All Claims of The Son's Deity

If you believe the Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus were more in agreement w/ one another,
what comparisons w/ the Byzantine Text helped you to reach that conclusion?

A common theme I've noticed w/ the true men of God is martyrdom
[i.e. prophets, John the baptist, the crucifixion, apostles].

A timeline I put together of translations...



Jerome
Latin Translation
382 AD

Translated into 500 Languages
500 AD

5th Century - 15th Century
400-1400 AD

Dark Ages

Rome enacted a myriad of laws making it illegal for a common people
to obtain the Word of God & read it in their own language.
13th Century - 19th Century

1215 AD

Pope Inoccent III issued a law commanding anyone who translates the Bible
would be seized for trail & penalties. He stated:

"As by the old law, the beast touching the holy mount was to be stoned to death,
so simple & uneducated men were not to touch the Bible or venture to preach its doctrines."

1234 AD
"No one may possess the books of the Old & New Testaments in the Romance language, & if anyone possesses them he must turn them over to the local bishop within eight days after promulgation of this decree, SO THAT THEY MAY BE BURNED lest, be he a cleric or a layman, he is suspected until he is cleared of all suspicion."

- De Lortsh, Histoire de la Bible en France, 1910, p. 14


John Wycliffe
First English Bible
1382 AD (Later Revisions 1388 & 1395)


I defy the pope & all his laws! If God spare my life, ere many years,
I will cause a boy that driveth the plough shall know more
of the scripture than thou dost."

- William Tyndale


"The translation of the scripture corrupted by William Tyndale should be utterly expelled, rejected, & put away
out of the hands of the people. All manner of books of the Old & New Testament in English being of the
crafty, false, & untrue translation of Tyndale shall be clearly & utterly abolished, extinguished,
& forbidden to be kept or used in this realm."

- King Henry VIII


"First, he maintained that faith alone justifies. Second, he maintained that to believe in forgiveness of sins,
& to embrace the mercy offered in the Gospel, was enough for salvation. Third, avered that human
traditions cannot bind the conscience, except where their neglect might occasion scandal."

- List of Charges Against William Tyndale


"Lord, open the king of England's eyes."

- William Tyndale Burned at The Stake


"But above all, beware ye wrest not the word to your own appetite as over many do, making it like a bell to sound as you please to interpret. But by the contrary, frame all your affections to follow the rule there set down. When ye read the scripture, read it with a sanctified & chaste ear: Admire reverently such obscure place as ye understand not, blaming only your own incapacity."

- King James I


Guy Fawkes Night
November 5th
Gunpowder Plot of 1605
I cannot figure out what this timeline is meant to convey. Can I presume that we have properly found Westcott and Hort as cleared of the charges made against them since no objections were made to what I shared?
 
is it really worth being left behind
just because of community pressure,
earthly 'christianity' versions of community,
... not listening to Him

the hebrews did not listen either...
caught up in earthly bonding,
hugs, etc.,
traditions, pharisees and their
edicts

almost half the prophets murdered..
to maintain that haughty status quo

behind the kind superficiality
of modern christian
is that same situation

please ignore many pastors,
especially yt ones,
many being modern pharisees
or else spelled by them..
they with their false scroll will be your ruin

salesmen with shiny gold teeth
rubbing their hands with glee
... wanting you to miss rapture
by that sorcery kjv..
using any tactic..
bullying
sanctimonious vatican
theology... lies.

don't be like the israelites
ignoring God's prophets
and listening to pharisees instead

yes , protestantism
preserved most of the vatican
evil.. it failed to reform
though meaning well
 
Last edited:
I cannot figure out what this timeline is meant to convey.
It's a timeline of Godly men who translated God's Word throughout time. What I'm curious about is what you found wrong
w/ The Byzantine Text that would put you in agreement w/ Westcott & Hort's Textual Criticism?

