Warnings by Reformers using ChatGPT

[civic]

Which gospel?

Doctrine Historic Christianity Baha’i Faith
God One God in three Persons: Father, Son, Holy Spirit (Matt. 28:19; 2 Cor. 13:14) -- One God, but rejects the Trinity; God is wholly transcendent and unknowable

Jesus Christ Eternal Son of God, fully God and fully man; virgin birth, sinless life, crucifixion, bodily resurrection--- One of many Manifestations of God, not God in essence; denies deity and exclusive salvific role


Final Revelation Jesus is the final and complete revelation of God (Heb. 1:1–2; Jude 1:3) Jesus was a Manifestation, but Baha’u’llah is a more recent one, bringing further revelation


Salvation By grace through faith in Christ alone (Eph. 2:8–9; John 3:16; Acts 4:12) By personal effort and moral obedience; faith in Baha’u’llah as the latest Manifestation is required


Scripture The Bible is the complete and final written Word of God (2 Tim. 3:16–17; Rev. 22:18–19) Accepts the Bible but believes it is corrupted; adds Baha’i writings (e.g., Kitáb-i-Aqdas)


Sin and Atonement All have sinned; Jesus’ death is a substitutionary atonement for sin (Rom. 3:23–25; 1 Pet. 2:24) Denies original sin and rejects substitutionary atonement


Resurrection of Christ Bodily resurrection of Christ is essential to the gospel (1 Cor. 15:14–17) Rejects bodily resurrection, teaches symbolic or spiritual resurrection


Eschatology (Last Things) Second coming of Christ, bodily resurrection of all, final judgment (Acts 1:11; John 5:28–29; Rev. 20) Christ already came symbolically in Baha’u’llah; rejects final judgment and bodily resurrection


Church and Mission The Church is the Body of Christ, tasked with preaching the gospel to all nations (Matt. 28:19–20) Promotes unity of all religions, global harmony, and progressive revelation

The Baha’i Faith departs from foundational Christian doctrines including the deity of Christ, the Trinity, the sufficiency of Scripture, substitutionary atonement, and salvation by grace through faith. These are non-negotiables in Christian theology (cf. Gal. 1:6–9; 2 John 1:9–11).

As such, the Baha’i Faith cannot be considered a part of the Christian faith, either historically or doctrinally, despite ethical overlap or reverence for Jesus.

So I ask again @Pancho Frijoles--which gospel are you, a Baha'i, referring to?

I'm a guest here, so what I say matters little, but do you have permission to engage believers in Christ here, especially when your religion radically departed from THE faith, THE Way?

@civic--is this permissible?

J.

As long as we treat our members respectfully regardless of our doctrinal differences all is good. Remember the golden rule.

On some other forums you can’t even question the Trinity and one in particular it’s off limits to mention it.

I like ours to be like in real life where we would defend if with people we meet outside of a church setting.

That’s what apologetics is all about. Defending what one believes.

There are many members here that I disagree with many of their doctrinal beliefs but I don’t let that stop me from engaging them and treating them respectfully.

And some forums make me sick the way they Gang up on those they disagree with their admins/ mods and lording their authority over others. It makes me want to puke

 

[Johann]

As long as we treat our members respectfully regardless of our doctrinal differences all is good. Remember the golden rule.

On some other forums you can’t even question the Trinity and one in particular it’s off limits to mention it.

I like ours to be like in real life where we would defend if with people we meet outside of a church setting.

That’s what apologetics is all about. Defending what one believes.

There are many members here that I disagree with many of their doctrinal beliefs but I don’t let that stop me from engaging them and treating them respectfully.

I'm fully supportive of respectful dialogue, but wouldn't the World Religions section of this forum be a more appropriate venue for this brother to present and defend his new faith tradition--especially since it represents a significant departure from the historic Christian faith once delivered to the saints (Jude 1:3)?

Or is the intent now to compromise the forum’s purpose by giving equal platform to all religions, regardless of their alignment with the historic Christian faith?

J.

 

[civic]

I'm fully supportive of respectful dialogue, but wouldn't the World Religions section of this forum be a more appropriate venue for this brother to present and defend his new faith tradition--especially since it represents a significant departure from the historic Christian faith once delivered to the saints (Jude 1:3)?

Or is the intent now to compromise the forum’s purpose by giving equal platform to all religions, regardless of their alignment with the historic Christian faith?

J.

