Why we naturally HATE penal substitution

Huh? Not everyone repents so how can I eapouse universalism?

Actually, it's calvinists that espouse universalism. Since it is God's will that all are saved and calvinists believe that man has no say in that matter then ipso facto all calvinists are by definition Universalists.
a calvinist says all does not mean all. it means elect

again, when you make false claims against a group. you hurt your own argument against them
 
a calvinist says all does not mean all. it means elect

again, when you make false claims against a group. you hurt your own argument against them
I proved that their claim that they believe the Bible coupled with their presuppositions do lead them to salvation for all. It's up to them to debate that proven statement.
 
I proved that their claim that they believe the Bible coupled with their presuppositions do lead them to salvation for all. It's up to them to debate that proven statement.
lol

and you say you do not hate them

if you had one conversation (serious) with them, you know this is not true

they believe that the elect is who God died for. not the whole world.

so they are not universalist.

your continued slander against them is on you.
 
lol

and you say you do not hate them
Stop projecting.
if you had one conversation (serious) with them, you know this is not true

they believe that the elect is who God died for. not the whole world.
That is called unconditional election which is worked into my statement.

That UE coupled with the Biblical fact that God wills that all are saved means that all are elect.
so they are not universalist.

your continued slander against them is on you.
If logical facts are slander then all your logical facts are slander also.
 
Huh? Not everyone repents so how can I eapouse universalism?

Actually, it's calvinists that espouse universalism. Since it is God's will that all are saved and calvinists believe that man has no say in that matter then ipso facto all calvinists are by definition Universalists.
If Christ took away the sin of the whole world then on what basis is anyone judged?

Wrong as usual. No Calvinists have no say in the matter. Dumb arguement
 
@civic

penal /pē′nəl/

adjective​

  1. Of, relating to, or prescribing punishment, as for breaking the law.
  2. Subject to punishment; legally punishable.
    "a penal offense."
  3. Serving as or constituting a means or place of punishment.
    "penal servitude; a penal colony."
Isaiah 53:5
But He was pierced for our transgressions, He was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon Him, and by His stripes we are healed.

God Said = penal substitution
Let's believe God at His word.


chastisement

noun​

  1. The act of chastising; pain inflicted for punishment and correction; discipline; punishment.
    Similar: disciplinepunishment

Christ was not "chastised for Himself" = the chastisement/punishment that brought us peace
 
If Christ took away the sin of the whole world then on what basis is anyone judged?
You do not know?

Here , JESUS will explain it = John 3:16-21

For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. 17For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.

18“He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20For everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. 21But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been done in God.”
 
Stop projecting.

That is called unconditional election which is worked into my statement.
unconditioanl election FOR THE ELECT.

not for all people

hence not universalism
That UE coupled with the Biblical fact that God wills that all are saved means that all are elect.
Yes. yuou and I believe this

they believe it to. but they interpret all as elect. not as all

again, if you would actually talk to them you would know this. everyone else seems to. why don't you?
If logical facts are slander then all your logical facts are slander also.
its not a logical fact. because a logical fact would only incur if they believed ALL MEANS ALL. and not just THE ELECT (not all)

but your are willing to stand on this mountain. continue. you will continue to slander calvinists. while claiming you are being slandered
 
yes its called projecting. :)
who is projecting. Not sure who you are talkin about here Bro

do calvinists believe that all mankind will end up in heaven, and non will be in hell (universalism)

or do calvinists believe that ALL or the WORLD (john 3) means the elect.. and not literally ALL mankind nor not the whole world?
 
unconditioanl election FOR THE ELECT.

not for all people

hence not universalism

Yes. yuou and I believe this

they believe it to. but they interpret all as elect. not as all

again, if you would actually talk to them you would know this. everyone else seems to. why don't you?

its not a logical fact. because a logical fact would only incur if they believed ALL MEANS ALL. and not just THE ELECT (not all)

but your are willing to stand on this mountain. continue. you will continue to slander calvinists. while claiming you are being slandered
It is not slandering to continue to defend the English language against word redefinitions (i.e.: redefining "all" as "elect"). I do not stand for that and neither should you. If you allow them the luxury of word definitions then what type of witness are you?

I believe that half of all heresies would immediately evaporate if people would just practice correct English language grammatical comprehension. This is a perfect case in point. And for us not to defend the English language is a great disservice to the Gospel.
 
It is not slandering to continue to defend the English language against word redefinitions (i.e.: redefining "all" as "elect"). I do not stand for that and neither should you. If you allow them the luxury of word definitions then what type of witness are you?

I believe that half of all heresies would immediately evaporate if people would just practice correct English language grammatical comprehension. This is a perfect case in point. And for us not to defend the English language is a great disservice to the Gospel.
Like 'meter' being replaced with 'theotokos'

i am with you @synergy = i do not stand for that
 
who is projecting. Not sure who you are talkin about here Bro

do calvinists believe that all mankind will end up in heaven, and non will be in hell (universalism)

or do calvinists believe that ALL or the WORLD (john 3) means the elect.. and not literally ALL mankind nor not the whole world?
How about we just believe the words of Christ = John 3:16-21

For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.

“He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been done in God.”
 
Jesus therefore answered and said to them, “Do not murmur among yourselves.
No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day.
It is written in the prophets, ‘And they shall all be taught by God.’
Therefore everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes to Me.
Not that anyone has seen the Father, except He who is from God; He has seen the Father.

LOVE the Gospel of John and especially this passage.

Thank You
 
Back
Top Bottom