Can I presume that we have properly found Westcott and Hort as cleared of the charges made against them since no objections were made to what I shared?
They practiced the occult, which is something that's clearly an abomination to God... so I'm not so sure.
If there's anything that debunks what's mentioned in the links below, I'll open to hearing you out.

https://www.bibleready.org/modern-translations
https://www.bibleready.org/westcott-and-hort
 
the kjv was curated by John Dee
a sorcerer.

the septuagint was commissioned by a pagan
ptolemy ii

who's assistant reported back to ptolemy
that the hebrew texts would need to changed.

modern christian has become anti
christ

=

against christ
 
Jesus is a true God if you just answer the question honestly below;
1. Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. (John 14:6)
2. God the Father's testimony, "eternal life is in His Son. (1John 5:11)
3. Do the Father's words expires 9 verses onward?
4. If no, then who is the eternal life in 1John 5:20
Well let's look at number 1...
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
The verse does not say no man cometh unto me, but by me.

Here's number 2...

And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
The verse does not say God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in Him.

Number 4...

And we know that the Son of God is come, even in his Son Jesus Christ.
The verse does not say that God is come, even in Him God.
 
The Father? question, "how are you using the term "Father". please explain"

second, while you're preparing, just one more thing, is the one whom you call "Father" do he have the TITLE ...... "LORD?" yes or no.

101G
Father as in Dad . . .

I don't know what I am supposed to be preparing but yes, the Father, aka the only true God, aka LORD, aka Yahweh.
 
<snip>
Right. People in Christ become the temple of the living God rather than, as the unitarians think, something like electricity that is inside of people.
<snip>
Just wondering where you heard this ^? I am a Biblical Unitarian and I have never heard that 'Christ being in us' and 'us being in Christ' is 'something like electricity that is inside of people'?
 
Last edited:
It's a timeline of Godly men who translated God's Word throughout time. What I'm curious about is what you found wrong
w/ The Byzantine Text that would put you in agreement w/ Westcott & Hort's Textual Criticism?

They practiced the occult, which is something that's clearly an abomination to God... so I'm not so sure.
If there's anything that debunks what's mentioned in the links below, I'll open to hearing you out.

https://www.bibleready.org/modern-translations
https://www.bibleready.org/westcott-and-hort
totally wrong. They got curious about what people were reporting. I think Westcott was in a group less than a year exploring this stuff. Hort was doing it longer and went to one seance but was not trying to expose it as in the quote "We tried to turn tables, but the creatures wouldn't stir. Both the De Morgans were radiant and pleasant." This is mocking the seance scenario rather than believing it.
Radingler's New Age Bible Versions appears to have many biases and improper handling of details about Westcott and Hort.
Another point is quite off:

1848July 6th - Hort: "One of the things, I think, which shows the falsity of the Evangelical notion of this subject (baptism), is that it is so trim and precise...no deep spiritual truths of the Reason are thus logically harmonious and systematic...the pure Romish view seems to me nearer, and more likely to lead to, the truth than the Evangelical...the fanaticism of the bibliolaters, [Hort mocks those who believe the bible] ...still we dare not forsake the Sacraments,or God will forsake us...I am inclined to think that no such state as 'Eden' (I mean the popular notion) ever existed, and that Adam's fallin no degree differed from the fall of each of his descendants"(Life, Vol.I, pp.76-78).
Here is the fuller quote about the bibliolaters:
and further, the Bible then was closed, but now, thanks to Luther, it is open, and no power(unless it be the fanaticism of the bibliolaters, among whom reading so many ' chapters ' seems exactly to correspond to the Romish superstition of telling so many dozen beads on a rosary) can close it again ;
There is dishonest quoting of this letter. It might be a harsh statement of rejecting casual reading instead of deep study. Many scholars today recommend deeper study rather than reading text out of context.
Many other places show the errancy of the people assembling and contriving proof texts against Hort and Westcott. Do more research rather than just taking the writings against Hort and Westcott as factual. Also, there appears to be very strong faith statements by these two, which should not be overlooked. Even if there are some odd views, this can appear with many solid Christians rather than assuming any group is pure and perfect in their doctrines.
 