Everyone here has the freedom to post on any forum and all of us should stay on topic . Sometimes a thread will go off topic with lots of interaction and we might let it run its course as long as we don’t get complaints

Is our forum perfect? No but we have done our best to make it welcoming to everyone. So we distinguish ourselves from most “ Christian “ forums online. I think most people who come here regularly appreciate that about us at BAM

 

[Pancho Frijoles]

Which gospel?

Hi Johann

I’m talking about the only gospel that transforms lives.
Can a false gospel change the violent to peaceful, the lustful into pure, the arrogant into humble, the greedy into generous, or the selfish into loving?
So there is only one eternal gospel, which is life and power of God.

Artificial intelligence models cannot show this transformation. But you Can show it, Johann.

Doctrine Historic Christianity Baha’i Faith

I don’t teach Baha’i theology or history, with the excepction of the thread that the Administrator created.
Indeed, you are the person who has talked more about Baha’i theology and history in this Forum.
This post of yours (quoted below) is just one of several that prove this.

God One God in three Persons: Father, Son, Holy Spirit (Matt. 28:19; 2 Cor. 13:14) -- One God, but rejects the Trinity; God is wholly transcendent and unknowable

Jesus Christ Eternal Son of God, fully God and fully man; virgin birth, sinless life, crucifixion, bodily resurrection--- One of many Manifestations of God, not God in essence; denies deity and exclusive salvific role


Final Revelation Jesus is the final and complete revelation of God (Heb. 1:1–2; Jude 1:3) Jesus was a Manifestation, but Baha’u’llah is a more recent one, bringing further revelation


Salvation By grace through faith in Christ alone (Eph. 2:8–9; John 3:16; Acts 4:12) By personal effort and moral obedience; faith in Baha’u’llah as the latest Manifestation is required


Scripture The Bible is the complete and final written Word of God (2 Tim. 3:16–17; Rev. 22:18–19) Accepts the Bible but believes it is corrupted; adds Baha’i writings (e.g., Kitáb-i-Aqdas)


Sin and Atonement All have sinned; Jesus’ death is a substitutionary atonement for sin (Rom. 3:23–25; 1 Pet. 2:24) Denies original sin and rejects substitutionary atonement


Resurrection of Christ Bodily resurrection of Christ is essential to the gospel (1 Cor. 15:14–17) Rejects bodily resurrection, teaches symbolic or spiritual resurrection


Eschatology (Last Things) Second coming of Christ, bodily resurrection of all, final judgment (Acts 1:11; John 5:28–29; Rev. 20) Christ already came symbolically in Baha’u’llah; rejects final judgment and bodily resurrection


Church and Mission The Church is the Body of Christ, tasked with preaching the gospel to all nations (Matt. 28:19–20) Promotes unity of all religions, global harmony, and progressive revelation

The Baha’i Faith departs from foundational Christian doctrines including the deity of Christ, the Trinity, the sufficiency of Scripture, substitutionary atonement, and salvation by grace through faith. These are non-negotiables in Christian theology (cf. Gal. 1:6–9; 2 John 1:9–11).

As such, the Baha’i Faith cannot be considered a part of the Christian faith, either historically or doctrinally, despite ethical overlap or reverence for Jesus.

So I ask again @Pancho Frijoles--which gospel are you, a Baha'i, referring to?

I'm a guest here, so what I say matters little, but do you have permission to engage believers in Christ here, especially when your religion radically departed from THE faith, THE Way?

@civic--is this permissible?

J.

 

[ProDeo]

Plan - Church of AI

The Church of AI has developed a strategy to allow for personalized AI to provide spiritual assistance.

church-of-ai.com

Church of AI, the new god chatgtp, it's already among us.

 

[Dizerner]

Or is the intent now to compromise the forum’s purpose by giving equal platform to all religions, regardless of their alignment with the historic Christian faith?

It's always been pretty much a free for all, and now at least the moderation here is less abusive than it used to be.

If you see it simply as a secular forum it helps, since its commitment is more oriented around secular values.

Just look at it like a mission field, and call out false doctrine instead of wondering if moderation should shut it down.

So I ask again @Pancho Frijoles--which gospel are you, a Baha'i, referring to?

We've already established quite clearly that he rejects the Bible as an authority and only pays it lip service.

 

[Johann]

It's always been pretty much a free for all, and now at least the moderation here is less abusive than it used to be.

If you see it simply as a secular forum it helps, since its commitment is more oriented around secular values.

