from that. He isn't giving his opinion. He is saying that it is worthless to put any confidence in the flesh, and then states what confidence in the flesh looks like. He counts all of that loss through all that God the Father Himself taught Paul for three years in the wilderness after conversion. Faith is where it is at. The Spiritual life is where it is at.
The seed of Abraham is Jesus, in whom all the nations of the world will be blessed. And that is by faith. So the true seed of Abraham are those Jews and Gentiles who believe in Christ by faith. They are the blessed ones of this promise. That is why Paul discounts the flesh. The flesh is dead, with all its trappings, while the spirit is alive in faith.
So, you want to separate Jesus from Israel now?As usual you trusting in the flesh, blood descendant. The Israel of God isnt born by blood Jn 1:13
13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
You trusting in the flesh, ethnicity. The seed is born of God, its SpiritualWow. Let's use Romans for a second and say you judge, yet are guilty of the same.
Peter gave the audience right off the bat.
"Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, [This is the person who wrote the book]
To those who reside as strangers, scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, [those in the diaspora from Israel spread throughout these Gentile nations, and thus they are strangers] who are chosen 2 according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, by the sanctifying work of the Spirit, [a]to obey Jesus Christ and be sprinkled with His blood: May grace and peace be multiplied to you." [That is, these Jewish exiles are believers in Christ.]
Peter is writing instruction to exiled Jewish believers, scattered through these countries do to the diaspora. God, through Peter, is quite specific.
It has much to do with ethnicity. God has not left Jewish believers at the time of Peter, strangers scattered throughout Gentile lands, without support, no matter what you say. Peter, as Paul is also quite specific, is the apostle to the circumcised, to the Jews, while Paul is the apostle to the Gentiles, called to be so by God. And Paul is more than happy to point this out.
"Paul, a bond-servant of Christ Jesus, [a]called as an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, 2 which He promised beforehand through His prophets in the holy Scriptures, 3 concerning His Son, who was born of a descendant of David according to the flesh, 4 who was declared the Son of God with power according to the [c]Spirit of holiness [d]by the resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord, 5 through whom we have received grace and apostleship [e]to bring about the obedience of faith among all the Gentiles in behalf of His name,"
Read the "envelope" of Peter's letter again
To: those who reside as strangers, scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, who are chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, by the sanctifying work of the Spirit, to obey Jesus Christ and be sprinkled with His blood
From: Peter
[with all apologies to the mail handler in finding those it is addressed to]
It is VERY specific. In order to properly interpret the book, you have to read it as one of those audience members. It is written to Jews, and therefore is understood from that point of view. It is not written to the church made up of Gentiles and Jews. That was Paul's area, this is Peter. If you don't look at it from the right point of view, you will not, I daresay, cannot properly understand it. And this lack of proper understanding affects how you handle the rest of scripture. [and it shows]
Sure. It wouldn't mean much to them because the issues addressed are not problems the face. You do understand that in writing, each book has a specific purpose, right? Consider Romans. Why is it so large? Why is it so dense in theology and teaching? The best answer is, because he wasn't sure if he was ever going to actually get there. He wrote it and sent it, I believe, a few years before he got a chance to go there. So, since he did not know if he would get to teach them at all, the book is focused on teaching.
And they would have sent it back to the return address since they aren't strangers, scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia.
You deny Peter's audience, you deny his purpose, you deny his labors. Yes, we can learn from his book, however you don't learn anything at all when you force your own beliefs upon the book. This is something you have clearly done. Even when given the logic that shows that Peter was speaking of a group of people (God's elect Remnant) out of the nation of Israel, and telling them who they are before God, you usurp what God has given them through Peter, for yourself. The writer I quoted from was clear that there are scriptures that speak of some of this of the church, but... this passage isn't it.
I pass on to you the warning of Paul in the book of Romans.
"17 But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive, were grafted in among them and became partaker with them of the [j]rich root of the olive tree, 18 do not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, remember that it is not you who supports the root, but the root supports you. 19 You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.” 20 Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear; 21 for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either. 22 See then the kindness and severity of God: to those who fell, severity, but to you, God’s kindness, if you continue in His kindness; for otherwise you too will be cut off. 23 And they also, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in; for God is able to graft them in again. 24 For if you were cut off from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and contrary to nature were grafted into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these who are the natural branches be grafted into their own olive tree?"
There is plenty to be learned from Peter's epistles, but they were written to the Jews, not to the chruch of Gentiles and Jews. As such, to understand them fully, one must look at it from the view of the audience. One must also always consider that it is ultimately God who wrote these books through Peter, so any point of conention you have is with God.