Just wondering where you heard this ^? I am a Biblical Unitarian and I have never heard that 'Christ being in us' and 'us being in Christ' is 'something like electricity that is inside of people'?
Whew. You are not as deep into unitarianism. The actual idea is that of the spirit there is sort of a power people get in them. One site says
Also, however, God gives His holy spirit nature to people as a gift to spiritually empower them, and when HOLY SPIRIT is used that way it should be translated as “holy spirit” (lower case “h” and “s”)
So the attempt is to depersonalize this and deny the Holy Spirit who came down upon Jesus at his baptism. Jesus said he would send a Comforter or Helper, not a force.
 
Last edited:
It would be wildly unusual for a genuine believer to say getting baptized in Jesus' name is optional. You really marginalize and minimize the New Testament example of Christianity.
What are you talking about? Are you saying getting baptized in Jesus name ONLY? is optional.

My savior. the Messiah. Specified to baptize int the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.

You think I am going to go against Him because I think he is wrong?

Be my guest but count me out.
 
Whew. You are not as deep into unitarianism. The actual idea is that of the spirit there is sort of a power people get in them. One site says

So the attempt is to depersonalize this and deny the Holy Spirit who came down upon Jesus at his baptism. Jesus said he would send a Comforter or Helper, not a force.
Nope I am a full blown Biblical Unitarian! What threw me off was the statement 'something like electricity that is inside of people.' that's what I had never heard before.

I understand the Holy Spirit is God, aka God's Spirit, aka the Spirit of God.

Then we have the gift of holy spirit, = the promise of the Father. . And behold, I am sending the promise of my Father upon you. But stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high. = And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Helper to be with you forever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him. You know him, for he dwells with you and will be in you. = Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, 'Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.' Now this he said about the Spirit, whom those wo believed in him were to receive, for as yet the Spirit had not been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified. = Being therefore exalted at the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the holy spirit, he has poured out this that you yourselves are seeing and hearing. = And Peter said to them, "Repent and be baptized everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins and you will receive the gift of the holy spirit. . . .The Comforter, the Helper is the indwelling gift of holy spirit,. (figurative, i.e. personification)
 
Last edited:
Nope I am a full blown Biblical Unitarian! What threw me off was the statement 'something like electricity that is inside of people.' that's what I had never heard before.

I understand the Holy Spirit is God, aka God's Spirit, aka the Spirit of God.

Then we have the gift of holy spirit, = the promise of the Father. . And behold, I am sending the promise of my Father upon you. But stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high. = And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Helper to be with you forever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him. You know him, for he dwells with you and will be in you. = Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, 'Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.' Now this he said about the Spirit, whom those wo believed in him were to receive, for as yet the Spirit had not been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified. = Being therefore exalted at the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the holy spirit, he has poured out this that you yourselves are seeing and hearing. = And Peter said to them, "Repent and be baptized everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins and you will receive the gift of the holy spirit. . . .The Comforter, the Helper is the indwelling gift of holy spirit,. (figurative, i.e. personification)
actually, I do not even know what unitarian is.


I would say that electricity is definitely one aspect by which to refer to our Eden mother the Holy Spirit.... who is our Comforter, together with Christ.
 
So what you're saying is you believe Jesus Christ is God Almighty in the flesh, but deny His eternal power & Godhead, correct?
If so, who then comes to reside within each believer once saved & sealed?

Jesus Christ isn't here presently, so how then are we ministered to when reading & studying His Word?
GINOLJC, to all. #1. no, in flesh, shared, he was G2758 κενόω kenoo. Philippians 2:6 "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:" Philippians 2:7 "But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:"

no reputation: G2758 κενόω kenoo (ke-no-ō') v.
1. to make empty.
2. (figuratively) to abase, neutralize, falsify.
[from G2756]
KJV: make (of none effect, of no reputation, void), be in vain
Root(s): G2756

#2. "If so, who then comes to reside within each believer once saved & sealed?" answer Jesus, who is God, the Holy Spirit.