Just look at it like a mission field, and call out false doctrine instead of wondering if moderation should shut it down.



We've already established quite clearly that he rejects the Bible as an authority and only pays it lip service.

Thank you brother, keep up the great work eis Christ Jesus!

And shalom to you and family @Dizerner --we are in the last days.

J.

 

[Pancho Frijoles]

We've already established quite clearly that he rejects the Bible as an authority and only pays it lip service.

I firmly reject the notion that the Bible is my SOLE source of authority, just as you would firmly reject the notion that the Book of Psalms is your SOLE source of authority.
I would never accuse you, though, of paying lip service to the Book of Psalms.
You do accuse me of paying lip service to the Bible.

I encourage you to present arguments instead of ad hominem attacks.

 

[ProDeo]

I firmly reject the notion that the Bible is my SOLE source of authority, just as you would firmly reject the notion that the Book of Psalms is your SOLE source of authority.
I would never accuse you, though, of paying lip service to the Book of Psalms.
You do accuse me of paying lip service to the Bible.

I encourage you to present arguments instead of ad hominem attacks.

From your profile, you are not Christian.

Don't take it personal if someone tells you Biblical truth, it's our job.

1John 4:1 Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world.
1John 4:2 By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God,
1Joh 4:3 and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already.

 

[civic]

It's always been pretty much a free for all, and now at least the moderation here is less abusive than it used to be.

If you see it simply as a secular forum it helps, since its commitment is more oriented around secular values.

Just look at it like a mission field, and call out false doctrine instead of wondering if moderation should shut it down.



We've already established quite clearly that he rejects the Bible as an authority and only pays it lip service.

I’m sure you would agree an online forum is not the church or a church model. It’s a form os social media in a forum format.

And you are right it’s more of a mission field so to speak that more resembles the real world outside of the “ church “ model we all are familiar with where we “ go to church “ and “ worship “ at with likeminded believers .
Forums have a vast mix of Protestants who have many denominational differences doctrinally, non believers, different religions , gnostics, pagans , “ cults “ much like we do in our society. We have many members here that live in other countries and cultures that are much different than we have in the states.

Just like where we live in the states we have religious freedoms and differences that all are able to express without the fear of retaliation or belittling them. This is the apologetic atmosphere we created here to make us different than the rest of the forums that bully, lord authority over its members, edit what they don’t like or disagree with , don’t accept having their own beliefs challenged otherwise you get banned.

That’s not us and it never will be what we do here.

 

[Studyman]

Was this sincere @ProDeo?

J.

This is a fascinating discussion about "AI".

Artificial; made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally, (What could be more natural than God, the creator of Natural) especially as a copy of something natural:

Calvinism is a religious philosophy based on "AI". The Bible doesn't promote such a philosophy when all of God's Words, which are Spiritual, are considered and is therefore, a false teaching, in my view. I came to this conclusion by considering Every Word of God as described in the Holy Scriptures.

Arminianism is also a religious philosophy based on "AI". The Bible doesn't promote such a philosophy when all of God's Words, which are Spiritual, are considered and is therefore, a false teaching, also in my view. I came to this conclusion by considering Every Word of God as described in the Holy Scriptures, as Jesus instructed me to do.

You used "AI" to expose a religion founded on "AI" and then requested an apology. You were given an apology as you requested, from someone who used "AI" to generate it, and you are now questioning the sincerity of the apology, because of the tool he used to generate it.

If ProDeo had simply apologized, using the same words, and not told you "who" prepared his apology, would you still have questioned his sincerity? Wouldn't it be shameful to question his sincerity given the complete and humble appearance of the apology itself? But because you know it was generated by a man-made machine, you questioned whether his apology occurred naturally.

I mean no disrespect to anyone here, I only wish to make a point. I can say to God, "God, I am seeking Your Truth with all my heart and with all my soul, or "Sincerely". But if God knows that even though I have His Oracles, and even though HE tells us His Word is Spiritual, I am still seeking the answers for my questions by choosing between several available man-made machines, and then "living by" or accepting its answers as God's Truth, would HE not, just as you did, question the "sincerity" of my seeking?

How is this any different than picking between the many differing religious sects, "Who come in Christ's Name", to teach us God's Truth.

How can a man-machine that gathers the opinions of religious men over the centuries injected into a computer, be our guide to God's Truth? How else is this machine programed? Can machines read, can the Spirit of God dwell in a man-made machine? Does the Temple of God exist in a man-made machine?