You trusting in the flesh, blood Jn 1;13So, you want to separate Jesus from Israel now?
Heresy.
Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
Which were born not of blood,.... Or bloods, in the plural number. The birth, here spoken of, is regeneration, expressed by a being born again, or from above; by a being quickened by the Spirit and grace of God; by Christ being formed in men; and by a partaking of the divine nature; and by being made new creatures, as all that believe in the name of Christ are; and which is the evidence of their being the sons of God: and now this is owing not to blood, or bloods; not to the blood of circumcision; or of the passover, which the Jews had an high opinion of, and ascribe life and salvation to, and to which notion this may be opposed: so their commentators (f) on Ezekiel 16:6 where the word "live" is twice used, observe on the first "live", by the blood of the passover, on the second "live", by the blood of circumcision; but, alas! these contribute nothing to the life of the new creature: nor is regeneration owing to the blood of ancestors, to natural descent, as from Abraham, which the Jews valued themselves upon; for sin, and not grace, is conveyed by natural generation: all men are of one blood, and that is tainted with sin, and therefore can never have any influence on regeneration; no blood is to be valued, or any one upon it, but the blood of Christ, which cleanses from all sin,
God specifically separated them from Israel. They are not Hebrew at all. Edomite, not Hebrew. Muslim?/Arab?/Palestinian? not Hebrew. Not mixed race. That is NOT how God handled it.Why do you make Hebrews and mixed-race Hebrews like Ishmael and Esau and make them into Gentile?
"15 Then the angel of the Lord called to Abraham a second time from heaven, 16 and said, “By Myself I have sworn, declares the Lord, because you have done this thing and have not withheld your son, your only son, 17 indeed I will greatly bless you, and I will greatly multiply your [f]seed as the stars of the heavens and as the sand, which is on the seashore; and your [g]seed shall possess the gate of [h]their enemies. 18 And in your seed all the nations of the earth shall [j]be blessed, because you have obeyed My voice.” "You interpret "nations" like a 21st century reader. And it doesn't say "world."
The word form for Earth in the promises to Abraham means the whole planet, and not a part.2 And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed. Genesis 12:1–3.
This is not completely correct. Yes, the physical blessings/promises of the covenants and promises belong to the Jews and Jews along. (mixed race included.) However, the spiritual blessings in the promises made to Abraham, dealing with Abraham's faith, is for both Jews (mixed race included), and non-Jewish Gentiles. However, no covenant in the Old Testament offers salvation. Even Paul says the Mosaic covenant existed (the Law) to make people sin more. To increase trespass. To bring sin to light. There is no salvation in the Law, only death. (See Romans.) In fact, Paul asked if the Jews knew that they would be judged by those who do not have the Law. Paul's point is those that followed the Law while not having the Law (non-Jewish Gentiles) will judge those who have the Law (Jews) but failed to keep it.God is going to multiply his seed, and it is Abraham's seed that is blessed because of covenant. His seed was to be like the stars in heaven and sand on the seashore. Abraham's family is blessed by virtue of covenant and BEING Abraham's seed.
If you think all fimailies of the world were to be blessed, and you understand the pormise to say that evil people have to be added, you don't get it. That's what you are saying. You just don't get it. That is not what God was saying. What did God say?If you think all families of the world were to be blessed, then you have to add Stalin, Hitler, Antichrist in that blessing. According to you Antichrist is blessed of God. Same blessings that were upon Antiochus Epiphanies. That's what you are saying.
So only Jesus is blessed? (Seed is SINGULAR, as the writer of Hebrews (or was it Paul in Roman's) was very precise in pointing out. And, it is only the spiritual blessings of the promises to Abraham that the non-Jewish Gentile believers partake in. They do not partake in the physical promises/blessings of the Abrahamic covenant. That is for Israel/Jews and in that the Remnant of Israel/Jews alone. Not to mention Abraham, who will actually be a live to see God's fulfillment of the covenant made with him. With the dead in Christ rising during the rapture, Abraham will be very much alive to see it.Sorry, but ONLY ABRAHAM'S SEED IS BLESSED OF GOD.
How can you still fail to understand. The covenant was made with Abraham and was for his physical descendants. However, Paul makes it even more clear that it is not just those who are Abraham's physical descendants, but those who are ALSO spiritual descendants of Abraham. The remnant of Israel, God's elect in Israel are the one's who will see the covenant fulfilled, along with Abraham himself.You trusting in the flesh, ethnicity. The seed is born of God, its Spiritual