#3. "Jesus Christ isn't here presently, so how then are we ministered to when reading & studying His Word?" Jesus Christ is no mor, he is glorified. he Jesus in Spirit is here. .... the "Comforter".

understanding "Diversity Oneness" will reveal that God is a plurality of himself.

101G.
 
Father as in Dad . . .

I don't know what I am supposed to be preparing but yes, the Father, aka the only true God, aka LORD, aka Yahweh.
if the Father is "LORD" ... ok, scripture, Isaiah 44:24 "Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;"

notice the "LORD", is a. ALONE, and b. BY HIMSELF. and alone means "having no one else present:" now this, John 1:3 "All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made."

is this the same one person who MADE ALL THINGS. YES, or No.

101G.
 
totally wrong. They got curious about what people were reporting. I think Westcott was in a group less than a year exploring this stuff. Hort was doing it longer and went to one seance but was not trying to expose it as in the quote "We tried to turn tables, but the creatures wouldn't stir. Both the De Morgans were radiant and pleasant." This is mocking the seance scenario rather than believing it.
Radingler's New Age Bible Versions appears to have many biases and improper handling of details about Westcott and Hort.
Another point is quite off:
Séances are a form of necromancy. Mocking it? I don't think so. It has to be pointed out that it's an abomination to God. Many came out of the New Age, not knowing the occult was Satanic, & got saved. So it's a very big deal b/c many believe they're really doing the work of God. You should give a listen to their testimonies.

Spiritism Forbidden​

"When thou art come into the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations. There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD: and because of these abominations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee." Deuteronomy 18:9-12
Here is the fuller quote about the bibliolaters:

There is dishonest quoting of this letter. It might be a harsh statement of rejecting casual reading instead of deep study. Many scholars today recommend deeper study rather than reading text out of context.
Many other places show the errancy of the people assembling and contriving proof texts against Hort and Westcott. Do more research rather than just taking the writings against Hort and Westcott as factual. Also, there appears to be very strong faith statements by these two, which should not be overlooked. Even if there are some odd views, this can appear with many solid Christians rather than assuming any group is pure and perfect in their doctrines.
I wasn't born into, or brought up in a religious environment. When I got saved, I had no bias, just a desire for the truth. Cherry picking verses & taking them out of context is what leads to false doctrines.

I chose to go w/ the Byzantine Text after doing side by side comparisons w/ the Alexandrian Text, & learning which set of manuscripts date straight back to the source. I'm just not comfortable going w/ a set of manuscripts that deny Christ's deity, make Him out as a liar, & a sinner. So yes, there's a reason why people say the Bible has errors/contradictions in it.

What criticisms on the Byzantine Text do you agree w/ Westcott & Hort on?
 
GINOLJC, to all. #1. no, in flesh, shared, he was G2758 κενόω kenoo. Philippians 2:6 "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:" Philippians 2:7 "But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:"

no reputation: G2758 κενόω kenoo (ke-no-ō') v.
1. to make empty.
2. (figuratively) to abase, neutralize, falsify.
[from G2756]
KJV: make (of none effect, of no reputation, void), be in vain
Root(s): G2756

#2. "If so, who then comes to reside within each believer once saved & sealed?" answer Jesus, who is God, the Holy Spirit.

#3. "Jesus Christ isn't here presently, so how then are we ministered to when reading & studying His Word?" Jesus Christ is no mor, he is glorified. he Jesus in Spirit is here. .... the "Comforter".

understanding "Diversity Oneness" will reveal that God is a plurality of himself.

101G.
Could we just go w/ scripture, comparing spiritual things w/ spiritual, 101G?

Imho, we already have God's Word in English. Unless we have an expertise in the Greek &/or Hebrew, I'd recommend not using that common method I see others using. It only creates confusion. Words can have different meanings too, depending on the context, in English as well as other languages. We have to keep that fact in mind.
 
Back
Top Bottom