I would kindly caution my friends about placing our trust in this popular tradition of seeking God and His Truth through the tool of artificial intelligence.

Yes, there is the appearance of truth and sincerity, and according to the letter, there can be compelling arguments made in support of their conclusions. And like most all of man-made religious conclusions, there are aspects of Godly truth in them. But I would say the very first example of "AI" was shown to us in the garden. And of a truth, God did say, "Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat". And Gamaliel was certainly a promoter of "AI" in the spirit of the term, when he trained the Pharisees how to worship God.

And we are warned by Jeremiah 23 of teachers who use "AI" to convince men who walk after the imagination of their own hearts, "no evil will come upon you".

"AI" has always been there for us, in my view. It's easy and seductive to use, and it does appear to promote Biblical Truth. I just don't believe "Artificial Intelligence" is a Tool created by God for Spiritual understanding of His Word, rather, it's a tool created by this world's religious system, to justify its own religious philosophies.

I can go to the "AI" platform, the Calvinist Parrot, and ask it questions, and it will use the Same Scriptures to make compelling arguments in favor of their specific religious philosophy. I can go to Browse 22 Arminianism AIs., and ask them questions, and they will use the Same Scriptures to make compelling arguments in favor of their specific religious philosophy. Doctrines such as God "Bypassed" His Own Laws in order to provide Love, Mercy and forgiveness for His People. (And many other such things they preach) JW GPT is another AI Platform used as a tool to promote JW religious philosophy. They use the same Bible to make compelling arguments in favor of their religious philosophies. I'm sure Catholics have the same Tool that they use to promote their religion as well.

Truly it's Babylon. We should stay away from this world's religious system today, and the Tools each of these religious sects use to persuade people to join their religion, the same as we were taught by Jesus to stay away from this same religious system, in Jesus Time.

I'm just going to trust in God to reveal Himself to me, through the exercise and method He promoted through His Son. I could be wrong, but it's my Choice to trust Him, and my Hope is, that HE knows what HE is doing. Because of what is written, I choose not to rely on the other voice in the garden, regardless of how seductive or compelling their arguments are.

 

[Pancho Frijoles]

From your profile, you are not Christian.

Don't take it personal if someone tells you Biblical truth, it's our job.

I welcome biblical truth, ProDeo… and I encourage you to keep doing your job. I truly appreciate it.
However, declaring that somebody pays lip service to the Bible is an ad hominem attack, unless you know the heart, mind and life of such person. What you can tell to that person is that you don’t agree with him because of A, B and C. That will always be welcomed.
The forum is to exchange views, debate, learn, connect, but not to judge the integrity of the participants, particularly on a theological basis.

1John 4:1 Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world.
1John 4:2 By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God,
1Joh 4:3 and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already.

I confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh from God.

 

[Johann]

This is a fascinating discussion about "AI".

Artificial; made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally, (What could be more natural than God, the creator of Natural) especially as a copy of something natural:

Calvinism is a religious philosophy based on "AI". The Bible doesn't promote such a philosophy when all of God's Words, which are Spiritual, are considered and is therefore, a false teaching, in my view. I came to this conclusion by considering Every Word of God as described in the Holy Scriptures.

Arminianism is also a religious philosophy based on "AI". The Bible doesn't promote such a philosophy when all of God's Words, which are Spiritual, are considered and is therefore, a false teaching, also in my view. I came to this conclusion by considering Every Word of God as described in the Holy Scriptures, as Jesus instructed me to do.

You used "AI" to expose a religion founded on "AI" and then requested an apology. You were given an apology as you requested, from someone who used "AI" to generate it, and you are now questioning the sincerity of the apology, because of the tool he used to generate it.

If ProDeo had simply apologized, using the same words, and not told you "who" prepared his apology, would you still have questioned his sincerity? Wouldn't it be shameful to question his sincerity given the complete and humble appearance of the apology itself? But because you know it was generated by a man-made machine, you questioned whether his apology occurred naturally.

I mean no disrespect to anyone here, I only wish to make a point. I can say to God, "God, I am seeking Your Truth with all my heart and with all my soul, or "Sincerely". But if God knows that even though I have His Oracles, and even though HE tells us His Word is Spiritual, I am still seeking the answers for my questions by choosing between several available man-made machines, and then "living by" or accepting its answers as God's Truth, would HE not, just as you did, question the "sincerity" of my seeking?

How is this any different than picking between the many differing religious sects, "Who come in Christ's Name", to teach us God's Truth.

