When was the End of the Old Covenant and the Beginning of the New Covenant?

Choosing an uninspired apocryphal work over the inspired canon does not seem like a regenerate choice. :confused:
You would be surprised how close the Jewish ✡️ Didache came to being canonical. It's basically a early Messianic church manual from the Messianic Apostles of the B'rit Hadashah to the Gentiles. It might behoove you to read it. You might learn something. Then again maybe not.
Shalom
 
You would be surprised how close the Jewish ✡️ Didache came to being canonical. It's basically a early Messianic church manual from the Messianic Apostles of the B'rit Hadashah to the Gentiles. It might behoove you to read it. You might learn something. Then again maybe not.
Shalom

Arrogant of you to presume I haven't read it... multiple times. But typical.

It's not canonical, and Eusebius says it's spurious. If you even know who he is. :rolleyes:

We have an inspired canon, the rule and guide of faith.

To the Law and to the Testimony!
 
Arrogant of you to presume I haven't read it... multiple times. But typical.

It's not canonical, and Eusebius says it's spurious. If you even know who he is. :rolleyes:

We have an inspired canon, the rule and guide of faith.

To the Law and to the Testimony!
Eusebius writings have been called into question just like yours. I guess that apple didn't fall to far from that tree.
I will always keep and study the Jewish ✡️ Didache. It's a good companion to my Jewish ✡️ Bible.
Shalom
 
Eusebius writings have been called into question just like yours. I guess that apple didn't fall to far from that tree.
I will always keep and study the Jewish ✡️ Didache. It's a good companion to my Jewish ✡️ Bible.
Shalom

cool story bro :cool:

"Called into question," lol, there is no text anywhere that someone hasn't, including the Bible, or we might say, especially the Bible.
 
Back
Top Bottom