How can a man-machine that gathers the opinions of religious men over the centuries injected into a computer, be our guide to God's Truth? How else is this machine programed? Can machines read, can the Spirit of God dwell in a man-made machine? Does the Temple of God exist in a man-made machine?

I would kindly caution my friends about placing our trust in this popular tradition of seeking God and His Truth through the tool of artificial intelligence.

Yes, there is the appearance of truth and sincerity, and according to the letter, there can be compelling arguments made in support of their conclusions. And like most all of man-made religious conclusions, there are aspects of Godly truth in them. But I would say the very first example of "AI" was shown to us in the garden. And of a truth, God did say, "Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat". And Gamaliel was certainly a promoter of "AI" in the spirit of the term, when he trained the Pharisees how to worship God.

And we are warned by Jeremiah 23 of teachers who use "AI" to convince men who walk after the imagination of their own hearts, "no evil will come upon you".

"AI" has always been there for us, in my view. It's easy and seductive to use, and it does appear to promote Biblical Truth. I just don't believe "Artificial Intelligence" is a Tool created by God for Spiritual understanding of His Word, rather, it's a tool created by this world's religious system, to justify its own religious philosophies.

I can go to the "AI" platform, the Calvinist Parrot, and ask it questions, and it will use the Same Scriptures to make compelling arguments in favor of their specific religious philosophy. I can go to Browse 22 Arminianism AIs., and ask them questions, and they will use the Same Scriptures to make compelling arguments in favor of their specific religious philosophy. Doctrines such as God "Bypassed" His Own Laws in order to provide Love, Mercy and forgiveness for His People. (And many other such things they preach) JW GPT is another AI Platform used as a tool to promote JW religious philosophy. They use the same Bible to make compelling arguments in favor of their religious philosophies. I'm sure Catholics have the same Tool that they use to promote their religion as well.

Truly it's Babylon. We should stay away from this world's religious system today, and the Tools each of these religious sects use to persuade people to join their religion, the same as we were taught by Jesus to stay away from this same religious system, in Jesus Time.

I'm just going to trust in God to reveal Himself to me, through the exercise and method He promoted through His Son. I could be wrong, but it's my Choice to trust Him, and my Hope is, that HE knows what HE is doing. Because of what is written, I choose not to rely on the other voice in the garden, regardless of how seductive or compelling their arguments are.

You don’t know what I use or don’t use, and frankly, it’s not your concern-- but thank you for your “sermon,” @Studyman.

I will certainly let you know if you’re speaking to me or to an AI.

Also, step away from the clichés-- you don’t want to become a “yes man” or just a “bob-your-head man.”

And for the record, @ProDeo is fully capable of thinking for himself.

Also, I don't use AI to "think for me" of what I don't already know or have studied--do you want proof of what I'm saying?

Since your sole motive seems to be an attempt to undermine my integrity, there’s a word for that -- ekpeirazō or nachash.

You might want to use AI Google to look up what that says about your character - and I’m not being facetious.


Many use AI Google right here-you included-- or Greek and Hebrew morphology and syntax but on further digging, asking questions--nothing, nada, between the ears.

Do have a lovely day.

J.

 

[ProDeo]

I welcome biblical truth, ProDeo… and I encourage you to keep doing your job. I truly appreciate it.
However, declaring that somebody pays lip service to the Bible is an ad hominem attack, unless you know the heart, mind and life of such person. What you can tell to that person is that you don’t agree with him because of A, B and C. That will always be welcomed.
The forum is to exchange views, debate, learn, connect, but not to judge the integrity of the participants, particularly on a theological basis.


I confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh from God.

I am sorry Pancho, but have to disagree. This is a Bible forum and among other things it foremost states :

Ex 20:3 - You shall have no other gods before me.

And Baha'i has many gods.

You can feel offended but I prefer you take the following at heart :

Matt 7:23 - And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

Give a thought.

 

[Dizerner]

I encourage you to present arguments instead of ad hominem attacks.

Look, if I present evidence that I really don't respect the book of Psalms, it's not "ad hominem" to call me out on it.

According to your standard, 50% of the Bible is ad hominem.

And I reject your standard of calling out sin "ad hominem."

 

[Studyman]

You don’t know what I use or don’t use, and frankly, it’s not your concern-- but thank you for your “sermon,” @Studyman.

I will certainly let you know if you’re speaking to me or to an AI.

Also, step away from the clichés-- you don’t want to become a “yes man” or just a “bob-your-head man.”

And for the record, @ProDeo is fully capable of thinking for himself.

Also, I don't use AI to "think for me" of what I don't already know or have studied--do you want proof of what I'm saying?

Since your sole motive seems to be an attempt to undermine my integrity, there’s a word for that -- ekpeirazō or nachash.

You might want to use AI Google to look up what that says about your character - and I’m not being facetious.


Many use AI Google right here-you included-- or Greek and Hebrew morphology and syntax but on further digging, asking questions--nothing, nada, between the ears.

Do have a lovely day.

J.

Thank you for your thoughtful reply, Johann. Yes, as you once said, there are some overly defensive and sensitive folks here. "AI" is an important topic in my view. I meant no disrespect.

 

[Dizerner]

Doctrines such as God "Bypassed" His Own Laws in order to provide Love, Mercy and forgiveness for His People. (And many other such things they preach)

This is a caricature and straw man of Arminianism.

Not one single Law of God was bypassed!

Every condemnation of the Law for every single of your smallest and greatest sins was carried out on the Cross!

NONE ignored, NONE bypassed, NONE swept under the rug, ALL were punished to their full in Christ.

And THAT is why "It is finished!"

 

[Pancho Frijoles]

Look, if I present evidence that I really don't respect the book of Psalms, it's not "ad hominem" to call me out on it.

You may be assuming that having different views about a passage is disrespecting that passage, or paying lip service to the Word of God in general.
That's a false and dangerous path to tread, my friend. It is the seed of sectarianism and division.

Let me be clear on this: I don't think you pay lip service to the Bible. I am sure you treasure the Bible in your mind and heart. No matter our differences in Theology.

And I reject your standard of calling out sin "ad hominem."

I encourage you to revise your definition of sin.
Errors in interpretation are NOT sins.
Your mistakes in interpreting the Bible don't make you a sinner. They just show you are as human as anyone here.

 

[Pancho Frijoles]

I am sorry Pancho, but have to disagree. This is a Bible forum and among other things it foremost states :

Ex 20:3 - You shall have no other gods before me.

And Baha'i has many gods.

You can feel offended but I prefer you take the following at heart :

Matt 7:23 - And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

Give a thought.

Hi ProDeo

The Baha'i Faith is a strictly monotheistic religion, and we are not discussing the Baha'i Faith here.
Please be sure that I don't feel offended, my friend.
I understand your comments come from love and interest.
Let's now go back to the topic under discussion, Artificial Intelligence

 

[Pancho Frijoles]

I’m sure you would agree an online forum is not the church or a church model. It’s a form os social media in a forum format.

And you are right it’s more of a mission field so to speak that more resembles the real world outside of the “ church “ model we all are familiar with where we “ go to church “ and “ worship “ at with likeminded believers .
Forums have a vast mix of Protestants who have many denominational differences doctrinally, non believers, different religions , gnostics, pagans , “ cults “ much like we do in our society. We have many members here that live in other countries and cultures that are much different than we have in the states.

Just like where we live in the states we have religious freedoms and differences that all are able to express without the fear of retaliation or belittling them. This is the apologetic atmosphere we created here to make us different than the rest of the forums that bully, lord authority over its members, edit what they don’t like or disagree with , don’t accept having their own beliefs challenged otherwise you get banned.

That’s not us and it never will be what we do here.

I am thankful for the environment you and other dear members create here, civic.
Let me add that, being an apologetics forum, people should find this a great opportunity to PRACTICE (or rehearse, I don't know what is the best word in English) debate skills.
An opportunity to challenge our own views and realize that there are people who think differently and are neither dumb nor perverse, but our companions in the same journey, in the same need of God's grace.

In this regard, I would strongly advice people in the Forum to debate with an AI model. It is a very important experience.
Take one controversial topic, and then ask the AI Model to debate taking one position. Then do the same but asking it to take the opposite position.

IF the @Administrator agrees, I could open, for example, a thread in which the AI would try to defend Calvinism, and other in which it would try to refute it. Or one defending the Trinity and another refuting it.
Forum members would paste their argument/counterargument. I would feed the AI model and then paste what it answered.

The AI will handle millions of pages of theological treatises, sermons, etc. and provide very interesting arguments and counter-arguments. In addition, the AI will always show respect, and will be willing to recognize not only our fallacies (and explain them to us so that we can learn) but its own fallacies.